GMCforum: GMCnet » [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT.

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

[GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. [message #332288]

Sat, 19 May 2018 00:24

BobDunahugh

Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

Karma:

Senior Member

I'm getting a crash course on 73 GMC's. Just not up to the details on them. I have two choices for this 73. One. Service the wheel bearings brakes and the suspension components that are on the 73 now. Two. Put the 78 rear suspension under the 73. Then all that work that had been done by me a few years ago when it was under the soon to burn 78. Then this could be a good upgrade for the 73 when I sell it. Plus in reality. It's just simpler to switch the 78 to the 73. And avoid the rebuilding the 73. Installing 77 gas tanks that have the larger gas fill pipe. And since the fill pipe is out. I can install a fuel return gas line fitting for the Howell EFI. This 73 is going to be a nice GMC. Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: BobDunahugh on Sat, 19 May 2018 00:24
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Sat, 19 May 2018 06:17
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: johnd01 on Mon, 21 May 2018 16:11
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Mon, 21 May 2018 16:45
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: James Hupy on Mon, 21 May 2018 17:14
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: johnd01 on Mon, 21 May 2018 20:02
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Tue, 22 May 2018 11:52
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: James Hupy on Tue, 22 May 2018 12:08
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: k2gkk on Tue, 22 May 2018 12:39
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Tue, 22 May 2018 13:36
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: bdub on Tue, 22 May 2018 13:44
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Emery Stora on Tue, 22 May 2018 13:00
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Cesar Carrasco on Tue, 22 May 2018 11:12
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Tue, 22 May 2018 12:14
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Dennis S on Tue, 22 May 2018 12:56
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Ken Henderson on Tue, 22 May 2018 13:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Cesar23ftr73 on Wed, 23 May 2018 14:19
		Re: [GMCnet] Thinking of putting my extra 78 rear suspension under my 73. Should work. RIGHT. By: Matt Colie on Wed, 23 May 2018 16:05

Previous Topic:	[GMCnet] Heat, pumps, and the gas tanks.
Next Topic:	New owner

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Nov 16 09:32:56 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00739 seconds