GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » IN-TANK FUEL PUMPS
IN-TANK FUEL PUMPS [message #242473] Thu, 06 March 2014 10:33 Go to previous message
corleyw is currently offline  corleyw   United States
Messages: 130
Registered: June 2007
Location: Battle Ground, WA
Karma:
Senior Member
Rob posted this in the nylon fuel lines forum, (but of course it has little or nothing to do with nylon fuel lines), which got me thinking about in-tank fuel pumps, and which would be ideal and why. Please try to keep this on topic, and only discuss "in-tank pumps" as much as possible.

Rob recommends a low pressure in-tank pump (3 psi), and has several reasons to justify that choice. If one is sticking to the Q-jet, that would seem like a pretty good choice. However, if one is contemplating eventually going to EFI, then you may feel a higher pressure pump is in order. GM mid '80s - mid '90s TBI EFI systems as used on a 454 Chevy truck, used a 12 psi in-tank pump. With Rob's suggestion, you would have to add an additional external pump to go to TBI EFI. As I understand it, other EFI systems use even higher pressure pumps, many in the 40 PSI range. Maybe it would make more sense to install a higher pressure pump to start with, then add a regulator as needed to get the proper pressure for the Q-jet, if that was retained? Maybe you feel as Rob does that the lower pressure in the lines is a good thing, or maybe you feel that a higher pressure in the lines would be a better protection against Vapor lock. That's the sort of thing we'd like to know...

For this discussion, let's assume:
1) Two in-tank pumps
2) A return line
3) A Q-jet for now, with possible future upgrade to TBI EFI
4) Price is not much of a factor (but don't recommend a Newmar diesel pusher)

The question then is, what pumps would you install, and why? If you have any specific part numbers, any pictures you can supply, etc., that would also be welcome information. The mechanics of vapor lock have been beat to death, so please try to avoid rehashing all that crap.

I've copied Rob's post here to kick things off. Very Happy

USAussie wrote on Wed, 05 March 2014 23:00

Bill,

Here you go!

1969 - 70 Buick Rivera Fuel Pump (6-7 psi):

http://www.carparts.com/results/?&Ntt=Repb314509

Here's a link to a Riviera Forum that notes a Delco EP297 works better.

http://www.1badriv.com/hardway.htm#Hi%20Po%20Fuel%20Pump

Here's a link that says the EP297 is deleted but the Delphi FE0065 in combination with the FS100

http://www.v8buick.com/showthread.php?270601-69-70-Riviera-electric-pump-replacement-Delco-EP297-discontinued

Here's a low pressure pump Delphi FE0065 (3.0) psi from O'Reilly's:

http://www.oreillyauto.com/site/c/detail/DLP0/FE0065/02535.oap?year=1988&make=Ford&model=F-150&vi=1121780&ck=Search_C0401_1121780_-1
&pt=C0401&ppt=C0025

Rock Auto specs on the FE0065:

http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/moreinfo.php?pk=1114104

I have two Repb314509's so I can run one in each tank up to a surge tank on the firewall which will feed the mechanical pump and
have an overflow that will pump back into the vent pipe on the fuel fill.

Because:

- low pressure in the fuel lines going to the surge tank which would reduce the amount of flow if there was a leak
- no fuel pressure regulator to fail and over pressurize the needle assembly
- can change over to EFI by replacing mechanical fuel pump with high pressure electric pump

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist





Corley '76 Glenbrook 29 other vehicles
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Previous Topic: Avion 50 amp wiring
Next Topic: Anyone know this GMC?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 04 15:41:11 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00990 seconds