GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] 4-Bags & Reaction Arms
[GMCnet] 4-Bags & Reaction Arms [message #241142] Mon, 24 February 2014 14:50 Go to previous message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma:
Senior Member
New discussion:

One of the benefits of the OEM air bag system is that it telegraphs middle
wheel loading to the rear wheel. That supposedly improves the ride, as
demonstrated by the famous railroad ties demonstration.

However, that design turned out to impose a serious problem also: During
braking, the middle wheel "pole vaults", raising the rear of the coach.
That raising lightens the vertical force on the rear wheel so that it is
incapable of generating as much retarding force as the middle wheel -- so
it tends to slide prematurely. An even WORSE consequence of the OEM design
is that the air bag, dependent on the center wheel's vertical bag arm to
react the rear wheel up-force, now finds that reaction missing -- the
center wheel "pole vaulted" it away.

Thus the development of the different 4-bag (Quad Bag, etc) systems.
Despite other claimed benefits, IMHO the major benefit of those systems is
the fact that the center pedestal preserves a reaction member for the rear
wheel. While pole vaulting of the center wheel still reduces the possible
braking force on the rear, at least it's not totally eliminated as with the
OEM.

SO, if there's validity to my argument that pole vaulting led to, and
justified, the 4-Bag systems, should we not consider that, with pole
vaulting eliminated by reaction arms, there was/is no justification for
4-bag systems?

Since I've run the 4-bag system since long before the development of the
reaction arms, I'm purely speculating when I propose that reaction arms
make 4-Bags redundant -- and perhaps even detrimental to ride quality. I'd
like to hear from those who've tried all the combinations -- even though
I'm not about to give up either upgrade.

WOW! -- And all with 1 finger!


Ken H.
Americus, GA
'76 X-Birchaven w/Cad500/Howell EFI & EBL
www.gmcwipersetc.com
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Question re Towing a Tracker
Next Topic: fuellines sucking air?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 10 03:20:01 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01381 seconds