GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Piston Ring End Gap (I know the specs are .010 - .023 but??)
Piston Ring End Gap [message #224924] Tue, 08 October 2013 23:21 Go to previous message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma:
Senior Member
Hello Engine builders:



The Quick Questions are:

(Mahle Cast Rings)
A What are you experienced Builders Using for an end gap when installing your rings?? any problems in the .010 to .015 Range

B With our engines running harder and sometimes hotter, are you running larger gaps?? Most Ring Companies seem to be indicating .0145 as being minimum for a 4.156 bore such as mine. (.030 over) (4.156 X 0.0035 = 0.0145)

My engine destroyed a crank. Mad I have a pocket full of theories as to why the engine failed, but none could be substantiated. Unfortunately not knowing the exact cause is frustrating.

I found a core crank,and had it ground .010 under on the mains and throws. I also had the rotating assembly balanced. Luckily the cylinders were not damaged and a light hone made them good as new. (I'm happy I did not have to replace my nice forged pistons Very Happy )

Now that I finally have all the parts on hand, I can start building the engine again. Currently, I’m measuring about .012 to .014 ring end gaps. While these measurements are fine according to service manual specifications, they may be a little tight according to general knowledge.

Best Regards

John Heslinga


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Monitor Panel Upgrade
Next Topic: Re: [GMCnet] ~ Final Drive ~
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 13 21:48:06 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05398 seconds