GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » A Modification not recommend for GMC Motorhomes (Unless you really want to waste time)
A Modification not recommend for GMC Motorhomes [message #209170] Wed, 29 May 2013 16:19 Go to previous message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma:
Senior Member
A Modification not recommend for GMC Motorhomes

Like many others, I have had trouble with fuel sending units. As I don’t have holes in the floor, this requires defueling and dropping the fuel tanks to attempt any service at all. I have been around this course three times and was not looking forward to a fourth.

An attempt to replace the sending units on the fuel pickup with an after market part by Equus though outwardly successful was time consuming, problematic and required efforts beyond the reasonable for a parts change. Though my tank level gages now do respond to the fuel level. There are inconsistencies and calibration issues that make this only qualify as a “Better Than Nothing” repair.

The failures of the existing senders were all instigated by connection failures in the actual sending unit inside of the fuel tank. These failures were most likely the result of corrosion allowed by alcohol now in motorfuel. Please note that the inside of my fuel tanks are very clean, and there was no visible corrosion. But, electrical connections that looked as if they should have been good often tested bad in an actual test that required them to pass current. GM sending units are a nominal 0 (empty) to 90 (full) ohms. This means that any error of increased resistance makes the gage report more fuel than is present. (Personally, I think this it really stupid on GM’s part, but it is far from the stupidest they have been.)

The Equus sending unit though it says it is good for tanks from 5 to 30 inches deep in actual fact cannot report effectively on very shallow tanks because the included float it too large and much of the travel will be lost. I had to salvage and reuse the OE float to get near the resolution needed for a vehicle gage to make sense. (If the top and bottom 1/4 are not included in the gage travel??)

It has also been noticed that the wipers have very high drag and frequently I have noticed the indicator reporting low when I restart after fueling. But, as soon as we get on the road they come along. This would concern me greatly if I was counting on them to report how much fuel I had available for the APU.....

Also, to get the float away from the pickup, the direction of the sending unit had to be reversed. This meant it couldn’t mount where the original was in the same direction, but had to be in the same place, but backwards. I hope to put pictures up in the next day or so. That may allow any people that are interested to make some sense of this whole circus.

So, if you have been considering this as opposed to buying replacement senders, think long and hard about your own time and effort.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: [GMCnet] Creating a "tent" for the GMC
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Towd ? Pulling a full sized pick-up or Land Rover ? (Mark Kasiewicz)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Oct 07 02:29:23 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00920 seconds