GMCforum: GMCnet » Bad-and I mean BAD MPG

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC [message #203317]

Mon, 01 April 2013 16:32

ljdavick

Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA

Karma:

Senior Member

Here is an interesting thread where SOB owners are talking about the MPG they get with their rigs. I think it's interesting that all of the respondents are running significantly newer drive-trains than any of us with all the benefits of electronics, but no better mileage.

<http://community.fmca.com/topic/5312-bad-and-i-mean-bad-mpg>

Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: ljdavick on Mon, 01 April 2013 16:32
		Re: [GMCnet] Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: Steven Ferguson on Tue, 02 April 2013 08:34
		Re: [GMCnet] Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: Keith V on Tue, 02 April 2013 08:53
		Re: [GMCnet] Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: mike miller on Tue, 02 April 2013 12:24
		Re: Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: Chr$ on Tue, 02 April 2013 11:36
		Re: Bad-and I mean BAD MPG - not GMC By: Chr$ on Tue, 02 April 2013 11:42

Previous Topic:	Mascerator question
Next Topic:	Re: [GMCnet] Mascerator question

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Nov 16 11:48:07 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05749 seconds