Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Am Fm radio reception
Am Fm radio reception [message #360213] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 09:40  |
Scott Nutter
 Messages: 782 Registered: January 2015 Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Does anyone have ideas on how to improve radio reception? I have the stock antenna on top of the cab, and a aftermarket antenna that goes on top of the windshield. Both work the same(poorly). My FM picks up more than the AM does. My hand held radio will come in crystal clear while my dash radio will not pick up the station.
Also, the in dash radio has engine rev interference, probably because my plugs may not be resistor type. Should I use the house batteries to power the in dash radio? Would that stop the engine interference?
Thanks, Scott
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI
Houston, Texas
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360214 is a reply to message #360213] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 10:09   |
Bullitthead
 Messages: 1411 Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most modern radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket. If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.
Terry Kelpien
ASE Master Technician
73 Glacier 260
Smithfield, Va.
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360215 is a reply to message #360214] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 10:28   |
Dolph Santorine
 Messages: 1236 Registered: April 2011 Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Also, try a known good radio.
Dolph Santorine
DE AD0LF
Wheeling, West Virginia
1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
Howell EFI/EBL , Reaction Arms, Manny Transmission
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 11:10 AM, Terry via Gmclist wrote:
>
> Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most modern
> radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket. If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC
> circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360216 is a reply to message #360214] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 10:36   |
James Hupy
 Messages: 6806 Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Problem is on the transmit side (usually), rather than the receive side.
5000 watts don't quite cut it in an environment cluttered with transmitter
signals. Back in the days of little to no regulations, 100,000 watt
transmitter power was not uncommon.
And offshore, across the Mexican border "outlaw" radio stations had so
much power that you could hear Mother Maybell Carter picking "Wildwood
Flower" on the barbed wire fences in Texas. But, not today. The FCC has
just about killed off the AM stations. So, its not your radio receiver if
you have no antenna problems. I went to Sirius on my cars, same signal for
thousands of miles. But, on my GMC, I never drive with the radio on. Too
many mechanical sounds of impending doom can be masked by it to suit me.
JWID.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 8:10 AM Terry via Gmclist
wrote:
> Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the
> performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most
> modern
> radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket.
> If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC
> circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the
> engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360218 is a reply to message #360213] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 12:26   |
Scott Nutter
 Messages: 782 Registered: January 2015 Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I forgot to mention that it is a newer alpine stereo in the dash.
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI
Houston, Texas
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360219 is a reply to message #360218] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 13:13   |
 |
ljdavick
 Messages: 3548 Registered: March 2007 Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
|
Senior Member |
|
|
My reception was very poor only to find that the connection in the ceiling of the cockpit was loose and almost disconnected. Once plugged in the reception was perfect.
Of course I didn’t find it until I was working on the ceiling!
Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976 Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca.
> On Nov 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Scott Nutter via Gmclist wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention that it is a newer alpine stereo in the dash.
> --
> Scott Nutter
> 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera
> installed MSD Atomic EFI
> Houston, Texas
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360226 is a reply to message #360225] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 22:42   |
Ken Henderson
 Messages: 8726 Registered: March 2004 Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hmpfff! "...almost as old as I am..." and then talk about 12 volts,
nuvistors, etc. Don't you remember the 6 VDC vibrators supplying ALL octal
vacuum tubes, like I do? :-(
Not to mention the scars I still bear from having a pot of molten tar
kicked over on me while watching the making radio batteries from dry cells
during WWII. Luckily, my great uncle, Dr. Marion Folsom, drove up in his
Model T about then. :-)
I still remember the tales told about my uncle who, when I was a little
boy, had one of the first 2-way radios in his Georgia (no "GA" foolishness
in those days) Highway Patrol cruiser. He was widely known for one of his
first broadcasts on it: The announcement that anyone coming to Newton (low
on the bank of the Flint river) that day "would have to do so by boat."
Let's see now, how can I tie this to the GMC???
Ken H.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:18 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
> RF_Burns wrote on Fri, 20 November 2020 20:47
>> Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the
> AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM
>> band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio
> manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.
>>
>> Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a weak
> station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.
>
> Wow Bruce,
>
> You must be almost as old as I am. Did some also contain "fire
> bottles"?? Did you ever run into those weird types with 12V B+ so they
> did need a
> vibrator power supply? Those did last long. Those, nuvistors and
> compactrons are all gone now.
>
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL,
> GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum
> Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360227 is a reply to message #360226] |
Fri, 20 November 2020 23:07   |
James Hupy
 Messages: 6806 Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I have some less than fond memories of 6 volt batteries, charged with
generators instead of alternators, and vibratory power supplies that ran
those batteries down in short order when I was parked in some secluded spot
with an "interesting person of the opposite sex". Before cellular
telephones, and nearest houses miles away.
Makes me appreciate the luxury of GMC motorhomes and all the
convenient stuff like generators and isolated starting batteries.
Some of that stuff of the past was just adequate.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 8:43 PM Ken Henderson via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
> Hmpfff! "...almost as old as I am..." and then talk about 12 volts,
> nuvistors, etc. Don't you remember the 6 VDC vibrators supplying ALL octal
> vacuum tubes, like I do? :-(
>
> Not to mention the scars I still bear from having a pot of molten tar
> kicked over on me while watching the making radio batteries from dry cells
> during WWII. Luckily, my great uncle, Dr. Marion Folsom, drove up in his
> Model T about then. :-)
>
> I still remember the tales told about my uncle who, when I was a little
> boy, had one of the first 2-way radios in his Georgia (no "GA" foolishness
> in those days) Highway Patrol cruiser. He was widely known for one of his
> first broadcasts on it: The announcement that anyone coming to Newton (low
> on the bank of the Flint river) that day "would have to do so by boat."
>
> Let's see now, how can I tie this to the GMC???
>
> Ken H.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:18 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
>
>> RF_Burns wrote on Fri, 20 November 2020 20:47
>>> Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the
>> AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM
>>> band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio
>> manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.
>>>
>>> Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a
> weak
>> station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.
>>
>> Wow Bruce,
>>
>> You must be almost as old as I am. Did some also contain "fire
>> bottles"?? Did you ever run into those weird types with 12V B+ so they
>> did need a
>> vibrator power supply? Those did last long. Those, nuvistors and
>> compactrons are all gone now.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> --
>> Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL,
>> GMCES
>> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum
>> Brakes with Applied Control Arms
>> SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360228 is a reply to message #360213] |
Sat, 21 November 2020 00:51   |
Ken Burton
 Messages: 10030 Registered: January 2004 Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Let's start with the basics on vehicle AM radio antennas. They require a good ground at the base of the antenna. The car / vehicle body is 1/2 of the antenna system and it's connection to the coax to feed RF to the radio is at the base of the antenna. NOT AT THE DASH OR RADIO
Almost every AM radio reception complaint I have ever worked on has been a poor ground connection where the antenna is mounted. On a car it is usually a rusty fender. You disassemble the antenna mounting and simply clean the fender or wherever it is mounted until shiny. Occasionally it was simply loose and only needed tightening. The GMC roof mount is the same thing except it is mounted in Aluminum which corrodes rather than rusts. Coat all of those loosened pieces with anti-seize when reassembling.
The other thing you can do to check this is to unplug the antenna from the radio and check the resistance between the center conductor of the cable and the antenna shaft on the roof. It should be around 1 or 2 ohms. Then check the shield of the cable too a good body ground. It too should be less than 3 ohms. DO NOT USE THE DASH or anything mounted to it as a ground connection for your meter when metering this. The dash is electrically connected to the engine ground and not the body ground.
I had mine corroded and had to clean it up about 15 years ago.
Ken B.
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
|
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360232 is a reply to message #360213] |
Sat, 21 November 2020 12:31   |
Scott Nutter
 Messages: 782 Registered: January 2015 Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ken Burton,
Would it be a good idea to pull a ground wire from the radio chassis to a good body ground source? Would that improve my AM reception?
Scott.
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI
Houston, Texas
[Updated on: Sat, 21 November 2020 14:14] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360252 is a reply to message #360213] |
Mon, 23 November 2020 11:27   |
jhbridges
 Messages: 8412 Registered: May 2011 Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ground it well, and be sure the antenna is working well. And realize, the AM section of current receivers is shiteye. Some of the Alpines are OK for AM, some aren't. As Bruce said there's likely an AM antenna trimmer on it someplace, look in the Alpine book and set it as advertised.
J.O. Weldon and Nestor Questor built most of the Mexican high power transmitters un der the Continental Electronics banner. I had the privilege of sitting at the table at a convention with several Gurus of the industry (Sellmeyer, Silliman pere and fils, Orban, Foti, Clark and several others) in the Continental hospitality suite drinking Mr J.O.'s whiskey and listening to his stories of the Mexican transmitters for several hours while Nestopr tended bar. (Nestor's idea opf bartending was, if he gave you a full glass of whiskey, he wouldn't have top serve you again quite as soon) Here's a short blurb: https://contelec.com/history/
--johnny
Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360280 is a reply to message #360232] |
Wed, 25 November 2020 03:02   |
Ken Burton
 Messages: 10030 Registered: January 2004 Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Do NOT install a wire between the radio and body ground. The radio is already attached to engine ground and if you add the suggested wire you are making a ground loop. (A noise receiving antenna at some undetermined frequency located a few feet away for the two biggest noise generators in the the coach. {the ignition system and the heater fan.})
Also if that wire were installed and one of the braided frame to engine or frame to body jumpers were to open up, which happens frequently on these coaches, you now have an alternate ground path for all of the charging current going to the house batteries and to other things. That wire will not be able to carry the current. It will burn under those conditions.
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360282 is a reply to message #360213] |
Wed, 25 November 2020 07:13   |
 |
RF_Burns
 Messages: 2277 Registered: June 2008 Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ken,
The 77-78 chassis wiring diagram I have shows the radio ground as being through the radio chassis, not a separate wire, so it gets ground from the dash frame it is mounted to. It also shows the dash is grounded by a separate wire direct the battery Neg (-), NOT to the engine block.
Since the antenna shield is grounded at the antenna (on the body) and also at the radio, the radio chassis is connected to the body ground. Therefore as-built there is already a ground loop in place.
If the engine to body ground straps fail, the antenna cable shield will carry the current. If the battery to engine block ground wire fails, again the antenna coax will complete the ground.
My Farm-boy mechanic and 45+ years in mobile radio communications tells me that separate dash ground wire from the battery should be disconnected from the battery and grounded at the engine.
When GE came out with their first microprocessor controlled, programmable radio we were having endless troubles with instability of the transmitter frequency. They finally sent an Engineer out to look at a new Police car with this issue. He promptly told me I had connected the radio power wrong, the ground wire had to go directly to the battery. I disagreed arguing the radio ground had to share the same ground as the radio case (mounting point) and the antenna ground, therefore be grounded to the vehicle body. But he insisted so we wired the radio ground wire to the battery. It did not fix the radio's instability, but as soon as the engine was started some starter current flowed though the new radio ground wire from the battery and out the case of the radio onto the body ground, through a grounding wire from the body to the engine block. This current was enough to burn a PCB trace from the radio ground wire connection to the radio chassis (case). This caused the 5 volt regulator to loose its proper ground reference and smoked the radio's microprocessor. The Police Chief was not amused and the Engineer was dumbfounded.
GE never did fix the issue as they claimed it worked fine on the bench (into a dummy antenna load) Trouble was when connected to an antenna the RF field when transmitting would upset the radio's voltage regulator powering the Voltage Controlled oscillator (VCO) causing stability in the VCO and therefore transmitter frequency. Once again... works as designed, but not designed to work!
Just my experience
Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC. 1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360297 is a reply to message #360282] |
Wed, 25 November 2020 17:48   |
Ken Burton
 Messages: 10030 Registered: January 2004 Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
|
Senior Member |
|
|
RF_Burns wrote on Wed, 25 November 2020 07:13Ken,
The 77-78 chassis wiring diagram I have shows the radio ground as being through the radio chassis, not a separate wire, so it gets ground from the dash frame it is mounted to. It also shows the dash is grounded by a separate wire direct the battery Neg (-), NOT to the engine block.
You failed to follow that wire any farther at the battery. That wire continues on through the battery connector and to a bolt on the engine Block (engine ground). We frequently call that continuation cable the negative battery cable.
Since the antenna shield is grounded at the antenna (on the body) and also at the radio, the radio chassis is connected to the body ground. Therefore as-built there is already a ground loop in place.
While the above is partially true, the antenna connector shield side is NOT DC connected to the radio frame itself. SO there is NO connection between body and engine ground there
If the engine to body ground straps fail, the antenna cable shield will carry the current. If the battery to engine block ground wire fails, again the antenna coax will complete the ground.
That connection inside the radio does not exist. If it did we would have many, many reports of smoked antenna coax cables and blown radios when the braided jumpers fail or were forgotten to be replaced on engine and transmission swaps. The engine to frame crossover is located on the back of the trans near the rear mount. I have replaced a few of them on other people's coaches.
My Farm-boy mechanic and 45+ years in mobile radio communications tells me that separate dash ground wire from the battery should be disconnected from the battery and grounded at the engine.
Agreed, but see previous comment. GM figured why not do it their way and it has worked just fine (other than corroded or loose connections) for a long time. The dash is still hooked to engine ground just by a slightly longer route on a 2 or 4 ga. cable.
When GE came out with their first microprocessor controlled, programmable radio we were having endless troubles with instability of the transmitter frequency. They finally sent an Engineer out to look at a new Police car with this issue. He promptly told me I had connected the radio power wrong, the ground wire had to go directly to the battery. I disagreed arguing the radio ground had to share the same ground as the radio case (mounting point) and the antenna ground, therefore be grounded to the vehicle body. But he insisted so we wired the radio ground wire to the battery. It did not fix the radio's instability, but as soon as the engine was started some starter current flowed though the new radio ground wire from the battery and out the case of the radio onto the body ground, through a grounding wire from the body to the engine block. This current was enough to burn a PCB trace from the radio ground wire connection to the radio chassis (case). This caused the 5 volt regulator to loose its proper ground reference and smoked the radio's microprocessor. The Police Chief was not amused and the Engineer was dumbfounded.
GE never did fix the issue as they claimed it worked fine on the bench (into a dummy antenna load) Trouble was when connected to an antenna the RF field when transmitting would upset the radio's voltage regulator powering the Voltage Controlled oscillator (VCO) causing stability in the VCO and therefore transmitter frequency. Once again... works as designed, but not designed to work!
Just my experience
Improper grounding will bite you frequently and people do not stop to consider it. What makes ours worse is we have 3 separate grounding systems in a GMC and most people do not stop to consider them.
I did a demonstration one time for Dan Gregg. He attached a ground wire to the base of his Paterson Distributor and ran it to battery negative. I told him not to do it but he disagreed.
The demonstration was to disconnect the starting battery negative cable from the engine block. Upon attempting to start the engine he promptly smoked the 12 ga. wire between the distributor base and the battery he had just installed. We replaced the wire and ran it to the engine instead of the battery.
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Mar 19 12:04:54 CDT 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03938 seconds
|