GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one
[GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one [message #356729] Mon, 13 July 2020 14:16 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
I've seen it get 3 GMC's home. And not home twice. To me. Worth the $6 to try. Would I drive it across town after the Trans X got me home? BIG NO. But, that's me. And MY Comfort Zone. My CZ would never allow me to do that. Ever. Mike got lucky that next year. ( Sometimes it's best to be lucky. Then good. ) GRIN.
I've seen owners put the Trans X in as a preventive measure. OK. But I have reservations on that one. What ye all say?
Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one [message #356733 is a reply to message #356729] Mon, 13 July 2020 15:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
6cuda6 is currently offline  6cuda6   United States
Messages: 975
Registered: June 2019
Karma: -6
Senior Member
Out of desperation were i know that i can't hurt anything more than what may have already been done....why not if..... its the difference of walking or driving.

As a preventative measure, for me, not a chance.....if it was really good stuff the oil manufacturers would already be using it....JMHO


Rich Mondor, Brockville, ON 77 Hughes 2600
Re: [GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one [message #356798 is a reply to message #356733] Wed, 15 July 2020 11:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GatsbysCruise is currently offline  GatsbysCruise   United States
Messages: 261
Registered: January 2017
Location: Waukegan, Illinois
Karma: 3
Senior Member
I am unsure what Trans-X is. So I am not able to make any good thoughts about it.

It sounds like it has a quality that when used under certain circumstances, it can get your
vehicle moving again. It doesn't sound like something that you would add like a oil suppliment.

Too many people use that term, "if it were that good, the manufacturers would be using it".
That is not totally accurate and it is used in too many senarios where it does not fit the
situation. its just a non productive comment.

Depending on what Trans-X is and its creative intent, it could be useful, or not.
If there is more information showing Trans-X is beneficial, I will carry it as well. If
it is just another myth, then I won't.

You must go by the facts, too many are too fast to dismiss ideas without any information
behind it.

slc



GatsbysCruise. \ 74GMC260 Former Glacier Model style. \ Waukegan, Illinois \ Keep those MiniDiscs Spinning \ MY GREYHOUND IS FASTER THAN YOUR HONOR ROLL STUDENT \ WindowsXP-Win7-Win8.1-UBUNTU STUDIO - UBUNTU VOYAGER - Berzin Auto Center
Re: [GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one [message #356800 is a reply to message #356798] Wed, 15 July 2020 11:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
6cuda6 is currently offline  6cuda6   Canada
Messages: 975
Registered: June 2019
Karma: -6
Senior Member
Anything you add to an oil that is not part of the additive package in there already is not needed or it would be already there. Same with fuel.....this is why they have certifications/classifications. (Unless specified by the OEM such as for limited slip diffs or you have an inferior or sub par oil and are adding missing ingredients)

Trans-X is one of 2 things....a product that makes rubber swell up or it makes friction material swell. ( maybe even both in this case). Nether of which is what you want in your trans unless something is not correct in the first place.

Do add-in additives have a place? Sure depending on what the condition is....but in general they are not needed and do more harm then good. Sometimes the choice is better than walking but one must understand the risk.



GatsbysCruise wrote on Wed, 15 July 2020 12:17
I am unsure what Trans-X is. So I am not able to make any good thoughts about it.

It sounds like it has a quality that when used under certain circumstances, it can get your
vehicle moving again. It doesn't sound like something that you would add like a oil suppliment.

Too many people use that term, "if it were that good, the manufacturers would be using it".
That is not totally accurate and it is used in too many senarios where it does not fit the
situation. its just a non productive comment.

Depending on what Trans-X is and its creative intent, it could be useful, or not.
If there is more information showing Trans-X is beneficial, I will carry it as well. If
it is just another myth, then I won't.

You must go by the facts, too many are too fast to dismiss ideas without any information
behind it.

slc



Rich Mondor, Brockville, ON 77 Hughes 2600
Re: [GMCnet] Thoughts on Trans X. Input much welcomed on this one [message #356835 is a reply to message #356800] Thu, 16 July 2020 03:00 Go to previous message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Tell that to the government on ethanol.

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Bill Bramlett
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Tankless HW Heaters
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 22 13:23:32 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00775 seconds