GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Difference in manufacturing quality by year? (Any advantage to early or late production?)
Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348584] Fri, 27 September 2019 16:11 Go to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
New member here, seeking a coach for my family of 5. Trying to be realistic as possible in terms of coach capability.

403 engines in the 77-78 years aside, were there any significant changes to the manufacturing process or model over the life of the production run?

Thank you guys for your time.


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348585 is a reply to message #348584] Fri, 27 September 2019 16:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
At great personal risk, I’ll take a stab at this:

73-74 had a less effective frame damping system. Also, their cabin AC was not as good. The earliest coaches did not have aluminum on the underside of the frame. Instead they used heat deflectors on the mufflers.

73-76 had a channel on the body side molding. This went to a single solid piece of aluminum in 1977.

77-78 had an improved air conditioning system

Lots of differences with the non-GM up fitters.

I’m sure I missed a lot, and I might be a year or so off on some of the changes.

Steering/Transmission/Frame/Fuel System/Living Systems largely unchanged.

It’s going to be interesting to see everyone else take on this.


Dolph

DE AD0LF

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 26’ ex-PalmBeach
Howell EFI & EBL, Reaction Arms, Manny Transmission

“The Aluminum and Fiberglass Mistress"




> On Sep 27, 2019, at 5:11 PM, ben--- via Gmclist wrote:
>
> New member here, seeking a coach for my family of 5. Trying to be realistic as possible in terms of coach capability.
>
> 403 engines in the 77-78 years aside, were there any significant changes to the manufacturing process or model over the life of the production run?
>
> Thank you guys for your time.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348589 is a reply to message #348585] Fri, 27 September 2019 16:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
It's those details I'm looking for and have a hard time finding.

Going with a engine replacement; and focus of question is more the body/interior/mechanicals - not chassis or power.

I really appreciate the response.

Keep them coming.


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348590 is a reply to message #348589] Fri, 27 September 2019 16:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
C Boyd is currently offline  C Boyd   United States
Messages: 2629
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 18
Senior Member
Here is the sales brochures for most years and models.
http://bdub.net/publications/index.html





BRG wrote on Fri, 27 September 2019 17:29
It's those details I'm looking for and have a hard time finding.

Going with a engine replacement; and focus of question is more the body/interior/mechanicals - not chassis or power.

I really appreciate the response.

Keep them coming.


C. Boyd
76 Crestmont
East Tennessee
Re: Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348595 is a reply to message #348584] Fri, 27 September 2019 17:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
GM upfitted coaches also had differences in the rear air system. Early coaches had the air compressor under the hood with three valves on a dash panel controlling the flow of air in the dash back to the bags.

Then there was Electro-Level that used rocker switches in the same dash location wired to solenoids in a cabinet near the rear wheels where the compressor was relocated to. From the solenoids much shorter air lines went to the bags.

Late coaches had Electro-Level II that had two air compressors - one for each side - as opposed to the Dana twin cylinder compressor - controlled from the same rocker panel, but relocated to the driver's left window. Electro-Level II ride height was controlled by optical switches that are still in use (I think).

My opinion is that the coaches simply got better each refresh, but no so significantly that that I'd toss out an older one in good shape.


Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348610 is a reply to message #348595] Fri, 27 September 2019 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
Thanks for those bits. Any other opinions you have would be welcomed.

So far, I seem to be hearing that there were several positive incremental improvements made. I guess that's expected but, it's nice to know the details.


I think I saw a video by Bounds about body sag due to poor frame support up front. Is that an all-year issue or do the later coaches have reinforced body support?


Thanks again.


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348614 is a reply to message #348610] Fri, 27 September 2019 19:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
BRG wrote on Fri, 27 September 2019 20:20
Thanks for those bits. Any other opinions you have would be welcomed.

So far, I seem to be hearing that there were several positive incremental improvements made. I guess that's expected but, it's nice to know the details.

I think I saw a video by Bounds about body sag due to poor frame support up front. Is that an all-year issue or do the later coaches have reinforced body support?

Thanks again.
BRG,

The body sag issue is pretty much across the platform. Part of it is that these coaches were designed for a life that was roughly twice the life of all the others in the came class. Most of ours are now at three times that. Yes, the older have it worse. Mine is a 73 23, and I love it. I would suggest that this not be a first choice. And that for -oh so many - reasons. But, if you should trip across one that was a 73 and you like it a lot and it has been loved, do not count it out. Just be real ready to deal with it (and plan on 10K of up grades if you do the work).

Matt - please don't tell me about early production, S2-7.9#1, 13'Boston Whaler #64, First year Honda 350-4, Original Jeep Gladiator with 230 OHC6, etc.


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348618 is a reply to message #348585] Fri, 27 September 2019 20:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Maybe I missed it, but somewhere around 1975 they switched to the HEI ignition which I think is superior to the previous points system.

One other thing I discovered on a 1978 that I have the tanks down on, is they ran the vent lines overhead attached to the floor using steel rather than hose to increase venting. This looks like it is OEM and not a PO installed thing.

Also on California coaches GM installed heat shields (special RPO) between the exhaust and the gas tanks (Jim K sells them) and also they used two carbon canisters instead if one.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348619 is a reply to message #348618] Fri, 27 September 2019 20:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Ben,
Please call me so we an discuss. 800-752-7502

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 6:45 PM Ken Burton via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Maybe I missed it, but somewhere around 1975 they switched to the HEI
> ignition which I think is superior to the previous points system.
>
> One other thing I discovered on a 1978 that I have the tanks down on, is
> they ran the vent lines overhead attached to the floor using steel rather
> than hose to increase venting. This looks like it is OEM and not a PO
> installed thing.
>
> Also on California coaches GM installed heat shields (special RPO) between
> the exhaust and the gas tanks (Jim K sells them) and also they used two
> carbon canisters instead if one.
> --
> Ken Burton - N9KB
> 76 Palm Beach
> Hebron, Indiana
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348622 is a reply to message #348610] Fri, 27 September 2019 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard Denney is currently offline  Richard Denney   United States
Messages: 920
Registered: April 2010
Karma: 9
Senior Member
73-74 had 1-1/4” bogie pins with a single lubrication hole in the space
between the two bushings. Getting grease into both bushings was a problem.
In ‘75, they increased the pin size to 1-1/2” (as a I recall), and the new
pin has two lubrication openings inside each of the two bushing races. This
is a more durable design. (I just got finished converting my early rear
suspension to bogie assemblies from a junked ‘76.)

73-74 coaches came with bias-ply tires, on wheels not designed or rated for
radial tires. That fact has motivated more than one upgrade to 16” aluminum
wheels (mine included).

Early ‘73 coaches had troublesome door latches that were upgraded in the
factory and at dealerships to the heavy-truck style used subsequently.
Which means ‘73’s have a large 8x8 stainless steel patch panel with the
latch mounted in it, to cover the hole left by the discontinued latch. Mine
was about the thousandth coach made—it has the patches.

73 and maybe 74 used 1” marine-grade plywood as a floor. Later coaches used
3/4” plus an insulation panel. These panels were laid into an aluminum
floor frame. In both, the floor creeps into a mustache cross-section, with
edges and centerline sagging below the frame rails, where the supports are.
That’s what causes sag, beaver checks below the cockpit windows,
middle-aged spread at the door opening, and a wavy floor.

Early coaches used different windows than later coaches. They have joints
in the horizontal runs between the radiused corners of the windows. Those
are leak points. That was part of my motivation to install modern
replacements from Gene Dotson.

The sub-structure under the cockpit floor was made from welded aluminum
round bar in early coaches, and stampings in later coaches. I don’t think
there is a preference.

Other than what’s already been mentioned, that’s what comes to mind. There
are many other minor changes, and I think Bill Bryant is the only person
who knows most of them.

Rick “who has a ‘73 with most of the big early coach weaknesses resolved”
Denney



On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:21 PM ben--- via Gmclist
wrote:

> Thanks for those bits. Any other opinions you have would be welcomed.
>
> So far, I seem to be hearing that there were several positive incremental
> improvements made. I guess that's expected but, it's nice to know the
> details.
>
>
> I think I saw a video by Bounds about body sag due to poor frame support
> up front. Is that an all-year issue or do the later coaches have reinforced
> body support?
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
'73 X-Glacier 230 "Jaws"
Northern Virginia
Offlist email: rick at rickdenney dot com
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348624 is a reply to message #348622] Fri, 27 September 2019 21:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
Oh, one more thing - with a family of 5 don’t suffer from analysis paralysis. One of my greatest regrets is not getting one of these magic machines sooner. The memories we made in our coach are so very precious to me. My daughter is now 24 and building a life of her own. We used the coach as a traveling girl’s club it seems. I know it sleeps 6 comfortably because we would often bring 3 of her friends with us wherever we went.

It’s a great way to travel. We’re not really campers. We go places. Sometimes we slept at Walmart! We drove the coach to hotels, RV parks, national parks too. We relied on campsite showers and restaurants but also ate out of the fridge, or used the microwave. The girls were comfortable and never bored. I never once was asked if we were there yet.

Get a coach that’s pretty much ready to go, make it safe (brakes, tires, fuel lines, air bags, etc.) and go. It helps if the generator and roof air work, but you can fix that. The dash air, if it works, well, count yourself lucky.

Your family is very lucky to have something like this in their future. Remember - there is nothing more comfortable to be stuck beside the road than a car with a fridge, bathroom and bed.

Also - share stories of your upgrades, trips, questions, and more.

Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, CA
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Distributor

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348626 is a reply to message #348622] Fri, 27 September 2019 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
Richard Denney wrote on Fri, 27 September 2019 21:01
73-74 had 1-1/4" bogie pins with a single lubrication hole in the space
between the two bushings. Getting grease into both bushings was a problem.
In '75, they increased the pin size to 1-1/2" (as a I recall), and the new
pin has two lubrication openings inside each of the two bushing races. This
is a more durable design. (I just got finished converting my early rear
suspension to bogie assemblies from a junked '76.)

73-74 coaches came with bias-ply tires, on wheels not designed or rated for
radial tires. That fact has motivated more than one upgrade to 16" aluminum
wheels (mine included).

Early '73 coaches had troublesome door latches that were upgraded in the
factory and at dealerships to the heavy-truck style used subsequently.
Which means '73's have a large 8x8 stainless steel patch panel with the
latch mounted in it, to cover the hole left by the discontinued latch. Mine
was about the thousandth coach made--it has the patches.

73 and maybe 74 used 1" marine-grade plywood as a floor. Later coaches used
3/4" plus an insulation panel. These panels were laid into an aluminum
floor frame. In both, the floor creeps into a mustache cross-section, with
edges and centerline sagging below the frame rails, where the supports are.
That's what causes sag, beaver checks below the cockpit windows,
middle-aged spread at the door opening, and a wavy floor.

Early coaches used different windows than later coaches. They have joints
in the horizontal runs between the radiused corners of the windows. Those
are leak points. That was part of my motivation to install modern
replacements from Gene Dotson.

The sub-structure under the cockpit floor was made from welded aluminum
round bar in early coaches, and stampings in later coaches. I don't think
there is a preference.

Other than what's already been mentioned, that's what comes to mind. There
are many other minor changes, and I think Bill Bryant is the only person
who knows most of them.

Rick "who has a '73 with most of the big early coach weaknesses resolved"
Denney



On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 8:21 PM ben--- via Gmclist
wrote:

> Thanks for those bits. Any other opinions you have would be welcomed.
>
> So far, I seem to be hearing that there were several positive incremental
> improvements made. I guess that's expected but, it's nice to know the
> details.
>
>
> I think I saw a video by Bounds about body sag due to poor frame support
> up front. Is that an all-year issue or do the later coaches have reinforced
> body support?
>
>
> Thanks again.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
'73 X-Glacier 230 "Jaws"
Northern Virginia
Offlist email: rick at rickdenney dot com
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

That's great stuff. Thanks a lot.


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348627 is a reply to message #348624] Fri, 27 September 2019 22:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
ljdavick wrote on Fri, 27 September 2019 21:59
Oh, one more thing - with a family of 5 don't suffer from analysis paralysis. One of my greatest regrets is not getting one of these magic machines sooner. The memories we made in our coach are so very precious to me. My daughter is now 24 and building a life of her own. We used the coach as a traveling girl's club it seems. I know it sleeps 6 comfortably because we would often bring 3 of her friends with us wherever we went.

It's a great way to travel. We're not really campers. We go places. Sometimes we slept at Walmart! We drove the coach to hotels, RV parks, national parks too. We relied on campsite showers and restaurants but also ate out of the fridge, or used the microwave. The girls were comfortable and never bored. I never once was asked if we were there yet.

Get a coach that's pretty much ready to go, make it safe (brakes, tires, fuel lines, air bags, etc.) and go. It helps if the generator and roof air work, but you can fix that. The dash air, if it works, well, count yourself lucky.

Your family is very lucky to have something like this in their future. Remember - there is nothing more comfortable to be stuck beside the road than a car with a fridge, bathroom and bed.

Also - share stories of your upgrades, trips, questions, and more.

Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, CA
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Distributor

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
You just described us and our plans to the letter. Couldn't have said it better myself. We're way more cruisers than campers.

Exactly right about analysis paralysis - I just have to find a floorplan - the floorplan - my wife likes.

The questions were an attempt to avoid any major preventables already run into by coach owners; and the feedback has been invaluable.



“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348628 is a reply to message #348627] Fri, 27 September 2019 23:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
It's not what works for others, it is what works for your family
circumstances. You can imagine what you need or want, but get in the coach
and live in it on a road trip of some duration, and you will learn what
works best for you and your family. Many GMCers have been there, done that,
and are more than willing to share what they have learned along their
journey. I compare the GMC to a time machine or transporter. Takes you to
new places and new experiences EVERY time you get behind the wheel.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, 8:50 PM ben--- via Gmclist
wrote:

> ljdavick wrote on Fri, 27 September 2019 21:59
>> Oh, one more thing - with a family of 5 don't suffer from analysis
> paralysis. One of my greatest regrets is not getting one of these magic
>> machines sooner. The memories we made in our coach are so very precious
> to me. My daughter is now 24 and building a life of her own. We used the
>> coach as a traveling girl's club it seems. I know it sleeps 6
> comfortably because we would often bring 3 of her friends with us wherever
> we went.
>>
>>
>> It's a great way to travel. We're not really campers. We go places.
> Sometimes we slept at Walmart! We drove the coach to hotels, RV parks,
>> national parks too. We relied on campsite showers and restaurants but
> also ate out of the fridge, or used the microwave. The girls were
>> comfortable and never bored. I never once was asked if we were there
> yet.
>>
>> Get a coach that's pretty much ready to go, make it safe (brakes, tires,
> fuel lines, air bags, etc.) and go. It helps if the generator and roof
>> air work, but you can fix that. The dash air, if it works, well, count
> yourself lucky.
>>
>> Your family is very lucky to have something like this in their future.
> Remember - there is nothing more comfortable to be stuck beside the road
>> than a car with a fridge, bathroom and bed.
>>
>> Also - share stories of your upgrades, trips, questions, and more.
>>
>> Larry Davick
>> A Mystery Machine
>> 1976(ish) Palm Beach
>> Fremont, CA
>> Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Distributor
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> You just described us and our plans to the letter. Couldn't have said it
> better myself. We're way more cruisers than campers.
>
> Exactly right about analysis paralysis - I just have to find a floorplan -
> the floorplan - my wife likes.
>
> The questions were an attempt to avoid any major preventables already run
> into by coach owners; and the feedback has been invaluable.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348631 is a reply to message #348584] Sat, 28 September 2019 00:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BRG   Canada
Messages: 10
Registered: September 2019
Location: Plano, TX
Karma: -1
Junior Member
Thought you folks might like this. Some interesting info I just found.


http://www.bdub.net/publications/Eleganza2OperationConquest6-74.pdf


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” ---- '78 Eleganza II Plano, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348632 is a reply to message #348631] Sat, 28 September 2019 02:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Olly Schmidt is currently offline  Olly Schmidt   United States
Messages: 1265
Registered: February 2014
Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
Senior Member
On 28.09.19 02:01, ben--- via Gmclist wrote:
> http://www.bdub.net/publications/Eleganza2OperationConquest6-74.pdf

Very nice text. Thank you.
--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP KeyID: 0x4196BF22
'76a 26' Eleganza II - Virginia, US
'73 23' Sequoia - Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Best regards

Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348641 is a reply to message #348632] Sat, 28 September 2019 11:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mghamms is currently offline  mghamms   United States
Messages: 466
Registered: March 2016
Location: Ware, Massachusetts
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Love It.

Peer Oliver Schmidt wrote on Sat, 28 September 2019 02:30
On 28.09.19 02:01, ben--- via Gmclist wrote:
> http://www.bdub.net/publications/Eleganza2OperationConquest6-74.pdf

Very nice text. Thank you.
--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP KeyID: 0x4196BF22
'76a 26' Eleganza II - Virginia, US
'73 23' Sequoia - Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1977 Kingsley 455 as stock as it gets except lots of Ragusa parts
Re: [GMCnet] Difference in manufacturing quality by year? [message #348642 is a reply to message #348641] Sat, 28 September 2019 12:38 Go to previous message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Ben,
Call me so I can discuss with you in private.
It will be worth your time. 800-752-7502

On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 9:46 AM Mike Hamm via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Love It.
>
> Peer Oliver Schmidt wrote on Sat, 28 September 2019 02:30
>> On 28.09.19 02:01, ben--- via Gmclist wrote:
>>> http://www.bdub.net/publications/Eleganza2OperationConquest6-74.pdf
>>
>> Very nice text. Thank you.
>> --
>> Best regards
>>
>> Peer Oliver Schmidt
>> PGP KeyID: 0x4196BF22
>> '76a 26' Eleganza II - Virginia, US
>> '73 23' Sequoia - Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
> --
> 1977 Kingsley 455 as stock as it gets except lots of Ragusa parts
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Previous Topic: Tiny leak on the engine water pump. Suggestions?
Next Topic: Mondello roller RV CAM KIT
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 19 23:42:16 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00941 seconds