GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in.
[GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in. [message #341371] Wed, 27 February 2019 10:15 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Manufactures only put a part in for a good reason. And the type of material used to make those parts. The GMC has 4 body mounts. 2 at the front, and 2 at the rear. The 2 main things that these mounts do. Is to keep the body, and frame as a unit. And keep 1. If you've ever taken a GMC completely apart. As I have. You've become very aware that the body is more of a main frame then the steel structure it sets on. We have 2 main steel structures. One at each end. To have something to attach drivetrain parts too. The 2 side rails have very little strength too them. I see them as a means of keeping the front/rear suspention structure. In position as to the relationship to each other. This is where the body pads come in. 2. There has to be a space between the body, and the suspention. To keep road vibration/noise away from the passenger area. These GMC's where built for a high end market. So whatever we use to make replacement pads. Shouldn't be any harder then the pads that GM supplied originally. Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in. [message #341374 is a reply to message #341371] Wed, 27 February 2019 20:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Barry Controls makes vibration isolators similar to the ones used on the front and rear body mounts. They are rated by axial and radial load. The 22003 model is the closest match to the GMC isolators. Same diameter but requires a taller plate. I used the 22003-14.

http://www.barrycontrols.com/UserFiles/File/Product_Catalog/bonded_tube/bcdi_prod_bonded_22000_series.pdf

JP
Re: [GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in. [message #341384 is a reply to message #341374] Thu, 28 February 2019 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adrien G. is currently offline  Adrien G.   United States
Messages: 474
Registered: May 2008
Location: Burns Flat, OK 73624
Karma: 1
Senior Member
JP, and B Dunahugh,

I don't recall what year of Ford I beam model truck uses strut pads that are identical to the front and rear round isolator pads our GMC MH uses.
Replaced mine some years back,along with the center pads. FWIW



Jp Benson wrote on Wed, 27 February 2019 18:46
Barry Controls makes vibration isolators similar to the ones used on the front and rear body mounts. They are rated by axial and radial load. The 22003 model is the closest match to the GMC isolators. Same diameter but requires a taller plate. I used the 22003-14.

http://www.barrycontrols.com/UserFiles/File/Product_Catalog/bonded_tube/bcdi_prod_bonded_22000_series.pdf

JP





Adrien & Jenny Genesoto 75 Glenbrook (26-3) Mods LS3.70 FD / Reaction Sys / 80mm Front&Intermidiate / Hydroboost / 16" Tires / Frame Rebuild / Interior Rebuild Yuba City,Ca. Text 530-nine-3-three-3-nine-nine-6
Re: [GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in. [message #341390 is a reply to message #341384] Fri, 01 March 2019 09:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Michael Leipold is currently offline  Michael Leipold   United States
Messages: 318
Registered: April 2011
Location: Greensboro NC
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I am confused, I tried searching for these and I-Beam trucks did not have struts.
Are you possibly calling them something different?

Adrien G. wrote on Thu, 28 February 2019 16:11
JP, and B Dunahugh,

I don't recall what year of Ford I beam model truck uses strut pads that are identical to the front and rear round isolator pads our GMC MH uses.
Replaced mine some years back,along with the center pads. FWIW



Jp Benson wrote on Wed, 27 February 2019 18:46
Barry Controls makes vibration isolators similar to the ones used on the front and rear body mounts. They are rated by axial and radial load. The 22003 model is the closest match to the GMC isolators. Same diameter but requires a taller plate. I used the 22003-14.

http://www.barrycontrols.com/UserFiles/File/Product_Catalog/bonded_tube/bcdi_prod_bonded_22000_series.pdf

JP




1973 GMC 26' Glacier - Unknown Mileage - Has a new switch pitch transmission with Powerdrive Smile
Re: [GMCnet] Reason for the body pads. How did vibration play in. [message #341398 is a reply to message #341390] Sat, 02 March 2019 01:15 Go to previous message
Adrien G. is currently offline  Adrien G.   United States
Messages: 474
Registered: May 2008
Location: Burns Flat, OK 73624
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Michael,

The I beam axles have each a control arm back to a mount at the frame. The large round rubber isolator at the end of the control arm to frame is very close to what the coach uses front and back. I was able to use them as replacement, OEM were rock hard. I also increased the thickness of the isolators ( 3/4 in ), gave me better clearance on top of the engine.

Hope this is a better explanation.



Michael Leipold wrote on Fri, 01 March 2019 07:56
I am confused, I tried searching for these and I-Beam trucks did not have struts.
Are you possibly calling them something different?

Adrien G. wrote on Thu, 28 February 2019 16:11
JP, and B Dunahugh,

I don't recall what year of Ford I beam model truck uses strut pads that are identical to the front and rear round isolator pads our GMC MH uses.
Replaced mine some years back,along with the center pads. FWIW



Jp Benson wrote on Wed, 27 February 2019 18:46
Barry Controls makes vibration isolators similar to the ones used on the front and rear body mounts. They are rated by axial and radial load. The 22003 model is the closest match to the GMC isolators. Same diameter but requires a taller plate. I used the 22003-14.

http://www.barrycontrols.com/UserFiles/File/Product_Catalog/bonded_tube/bcdi_prod_bonded_22000_series.pdf

JP



Adrien & Jenny Genesoto 75 Glenbrook (26-3) Mods LS3.70 FD / Reaction Sys / 80mm Front&Intermidiate / Hydroboost / 16" Tires / Frame Rebuild / Interior Rebuild Yuba City,Ca. Text 530-nine-3-three-3-nine-nine-6
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] All about batteries, battery monitors, battery using appliances and charging
Next Topic: [GMCnet] All about batteries, battery monitors, battery using appliances and charging
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 18 23:17:39 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03264 seconds