GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels
[GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 11:58 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
At our last GMCMI event. While setting at the liars table. I got in on the end of their discussion on premium fuels. Their thought was that it was better. But what does the term better mean? In the last 16 years with our GMC. I've only used regular gas that was rated as 87 octane. Was wet, and it burned. Never cared if it had Ethanal in it. ( This isn't an Ethanal discussion. )Never had issues with it. Got gas yesterday at $1.79 a gal here in Iowa. Premium was at $2.59. That's a big difference in cost. So what do you get for the extra cash. Premium is higher in octane. Generally at 89 octane. Octane helps to prevent pre detonation in the engines combustion chamber. Commonly called ping. Or knock. And this knock can take out the tops of piston/rings. Gasoline formulations have changed over the years. Just aren't meant to be atomized by way of a carburetor. The carb left the stage in 1988 for the most part. With EFI systems that have spark control, and a knock sensor. Like the GM Howell. 89 octane gas just isn't needed as a precaution to avoid knock. Save that $70 cents a gal. Get an EFI with a knock sensor for engine safety. And that's really where the MPG improvement is. Bob Dunahugh 78 403 Royale
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339831 is a reply to message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 12:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JerryW is currently offline  JerryW   United States
Messages: 256
Registered: August 2018
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Don’t believe everything you hear. Especially at a place called the “liar’s table” !

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Frederick CO

> On Dec 30, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Bob Dunahugh wrote:
>
> At our last GMCMI event. While setting at the liars table. I got in on the end of their discussion on premium fuels. Their thought was that it was better. But what does the term better mean? In the last 16 years with our GMC. I've only used regular gas that was rated as 87 octane. Was wet, and it burned. Never cared if it had Ethanal in it. ( This isn't an Ethanal discussion. )Never had issues with it. Got gas yesterday at $1.79 a gal here in Iowa. Premium was at $2.59. That's a big difference in cost. So what do you get for the extra cash. Premium is higher in octane. Generally at 89 octane. Octane helps to prevent pre detonation in the engines combustion chamber. Commonly called ping. Or knock. And this knock can take out the tops of piston/rings. Gasoline formulations have changed over the years. Just aren't meant to be atomized by way of a carburetor. The carb left the stage in 1988 for the most part. With EFI systems that have spark control, and a knock sensor. Like the G
> M Howell. 89 octane gas just isn't needed as a precaution to avoid knock. Save that $70 cents a gal. Get an EFI with a knock sensor for engine safety. And that's really where the MPG improvement is. Bob Dunahugh 78 403 Royale
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339832 is a reply to message #339831] Sun, 30 December 2018 12:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Premium vs lesser grades? Hmmm!
Let me see. 87 octane vs 92.
8.7 to 1 vs 9.2 to 1 compression ratio. That's the rub. Not a lot of
difference really.
But, when you factor in heavily laden vehicles, full of carbon, thin
valve edges, poorly designed combustion chambers, mass production,
incorrect gaskets retro fitted, etc., etc. the picture comes into focus a
bit better.
There is a principle here somewhere in the recesses of my head. "Rate
of flame propagation" in combustible materials, or some such obscurity. Has
to do with the variables in engines with similar designs performing
differently under nearly identical circumstances. Thermodynamics was not
one of my best subjects, many here on the net are well versed in it, so I
won't dwell upon it, other than to say, "Bad Crap Happens" to good engines
if you don't pay attention to those small, almost silent, rattling noises
that come from the engine compartment under the right set of conditions. A
bit higher octane fuel kinda serves like an insurance policy. Never know
when you are going to need it.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Dec 30, 2018 10:26 AM, "Emery Stora via Gmclist"
wrote:

Don’t believe everything you hear. Especially at a place called the “liar’s
table” !

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Frederick CO


> On Dec 30, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Bob Dunahugh wrote:
>
> At our last GMCMI event. While setting at the liars table. I got in on
the end of their discussion on premium fuels. Their thought was that it was
better. But what does the term better mean? In the last 16 years with our
GMC. I've only used regular gas that was rated as 87 octane. Was wet, and
it burned. Never cared if it had Ethanal in it. ( This isn't an Ethanal
discussion. )Never had issues with it. Got gas yesterday at $1.79 a gal
here in Iowa. Premium was at $2.59. That's a big difference in cost. So
what do you get for the extra cash. Premium is higher in octane. Generally
at 89 octane. Octane helps to prevent pre detonation in the engines
combustion chamber. Commonly called ping. Or knock. And this knock can
take out the tops of piston/rings. Gasoline formulations have changed over
the years. Just aren't meant to be atomized by way of a carburetor. The
carb left the stage in 1988 for the most part. With EFI systems that have
spark control, and a knock sensor. Like the G
> M Howell. 89 octane gas just isn't needed as a precaution to avoid knock.
Save that $70 cents a gal. Get an EFI with a knock sensor for engine
safety. And that's really where the MPG improvement is. Bob Dunahugh 78
403 Royale
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339838 is a reply to message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 16:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Stations I buy from sell midgrade no alcohol, currently getting a .50/gallon premium versus regular alcoholized hovers around $2. The 23' with a stock carb liked no alcohol in pretty much whatever octane it came. The current coach came with MSD Atomic via Miguel Mendez. I write its shitty performance of to the engine which blew, Miguel has several out there working just fine so it's doable. I'll bother him after it's back together.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339846 is a reply to message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 18:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Premium stands for "PREMIUM PRICE" and "Premium profits". Use whatever fuel the engine calls for. On a lower compression engine there is no need for a fuel with a higher AKI (Octane) rating.

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339848 is a reply to message #339846] Sun, 30 December 2018 18:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
If you have a 100% cylinder fill at sea level, you will have 14.7 psi in
the cylinder. If you multiply that by your compression ratio, you can come
up with what your cranking cylinder pressure should be if this were a
perfect world, which it ain't. Figure 80% of that for an engine in good
condition. If you are at high altitude, figure 70%.
Example: 14.7 psi x 8.2 = 120.54. Multiply that 10 fold for combustion
pressure. If that figure exceeds the anti knock index for the fuel you are
using, combustion irregularities may occur.
This is ONLY AN EXAMPLE. Your figures will vary. Altitude, spark
timing, air /fuel ratio, and about a jillion other factors will influence
these numbers. DO YOU NEED TO USE PREMIUM FUEL? SHORT ANSWER, NO. BUT, do
you want to use premium fuel? You can supply this answer for yourself.
Jim Hupy

On Dec 30, 2018 4:20 PM, "Ken Burton" wrote:

Premium stands for "PREMIUM PRICE" and "Premium profits". Use whatever
fuel the engine calls for. On a lower compression engine there is no need
for
a fuel with a higher AKI (Octane) rating.
--
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339849 is a reply to message #339848] Sun, 30 December 2018 19:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
And, if you really care who profits from the sale of a gallon of gasoline,
I will venture a clue or two. It ain't the guys who drill holes in the
ground, pump out the crude, transport it to the refinery, pays to convert
it into gasoline, blend it with government mandated amount of alcohol,
deliver it to gas stations and pump it into your motor home. If they make
$.06 a gallon, they run a tidy house. But, uncle sam, state, county, city,
all get their cuts whether or not Exxon makes a dime. But, geez, they build
such great roads and bridges with your money.
Jim Hupy

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 4:58 PM James Hupy If you have a 100% cylinder fill at sea level, you will have 14.7 psi in[/color]
> the cylinder. If you multiply that by your compression ratio, you can come
> up with what your cranking cylinder pressure should be if this were a
> perfect world, which it ain't. Figure 80% of that for an engine in good
> condition. If you are at high altitude, figure 70%.
> Example: 14.7 psi x 8.2 = 120.54. Multiply that 10 fold for
> combustion pressure. If that figure exceeds the anti knock index for the
> fuel you are using, combustion irregularities may occur.
> This is ONLY AN EXAMPLE. Your figures will vary. Altitude, spark
> timing, air /fuel ratio, and about a jillion other factors will influence
> these numbers. DO YOU NEED TO USE PREMIUM FUEL? SHORT ANSWER, NO. BUT, do
> you want to use premium fuel? You can supply this answer for yourself.
> Jim Hupy
>
> On Dec 30, 2018 4:20 PM, "Ken Burton" wrote:
>
> Premium stands for "PREMIUM PRICE" and "Premium profits". Use whatever
> fuel the engine calls for. On a lower compression engine there is no need
> for
> a fuel with a higher AKI (Octane) rating.
> --
> Ken Burton - N9KB
> 76 Palm Beach
> Hebron, Indiana
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339850 is a reply to message #339849] Sun, 30 December 2018 19:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Happy New Year! Rant off.!
Jim Hupy

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 5:39 PM James Hupy And, if you really care who profits from the sale of a gallon of gasoline,[/color]
> I will venture a clue or two. It ain't the guys who drill holes in the
> ground, pump out the crude, transport it to the refinery, pays to convert
> it into gasoline, blend it with government mandated amount of alcohol,
> deliver it to gas stations and pump it into your motor home. If they make
> $.06 a gallon, they run a tidy house. But, uncle sam, state, county,
> city, all get their cuts whether or not Exxon makes a dime. But, geez, they
> build such great roads and bridges with your money.
> Jim Hupy
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2018, 4:58 PM James Hupy
>> If you have a 100% cylinder fill at sea level, you will have 14.7 psi in
>> the cylinder. If you multiply that by your compression ratio, you can come
>> up with what your cranking cylinder pressure should be if this were a
>> perfect world, which it ain't. Figure 80% of that for an engine in good
>> condition. If you are at high altitude, figure 70%.
>> Example: 14.7 psi x 8.2 = 120.54. Multiply that 10 fold for
>> combustion pressure. If that figure exceeds the anti knock index for the
>> fuel you are using, combustion irregularities may occur.
>> This is ONLY AN EXAMPLE. Your figures will vary. Altitude, spark
>> timing, air /fuel ratio, and about a jillion other factors will influence
>> these numbers. DO YOU NEED TO USE PREMIUM FUEL? SHORT ANSWER, NO. BUT, do
>> you want to use premium fuel? You can supply this answer for yourself.
>> Jim Hupy
>>
>> On Dec 30, 2018 4:20 PM, "Ken Burton" wrote:
>>
>> Premium stands for "PREMIUM PRICE" and "Premium profits". Use whatever
>> fuel the engine calls for. On a lower compression engine there is no need
>> for
>> a fuel with a higher AKI (Octane) rating.
>> --
>> Ken Burton - N9KB
>> 76 Palm Beach
>> Hebron, Indiana
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339852 is a reply to message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 20:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Scott Nutter is currently offline  Scott Nutter   United States
Messages: 782
Registered: January 2015
Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Amen James Hupy!! Telling it how it is %100!!!

Scott Nutter 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI Houston, Texas
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339853 is a reply to message #339829] Sun, 30 December 2018 21:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ernest Dankert is currently offline  Ernest Dankert   United States
Messages: 133
Registered: May 2007
Location: Ogden, New York
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I distrust large volume fuel distribution (BJ-SAM-Costco), to hold to the 10% rule, especially at the higher octane grades. Alcohol is less expensive
and higher octane than gasoline. Pulling up a grade in the Rockies with a carb is tough, you have a fuel with higher reid vapor pressure (than design)
lower atmospheric pressure and a high burn rate. At home I have a source of 89 octane non-ethanol, last bulk delivery was $3.40/gal in the Peoples Republic
of New Yorkistan. I get 10% better mileage (consistently) compared to ethanol adulterated non bulk fuel and about 15% better than a bulk distributor.

Editorial
For the most part ethanol is an adulterating agent that delivers poorer fuel economy. As a move towards energy independence the reward is nebulous at best
with a flex fuel engine. The politicians have seized the ethanol card to buy the agriculture vote. Unfortunately the higher commodity corn price has elevated
land purchase & rents, crop inputs (fertilizer, herb + insecticide, seed (Dow & DuPont consolidation). Strategically should we be be burning up our crop land
for an inferior fuel?

I also suspect some elected officials used the ethanol solution to obsolete old equipment.

Reasons not to use ethanol:
1) 1.1 btu gain is offset by poorer fuel economy
2) Poor shelf life, the fuel separates to green sludge or water.
3) Incompatible with many elastomers, requires specialized gaskets and carb rebuilds of small engines
4) Ethanol blends can not be pipeline shipped; the ethanol must be blended locally and requires truck or rail transport. Transportation accidents require special
foam; alcohol fires are difficult to recognize.
5) At blends >10% more frequent engine oil changes are recommended.

Reasons to use ethanol:
1) Better mileage for 100% fueled engines specially designed for 12:1 compression
2)


1977 Eleganza II
Ogden NY
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339870 is a reply to message #339829] Mon, 31 December 2018 17:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Ernest. I wouldn't say that we are burning up our crop lands here in Iowa because of ethanal. The amount of corn, and soybean grown here is way be on anyone's possible comprehension. Cedar Rapids is a town just over 100,00 people. Over a half million bushes of corn get processed into food products each 365 day of the year. Then think about the fact that Cedar Rapids is a small processor in this country. Over half of the soybean crop did go to China till the tariffs hit. That cost Iowa about 14 billion in lost income. But the FED is going to subsidies our lost. ( So thanks to all you taxes payers out there.) Yes. Corn prices have gone up in the last 15 years. But the food you eat everyday is still the cheapest in the entire world as to the cost of living. So with the increases in the price corn/beans. There's more money for R&D for hybrid seeds being developed. Thus being able to produce even more corn/beans for the world. More trucks, tractors, and other equipment being ordered for production. Iowa also produces more pork then any other state because of the crops. 1/3 of the population is employed in agriculture. A third of our electrical power comes from the winds in those fields. Their working for 100% renewable power in 9 years. Their closing a nuclear plant next year because of reducing need. I 2008. And the rest of the country saw a recession. We saw none of it. Our state government runs in the black. Yes. Iowa sets at the edge of the Earth. You can see the edge from here. Most of the country sees us as just a spacer between the coast. If they know of us at all. That's perfectly fine. From the edge. Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339871 is a reply to message #339829] Mon, 31 December 2018 18:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
My experience has been, when the nice places get touted, ever body goes there and directly they aren't nice anymopre. You should whisper Smile

=--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339879 is a reply to message #339848] Mon, 31 December 2018 23:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Beckman is currently offline  George Beckman   United States
Messages: 1085
Registered: October 2008
Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
James Hupy wrote on Sun, 30 December 2018 16:58
If you have a 100% cylinder fill at sea level, you will have 14.7 psi in
the cylinder. If you multiply that by your compression ratio, you can come
up with what your cranking cylinder pressure should be if this were a
perfect world, which it ain't. Figure 80% of that for an engine in good
condition. If you are at high altitude, figure 70%.
Example: 14.7 psi x 8.2 = 120.54. Multiply that 10 fold for combustion
pressure. If that figure exceeds the anti knock index for the fuel you are
using, combustion irregularities may occur.

One cravat about 100% cylinder fill. That only happens at wide open throttle. Most of the time we drive around with a much lower compression pressure. The old time vacuum gauge helps get better mileage because much less air is getting in, meaning less gas at the same time due to the air-fuel ratio. But it is not efficient. It is a way to detune your engine by lowering the working compression pressure.

This is the main problem with spark engines. We starve them for air thus lowering the compression pressure. Diesel take a full charge of air. And higher compression pressures yield more bang for your buck.


'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339880 is a reply to message #339879] Tue, 01 January 2019 00:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Pistons don't suck air into cylinders. Atmospheric pressure, present around
the engine, senses the pressure differential between inside the cylinders
vs and atmospheric pressure, and fills the cylinders as much as is possible
given flow restrictions and time constraints. That's why you use a
correction factor of 75% or so at sea level, less than that at higher
altitudes where atmospheric pressure is less.
Jim Hupy (Happy New Year)

On Mon, Dec 31, 2018, 9:53 PM George Beckman James Hupy wrote on Sun, 30 December 2018 16:58[/color]
>> If you have a 100% cylinder fill at sea level, you will have 14.7 psi in
>> the cylinder. If you multiply that by your compression ratio, you can
> come
>> up with what your cranking cylinder pressure should be if this were a
>> perfect world, which it ain't. Figure 80% of that for an engine in good
>> condition. If you are at high altitude, figure 70%.
>> Example: 14.7 psi x 8.2 = 120.54. Multiply that 10 fold for
> combustion
>> pressure. If that figure exceeds the anti knock index for the fuel you
> are
>> using, combustion irregularities may occur.
>
> One cravat about 100% cylinder fill. That only happens at wide open
> throttle. Most of the time we drive around with a much lower compression
> pressure.
> The old time vacuum gauge helps get better mileage because much less air
> is getting in, meaning less gas at the same time due to the air-fuel ratio.
> But it is not efficient. It is a way to detune your engine by lowering the
> working compression pressure.
>
> This is the main problem with spark engines. We starve them for air thus
> lowering the compression pressure. Diesel take a full charge of air. And
> higher compression pressures yield more bang for your buck.
>
> --
> '74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
> Best Wishes,
> George
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339903 is a reply to message #339829] Wed, 02 January 2019 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Tyler is currently offline  Chris Tyler   United States
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Dirty little secret is that often you dont get what you pay for. Its common to substitute lower octane and 90% will not know the difference.
But the 10 % who actually need the octane will.
The state checks volume but not octane levels at least here
Its also common to have independant stations buying non branded gas- So what you were getting wasnt nessesarily ammoco because it was an ammoco station.
Had a relative who was an ammco distibtor in FL for many years


76 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339915 is a reply to message #339870] Thu, 03 January 2019 01:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Chris Tylor is absolutely correct. I do a fair amount of road race track events. Running engines that are in the range of 13.5 to 1 compression. Our GMC's are about 7 to 1. I use 110 octane leaded fuel. Listings on the pumps aren't always what you get. That's why the GM timing recommendations are lower for safe operation. With our GMC's. To avoid these variations. And get the maximum performance. I'll buy 50 to 100 gals ( at $7,50 a gal ) for the weekend track event. Then I'll tune the engine based on that fuel, altitude, temps expected, and humidity. But we can't do this for every fill up in our GMC's. Then on top of that. Modern fuels now are meant to be atomized with EFI systems. The GM Howell EFI system with spark control. Will adjust spark timing if you end up with lower octane level. That's why you can run lower octane fuel then what's posted. Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale

________________________________
From: Bob Dunahugh
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2018 5:49 PM
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Subject: RE: Premium grade fuels

Ernest. I wouldn't say that we are burning up our crop lands here in Iowa because of ethanal. The amount of corn, and soybean grown here is way be on anyone's possible comprehension. Cedar Rapids is a town just over 100,00 people. Over a half million bushes of corn get processed into food products each 365 day of the year. Then think about the fact that Cedar Rapids is a small processor in this country. Over half of the soybean crop did go to China till the tariffs hit. That cost Iowa about 14 billion in lost income. But the FED is going to subsidies our lost. ( So thanks to all you taxes payers out there.) Yes. Corn prices have gone up in the last 15 years. But the food you eat everyday is still the cheapest in the entire world as to the cost of living. So with the increases in the price corn/beans. There's more money for R&D for hybrid seeds being developed. Thus being able to produce even more corn/beans for the world. More trucks, tractors, and other equipment being ordered for production. Iowa also produces more pork then any other state because of the crops. 1/3 of the population is employed in agriculture. A third of our electrical power comes from the winds in those fields. Their working for 100% renewable power in 9 years. Their closing a nuclear plant next year because of reducing need. I 2008. And the rest of the country saw a recession. We saw none of it. Our state government runs in the black. Yes. Iowa sets at the edge of the Earth. You can see the edge from here. Most of the country sees us as just a spacer between the coast. If they know of us at all. That's perfectly fine. From the edge. Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339922 is a reply to message #339903] Thu, 03 January 2019 07:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Chris Tyler wrote on Wed, 02 January 2019 16:49
Dirty little secret is that often you dont get what you pay for. Its common to substitute lower octane and 90% will not know the difference.
But the 10 % who actually need the octane will.
The state checks volume but not octane levels at least here
Its also common to have independant stations buying non branded gas- So what you were getting wasnt nessesarily ammoco because it was an ammoco station.
Had a relative who was an ammco distibtor in FL for many years
Chris,

You are right about most of this, but most states require that motorfuel octane be certified by the distributor. Doing that is not simple. It requires a laboratory knock engine and a skilled technician. But, just because the fuel is certified does not mean it ended up in the right tank. Not long ago we had a local station get busted. The owner would order mid grade and have the driver drop most of it into the premium grade tank. This is more common than one might suspect. I have had cars that needed high octane, but the best was the '87 TurboCoupe. I could have made calibrations on the boost gauge for pump grade. I did file a few complaints with the state.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339927 is a reply to message #339922] Thu, 03 January 2019 14:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
Matt Colie wrote on Thu, 03 January 2019 07:47
Not long ago we had a local station get busted. The owner would order mid grade and have the driver drop most of it into the premium grade tank. This is more common than one might suspect.
Matt
I worked at a gas station for a while and there was no "Mid-Grade" tank... Mid-Grade was just a blend of 87 and 93... Always thought mid-grade was a ripoff, cause the price was always halfway between regular and premium, but 89 is not half way between 87 and 93..... That would be what, 90, right?

Anyway, because I'm a cheap SOB, if I'm getting detonation on 87, rather than go midgrade, I fill with Regular then flip the pump off before I'm full and add a few gallons of premium in there...

Matt: Maybe the guy got busted putting regular in the premium tank....?


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX

[Updated on: Thu, 03 January 2019 14:59]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339928 is a reply to message #339829] Thu, 03 January 2019 15:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
So glancing through this thread, I don't see any mention of "Top Tier Gas" so if I missed it, sorry, if I did not, here is a little blurb on it's history:

Quote:
In the late 1980s, automakers became concerned with fuel additives as more advanced fuel injection technology became widely used in new cars. The injectors often became clogged, and the problem was found to be inadequate levels of detergent additives in some gasoline. The automakers began to recommend specific brands of gas with adequate content to their customers. But some fuel marketers were still not using detergents, and in a move supported by the auto industry, the federal government mandated specific levels of additives. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) introduced the minimum gasoline detergent standard[14] in 1995.

However, the new regulations had unintended consequences. The new EPA standards required lower levels of detergent additives than were then being used by a few major fuel marketers. When the new regulations came in, most gasoline marketers who had previously provided higher levels of detergents reduced the level of detergents in their gasolines to meet the new standard.[15] The EPA detergent additive levels were designed to meet emissions standards but not engine longevity standards. Automakers said they were seeing persistent problems such as clogged fuel injectors, and contaminated combustion chambers, resulting in higher emissions and lower fuel economy.[16]

By 2002, the automakers said their repair records suggested that the EPA standard for detergents wasn't high enough, but the EPA was not responsive when they asked them to increase the standards. These concerns were heightened by plans to introduce a new generation of vehicles that would meet the EPA's "Tier Two" environmental standards for reduced emissions. These vehicles require higher levels of detergents to avoid reduced performance.[15] Cars with direct injection technology (GDI) have been especially prone to carbon buildup, and car makers recommend fuels with higher detergent levels to combat the problem.[17] At first GDI was mainly available in high-end autos, but it is now being used in mid-range cars and economy cars, such as the Hyundai Sonata, Ford Focus and Hyundai Accent.[18][19][20]

In 2004 representatives of BMW, General Motors, Honda, and Toyota got together to specify what makes a good fuel. Using recommendations from the Worldwide Fuel Charter, a global committee of automakers and engine manufacturers, they established a proprietary standard for a class of gasoline called "TOP TIER" Detergent Gasoline The new standard required increased levels of detergents, and restricted metallic content. Volkswagen/Audi joined the group of automakers in 2007. Gas brands can participate and get a TOP TIER license if they meet certain standards, which includes performance tests for intake valve and combustion chamber deposits, fuel injector fouling, and intake valve sticking. Additive manufacturers pay for the testing, the cost of which varies from year to year, while gasoline companies pay an annual fee based on the number of stations it operates to participate in the program.[21]

In addition to higher detergent levels, Top Tier standards also require that gasolines be free of metallic additives, which can be harmful to the emissions control systems in cars.


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Premium grade fuels [message #339929 is a reply to message #339829] Thu, 03 January 2019 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
TR 1 is currently offline  TR 1   United States
Messages: 348
Registered: August 2015
Location: DFW
Karma: -7
Senior Member
One thing to note, in order to obtain a Top Tier certification, all grades must meet the minimum standards at all stations. As an example, for a while, BP was not on this list. Apparently their premium met Top Tier standards, but not regular and mid-grade, so they were unable to get the certification. Later on, they chose to update their regular to meet top tier as well, and were added.

Here is the Top Tier website with a list of approved stations:

https://toptiergas.com/licensed-brands/


Mark S. '73 Painted Desert, Manny 1 Ton Front End, Howell Injection, Leigh Harrison 4bag and Rear Brakes, Fort Worth, TX
Previous Topic: Do all the 26' units have the same roof ?
Next Topic: [GMCnet] expanding refer foam
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 22 11:42:12 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06088 seconds