GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub?
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320205] Sun, 09 July 2017 10:37 Go to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
I think that is one wheel that does not need much re-invention. The rear
spindles and bearings are very much up to the task required of them. But,
they require periodic maintence. The coach is very much a product of the
70's, with engineering that precedes that time frame. No sealed throw away
unitized hubs to be found. Up until the HEI ignition was fitted in 75-76,
10,000 mile plug changes and points and condenser were the order of the
day. Wheel bearings needed to be disassembled and repacked with fresh
grease. Still do. If you neglect your maintenance, it is like playing
Russian Roulette with all chambers loaded.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Jul 9, 2017 8:06 AM, "Mike Sadlon" wrote:

I have been doing a little research and the 70's-early 80's one ton single
wheel trucks front rotors use the same bearings as our rear hubs.
Has anyone ever tried to fit them on.
My thought would be, a disc brake setup that would use a late model rim.
After my tire lose the other day, it got me thinking.
If you are going to add discs, and at the price of aluminum rims, you might
be able to save money on the conversion.

Thoughts?

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320210 is a reply to message #320205] Sun, 09 July 2017 11:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
James Hupy wrote on Sun, 09 July 2017 11:37
I think that is one wheel that does not need much re-invention. The rear spindles and bearings are very much up to the task required of them. But, they require periodic maintence. The coach is very much a product of the 70's, with engineering that precedes that time frame. No sealed throw away unitized hubs to be found. Up until the HEI ignition was fitted in 75-76, 10,000 mile plug changes and points and condenser were the order of the day. Wheel bearings needed to be disassembled and repacked with fresh grease. Still do. If you neglect your maintenance, it is like playing Russian Roulette with all chambers loaded.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

Jim,

Your observations are largely correct, but the problem with the rear bearings is simple that the grease of the day oxidized badly and with very little provocation. This was the same issue with the front bearings.

While bearing seals are better, the real change there was materials that don't age as badly. These materials are used in all the new seals as well. Even OE had validated it for use in the few numbers still in production.

How good is the new grease?
Well we have two cars in the garage. Both have sealed front wheel bearings and one had one replaced at 150K when about 10 years old. The other and the rears are still there. That is the NEW car. The other is 22 years old and is somewhere north of 200K and that is unknown, it could be a lot more.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320212 is a reply to message #320210] Sun, 09 July 2017 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bruce Hart is currently offline  Bruce Hart   United States
Messages: 1501
Registered: October 2011
Location: La Grange, Wyoming
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Matt,
I had a 97 chevy 4x4 with 350k miles and never changed front bearings.

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Matt Colie wrote:

> James Hupy wrote on Sun, 09 July 2017 11:37
>> I think that is one wheel that does not need much re-invention. The rear
> spindles and bearings are very much up to the task required of them. But,
>> they require periodic maintence. The coach is very much a product of the
> 70's, with engineering that precedes that time frame. No sealed throw away
>> unitized hubs to be found. Up until the HEI ignition was fitted in
> 75-76, 10,000 mile plug changes and points and condenser were the order of
> the
>> day. Wheel bearings needed to be disassembled and repacked with fresh
> grease. Still do. If you neglect your maintenance, it is like playing
> Russian
>> Roulette with all chambers loaded.
>> Jim Hupy
>> Salem, Or
>> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>
> Jim,
>
> Your observations are largely correct, but the problem with the rear
> bearings is simple that the grease of the day oxidized badly and with very
> little
> provocation. This was the same issue with the front bearings.
>
> While bearing seals are better, the real change there was materials that
> don't age as badly. These materials are used in all the new seals as well.
> Even OE had validated it for use in the few numbers still in production.
>
> How good is the new grease?
> Well we have two cars in the garage. Both have sealed front wheel
> bearings and one had one replaced at 150K when about 10 years old. The
> other and
> the rears are still there. That is the NEW car. The other is 22 years
> old and is somewhere north of 200K and that is unknown, it could be a lot
> more.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Bruce Hart
1976 Palm Beach
Milliken, Co
GMC=Got More Class
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Bruce Hart 1976 Palm Beach 1977 28' Kingsley La Grange, Wyoming
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320215 is a reply to message #320205] Sun, 09 July 2017 12:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike S   United States
Messages: 82
Registered: February 2017
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Karma: 3
Member
Uhmmm, My question isn't about new sealed hubs, but 78-91 1 ton front hub/rotor that uses the same bearings as our rear.

I have seen Ken Hendersons' drawing for the spindle, but the number I'm looking for, he has labeled X.

And will the rotor clear the bogie arm?

Mike
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320218 is a reply to message #320205] Sun, 09 July 2017 12:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
there are simpler ways to get to where you need.
Call me as we do this type of mods for customers and at our shop.


On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 8:37 AM, James Hupy wrote:

> I think that is one wheel that does not need much re-invention. The rear
> spindles and bearings are very much up to the task required of them. But,
> they require periodic maintence. The coach is very much a product of the
> 70's, with engineering that precedes that time frame. No sealed throw away
> unitized hubs to be found. Up until the HEI ignition was fitted in 75-76,
> 10,000 mile plug changes and points and condenser were the order of the
> day. Wheel bearings needed to be disassembled and repacked with fresh
> grease. Still do. If you neglect your maintenance, it is like playing
> Russian Roulette with all chambers loaded.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>
> On Jul 9, 2017 8:06 AM, "Mike Sadlon" wrote:
>
> I have been doing a little research and the 70's-early 80's one ton single
> wheel trucks front rotors use the same bearings as our rear hubs.
> Has anyone ever tried to fit them on.
> My thought would be, a disc brake setup that would use a late model rim.
> After my tire lose the other day, it got me thinking.
> If you are going to add discs, and at the price of aluminum rims, you might
> be able to save money on the conversion.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320221 is a reply to message #320212] Sun, 09 July 2017 13:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hal StClair   United States
Messages: 971
Registered: March 2013
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Karma: -12
Senior Member
Now that's impressive Bruce, especially in your weather conditions.
Hal

Bruce Hart wrote on Sun, 09 July 2017 10:48
Matt,
I had a 97 chevy 4x4 with 350k miles and never changed front bearings.

On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Matt Colie wrote:

> James Hupy wrote on Sun, 09 July 2017 11:37
>> I think that is one wheel that does not need much re-invention. The rear
> spindles and bearings are very much up to the task required of them. But,
>> they require periodic maintence. The coach is very much a product of the
> 70's, with engineering that precedes that time frame. No sealed throw away
>> unitized hubs to be found. Up until the HEI ignition was fitted in
> 75-76, 10,000 mile plug changes and points and condenser were the order of
> the
>> day. Wheel bearings needed to be disassembled and repacked with fresh
> grease. Still do. If you neglect your maintenance, it is like playing
> Russian
>> Roulette with all chambers loaded.
>> Jim Hupy
>> Salem, Or
>> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>
> Jim,
>
> Your observations are largely correct, but the problem with the rear
> bearings is simple that the grease of the day oxidized badly and with very
> little
> provocation. This was the same issue with the front bearings.
>
> While bearing seals are better, the real change there was materials that
> don't age as badly. These materials are used in all the new seals as well.
> Even OE had validated it for use in the few numbers still in production.
>
> How good is the new grease?
> Well we have two cars in the garage. Both have sealed front wheel
> bearings and one had one replaced at 150K when about 10 years old. The
> other and
> the rears are still there. That is the NEW car. The other is 22 years
> old and is somewhere north of 200K and that is unknown, it could be a lot
> more.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Bruce Hart
1976 Palm Beach
Milliken, Co
GMC=Got More Class
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org




"I enjoy talking to you. Your mind appeals to me. It resembles my own mind, except you happen to be insane." 1977 Royale 101348, 1977 Royale 101586, Diesel powered, 1974 Eagle Bus 45',w/slideout, Rio Rancho, NM
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320230 is a reply to message #320215] Sun, 09 July 2017 16:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Hmmm...wonder why I didn't measure & label that? If you really need it, I
probably still have the spindle.

Ken H.


On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 1:10 PM, Mike Sadlon wrote:

> Uhmmm, My question isn't about new sealed hubs, but 78-91 1 ton front
> hub/rotor that uses the same bearings as our rear.
>
> I have seen Ken Hendersons' drawing for the spindle, but the number I'm
> looking for, he has labeled X.
>
> And will the rotor clear the bogie arm?
>
> Mike
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320253 is a reply to message #320205] Mon, 10 July 2017 08:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike S   United States
Messages: 82
Registered: February 2017
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Karma: 3
Member
Thanks Ken

But not necessary, I ordered a hub, and next time I take parts to Jeff Sirum, I will get an arm.

I am real interested to see if it clears.
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320264 is a reply to message #320253] Mon, 10 July 2017 13:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hal StClair   United States
Messages: 971
Registered: March 2013
Location: Rio Rancho NM
Karma: -12
Senior Member
That would be a real find if it fits Mike. Keep us posted.
Hal


"I enjoy talking to you. Your mind appeals to me. It resembles my own mind, except you happen to be insane." 1977 Royale 101348, 1977 Royale 101586, Diesel powered, 1974 Eagle Bus 45',w/slideout, Rio Rancho, NM
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320282 is a reply to message #320205] Mon, 10 July 2017 23:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dshafer is currently offline  dshafer   United States
Messages: 68
Registered: June 2016
Location: SW Ohio
Karma: 3
Member
There is a hub that will fit and use the same bearings. I have trial fitted it onto my parts 73. It clears the bogie but moves the wheel inboard too much. I think a 2 inch spacer puts the wheel very close to where it needs to be. I got side-tracked and did not go any further. I do have some calipers and chevy brackets that I hope to make fit. I decided that I need a mill and lathe to finish the project... anyway it's as good an excuse as I am likely to get soon. The lathe and mill have been acquired but are not running yet. I don't remember the specifics but I do think it is a one ton rotor from about the year stated by Mike Sadlon. may even be more than one thickness of rotor to chose from. I do have the part number available... somewhere. The question now is whether to alter someone's brackets and reaction arms or make my own.
Dave


1977 26 foot 403
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320286 is a reply to message #320205] Tue, 11 July 2017 07:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mike S   United States
Messages: 82
Registered: February 2017
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Karma: 3
Member
Thanks Dave, that's what I was looking for.

The 2 inches would be about perfect to run late model SRW rims.

Jeff has brake kits in stock and once I get a hub on the arm, I will see if anything already out there fits.

The late model SRW rims are out there cheap, $100-$250 for 4.

And with the hub and rotor at $70 on rockauto. It would be much cheaper that New Aluminum dually rims.

Mike
Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320288 is a reply to message #320286] Tue, 11 July 2017 08:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Originally, during the testing of the "pie wagon" rear suspension, photo's
depict it using toronado wheels and hubs. That stuff proved to be NOT
STRONG ENOUGH, and was replaced with what we have now. Proceed with
caution. People's lives depend upon you getting it right the first time.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Jul 11, 2017 6:02 AM, "Mike Sadlon" wrote:

> Thanks Dave, that's what I was looking for.
>
> The 2 inches would be about perfect to run late model SRW rims.
>
> Jeff has brake kits in stock and once I get a hub on the arm, I will see
> if anything already out there fits.
>
> The late model SRW rims are out there cheap, $100-$250 for 4.
>
> And with the hub and rotor at $70 on rockauto. It would be much cheaper
> that New Aluminum dually rims.
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Single front wheel rotor on rear hub? [message #320300 is a reply to message #320205] Tue, 11 July 2017 14:35 Go to previous message
dshafer is currently offline  dshafer   United States
Messages: 68
Registered: June 2016
Location: SW Ohio
Karma: 3
Member
Mike, The problem as I remember is that the wheel well only has room for the 6 inch wide rim. Other mods will need be made to get in the wheels you mentioned which I think are 8 inches wide.
Good Luck, I'm right behind you.
Dave


1977 26 foot 403
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] plan B. I really don't need my ride height sensors/valves anyway. Just simple.
Next Topic: DuraCool at home
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 09 10:05:12 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01633 seconds