GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » manifolds vs headers
manifolds vs headers [message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 12:54 Go to next message
erichb is currently offline  erichb   United States
Messages: 22
Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member
My driver side is J passenger side is H. Is that correct or did PO deviate

Both leak, i pulled passenger last fall and had a previously welded crack repaired. I didnt waste the remflex gasket on it yet since i have leaks at the donuts as well. Which means i prob have to get right at the manifold first and then get the section from manifolds to newer mufflers done right

So how much can i waste on manifolds before it makes sense to just go with the 355y header

PO looks to have put in the 2.5 double muffler set up in . Prob within a few years as it looks solid. The tubes from manifolds to mufflers restrict down at the bends quite a bit so those need to be done better and probbaly supported better since the connections dont fit tight

If i could find good manifolds i would probably remove back to the y and put single muffler in rear all with the 2.5" 3" would be better, but not sure it woukd improve any noticeable amount to scrap good material

Thoughts ???



73 Canyonlands, Fresh TH425 and FD, Bags and Pins updated. Needs A/C, Top and Front service....Minneapolis
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296249 is a reply to message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 15:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bwevers is currently offline  bwevers   United States
Messages: 597
Registered: October 2010
Location: San Jose
Karma: 5
Senior Member
It's hard to find replacement manifolds.
Most people put Thorley headers after they crack.


Bill Wevers GMC49ers, GMC Western States 1975 Glenbrook - Manny Powerdrive, OneTon 455 F Block, G heads San Jose
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296252 is a reply to message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 16:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
winter is currently offline  winter   United States
Messages: 247
Registered: September 2007
Location: MPLS MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
With headers, plan to put some high temp protection on the plug wires and speedometer cable.

Jerrod Winter
1977 Palm Beach
Green Jelly Bean
Twin Cities, Minnesota
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296259 is a reply to message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 18:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Steve is currently offline  Steve   United States
Messages: 506
Registered: September 2013
Location: East Greenville, Pa
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I went with the Thorley headers. No issues in the past three years, Just be careful with items next to the hot header. Some say the transmission governor is difficult to remove with headers.

1978 GMC Royal
Eastern Pennslyvania
1968 Chevrolet C20 396 Camper Special
1969 Chevrolet C20 Camper Special
1985 Buick Electra Park Avenue
1992 Camaro 25th Anniversary Heretage Edition Black
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296261 is a reply to message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 19:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dennis S is currently offline  Dennis S   United States
Messages: 3046
Registered: November 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Erich
455 Manifolds
LH 407103
RH 411970

Are the numbers for the correct exhaust manifolds.

The donuts can be fussy to get sealed. Do you still have the springs on the studs?
I bought new donuts at NAPA and had success.

Did you resurface the repaired manifold --the local machine shop was charging $30 each to essentially put them on a big belt sander.

I may be in the minority but I prefer the manifolds over the headers. I believe they produce less noise and engine compartment heat.

Dennis


erichb wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 12:54
My driver side is J passenger side is H. Is that correct or did PO deviate

Both leak, i pulled passenger last fall and had a previously welded crack repaired. I didnt waste the remflex gasket on it yet since i have leaks at the donuts as well. Which means i prob have to get right at the manifold first and then get the section from manifolds to newer mufflers done right

So how much can i waste on manifolds before it makes sense to just go with the 355y header

PO looks to have put in the 2.5 double muffler set up in . Prob within a few years as it looks solid. The tubes from manifolds to mufflers restrict down at the bends quite a bit so those need to be done better and probbaly supported better since the connections dont fit tight

If i could find good manifolds i would probably remove back to the y and put single muffler in rear all with the 2.5" 3" would be better, but not sure it woukd improve any noticeable amount to scrap good material

Thoughts ???




Dennis S
73 Painted Desert 230
Memphis TN Metro
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296263 is a reply to message #296261] Fri, 26 February 2016 19:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tphipps is currently offline  tphipps   United States
Messages: 3005
Registered: August 2004
Location: Spanish Fort, AL
Karma: 9
Senior Member
With the Remflex exhaust gaskets, you may not need to run your exhaust manifold across a belt sander operation. They are quite forgiving, if applied according to Remflex instructions. Remember the middle bolt is not designed to tighten up the manifold. It provides initial alignment and gives you something to hang the gasket and manifold on, while re-installing the manifold. Tighten snug, do not muscle it down. If over-tightened, it pulls the manifold out of alignment with the block and will lead to early failure of the Remflex gasket.
Tom, MS II


2012 Phoenix Cruiser model 2552 KA4CSG
Re: [GMCnet] manifolds vs headers [message #296266 is a reply to message #296252] Fri, 26 February 2016 20:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
And either remove, cut away, or add protective shielding to the right wheel
well liner. I wound up cutting away the heat distorted ABS and replacing
that section with aluminum

Ken H.


On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:23 PM, jerrod winter wrote:

> With headers, plan to put some high temp protection on the plug wires and
> speedometer cable.
> --
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296274 is a reply to message #296246] Fri, 26 February 2016 21:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
erichb wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 11:54
My driver side is J passenger side is H. Is that correct or did PO deviate

Both leak, i pulled passenger last fall and had a previously welded crack repaired. I didnt waste the remflex gasket on it yet since i have leaks at the donuts as well. Which means i prob have to get right at the manifold first and then get the section from manifolds to newer mufflers done right

So how much can i waste on manifolds before it makes sense to just go with the 355y header

PO looks to have put in the 2.5 double muffler set up in . Prob within a few years as it looks solid. The tubes from manifolds to mufflers restrict down at the bends quite a bit so those need to be done better and probbaly supported better since the connections dont fit tight

If i could find good manifolds i would probably remove back to the y and put single muffler in rear all with the 2.5" 3" would be better, but not sure it woukd improve any noticeable amount to scrap good material

Thoughts ???


I'm not a fan of headers. They are a last resort if you cannot repair your cast iron manifolds. If your original manifolds are not cracked, do what you have to do to seal them. If they are cracked, a decent repair is probably not worth while. However, I feel that good originals are available either form members or Cinnabar. Headers have a lot of additional issues such as engine compartment heat and related hacks, governor and dipstick accessibility, etc.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] manifolds vs headers [message #296315 is a reply to message #296266] Sat, 27 February 2016 17:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member



Any stock manifold can be checked with a good steel straight edge. Or run it over your belt sander to see where the high spots are. As putting a warped manifold on will just put stress on that manifold. Thus causing it to crack later. Personally. I surface all used exh manifolds before installing. I think it's money well spent. As then they'll last longer then any set of headers. And avoid the problems involved with headers. As to performance. Our stock manifolds are very large internally for good flow at the RPM's we travel at. Header are mostly beneficial above 5,000 RPM. Bob Dunahugh

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296318 is a reply to message #296246] Sat, 27 February 2016 18:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
erichb is currently offline  erichb   United States
Messages: 22
Registered: February 2013
Karma: 0
Junior Member

how about these..... http://thorntonmusclecars.com/products/manifolds/1970-1972-dual-exhaust-manifolds


73 Canyonlands, Fresh TH425 and FD, Bags and Pins updated. Needs A/C, Top and Front service....Minneapolis
Re: [GMCnet] manifolds vs headers [message #296327 is a reply to message #296266] Sat, 27 February 2016 20:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bullitthead is currently offline  Bullitthead   United States
Messages: 1411
Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
Senior Member
10-4 on the shielding, Ken

Terry Kelpien ASE Master Technician 73 Glacier 260 Smithfield, Va.
Re: [GMCnet] manifolds vs headers [message #296332 is a reply to message #296327] Sun, 28 February 2016 01:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Cost of a new manifold exceed the header units.
Should you use the Springfield ignition wires, they hold up to the heat and
the ceramic coating works well to contain heat and corrosion plus you can
gain power as long as you do few things correctly.
We supply lot of them, and receive positive results.

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Terry wrote:

> 10-4 on the shielding, Ken
> --
> Terry Kelpien
> ASE Master Technician
> 73 Glacier 260
> Smithfield, Va.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296360 is a reply to message #296318] Sun, 28 February 2016 19:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dennis S is currently offline  Dennis S   United States
Messages: 3046
Registered: November 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Erich

The right side "might" fit but the left side looks like it would interfere with the governor.

Dennis

erichb wrote on Sat, 27 February 2016 18:13

how about these..... http://thorntonmusclecars.com/products/manifolds/1970-1972-dual-exhaust-manifolds



Dennis S
73 Painted Desert 230
Memphis TN Metro
Re: [GMCnet] manifolds vs headers [message #296362 is a reply to message #296360] Sun, 28 February 2016 19:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member
It doesn't interfere with the governor but you cannot get the governor in or out without taking off the left header.

Emery Stora
77 Kngsley
Frederick, CO


> On Feb 28, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Dennis Sexton wrote:
>
> Erich
>
> The right side "might" fit but the left side looks like it would interfere with the governor.
>
> Dennis
>
> erichb wrote on Sat, 27 February 2016 18:13
>> how about these..... http://thorntonmusclecars.com/products/manifolds/1970-1972-dual-exhaust-manifolds
>
>
> --
> Dennis S
> 73 Painted Desert 230
> Memphis TN Metro
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: manifolds vs headers [message #296388 is a reply to message #296360] Mon, 29 February 2016 00:05 Go to previous message
JohnS is currently offline  JohnS   United States
Messages: 126
Registered: December 2014
Location: Vacaville, CA
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Manny makes a left side header which allows removal of the governor with the header in place.

John Shutzbaugh, Vacaville, CA, ncserv@aol.com; 78 Buskirk stretch, "What were we thinking?"
Previous Topic: Gasket set for sale
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Planning to Go Get my GMC
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Oct 06 17:48:10 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02379 seconds