Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Carbon Monoxide monitors
Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296235] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 11:12 |
Who_dun_it
Messages: 176 Registered: April 2007 Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hi - I need to replace a monitor that is hard-wired into the coach. Is there a functional difference, except how they are powered, between the $60-$80 unit that is hard-wired, and specified the RV use, and the $20, battery operated unit available at Home Depot, Lowes, etc.?
Thank you
Les
T.O. CA
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296236 is a reply to message #296235] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 11:25 |
jhbridges
Messages: 8412 Registered: May 2011 Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Not that I could tell. The RV specific ones still have to be tossed and replaced regularly. I went with the $20 one. Ask me why my icebox was relegated to "AC DC ONLY" until I fitted the compartment with a vent fan.
--johnny
Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296241 is a reply to message #296235] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 11:48 |
|
Richard RV
Messages: 631 Registered: July 2012 Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello Les. The battery powered units work fine, but it's more a question of the detecting sensor type than how it's powered. In a carbon monoxide detector a electrochemical sensor is superior.
If you're also looking at smoke detectors, combination ionization and photoelectric smoke detectors are your best bet for complete coverage. Ionizations sensors are better for flames and a lot of smoke, photoelectric are better for smoldering fires.
Whatever you get, the prices won't make a huge impact on your budget, so get something with the best sensing methods, change the batteries as directed (usually yearly - although some now come with lifetime batteries), and realize all detectors have an expiration date and need replacement after several +/- years.
As far as the differences between an "RV" detector and one meant for a home, the NFPA revised their regulations last year, do allow battery operated detectors, do require replacement as per the manufacturer's schedule, require testing after storage and suggested weekly, etc.
Ostensibly the difference between an RV specific and residential detector is "beefier" construction meant to take higher humidity, heat and vibration. I have not read the new NFPA 1192 and don't know if UL has changed their regulations to reflect the NFPA, so I don't know whether the regulations differentiate between RV and residential. I suspect not. If you test the unit regularly (and why wouldn't you?), there's little risk to using a residential detector. If it does fail during a periodic test, replace it. You could buy two or three residential detectors for the price of an RV specific one.
Richard
'77 Birchaven TZE...777;
'76 Palm Beach under construction;
‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296247 is a reply to message #296235] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 13:04 |
|
Matt Colie
Messages: 8547 Registered: March 2007 Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 12:12Hi - I need to replace a monitor that is hard-wired into the coach. Is there a functional difference, except how they are powered, between the $60-$80 unit that is hard-wired, and specified the RV use, and the $20, battery operated unit available at Home Depot, Lowes, etc.?
Thank you
Les
T.O. CA
Les,
In a GMC, I would say that you can use what ever battery operated unit you like. Many of the RV-specific are 12V powered and can be counted on the kill the house bank. But then there comes the "RV Special" rub....
Why are many RVs stuck with that?
Did you ever try to sleep in the back of any other motorhome or even ride in a typical travel trailer?
If you had, the situation is self-evident.
We don't need the vibration proof stuff.
Matt
Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296264 is a reply to message #296256] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 19:45 |
Dolph Santorine
Messages: 1236 Registered: April 2011 Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I agree with Jim
I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
Dolph Santorine
DE N8JPC
Wheeling, West Virginia
1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>
> Les,
>
>
> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
> smoke.
>
> jim galbavy
> '73 x-CL ANNIE
> Lake Mary, Fl
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296267 is a reply to message #296264] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 20:09 |
k2gkk
Messages: 4452 Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
And THAT will ALSO kill your battery unless you use a battery disconnect device!
Voice of experience here!
Mac in OKC
"Money Pit"
'76 ex-P.B.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 19:46, Adolph Santorine wrote:
>
> I agree with Jim
>
> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>
> Dolph Santorine
>
> DE N8JPC
>
> Wheeling, West Virginia
>
> 1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
> 1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
>
>
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>>
>> Les,
>>
>>
>> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
>> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
>> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
>> smoke.
>>
>> jim galbavy
>> '73 x-CL ANNIE
>> Lake Mary, Fl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296268 is a reply to message #296267] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 20:16 |
Dolph Santorine
Messages: 1236 Registered: April 2011 Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Damn - I thought those things ran on Unicorn flatulence!
Dolph Santorine
DE N8JPC
Wheeling, West Virginia
1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 9:09 PM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:
>
> And THAT will ALSO kill your battery unless you use a battery disconnect device!
>
> Voice of experience here!
>
> Mac in OKC
> "Money Pit"
> '76 ex-P.B.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 19:46, Adolph Santorine wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Jim
>>
>> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>>
>> Dolph Santorine
>>
>> DE N8JPC
>>
>> Wheeling, West Virginia
>>
>> 1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
>> 1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>>>
>>> Les,
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
>>> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
>>> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
>>> smoke.
>>>
>>> jim galbavy
>>> '73 x-CL ANNIE
>>> Lake Mary, Fl
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296275 is a reply to message #296262] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 22:04 |
|
Richard RV
Messages: 631 Registered: July 2012 Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Okay, I looked into it a little bit more and there is no differentiation for residential occupancy or recreational vehicles for smoke detectors, CO detectors or propane detectors according to the standards that apply to an RV. The new NFPA I mentioned above references the UL standards UL217 for smoke detectors, UL2034 for CO detectors, and UL1484 for propane detectors. All of them specifically state that each standard covers both residential and RVs.
Smoke detectors are required to be battery operated in RVs, but there was an exception for 5th wheels that they could be AC hardwired. Not sure why that would be. I did see there were other standards for marine applications, but those would not apply in any case.
Richard
'77 Birchaven TZE...777;
'76 Palm Beach under construction;
‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296276 is a reply to message #296264] |
Fri, 26 February 2016 22:17 |
|
Richard RV
Messages: 631 Registered: July 2012 Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dolph Santorine wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 20:45I agree with Jim
I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
Wise to do so with propane.
Smoke detectors are supposed to be mounted on the ceiling, or on the wall a few inches from the ceiling, and they shouldn't be stuck in corners as the air (and smoke) doesn't circulate as much in corners.
http://www.hopkinsmn.com/residents/health/img/smoke-detector-place.jpg
Some are quite firm in their belief that CO detectors need to be placed low in the room as CO is heavier than air. The NFPA dispells that theory and states that CO from combustion sources mixes with air and circulates and disperses quite readily. So the combination smoke/CO alarms should follow the normal detector placement guidelines.
Richard
'77 Birchaven TZE...777;
'76 Palm Beach under construction;
‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
|
|
|
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296292 is a reply to message #296235] |
Sat, 27 February 2016 07:22 |
rcjordan
Messages: 1913 Registered: October 2012 Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Yeah, I was surprised to learn that when I stumbled across it a few months ago. I have a hard-wired CO/LP detector down low across from the LP appliances and HAD a 9v smoke detector on the ceiling in the rear. So, I replaced the less-than-1yr-old in the rear twin with a 9v combo co/smoke.
http://amzn.to/1UqnnzD
SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296302 is a reply to message #296276] |
Sat, 27 February 2016 12:05 |
k2gkk
Messages: 4452 Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
My home CO detector is plugged in to AC outlet in hall just outside master bedroom.
I have seven AC powered (9V DC battery backup) near ceilings in bedrooms or halls.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ Since 30 November '53 ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"
> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:17:25 -0700
> To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
> From: birchaven77@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors
>
> Dolph Santorine wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 20:45
>> I agree with Jim
>>
>> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>
>
> Wise to do so with propane.
>
> Smoke detectors are supposed to be mounted on the ceiling, or on the wall a few inches from the ceiling, and they shouldn't be stuck in corners as the
> air (and smoke) doesn't circulate as much in corners.
> http://www.hopkinsmn.com/residents/health/img/smoke-detector-place.jpg
>
> Some are quite firm in their belief that CO detectors need to be placed low in the room as CO is heavier than air. The NFPA dispells that theory and
> states that CO from combustion sources mixes with air and circulates and disperses quite readily. So the combination smoke/CO alarms should follow
> the normal detector placement guidelines.
>
> Richard
> --
> '77 Birchaven TZE...777
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Oct 05 23:22:28 CDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00876 seconds
|