GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Carbon Monoxide monitors
Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296235] Fri, 26 February 2016 11:12 Go to next message
Who_dun_it is currently offline  Who_dun_it   United States
Messages: 176
Registered: April 2007
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Hi - I need to replace a monitor that is hard-wired into the coach. Is there a functional difference, except how they are powered, between the $60-$80 unit that is hard-wired, and specified the RV use, and the $20, battery operated unit available at Home Depot, Lowes, etc.?

Thank you
Les
T.O. CA
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296236 is a reply to message #296235] Fri, 26 February 2016 11:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Not that I could tell. The RV specific ones still have to be tossed and replaced regularly. I went with the $20 one. Ask me why my icebox was relegated to "AC DC ONLY" until I fitted the compartment with a vent fan.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296241 is a reply to message #296235] Fri, 26 February 2016 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard RV   United States
Messages: 631
Registered: July 2012
Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
Senior Member
Hello Les. The battery powered units work fine, but it's more a question of the detecting sensor type than how it's powered. In a carbon monoxide detector a electrochemical sensor is superior.

If you're also looking at smoke detectors, combination ionization and photoelectric smoke detectors are your best bet for complete coverage. Ionizations sensors are better for flames and a lot of smoke, photoelectric are better for smoldering fires.

Whatever you get, the prices won't make a huge impact on your budget, so get something with the best sensing methods, change the batteries as directed (usually yearly - although some now come with lifetime batteries), and realize all detectors have an expiration date and need replacement after several +/- years.

As far as the differences between an "RV" detector and one meant for a home, the NFPA revised their regulations last year, do allow battery operated detectors, do require replacement as per the manufacturer's schedule, require testing after storage and suggested weekly, etc.

Ostensibly the difference between an RV specific and residential detector is "beefier" construction meant to take higher humidity, heat and vibration. I have not read the new NFPA 1192 and don't know if UL has changed their regulations to reflect the NFPA, so I don't know whether the regulations differentiate between RV and residential. I suspect not. If you test the unit regularly (and why wouldn't you?), there's little risk to using a residential detector. If it does fail during a periodic test, replace it. You could buy two or three residential detectors for the price of an RV specific one.

Richard


'77 Birchaven TZE...777; '76 Palm Beach under construction; ‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296247 is a reply to message #296235] Fri, 26 February 2016 13:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Who_dun_it wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 12:12
Hi - I need to replace a monitor that is hard-wired into the coach. Is there a functional difference, except how they are powered, between the $60-$80 unit that is hard-wired, and specified the RV use, and the $20, battery operated unit available at Home Depot, Lowes, etc.?

Thank you
Les
T.O. CA

Les,

In a GMC, I would say that you can use what ever battery operated unit you like. Many of the RV-specific are 12V powered and can be counted on the kill the house bank. But then there comes the "RV Special" rub....
Why are many RVs stuck with that?
Did you ever try to sleep in the back of any other motorhome or even ride in a typical travel trailer?
If you had, the situation is self-evident.

We don't need the vibration proof stuff.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296256 is a reply to message #296235] Fri, 26 February 2016 18:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Galbavy is currently offline  Jim Galbavy   
Messages: 1443
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Les,


There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
smoke.

jim galbavy
'73 x-CL ANNIE
Lake Mary, Fl
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296262 is a reply to message #296256] Fri, 26 February 2016 19:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard RV   United States
Messages: 631
Registered: July 2012
Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
Senior Member
Hey Jim. I looked though Mac's web site but couldn't find anything on the difference between residential and RV detectors. I did run across an article from 2.5 years ago that quotes Mac and says, "Although not designed specifically for RVs, McCoy recommends the Kidde Pi9010 (in the guide starting on page 55) dual-sensor alarm."

Full article at:
http://www.trailerlife.com/trailer-how-to/trailer-tech/proper-selection-and-maintenance-of-smoke-and-carbon-monoxide-detectors-are-critical-for-safe-r v-living/

His recommendation to use a can of compressed air like that used to clean keyboards to clean the inside of the detectors is an excellent one.

Richard


'77 Birchaven TZE...777; '76 Palm Beach under construction; ‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296264 is a reply to message #296256] Fri, 26 February 2016 19:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
I agree with Jim

I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.

Dolph Santorine

DE N8JPC

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,


> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>
> Les,
>
>
> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
> smoke.
>
> jim galbavy
> '73 x-CL ANNIE
> Lake Mary, Fl
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296267 is a reply to message #296264] Fri, 26 February 2016 20:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
And THAT will ALSO kill your battery unless you use a battery disconnect device!

Voice of experience here!

Mac in OKC
"Money Pit"
'76 ex-P.B.

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 19:46, Adolph Santorine wrote:
>
> I agree with Jim
>
> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>
> Dolph Santorine
>
> DE N8JPC
>
> Wheeling, West Virginia
>
> 1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
> 1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
>
>
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>>
>> Les,
>>
>>
>> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
>> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
>> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
>> smoke.
>>
>> jim galbavy
>> '73 x-CL ANNIE
>> Lake Mary, Fl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296268 is a reply to message #296267] Fri, 26 February 2016 20:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
Damn - I thought those things ran on Unicorn flatulence!

Dolph Santorine

DE N8JPC

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,


> On Feb 26, 2016, at 9:09 PM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:
>
> And THAT will ALSO kill your battery unless you use a battery disconnect device!
>
> Voice of experience here!
>
> Mac in OKC
> "Money Pit"
> '76 ex-P.B.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 19:46, Adolph Santorine wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Jim
>>
>> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>>
>> Dolph Santorine
>>
>> DE N8JPC
>>
>> Wheeling, West Virginia
>>
>> 1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
>> 1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:27 PM, Jim Galbavy wrote:
>>>
>>> Les,
>>>
>>>
>>> There is a big difference between household and RV CO and Smoke detectors.
>>> You can read up on them on MAC the FIRE GUY's website. By the time a
>>> household detector goes off in a RV you would be overcome from CO &
>>> smoke.
>>>
>>> jim galbavy
>>> '73 x-CL ANNIE
>>> Lake Mary, Fl
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296269 is a reply to message #296267] Fri, 26 February 2016 20:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Galbavy is currently offline  Jim Galbavy   
Messages: 1443
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Think 9 volt battery.

jim galbavy
'73 x-CL ANNIE
Lake Mary, Fl
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296270 is a reply to message #296262] Fri, 26 February 2016 20:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jim Galbavy is currently offline  Jim Galbavy   
Messages: 1443
Registered: August 2007
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Mac has changed up his web site. I remember talking to him about the
differences of household VS RV. Could have been saved to a U-Tube video.
Give Mac a phone call and ask him.

jim galbavy
'73 x-CL ANNIE
Lake Mary, Fl
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296275 is a reply to message #296262] Fri, 26 February 2016 22:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard RV   United States
Messages: 631
Registered: July 2012
Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
Senior Member
Okay, I looked into it a little bit more and there is no differentiation for residential occupancy or recreational vehicles for smoke detectors, CO detectors or propane detectors according to the standards that apply to an RV. The new NFPA I mentioned above references the UL standards UL217 for smoke detectors, UL2034 for CO detectors, and UL1484 for propane detectors. All of them specifically state that each standard covers both residential and RVs.

Smoke detectors are required to be battery operated in RVs, but there was an exception for 5th wheels that they could be AC hardwired. Not sure why that would be. I did see there were other standards for marine applications, but those would not apply in any case.

Richard


'77 Birchaven TZE...777; '76 Palm Beach under construction; ‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296276 is a reply to message #296264] Fri, 26 February 2016 22:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard RV   United States
Messages: 631
Registered: July 2012
Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
Senior Member
Dolph Santorine wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 20:45
I agree with Jim

I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.


Wise to do so with propane.

Smoke detectors are supposed to be mounted on the ceiling, or on the wall a few inches from the ceiling, and they shouldn't be stuck in corners as the air (and smoke) doesn't circulate as much in corners.
http://www.hopkinsmn.com/residents/health/img/smoke-detector-place.jpg

Some are quite firm in their belief that CO detectors need to be placed low in the room as CO is heavier than air. The NFPA dispells that theory and states that CO from combustion sources mixes with air and circulates and disperses quite readily. So the combination smoke/CO alarms should follow the normal detector placement guidelines.

Richard


'77 Birchaven TZE...777; '76 Palm Beach under construction; ‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
Re: Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296292 is a reply to message #296235] Sat, 27 February 2016 07:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rcjordan   United States
Messages: 1913
Registered: October 2012
Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Yeah, I was surprised to learn that when I stumbled across it a few months ago. I have a hard-wired CO/LP detector down low across from the LP appliances and HAD a 9v smoke detector on the ceiling in the rear. So, I replaced the less-than-1yr-old in the rear twin with a 9v combo co/smoke.

http://amzn.to/1UqnnzD


SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors [message #296302 is a reply to message #296276] Sat, 27 February 2016 12:05 Go to previous message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
My home CO detector is plugged in to AC outlet in hall just outside master bedroom.
I have seven AC powered (9V DC battery backup) near ceilings in bedrooms or halls.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ Since 30 November '53 ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"


> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 21:17:25 -0700
> To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
> From: birchaven77@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Carbon Monoxide monitors
>
> Dolph Santorine wrote on Fri, 26 February 2016 20:45
>> I agree with Jim
>>
>> I also use a propane detector, which is best mounted low.
>
>
> Wise to do so with propane.
>
> Smoke detectors are supposed to be mounted on the ceiling, or on the wall a few inches from the ceiling, and they shouldn't be stuck in corners as the
> air (and smoke) doesn't circulate as much in corners.
> http://www.hopkinsmn.com/residents/health/img/smoke-detector-place.jpg
>
> Some are quite firm in their belief that CO detectors need to be placed low in the room as CO is heavier than air. The NFPA dispells that theory and
> states that CO from combustion sources mixes with air and circulates and disperses quite readily. So the combination smoke/CO alarms should follow
> the normal detector placement guidelines.
>
> Richard
> --
> '77 Birchaven TZE...777
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Off topic.Taking a few days off.
Next Topic: Installation instructions for a Mac NGMC-2010 dash
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Oct 05 23:22:28 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00876 seconds