Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down?
[GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 08:28 |
Olly Schmidt
Messages: 1265 Registered: February 2014 Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I bought a new fridge, a Dometic RM2454. This is quite a bit shorter
than my existing Norcold. 52" to 36" height.
Now I wonder, do I put empty space below the fridge or above the fridge?
I would prefer to have empty space below, but would hate to have less
than optimal cooling in the fridge, and I read something about a chimney
effect one must have.
Any and all hints are greatly appreciated.
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
'76a Eleganza II, VA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Best regards
Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285190 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 08:32 |
jhbridges
Messages: 8412 Registered: May 2011 Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
|
Senior Member |
|
|
My icebox was installed with insufficient venting (Norcold 3 way), merely a 4x12 vent above the icebox, although a decent sized one at the bottom. I got a new vent the same size and put two 12v computer fans in it. works fine this way.
--johnny
Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285192 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 08:46 |
rcjordan
Messages: 1913 Registered: October 2012 Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The Co-op put the microwave over the refer. We thought that was a great use of the space.
SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285193 is a reply to message #285190] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 08:39 |
Olly Schmidt
Messages: 1265 Registered: February 2014 Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Johnny,
as the older one already was a three way from the factory, I am pretty
certain that the vent itself is fine. The question is, whether to put
the fridge more near the bottom or more near the top of the coach. I
*think* top is better, as that way everything up there is like before,
but I'd prefer someone with more knowledge to confirm.
And I already have a temp controlled fan behind the fridge, courtesy of
my PO.
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
the internet company
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Best regards
Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285194 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 09:08 |
lqqkatjon
Messages: 2324 Registered: October 2010 Location: St. Cloud, MN
Karma: 5
|
Senior Member |
|
|
do you have a roof vent over the fridge? If so, no issues going up, and probably better. Key is good air in the bottom, then it is to get the hot air out the roof, and the most effective way of accomplishing that in your install.
if you only have wall vents, then you would want to keep the fridge low, and possibly install a roof vent anyway.
Jon Roche
75 palm beach
EBL EFI, manny headers, Micro Level, rebuilt most of coach now.
St. Cloud, MN
http://lqqkatjon.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285195 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 09:01 |
Mr ERFisher
Messages: 7117 Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Rad here
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/refer-cabinet-door/p20811-trash-container-in-place.html
On Monday, August 17, 2015, Peer Oliver Schmidt GMC
wrote:
> I bought a new fridge, a Dometic RM2454. This is quite a bit shorter
> than my existing Norcold. 52" to 36" height.
>
> Now I wonder, do I put empty space below the fridge or above the fridge?
>
> I would prefer to have empty space below, but would hate to have less
> than optimal cooling in the fridge, and I read something about a chimney
> effect one must have.
>
> Any and all hints are greatly appreciated.
> --
> Best regards
>
> Peer Oliver Schmidt
> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>
> '76a Eleganza II, VA
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285197 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 09:15 |
Ken Henderson
Messages: 8726 Registered: March 2004 Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Peer,
I can't claim any special knowledge or experience, but I wouldn't even
consider putting it low. It seems obvious to me that the shorter the
chimney the better. And you'll be able to take advantage of the curvature
of the coach side to confine airflow to the fins (which I presume are
across the top rear like my RM2652's), which is the primary objective of
the chimney.
Ken H.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Peer Oliver Schmidt GMC <
posde@theinternet.de> wrote:
> I bought a new fridge, a Dometic RM2454. This is quite a bit shorter
> than my existing Norcold. 52" to 36" height.
>
> Now I wonder, do I put empty space below the fridge or above the fridge?
>
> I would prefer to have empty space below, but would hate to have less
> than optimal cooling in the fridge, and I read something about a chimney
> effect one must have.
>
> Any and all hints are greatly appreciated.
> --
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285202 is a reply to message #285200] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 09:41 |
Olly Schmidt
Messages: 1265 Registered: February 2014 Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thomas,
> Configure the extra empty space if big enough for the microwave. If not big enough, configure it for storage. Heat chimney is important.
It will become extra storage.
Microwave ain't important atm for us, and if it ever might become, it
will replace the oven.
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
the internet company
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Best regards
Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285203 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 09:59 |
rcjordan
Messages: 1913 Registered: October 2012 Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I should have added that I'm loading every nook with the Coop's fire suppression system. Engine and refer compartments were TOP on the list. I also plan to remotely monitor temps in that compartment (and others) with a bluetooth LE or -maybe- hardwired raspberrypi system. I have the TI bluetooth sensor on hand and it works, but the smartphone app is in dev mode and clunky. I'll use it, though, if I can't come up with something better. I also have the roof vent.
SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285207 is a reply to message #285197] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 10:17 |
Olly Schmidt
Messages: 1265 Registered: February 2014 Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> I can't claim any special knowledge or experience, but I wouldn't even
> consider putting it low. It seems obvious to me that the shorter the
> chimney the better. And you'll be able to take advantage of the curvature
> of the coach side to confine airflow to the fins (which I presume are
> across the top rear like my RM2652's), which is the primary objective of
> the chimney.
>
Below it is. Any suggestion on what to use to keep the fridge up? My
idea would be MDF, go to Lowe's, get them to cut me three pieces. One
for the top (as wide (22") as the empty space between is, and as deep as
the fridge is (19")), two for the side, and one for the back, but maybe
others have better ideas.
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
the internet company
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Best regards
Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285211 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 10:42 |
rcjordan
Messages: 1913 Registered: October 2012 Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
>TI Sitara ARM AM335x Starter Kit
New one is plug-n-play (except the UI on the app sucks. Hopefully, some dev will produce a better one soon.)
http://www.ti.com/ww/en/wireless_connectivity/sensortag/
>Essential shall stay as stock as possible
With just hanging the dongle, everything stays stock for the purists. And, with the horror stories about refer fires here at gmcnet and at the co-op, I consider temp monitoring essential.
SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285223 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 11:37 |
Steve Jess
Messages: 169 Registered: April 2012
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The POs of my coach also put a smaller fridge in (I'm hoping to fix that someday...) They raised it up with wood inserts so the top lined up with the original opening, than put small doors in front of the six inches or so of shelf space that was created...which is pretty deep and makes a handy place to store dry goods, though a drawer would have been a better idea.
Steve Jess - Helena, MT
Helena Bureau ChiefMontana Public Radio
> To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:27:12 -0700
> From: rallymaster@juno.com
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down?
>
>
> If you have the roof vent, Peer, I'd move the fridge up, and put a new
> bottom in the compartment for the fridge to sit on. The NoCold folks
> claim the bottom of the lower vent should be at the bottom of the fridge
> compartment for best operation and to keep any propane leakage from
> pooling in the compartment. I don't know if Dometic mentions that or
> not. Check their installation manual.
>
> RonC
>
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:28:14 -0400 Peer Oliver Schmidt GMC
> writes:
>> I bought a new fridge, a Dometic RM2454. This is quite a bit shorter
>> than my existing Norcold. 52" to 36" height.
>>
>> Now I wonder, do I put empty space below the fridge or above the
>> fridge?
>>
>> I would prefer to have empty space below, but would hate to have
>> less
>> than optimal cooling in the fridge, and I read something about a
>> chimney
>> effect one must have.
>>
>> Any and all hints are greatly appreciated.
>> --
>> Best regards
>>
>> Peer Oliver Schmidt
>> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>>
>> '76a Eleganza II, VA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>
>
> Ron & Linda Clark
> North Plains, ORYGUN
> 78 Eleganza II
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285224 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 11:27 |
<rallymaster
Messages: 361 Registered: May 2014
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
If you have the roof vent, Peer, I'd move the fridge up, and put a new
bottom in the compartment for the fridge to sit on. The NoCold folks
claim the bottom of the lower vent should be at the bottom of the fridge
compartment for best operation and to keep any propane leakage from
pooling in the compartment. I don't know if Dometic mentions that or
not. Check their installation manual.
RonC
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 09:28:14 -0400 Peer Oliver Schmidt GMC
writes:
> I bought a new fridge, a Dometic RM2454. This is quite a bit shorter
> than my existing Norcold. 52" to 36" height.
>
> Now I wonder, do I put empty space below the fridge or above the
> fridge?
>
> I would prefer to have empty space below, but would hate to have
> less
> than optimal cooling in the fridge, and I read something about a
> chimney
> effect one must have.
>
> Any and all hints are greatly appreciated.
> --
> Best regards
>
> Peer Oliver Schmidt
> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>
> '76a Eleganza II, VA
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
Ron & Linda Clark
North Plains, ORYGUN
78 Eleganza II
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Smaller fridge - move up or down? [message #285228 is a reply to message #285189] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 11:52 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The only advantage to moving it down would be that you would have less angle on the flue. This would probably be cancelled out by the increased length. When I installed my Norcold 3-way, there was a note in the installation instructions about the angle of the flue, I exceeded it by quite a few degrees, but the fridge works fine.
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
|
|
[GMCnet] Size of bottom compartment below RM 2454 [message #285250 is a reply to message #285244] |
Mon, 17 August 2015 16:57 |
Olly Schmidt
Messages: 1265 Registered: February 2014 Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
|
Senior Member |
|
|
> [..]
> Any idea on my plan for below the fridge? Is MDF a good idea? What
> thickness is best?
>
It seems I need 2 times 15x24 for the sides, 1 time 24x24 for the top, 1
time 13 1/2 x 24 for the back. All at 3/4" thick should be good to go imho.
The old Norcold is 52 1/8 x 21 3/4 x 24, the new RM 2454 is 36-9/16 x
23-11/16 x 24 and weights 78lbs empty.
Comments?
--
Best regards
Peer Oliver Schmidt
the internet company
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Best regards
Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Nov 19 05:45:56 CST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01170 seconds
|