Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Vapor Lock Solution?
Vapor Lock Solution? [message #281848] |
Fri, 10 July 2015 19:04 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I am trying the vapor lock solution that was suggested by Michael Morton a while back. Like him, I had my Q-jet filter housing modified with a return line outlet at the top of the housing. My mechanic drilled, tapped, and soldered in a fitting to attach a return line to the gasoline filler pipe. I then had him tap into the filler pipe and run the line for me. I would have done that part myself but for having wrist surgery about 6 weeks ago making me unable to use my right hand fully.
The theory is the same as using the three port mechanical fuel pump or a three port filter, but it eliminates any deadhead all the way to the carb. Michael said this was the thing that FINALLY cured his vapor lock issue. I'm hoping for the same results, having tried everything else, but in tank pumps.
Pics at: http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6819-carburetor-fuel-return.html
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #281969 is a reply to message #281848] |
Sun, 12 July 2015 22:34 |
Bob de Kruyff
Messages: 4260 Registered: January 2004 Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Carl S. wrote on Fri, 10 July 2015 18:04I am trying the vapor lock solution that was suggested by Michael Morton a while back. Like him, I had my Q-jet filter housing modified with a return line outlet at the top of the housing. My mechanic drilled, tapped, and soldered in a fitting to attach a return line to the gasoline filler pipe. I then had him tap into the filler pipe and run the line for me. I would have done that part myself but for having wrist surgery about 6 weeks ago making me unable to use my right hand fully.
The theory is the same as using the three port mechanical fuel pump or a three port filter, but it eliminates any deadhead all the way to the carb. Michael said this was the thing that FINALLY cured his vapor lock issue. I'm hoping for the same results, having tried everything else, but in tank pumps.
Pics at: http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6819-carburetor-fuel-return.html
Carl. I'm very interested in this mod and have all the parts ready to go. I just returned from a trip to humtington beach and had some vapor lock at 110 F until i activated the electric pump--nothing serious but I would like to eliminate the need for a booster pump at all.
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
[Updated on: Sun, 12 July 2015 22:34] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #281996 is a reply to message #281969] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 10:03 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bob de Kruyff wrote on Sun, 12 July 2015 20:34Carl S. wrote on Fri, 10 July 2015 18:04I am trying the vapor lock solution that was suggested by Michael Morton a while back. Like him, I had my Q-jet filter housing modified with a return line outlet at the top of the housing. My mechanic drilled, tapped, and soldered in a fitting to attach a return line to the gasoline filler pipe. I then had him tap into the filler pipe and run the line for me. I would have done that part myself but for having wrist surgery about 6 weeks ago making me unable to use my right hand fully.
The theory is the same as using the three port mechanical fuel pump or a three port filter, but it eliminates any deadhead all the way to the carb. Michael said this was the thing that FINALLY cured his vapor lock issue. I'm hoping for the same results, having tried everything else, but in tank pumps.
Pics at: http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6819-carburetor-fuel-return.html
Carl. I'm very interested in this mod and have all the parts ready to go. I just returned from a trip to Huntington Beach and had some vapor lock at 110 F until i activated the electric pump--nothing serious but I would like to eliminate the need for a booster pump at all.
When I get a chance, I'll maneuver the air cleaner around so I can get a few pics of the carburetor fuel inlet and try to get a better pic of the filler tap. We are taking a week long trip to Silver City in a week and a half and that should be a good test. My electric booster pump usually cures the problem, but last summer, on the way to and from Show Low, I had a terrible time pulling some of the grades. I'm hoping this does the trick. I'll be sure to report back in early August after our trip.
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282007 is a reply to message #281969] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 12:31 |
armandminnie
Messages: 864 Registered: May 2009 Location: Marana, AZ
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bob and Carl, I have some theories about what is happening when we suffer from "vapor lock" and I would like your opinions.
I think we should divide the fuel system into before the pump and after the pump to understand what is happening and what we can do about it. The common factor is fuel temperature - in both cases the fuel is hot, only the heat sources are different. The other factor - the one that varies - is "atmospheric" pressure. Before the pump we have whatever pressure is in the tanks minus the negative pressure from the fuel pump - a bad combination in that part of the system can cause the fuel to boil in the tanks and/or the lines causing the pump to lose its prime at least momentarily if not longer - I think this is where the term "vapor lock" came from. The farther away the pump is from the tanks the more chance there is for this to happen because more vacuum is required. After the pump the fuel is under more pressure and is much less likely to boil but the heat added getting to the carburetor can still be enough to cause some "stumbling" but probably not stalling under most circumstances since the pump continues to apply pressure and the bubbles quickly go away.
An electric fuel pump installed near the tanks requires less vacuum because it is closer and below the tanks so it helps eliminate the pre-pump vapor issues. The electric fuel pump's added pressure helps prevent vaporization after it. The three-port fuel filter at the carburetor combined with some in-tank pumps would seem to be the best solution.
Armand Minnie
Marana, AZ
'76 Eleganza II TZE166V103202
visit my gmc blog
click here to visit gmcws.org
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282014 is a reply to message #282007] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 15:49 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Armand,
I think your last sentence is correct. The best solution would be in-tank fuel pumps, and a return (three port filter) at the carburetor. Short of that, I'm hoping the solution I am trying will be the next best thing. As far as "atmospheric" pressure goes, I have seldom had any pressure in my tanks at refill time. Evidently my vent system is working correctly. Everything on it has been replaced except the charcoal canister and, although I have had some residual pressure in the tanks when removing the gas cap, it is never much.
I'm hoping that by providing a means of keeping the gas circulating in the supply line, it will not have the opportunity to vaporize, and if it does, it will be relieved at the return port in the filter housing. That was the idea behind the 'Toronado with air conditioning' fuel pump and the in line fuel filter with a relief port that Chrysler used back in the '70s and '80s.
From what I understand, electric fuel pumps do not do a very good job of pulling fuel so it would be ideal to locate the electric pump inside the tank. This would eliminate a low pressure condition between the tank and the pump, the condition when gas is most likely to turn to vapor. Mechanical pumps, on the other hand, do a good job of pulling but probably neither one will pump a vaporous gas as well as a liquid.
Of course we have to consider the different gasoline formulations as well. My understanding is that 'winter mix' gasoline is more prone to vaporizing than 'summer mix'. I can attest to the fact that 'pure gas', without ethanol, works much better in our coaches than 10% ethanol blends. A few years ago, on a trip to San Antonio in early May, I got a tank of pure gas in Las Cruces and proceeded to drive from El Paso to Carlsbad Caverns. There is some desolate, hot desert on that route, and even the long steep grades ascending the Guadalupe Mountains were not a problem. The coach ran better than ever. But, most of us are stuck with ethanol in our fuel, so we have to look for other solutions. Hopefully this will be it.
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282015 is a reply to message #282014] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 16:08 |
Keith V
Messages: 2337 Registered: March 2008 Location: Mounds View,MN
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I don't understand how the port in the fuel filter works.
Is there a pressure regulator ( or restriction) on it so the carb gets it's 3-5 psi fuel?
Otherwise it seems you will starve the carb
Keith Vasilakes
Mounds View. MN
75 ex Royale GMC
ask me about MicroLevel
Cell, 763-732-3419
My427v8@hotmail.com
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282021 is a reply to message #282015] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 16:51 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Keith V wrote on Mon, 13 July 2015 14:08I don't understand how the port in the fuel filter works.
Is there a pressure regulator ( or restriction) on it so the carb gets it's 3-5 psi fuel?
Otherwise it seems you will starve the carb
We'll see. The fitting coming out of the carb filter housing is 1/4" (OD). It has a very small opening, effectively, a restriction. The guy I got the idea from says there is no need for a restrictor in the line and it works well for him without one. I think the fuel pumps provide enough volume to feed the carburetor and keep the fuel flowing in the return line without issue. Like I said, we'll see. Initial test showed no indication of any fuel starvation issues, although I only drove it about six miles (all up hill though).
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282053 is a reply to message #282007] |
Mon, 13 July 2015 20:29 |
Bob de Kruyff
Messages: 4260 Registered: January 2004 Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
armandminnie wrote on Mon, 13 July 2015 11:31Bob and Carl, I have some theories about what is happening when we suffer from "vapor lock" and I would like your opinions.
I think we should divide the fuel system into before the pump and after the pump to understand what is happening and what we can do about it. The common factor is fuel temperature - in both cases the fuel is hot, only the heat sources are different. The other factor - the one that varies - is "atmospheric" pressure. Before the pump we have whatever pressure is in the tanks minus the negative pressure from the fuel pump - a bad combination in that part of the system can cause the fuel to boil in the tanks and/or the lines causing the pump to lose its prime at least momentarily if not longer - I think this is where the term "vapor lock" came from. The farther away the pump is from the tanks the more chance there is for this to happen because more vacuum is required. After the pump the fuel is under more pressure and is much less likely to boil but the heat added getting to the carburetor can still be enough to cause some "stumbling" but probably not stalling under most circumstances since the pump continues to apply pressure and the bubbles quickly go away.
An electric fuel pump installed near the tanks requires less vacuum because it is closer and below the tanks so it helps eliminate the pre-pump vapor issues. The electric fuel pump's added pressure helps prevent vaporization after it. The three-port fuel filter at the carburetor combined with some in-tank pumps would seem to be the best solution.
I'm sure vapor lock is a term used for problems that may not truly be vapor lock. Without my electric pump running, I only encounter some sort of starvation just after sitting for a few moments. I doubt i am using enough fuel to require much more than what is supposed to be in the float bowl, so i have it in my head that fuel is boiling in the carb or just before the carb. i have learned to turn on the electric pump in situation were I will be sitting idling for a few moments. I rarely experience starvation while driving. I discovered that when my fan clutch failed, that I had starvation going down the road even with the electric pump running, so I assume my occasional problem is related to engine compartment temps and not much further back than that. I'm thinking that keeping the fuel flowing as close to the carburetor the better. Obviously we can't do much about fuel boiling in the carb other than blocking the crossover (which I haven't) or using a better isolating gasket (which I don't have clearance for). I hope Carl's solution helps since I'm ready to go.
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282085 is a reply to message #282080] |
Tue, 14 July 2015 10:41 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
John Heslinga wrote on Tue, 14 July 2015 07:19The 3 port filters and fuel pumps have restrictions. They do NOT flow full 1/4 inch. Check out the following picture and description.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/3-port-fuel-pump-2c-filter-2c-and-hot-fuel/p41489-3-port-fuel-pump.html
Either does a 1/4" OD fitting. The ID on the fittings we used is less than 1/8" and smaller than the return port on the three port filter. It's really not much larger than a carburetor main jet. IF it does pose a problem, I can always add an additional restrictor in one of the fittings.
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282089 is a reply to message #281848] |
Tue, 14 July 2015 11:55 |
JohnL455
Messages: 4447 Registered: October 2006 Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I'm going to try a 12V 10A Peltier dual fan cooler module. They have gotten cheap on eBay and I think I can squeeze another 10A though running the refer on 12V down the road is a draw already. I'll either try to cool the main tank or fuel line Only 29 bucks.
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
|
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282212 is a reply to message #281848] |
Wed, 15 July 2015 21:53 |
JohnL455
Messages: 4447 Registered: October 2006 Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ok if it's not in Chinese. I don't know if it will chill a tank but should be able to cool a fuel line and the volume of fuel passing through it.
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282216 is a reply to message #282212] |
Wed, 15 July 2015 23:37 |
Ken Burton
Messages: 10030 Registered: January 2004 Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I do not have much use for those Peltier modules. They consume a lot of power for not much cooling. I have two 12 volt coolers with them and they just barely cool. I wrapped one of the coolers in insulation but it did not help much. I hope I'm wrong but I think you will not get much cooling with a steady stream of hot fuel going through one of them. Please let us know what happens. The ones I have draw 60 to 90 watts.
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282217 is a reply to message #281848] |
Wed, 15 July 2015 23:50 |
kerry pinkerton
Messages: 2565 Registered: July 2012 Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
|
Senior Member |
|
|
what about using the condensate from the AC unit and evaporative cooling?
Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama
Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282225 is a reply to message #281848] |
Thu, 16 July 2015 08:29 |
JohnL455
Messages: 4447 Registered: October 2006 Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Thought of that one many times. A liquid line wrapped around the low side line and pumpef to a fuel cooler.
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
|
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282246 is a reply to message #282226] |
Thu, 16 July 2015 15:25 |
Carl S.
Messages: 4186 Registered: January 2009 Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
|
Senior Member |
|
|
A bit of an update here:
I got my new rear tires on last night and drove the coach accross town to the emission test station, it didn't pass for the first time in 7 years, but that's another story.
The temps in Tucson were in the low 90s this morning and I have always had fuel starvation/vapor lock issues in the past, driving on surface streets in July. This time I had NONE. The coach ran better than ever without any stumbling at all. And that was without the electric fuel pump on. I kicked the secondaries in several times and it never even coughed once. I think the fuel return from the carb inlet is going to be a success.
So...now to get the carburetor rebuilt and sorted out. In this case I count this as two steps forward and one step back. Should be ready for our mid Summer trip by next weekend as planned.
Carl Stouffer
'75 ex Palm Beach
Tucson, AZ.
Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
|
|
|
Re: Vapor Lock Solution? [message #282256 is a reply to message #282007] |
Thu, 16 July 2015 19:07 |
George Beckman
Messages: 1085 Registered: October 2008 Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
|
Senior Member |
|
|
armandminnie wrote on Mon, 13 July 2015 10:31
I think this is where the term "vapor lock" came from. The farther away the pump is from the tanks the more chance there is for this to happen because more vacuum is required. After the pump the fuel is under more pressure and is much less likely to boil but the heat added getting to the carburetor can still be enough to cause some "stumbling" but probably not stalling under most circumstances since the pump continues to apply pressure and the bubbles quickly go away.
An electric fuel pump installed near the tanks requires less vacuum because it is closer and below the tanks so it helps eliminate the pre-pump vapor issues. The electric fuel pump's added pressure helps prevent vaporization after it. The three-port fuel filter at the carburetor combined with some in-tank pumps would seem to be the best solution.
I think Armand is on the right track. I have TBI. My pressure runs about 17 lbs. I am pretty convinced that fuel will not boil at 17 lbs. If it did the tanks would be boiling big time. Conversely if pressure raises boiling point, vacuum lowers boiling point.
We went over Monarch Pass, Colorado, West to East. One would think it would be cool at 7,000 feet in September, but it was not. At about 8,000 I had my first ever "sagging" in power. I knew what was up. I stopped to see if the tanks had pressure and they had lots of pressure. They did and I could hear gas rumbling down there. I closed that back up.
My pump is on the cross member in front of the tanks. I can only conclude that the pump was cavitating in bubbles on the low pressure side. Atmospheric pressure was less. Therefore pressure on the exterior of the tanks was less. (Our tanks are quite flexible and expand and contract with pressure.) The pump was sucking gas and therefore lowering the pressure in the tank to pump line.
Now to Carl's solution... it works to a point. That is why GM and other vehicles had pump bypass filters for a while. The problem for me as a TBI person is I am bypassing lots of fuel all the time, much more than the mechanical pump ever would. The TBI is up where the carburetor was which means lines, in my case, go up over the bell housing and into the back of the TBI. I fear gas is warmed in the process. So, while gas is cool, because of night cooling or a recent fill up, all is well.
Our first coach had vapor separator problems and even on a cool day, after fill up, the gas gauge went down really fast in the first 30 miles. Like from full to 1/2 tank. If I stopped and burped the filler cap and rapped on the separator, the tank went back to full. Again, on a cool day.
'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun Nov 17 22:07:27 CST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02266 seconds
|