GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned
[GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280163] Wed, 17 June 2015 23:16 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member












Some may be interested in this. I need to figure out what went wrong. As this info might be of value to someone else some day. As the cause isn't real clear at this point. The oil level was on full. Glenn used Mobil one. The engine had about 8,000 miles on a rebuild. HV oil pump was installed. The work done appears well done by someone that does a lot of work on GMC's. Engine was balanced, APR rod bolts installed cost just under $200. Vary good quality bearings, pistons, and double roller timing chain. Heads have hardened seats with all new valves, and springs. The bearings tell a story that oil was in short supply over a period of time. In other words. It wasn't like an oil cooler line ruptured. Rods 1,and 2 were locked up. Rods 3, and 4 spun in their rods. Rod bearings 5, 6, 7, and 8 are lightly grooved. But 8 was in the best condition of them all. Mains are all groove. Pistons, and cylinder walls have scratches. Block is bored .060 over. Heads are in great shape. At thi
s point the crankshaft pistons, and block are now all junk. May come down that the heads, cam assembly, and water pump maybe the only parts that can be used again. Have an extra complete 455. Need to disassemble that engine to make a good short block.Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280165 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 01:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Beckman is currently offline  George Beckman   United States
Messages: 1085
Registered: October 2008
Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
BobDunahugh wrote on Wed, 17 June 2015 21:16




story that oil was in short supply over a period of time. In other words. It wasn't like an oil cooler line ruptured. Rods 1,and 2 were locked up. Rods 3, and 4 spun in their rods. Rod bearings 5, 6, 7, and 8 are lightly grooved. But 8 was in the best condition of them all. Mains are all groove. Pistons, and cylinder walls have scratches.


Is the oil pump drive shaft enact? Had one break years ago in a 273 Dodge.


'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280167 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 02:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wally is currently offline  wally   United States
Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Karma: 5
Senior Member
BobDunahugh wrote on Wed, 17 June 2015 23:16












Some may be interested in this. I need to figure out what went wrong. As this info might be of value to someone else some day. As the cause isn't real clear at this point. The oil level was on full. Glenn used Mobil one. The engine had about 8,000 miles on a rebuild. HV oil pump was installed. The work done appears well done by someone that does a lot of work on GMC's. Engine was balanced, APR rod bolts installed cost just under $200. Vary good quality bearings, pistons, and double roller timing chain. Heads have hardened seats with all new valves, and springs. The bearings tell a story that oil was in short supply over a period of time. In other words. It wasn't like an oil cooler line ruptured. Rods 1,and 2 were locked up. Rods 3, and 4 spun in their rods. Rod bearings 5, 6, 7, and 8 are lightly grooved. But 8 was in the best condition of them all. Mains are all groove. Pistons, and cylinder walls have scratches. Block is bored .060 over. Heads are in great shape. At thi
s point the crankshaft pistons, and block are now all junk. May come down that the heads, cam assembly, and water pump maybe the only parts that can be used again. Have an extra complete 455. Need to disassemble that engine to make a good short block.Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


There has been some controversy over oil starvation due to oil not draining back from the heads quick enough and letting the pan oil level getting down enough that the pump gets air. Joe Mondello was a fan of oil restictors to limit the amount of oil that gets up there. Restricted push rods, lifter bore orifice restrictors and cam bearing oil restrictors were used. Some went as far a external returns from the heads like John Helsinga posted http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussions-2/p52098-cylinder-head-external-oil-drain-modification.html It could be the oil pick up clearance to the pan is too great. The Toronado pan we use is deeper than a rear wheel drive and takes a longer pickup. Possibly the oil drain from the heads is obstructed by the head gasket or the oil passage in the head is not quite right. There is supposed to be a baffle that mounts on the rear main, also different than rear drive. John Helsinga's pic again http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/engine-failure/p50887-engine-bearing-failure.html Most of this stuff is on engines with HV pumps that turn a higher RPM than a GMC does but something happened to it.


Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280170 is a reply to message #280167] Thu, 18 June 2015 03:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Wally,

SPOT ON MATE!

Even with a 4.11 FD I wonder how many 455's or 403's ever hit 4000 rpm?

Ref: http://www.appliedgmc.com/level.itml/icOid/482

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic

-----Original Message-----
From: Wally Anderson

Most of this stuff is on engines with HV pumps that turn a higher RPM than a GMC does but something happened to it.
--
Wally

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280189 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 09:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Well, a failed shaft would be an acute problem, would it not? And, Bob says this appears as a longer term problem, did he not? I look forward to seeing what caused the failure. I have to wonder though - and it will be very apparent - whether the pump drive was hardened or not, and if not whether it shows signs of abnormal wear that might allow slippage.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280201 is a reply to message #280167] Thu, 18 June 2015 11:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
wally wrote on Thu, 18 June 2015 02:29
There has been some controversy over oil starvation due to oil not draining back from the heads quick enough and letting the pan oil level getting down enough that the pump gets air. Joe Mondello was a fan of oil restictors to limit the amount of oil that gets up there. Restricted push rods, lifter bore orifice restrictors and cam bearing oil restrictors were used. Some went as far a external returns from the heads like John Helsinga posted http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussions-2/p52098-cylinder-head-external-oil-drain-modification.html It could be the oil pick up clearance to the pan is too great. The Toronado pan we use is deeper than a rear wheel drive and takes a longer pickup. Possibly the oil drain from the heads is obstructed by the head gasket or the oil passage in the head is not quite right. There is supposed to be a baffle that mounts on the rear main, also different than rear drive. John Helsinga's pic again http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/engine-failure/p50887-engine-bearing-failure.html Most of this stuff is on engines with HV pumps that turn a higher RPM than a GMC does but something happened to it.
Are you saying the HV pump might have pushed so much oil into the engine that it couldn't flow back down fast enough and the pump kept sucking air as a result?
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280202 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 11:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
REGARDLESS of the root cause. Would not the oil pressure gauge have shown fluctuations in oil pressure caused by the oil pump, restricted return, etc? This engine sounds like it was oil starved on the bearings for some time. That would HAVE to show up on the gauge.

Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280204 is a reply to message #280201] Thu, 18 June 2015 11:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
First of all, Bob, this is for you. Is the oil pick up screen and tube
assembly a bolt on style, or an interference fit in the pump housing?
Second, is the bottom of the oil pump screen in the bottom of the sump?
There at least three oil pans that I have seen, that have the clearance for
the front driveshaft in them, that have a difference in depth. Is the pick
up matched to the pan sump that you took off of the engine that has the
failed bearings? Are both oil baffles installed? There should be a
slinger/catcher slot attatched with spot welds to the windage side of the
oil pan that returns oil slung from the crank and rods to the sump area.
There should be a baffle that attaches to the #4 mainbearing studs as well
as one oil pump mounting bolt, and finally, there is, in the area of the
front mainbearing cap, a third baffle that prevents oil from getting to the
timing chain and overloading the crank slinger. Were all of those parts in
place when you disassembled the engine? If the pick up screen tube is a
pressed in type, is it tight in the pump body? If not, air can be sucked in
at that intersection and introduced to the pump gears. Areated oil will not
circulate to the front of the engine, no matter what kind of a pump is
used. Make sure the oil filter base adapter has the correct gasket. It also
can cause cavitation if the wrong one is used there. Just checking what it
could be. Not critisizing anyones work here, but trying to find the cause
of those bearing failures. The original engine that I replaced in Todd
Sullivan's coach had similar bearing wear problems, and I traced it down to
a loose pick up tube in the oil pump. It didn't last much longer than the
one that you just disassembled.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:09 AM, A. wrote:

> wally wrote on Thu, 18 June 2015 02:29
>> There has been some controversy over oil starvation due to oil not
> draining back from the heads quick enough and letting the pan oil level
> getting
>> down enough that the pump gets air. Joe Mondello was a fan of oil
> restictors to limit the amount of oil that gets up there. Restricted push
> rods,
>> lifter bore orifice restrictors and cam bearing oil restrictors were
> used. Some went as far a external returns from the heads like John Helsinga
>> posted
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussions-2/p52098-cylinder-head-external-oil-drain-modification.html
> It could be the oil pick up
>> clearance to the pan is too great. The Toronado pan we use is deeper
> than a rear wheel drive and takes a longer pickup. Possibly the oil drain
> from
>> the heads is obstructed by the head gasket or the oil passage in the
> head is not quite right. There is supposed to be a baffle that mounts on
> the
>> rear main, also different than rear drive. John Helsinga's pic again
>>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/engine-failure/p50887-engine-bearing-failure.html
> Most of this stuff is on engines with HV pumps that turn a
>> higher RPM than a GMC does but something happened to it.
> Are you saying the HV pump might have pushed so much oil into the engine
> that it couldn't flow back down fast enough and the pump kept sucking air as
> a result?
> --
> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
> Upper Alabama
> After all is said and done, a helluva lot more is said than done.
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280237 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 21:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Pryzl1 is currently offline  Pryzl1   United States
Messages: 100
Registered: November 2011
Location: Toledo, OH
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Jim, I'm in the middle of having a 455 ci engine rebuilt that had been installed in a GMC motorhome The engine had approximately 40,000 miles before it was replaced with an EFI engine. At this point in time I was planning on having a high volume / high pressure pump installed. Is this the preferred oil pump for use in the GMC motorhome engines? When the engine was dismantled, there were no wingage trays in the oil pan. I was not planning on reinstalling windage trays. Should the windage trays be included in the engine rebuild?

John 1976 GMC Eleganza II - "The Never Ending Story" Partial Restoration - a work in progress 455cc NW Ohio Member of the GMCMI, GMC Great Lakers Motorhome Club, GMCES and Dixielanders
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280242 is a reply to message #280237] Thu, 18 June 2015 22:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Pryzl1 wrote on Thu, 18 June 2015 21:28
Jim, I'm in the middle of having a 455 ci engine rebuilt that had been installed in a GMC motorhome The engine had approximately 40,000 miles before it was replaced with an EFI engine. At this point in time I was planning on having a high volume / high pressure pump installed. Is this the preferred oil pump for use in the GMC motorhome engines? When the engine was dismantled, there were no wingage trays in the oil pan. I was not planning on reinstalling windage trays. Should the windage trays be included in the engine rebuild?
The pdf in the below URL contains more common sense in one short article than you can get from volumes of manuals and has more value than most of the opinions out there:

http://www.gmceast.com/technical/Weidner_Rebuilding_that_Motor.pdf
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280243 is a reply to message #280237] Thu, 18 June 2015 22:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Beckman is currently offline  George Beckman   United States
Messages: 1085
Registered: October 2008
Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Pryzl1 wrote on Thu, 18 June 2015 19:28
. At this point in time I was planning on having a high volume / high pressure pump installed. Is this the preferred oil pump for use in the GMC motorhome engines?


I have been told that high volume is good. High pressure will shove the seals out of the ends of the engine. No high pressure.

My engine has the high volume. Pressure runs about 42 at 2500 unless pulling a hill in hot weather. Then it will drop to 37. As soon as I start down the other side the pressure climbs as the engine cools.


'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280247 is a reply to message #280163] Thu, 18 June 2015 23:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member


Jim. Great thought's. The three baffles were in place. Had to just go out and check. It's the see. But didn't look as I disassembled it. The oil pickup hung down at about a 15 degree angle. So I think it was at least close to the bottom. And the oil pickup is a press in type. Reasonable press fit with some sealant. I always tack weld that type. The pickup screen was clean. As to drain back from the heads. The drains had been opened up. Someone did a good smooth job on the drains. These 455's in our GMC's run in the 3000 RPM range. At that RPM's. The stock drains are more then large enough. As for the HV oil pump delivering too much oil up in the valve covers. Thus needing to have the oil flow restricted to above the heads. That just isn't a good idea in our application. That oil is used to lubricate, and cool the valve train. And cooling the exhaust valve, and spring is vary important for us. If we ran our 403's, and 455's in the 6,000 RPM range. Restricting the oil is a g
ood idea in some of those applications. And as for the HV oil pump delivering too much extra oil to the top of the heads. Thus starving the oil pump of oil. That just will not happen in our case. Less just say that the oil pump relief valves in both the stock, and HV pump are both set at 45 PSI. Both the stock, and HV pumps will deliver the exact same amount of oil to the bearings. And valve train. That extra oil that the HV pump produces will just be dumped back into the bottom of the oil pan. I had a 1 ton truck that had bearing clearance issues. There was so much oil in suspension above 60 MPH that the oil pump would starve for oil. Back to the 455. Tonight I cleaned the HV oil pump. I did notice that the driven end of the the shaft that went into the pump had more weir on it then I expected. Next step is to take the complete oil pump assembly apart. The HV pump didn't cause this issue. But it's relief valve, and spring. many have had something to do with the amount of
oil delivered. The answer is there some were. Thanks for the thought's. Bob Dunahugh





Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280249 is a reply to message #280163] Fri, 19 June 2015 00:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
John. You mentioned a high volume/ high pressure oil pump. The two are not the same. A high volume pump has longer gears. Thus more displacement. It simply pumps more oil. A high pressure pump has a stronger relief valve spring. I've seen guy's simply stretch, or shim a stock relief valve spring for more pressure. If you aren't turning the crank. Check the bearing to crank clearance. New is .0003. Anything at, or greater then .002. I'd suggest the HV pump with the stock relief valve spring.

Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280250 is a reply to message #280247] Fri, 19 June 2015 05:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wally is currently offline  wally   United States
Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Karma: 5
Senior Member
BobDunahugh wrote on Thu, 18 June 2015 23:43


Jim. Great thought's. The three baffles were in place. Had to just go out and check. It's the see. But didn't look as I disassembled it. The oil pickup hung down at about a 15 degree angle. So I think it was at least close to the bottom. And the oil pickup is a press in type. Reasonable press fit with some sealant. I always tack weld that type. The pickup screen was clean. As to drain back from the heads. The drains had been opened up. Someone did a good smooth job on the drains. These 455's in our GMC's run in the 3000 RPM range. At that RPM's. The stock drains are more then large enough. As for the HV oil pump delivering too much oil up in the valve covers. Thus needing to have the oil flow restricted to above the heads. That just isn't a good idea in our application. That oil is used to lubricate, and cool the valve train. And cooling the exhaust valve, and spring is vary important for us. If we ran our 403's, and 455's in the 6,000 RPM range. Restricting the oil is a g
ood idea in some of those applications. And as for the HV oil pump delivering too much extra oil to the top of the heads. Thus starving the oil pump of oil. That just will not happen in our case. Less just say that the oil pump relief valves in both the stock, and HV pump are both set at 45 PSI. Both the stock, and HV pumps will deliver the exact same amount of oil to the bearings. And valve train. That extra oil that the HV pump produces will just be dumped back into the bottom of the oil pan. I had a 1 ton truck that had bearing clearance issues. There was so much oil in suspension above 60 MPH that the oil pump would starve for oil. Back to the 455. Tonight I cleaned the HV oil pump. I did notice that the driven end of the the shaft that went into the pump had more weir on it then I expected. Next step is to take the complete oil pump assembly apart. The HV pump didn't cause this issue. But it's relief valve, and spring. many have had something to do with the amount of
oil delivered. The answer is there some were. Thanks for the thought's. Bob Dunahugh





Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


Bob I'm wondering about the 15 degree hang down of the pickup and why. Maybe shorter rear wheel drive pickup is on there? here is a pic of ours in 2006. http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/power-level-valve-fitting/p58201-oil-pump-pickup.html and Play-doh check of pan to pickup distance http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/power-level-valve-fitting/p58202-pickup-to-pan-clearance-check.html


Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook

[Updated on: Fri, 19 June 2015 06:08]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280256 is a reply to message #280163] Fri, 19 June 2015 08:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Bob, is there any chance the 'wear' you saw on the pump driveshaft was sufficient to let it slip in the driven gear instead of turning it?

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280261 is a reply to message #280249] Fri, 19 June 2015 09:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member

The oil pump 5/16 hex drive shaft wasn't to the point of rotating freely in the oil pump yet. Maybe another 30,000 miles. As to the oil pump pickup angle. That didn't seemed right to me. The other 455 is coming apart Sat. I'll be paying attention to that one.GM listed normal oil pressure specs as 30 to 45 PSI. For our use. I'd never go over that. Just no reason at all.

Bob Dunahugh




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280263 is a reply to message #280261] Fri, 19 June 2015 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Bob, you and I both know that 45 psi. Is plenty of pressure, hot and
running, 5-7 psi is also plenty at idle no load. But, a continuous supply
of non aerated oil is super critical to allow the fluid wedge to form to
hydraulic the shaft and bearings apart. If there is air in the stream, not
only will the wedge not form, but oil will not circulate, only compress the
bubbles in the stream. The farther downstream from the pump you get, the
less oil you get. Sound familiar to your circumstances? Just sayin'.
Jim Hupy
On Jun 19, 2015 7:34 AM, "Bob Dunahugh" wrote:

>
> The oil pump 5/16 hex drive shaft wasn't to the point of rotating freely
> in the oil pump yet. Maybe another 30,000 miles. As to the oil pump pickup
> angle. That didn't seemed right to me. The other 455 is coming apart Sat.
> I'll be paying attention to that one.GM listed normal oil pressure specs as
> 30 to 45 PSI. For our use. I'd never go over that. Just no reason at all.
>
> Bob Dunahugh
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280287 is a reply to message #280163] Fri, 19 June 2015 13:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
I'll be interested in the pickup pan distance. In re the shaft, although it doesn't spin freely, is it possible that it 'skips' under load like a wrench on a nut that's rounded a bit? If it were questionable, you could check it by chucking the drive in your drill, putting the pickup in a bucket with dsome oil, and spinning it to see if it 'skips' or not.
I lost a shaft once due to the pump seizing, but fortunately it sheared which stopped the sparks as well, and the engine survived.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280319 is a reply to message #280261] Sat, 20 June 2015 00:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member




Tonight I examined the HV pump. It ingested a lot of junk. The gears, case, and shaft. Lot's of damage internally. It had nothing to do with the failure to start with. It did put extra load on the oil pump drive shaft. And that drive shaft was going to have a premature failure down the road. Maybe 30,000 mile down the road. Don't truly know.I now need to disassemble the other 455. And note the oil pickup that's on the oil pump. The 455 that was in the GMC had a valve job done by someone. Then later the short block was rebuilt by someone else. This is generally not a good thing. It's coming down to, in my mined. Some sort of contamination from the heads, or oil cooler. Then a slow deterioration. Engines are much like the human body. If surgery is needed. They try to do all the work in one shot. Because every time they open you up. The greater chance for infection, or contamination. Basically the same thing. The human body works best with the OEM parts. Engines do too. Fred i
n his post covered that topic well. If you're engine needs major surgery. Put it back to the new GM specs. of the year of the build. Not to what GM said could be EXCEPT ABLE. And I don't do just except able. That's when none stock items need to be used. I don't know how to put this in a true polite manner. Sorry. But half ass work get's half ass results. GM did a great job with the 403, and 455. That wheel is fine. Don't try to improve what GM did so well. Go change what GM could have done better with. To me, and many others. The final drive should have been a 3:70. The front knuckles should have had a gowned bearing surface for the front wheel bearings. EFI, and 6 wheel disc brakes. But these are new developments since the 70's. But nice assets now. Some may disagree. That's fine.
Jim H. We have to important gauges in our GMC's. Temp, and oil. Temp is simple. If you see it climb higher than normal. You will be correct to think that something is not doing well. The oil pressure gauge has too much read into what it reads. All you need is a cushion of oil between the bearing, and the shaft as Jim said. You're absolutely correct on you Pressure values. And the dash board mechanic will go out of his mind with that idea. But he's wrong due to lack of knowledge. And you're correct.
Bob Dunahugh





_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] The GMC that Glenn, and BJ owned [message #280334 is a reply to message #280163] Sat, 20 June 2015 07:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
Bob, can you tell what kind of 'stuff' did the damage? What did the remaining oil in the pan look like? Was there sludge or grit in the pan?

I'm struggling to come up with possible causes also.

Isn't there a galley plug somewhere near the distributor that is supposed to be removed so that particular galley can be cleaned?

Are you leaning toward the HV oil pump cavitating and causing one bearing to fail which lead to the others? If the oil flow path that Rob Mueller showed is correct (and I'm betting it is), why would not the filter have trapped any debris? Did you open the filter and see if there is anything in it?

What would have happened if some punk opened the hood and put a handful of dirt in the oil filler tube?

Grasping at straws here.


Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Email listserver move
Next Topic: Removing preheater hoses
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Sep 24 06:15:29 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01440 seconds