GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question
[GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271424] Sun, 08 February 2015 16:58 Go to next message
glwgmc is currently offline  glwgmc   United States
Messages: 1014
Registered: June 2004
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Thanks Jim, Matt and others that have responded so far. The root cause issue here is that the only base line we seem to have is the factory manual that says the system takes 6 quarts when filling a new, dry engine. That is the only place and time that it seems we can truly calibrate the dip stick.

If any modifications are made, then the dry system capacity changes and 6 quarts will no longer reflect full on the dip stick as the initial fill would have to account for the additional system capacity. That is the case we experienced, JimH, when filling the Clasco after you secured the previously loose dip stick tube at what you determined to be the correct factory location and installing the new S&J engine. When filled with 6 quarts dry, the dip stick showed the oil level about half way between the full and add marks. That made sense to me given the larger capacity of the cooler in the aluminum radiator and the external oil cooler. So, the correct dry fill amount given that system configuration is apparently 6.5 quarts.

The case for the Royale is not so straight forward. Since I found its dip stick tube was also loose, there is no reliable base line to know the actual dry fill capacity of that system. The Royale is configured the same as the Clasco, but without the external oil cooler, so one would think the dry fill capacity would be less, likely closer to the 6 quarts the factory specifies.

But as Matt points out, that specified 6 quart capacity for a stock configuration is not necessarily correct, either. Empirical data from his dyno tests say 6 quarts is too much and some of that excess will burn off quickly. The other conundrum here is KenH's measurements which show that full on the dip stick occurs when there are only 3 quarts of oil in the sump end of the pan, an additional 1 quart sits in the shallow front end of the pan, around one quart sits in the filter and the rest is somewhere else in the system.

Come oil change time we think we need to add back 5 quarts to bring the system back to full. And, we think none of the oil in the cooler(s) and lines will drain out so that means something around one quart goes into the filter leaving four quarts to go into the sump end of the pan. But, if that is the case then KenH's measurements would say the dip stick would read one quart OVER filled unless one of those quarts really did drain out of the cooler(s) and lines.

The bottom line is we currently have no real base line to go on once we pass the initial dry fill (and even that may not be correct). I think we need to develop a reliable way for all of our owners to know when they have the proper amount of oil in the engine no matter what modifications may have been made over time to the system capacity, the dip stick or the tube. That is what I am seeking to find.

I am wondering if all these variations may be partially responsible for the number of newly installed engines that have reportedly gone south no matter who the engine builder was. As I said in the earlier post, if KenH's measurements are correct and 3 quarts in the deep end of the sump is where the factory says is full then it would not take much of a change in system capacity, or a change in the effective length of the dip stick tube, or a mistaken previous calibration of the dip stick itself, for the oil in the sump to reach a critically low level.

Hence, I remain convinced that we need to come up with a reliable way for every owner to really calibrate the dip stick based on something other than how much oil we put back in after an oil change or by trying to find the inflection point on rate of oil consumption. So far the only seemingly certain way to do that is to measure down on the sump end of the pan the 4.5" from the flange KenH's photos show should be full, drill a small hole and add oil until it starts to dribble out. Then, calibrate the dip stick at that point and seal the hole. I am hoping someone can come up with a less invasive, but equally repeatable and reliable, method. Thanks for all the band width.

Jerry
Jerry Work
The Dovetail Joint
Fine furniture designed and hand crafted in the 1907 former Masonic Temple building in historic Kerby, OR
Visitors always welcome!
glwork@mac.com
http://jerrywork.com
================

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 09:54:23 -0800
From: James Hupy
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org"
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Jerry, once the system is full, including the filter, lines, radiator
cooler, auxillary cooler, and the front of the oil pan that some say does
not empty when changing oil, what SHOULD remain in the deep part of the
sump if the system is full, is 5 quarts. Drain the oil from the sump and
unscrew the filter, catching it's contents into the same oil pan. Measure
that amount, and replace that amount. Mark the stick.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:49:51 -0700
From: Matt Colie
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This is referenced to the quote glwgmc (Jerry Work) wrote on Sun, 08 February 2015 11:34

Jerry,

You are correct to be concerned.
In the case of the Olds 455, the stated refill capacity is definitely wrong for an engine in stock trim. I when about this long and hard early in my
ownership. At the fill mark, the top quart goes away fast. Much of it through the crankcase vent system. (I only say most because I can't prove -
all.)

While the lube oil handling may have been modified over the years, if it does not completely drain during a lube oil service, it does not matter.
This is something that will have to be determined on a individual basis.
=======================




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Jerry & Sharon Work
78 Royale
Kerby, OR
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271434 is a reply to message #271424] Sun, 08 February 2015 19:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Reply with reference to what glwgmc (Jerry Work)wrote on Sun, 08 February 2015 17:58

Jerry,

I have plan for you.
It will be involved and somewhat complicated.
It should leave you with a safe and comfortable answer.

Problem and an known issue:
If the crank dips in the lube oil, it can quickly whip it into foam that does no good for anything and that foam can get carried out by the crankcase ventilation system.

So, if you can get someone with an open engine to measure the distance from the pan rail to a crankshaft counter weight, you have a good start. You kind of need to know this and you will see why down the page. None of this needs to be exact, but it needs to be better than a guess.

- Measure the apparent depth from the pan rail to the bottom of the pan in the location of the dip tube.
- Get a long piece of something like 1/16~3/32 gas welding (no flux) rod. As that is that is 3' nominal, you may have to weld two pieces together to get enough length. Sand one end about five or six inches from the end so the oil level is clear.
- With the engine cold, stick your test stick in there. You should be able to feel it hit the pan bottom.
- Mark the test stick at both the top of the dip tube and the current lube oil level.
- Measure the test stick from the bottom to the oil level. Subtract that from the depth of the pan. It should be less than the counter weight height. Yes, there will be some cosine error here, but that should not be big enough to matter.
* You can now compare the test stick to your dipstick.

If you are in any doubt at this point, idle the engine for about a minute. (It takes 30~45 seconds for a cold engine to get oil everyplace it wants to go.) Don't get the engine warm, you want all the hangup you can get. Now, go in with the test stick again. This level Better be Clear of the counter weight swing.

So now you know the amount level pull down. That should leave you with a warm fuzzy about the stick calibration.

*** Do Not run with the test stick in. If it contacts moving parts that can be bad. I call tell you some of the things that can go wrong, that takes beer and time.

I know this is long and involved, but it is safe.
By the way, this is not a dyno lab procedure. There they usually know all about the engine from the guys that built it. This is the way you recalibrate the dipstick of an old boat engine the was installed at an angle years ago and nobody knows for sure how much oil you can out in it and maybe the stick is gone or broken.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271554 is a reply to message #271424] Mon, 09 February 2015 22:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
glwgmc wrote on Sun, 08 February 2015 15:58
Thanks Jim, Matt and others that have responded so far. The root cause issue here is that the only base line we seem to have is the factory manual that says the system takes 6 quarts when filling a new, dry engine. That is the only place and time that it seems we can truly calibrate the dip stick.

If any modifications are made, then the dry system capacity changes and 6 quarts will no longer reflect full on the dip stick as the initial fill would have to account for the additional system capacity. That is the case we experienced, JimH, when filling the Clasco after you secured the previously loose dip stick tube at what you determined to be the correct factory location and installing the new S&J engine. When filled with 6 quarts dry, the dip stick showed the oil level about half way between the full and add marks. That made sense to me given the larger capacity of the cooler in the aluminum radiator and the external oil cooler. So, the correct dry fill amount given that system configuration is apparently 6.5 quarts.

The case for the Royale is not so straight forward. Since I found its dip stick tube was also loose, there is no reliable base line to know the actual dry fill capacity of that system. The Royale is configured the same as the Clasco, but without the external oil cooler, so one would think the dry fill capacity would be less, likely closer to the 6 quarts the factory specifies.

But as Matt points out, that specified 6 quart capacity for a stock configuration is not necessarily correct, either. Empirical data from his dyno tests say 6 quarts is too much and some of that excess will burn off quickly. The other conundrum here is KenH's measurements which show that full on the dip stick occurs when there are only 3 quarts of oil in the sump end of the pan, an additional 1 quart sits in the shallow front end of the pan, around one quart sits in the filter and the rest is somewhere else in the system.

Come oil change time we think we need to add back 5 quarts to bring the system back to full. And, we think none of the oil in the cooler(s) and lines will drain out so that means something around one quart goes into the filter leaving four quarts to go into the sump end of the pan. But, if that is the case then KenH's measurements would say the dip stick would read one quart OVER filled unless one of those quarts really did drain out of the cooler(s) and lines.

The bottom line is we currently have no real base line to go on once we pass the initial dry fill (and even that may not be correct). I think we need to develop a reliable way for all of our owners to know when they have the proper amount of oil in the engine no matter what modifications may have been made over time to the system capacity, the dip stick or the tube. That is what I am seeking to find.

I am wondering if all these variations may be partially responsible for the number of newly installed engines that have reportedly gone south no matter who the engine builder was. As I said in the earlier post, if KenH's measurements are correct and 3 quarts in the deep end of the sump is where the factory says is full then it would not take much of a change in system capacity, or a change in the effective length of the dip stick tube, or a mistaken previous calibration of the dip stick itself, for the oil in the sump to reach a critically low level.

Hence, I remain convinced that we need to come up with a reliable way for every owner to really calibrate the dip stick based on something other than how much oil we put back in after an oil change or by trying to find the inflection point on rate of oil consumption. So far the only seemingly certain way to do that is to measure down on the sump end of the pan the 4.5" from the flange KenH's photos show should be full, drill a small hole and add oil until it starts to dribble out. Then, calibrate the dip stick at that point and seal the hole. I am hoping someone can come up with a less invasive, but equally repeatable and reliable, method. Thanks for all the band width.

Jerry
Jerry Work
The Dovetail Joint
Fine furniture designed and hand crafted in the 1907 former Masonic Temple building in historic Kerby, OR
Visitors always welcome!
glwork@mac.com
http://jerrywork.com
================

Message: 2
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 09:54:23 -0800
From: James Hupy
To: "gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org"
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Jerry, once the system is full, including the filter, lines, radiator
cooler, auxillary cooler, and the front of the oil pan that some say does
not empty when changing oil, what SHOULD remain in the deep part of the
sump if the system is full, is 5 quarts. Drain the oil from the sump and
unscrew the filter, catching it's contents into the same oil pan. Measure
that amount, and replace that amount. Mark the stick.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:49:51 -0700
From: Matt Colie
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

This is referenced to the quote glwgmc (Jerry Work) wrote on Sun, 08 February 2015 11:34

Jerry,

You are correct to be concerned.
In the case of the Olds 455, the stated refill capacity is definitely wrong for an engine in stock trim. I when about this long and hard early in my
ownership. At the fill mark, the top quart goes away fast. Much of it through the crankcase vent system. (I only say most because I can't prove -
all.)

While the lube oil handling may have been modified over the years, if it does not completely drain during a lube oil service, it does not matter.
This is something that will have to be determined on a individual basis.
=======================




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


One way is to borrow a known good or original dipstick and see what your system says. Any other mods that have been made over the years have no effect on what a known dipstick will read. If yours doesn't agree- remark it. Go to a rally and try a couple.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271607 is a reply to message #271554] Tue, 10 February 2015 10:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Bob de Kruyff wrote on Mon, 09 February 2015 23:34
One way is to borrow a known good or original dipstick and see what your system says. Any other mods that have been made over the years have no effect on what a known dipstick will read. If yours doesn't agree- remark it. Go to a rally and try a couple.

Bob,

The idea is good, but the alternative stick must be compared by comparing the reported lube oil levels, not just comparing the sticks themselves. It is a two part system and there may have been changes to the diptube in 40odd years.

I think I am going to do an experiment. I will make up a very long surrogate lube oil level indicator stick that measures from contact with the bottom of the pan. I can then both share the device and publish the discovered values. No, I'm not quite sure what this thing looks like yet, but it won't be at paterson because I don't expect to be.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271622 is a reply to message #271607] Tue, 10 February 2015 11:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
skip2 is currently offline  skip2   United States
Messages: 544
Registered: September 2011
Location: Winter Haven,FL (center o...
Karma: 3
Senior Member
I don't know if this helps. I found a photo in Ken Hendersons albums of a side view of crank in block with tape measure beside it and it appears that the crank extends down 4" from the bottom of the block at the bottom of the throw.
Skip Hartline


74 Canyon Lands, FiTech, 3.7 FD LSD, Manny Tranny, Springfield Distributor, 2001 Chevy Tracker Ragtop Towd
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271626 is a reply to message #271622] Tue, 10 February 2015 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Here's the photo Skip found, along with an extract from a message I sent to
someone off-line yesterday:

While looking for those photos, I happened to notice
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/455-oil-pan-capacity/p10800.html
There, the relationships and measurements are much more clear than in most
of the views, despite the dipstick tube having not yet been trimmed.
Notice that:

(1) The oil pickup extends down to about 7-1/4", putting it near the
7-1/2" you postulated for the depth of the pan.

(2) The horizontal baffle (presumably intended to suppress ripples on the
surface of the oil and missing from a lot of engines) is right at 4-3/8".

(3) The two rods to the right of the tape are near the bottom of their
strokes, and are at about 4" below the flange -- just enough to clear the
oil pool at 4-3/8" (3q.).

It's all pretty convincing to me. And I still don't know where that 5th
quart of oil hides unless it is that the front section is actually almost
empty when the engine shuts down and is only slightly refilled by drain
down. That would allow for 3 in the deep end, 1 in the shallow end, and 1
in the filter.

Ken H.

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Skip Hartline
wrote:

> I don't know if this helps. I found a photo in Ken Hendersons albums of a
> side view of crank in block with tape measure beside it and it appears that
> the crank extends down 4" from the bottom of the block at the bottom of
> the throw.
> Skip Hartline
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Dip stick calibration question [message #271681 is a reply to message #271626] Wed, 11 February 2015 09:16 Go to previous message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Ken Henderson wrote on Tue, 10 February 2015 13:14
Here's the photo Skip found, along with an extract from a message I sent to someone off-line yesterday:

While looking for those photos, I happened to notice http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/455-oil-pan-capacity/p10800.html There, the relationships and measurements are much more clear than in most of the views, despite the dipstick tube having not yet been trimmed.
Notice that:

(1) The oil pickup extends down to about 7-1/4", putting it near the 7-1/2" you postulated for the depth of the pan.

(2) The horizontal baffle (presumably intended to suppress ripples on the surface of the oil and missing from a lot of engines) is right at 4-3/8".

(3) The two rods to the right of the tape are near the bottom of their strokes, and are at about 4" below the flange -- just enough to clear the oil pool at 4-3/8" (3q.).

It's all pretty convincing to me. And I still don't know where that 5th quart of oil hides unless it is that the front section is actually almost empty when the engine shuts down and is only slightly refilled by drain down. That would allow for 3 in the deep end, 1 in the shallow end, and 1 in the filter.

Ken H.

And, those measurements were a great help to make the case. Thank you for thinking to do that and post the pictures.

I don't find it at all out of line that a 455 will have a quart or maybe a little more oil "in process" when it is running. There are lots of places to put it. I don't feel like running the whole list, but those that have ever built up a dry engine will agree. And, it would not surprise me that if someone discovered that the front pan section was almost empty when running.

Remember the video of an engine with clear valve gear covers that got posted a little while ago? (It might have been FB.) It took 30~45 seconds for the rockers to show oil. So, the pump was running that long to re-fill the in process oil and it probably wasn't done yet. There is always lube oil that has long dwell in the valve gear case. Part of this is counted on to cool the lube oil.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] 1978 GMC Royale 23 ft ?
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Recommended tow bar - MiniCooper
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 01:27:19 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00925 seconds