GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Re: [GMCnet] Why a carrier in the navy never appealed to me- fuel tank progress
Re: [GMCnet] Why a carrier in the navy never appealed to me- fuel tank progress [message #246805] Tue, 08 April 2014 17:28 Go to next message
Jim Bounds is currently offline  Jim Bounds   United States
Messages: 842
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
We have found crushed and missing body pads are a big factor in crushed fuel, brake, air, lp lines and wiring.  You need 1/2" gap between the body and frame.  $50 for 20 body pads 1/2" thick. Durometer does not matter as much as the decoupling effect you get with 1/2" gap. This decoupling reduces transmitted vibration.

Jim Bounds

-------- Original message --------
From: Bob de Kruyff <NEXT2POOL@AOL.COM>
Date: 04/07/2014 10:42 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Why a carrier in the navy never appealed to me- fuel
tank progress



Joe Weir wrote on Sun, 06 April 2014 20:50
> That is a thought.  There is a gap between the frame and the body, so there should be room at the top of the tank, but there are impressions of the top of the tank on the aluminum above like they have been rubbing. 
>
> Bob de Kruyff wrote on Sun, 06 April 2014 21:14
> > Well the thread has taken a 90 deg turn. However, some people cut the underfloor aluminum and insulation to give the sender adequate clearance so that vibration doesn't crack the fittings that may be hard up against the floor underside.

I'm sure the pads are part of it, but I think they are close anyway. I don't think it will hurt to provide a bit of relief there.
--
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] Why a carrier in the navy never appealed to me- fuel tank progress [message #246816 is a reply to message #246805] Tue, 08 April 2014 19:22 Go to previous message
Joe Weir is currently offline  Joe Weir   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: February 2013
Location: Columbia, SC
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Big Jim,

Thanks for the reminder. I have a set of 1/2" pads cooling their jets in a box in the coach, awaiting their turn. I am somewhat unsure about the install process, though. Now would be the time, however, since I have it all jacked up.

Jim Bounds wrote on Tue, 08 April 2014 17:28

We have found crushed and missing body pads are a big factor in crushed fuel, brake, air, lp lines and wiring.  You need 1/2" gap between the body and frame.  $50 for 20 body pads 1/2" thick. Durometer does not matter as much as the decoupling effect you get with 1/2" gap. This decoupling reduces transmitted vibration.

Jim Bounds


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist




76 Birchaven - "Wicked Mistress" - New engine, trans, alum radiator, brakes, Sully airbags, fuel lines, seats, adult beverage center... those Coachmen guys were really thinking about us second hand owners by including that beverage center... Columbia, SC.
Previous Topic: GMCMart - Wes Caughlin?
Next Topic: Electric Choke Conversion for Carb.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 17:21:50 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00754 seconds