GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » changing steel wheels to alum
changing steel wheels to alum [message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 09:06 Go to next message
C Boyd is currently offline  C Boyd   United States
Messages: 2629
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 18
Senior Member
I am currently in a discussion about how many threads are allowed by DOT to show after tightening. It is centered on replacing front steel wheels on a big truck with Alcoas. This particular truck has the cone shaped lug nuts and tapered holes and are lug centered but the same discussion also covers changing the hub centered wheels also with the flat washers attached to the nut. The issue; is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads showing after installation. Trucks that come from the factory with Alcoas do have longer studs and probably have 1/2" stud showing. The tire store that this newbie uses says he needs longer ($500) studs to meet DOT requirements. I have ran Alcoas on the big trucks with short studs for 15 years with no issues. I did have them covered with nut covers and have been thru MANY spot DOT checks and have passed without asking me to remove a nut cover to check? I believe that 2-3 threads showing is safe from experience. Google DOT did not help. Alcoa says to use the longer studs and special Alcoa lugnuts on the hub centered wheels but no info on the tapered wheels as they are basicly obsolete.
Anybody know what the DOT requirements are??


C. Boyd
76 Crestmont
East Tennessee
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184434 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 10:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Harry is currently offline  Harry   Canada
Messages: 1888
Registered: October 2007
Location: Victoria, BC CANADA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Should be at least 3 threads showing.
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184455 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 12:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powerjon is currently offline  powerjon   United States
Messages: 2446
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 5
Senior Member
We have been having this discussion over and over for years and
years. I had written a email on this many years ago pointing to this
information.

Paraphrased from GMCMI newsletter 84, page 2 article:

"Owners installing Alcoa wheels do not have to change the original
studs since there is sufficient thread length for proper mounting
provided by the Alcoa Swivel lug nuts, The original stud and Alcoa
wheel combination allows for .532 inches of thread, which is more than
the pitch diameter of the stud. A longer stud does not provide more
strength, it just has more threads exposed."

Having extra threads exposed do not make it any safer.

JR Wright
78 Buskirk Stretch
Michigan


>
>
> I am currently in a discussion about how many threads are allowed by
> DOT to show after tightening. It is centered on replacing front
> steel wheels on a big truck with Alcoas. This particular truck has
> the cone shaped lug nuts and tapered holes and are lug centered but
> the same discussion also covers changing the hub centered wheels
> also with the flat washers attached to the nut. The issue; is the
> stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads showing after
> installation. Trucks that come from the factory with Alcoas do have
> longer studs and probably have 1/2" stud showing. The tire store
> that this newbie uses says he needs longer ($500) studs to meet DOT
> requirements. I have ran Alcoas on the big trucks with short studs
> for 15 years with no issues. I did have them covered with nut
> covers and have been thru MANY spot DOT checks and have passed
> without asking me to remove a nut cover to check? I believe that
> 2-3 threads showing is safe from experience. Google DOT did not help
> . Alcoa says to use the longer studs and special Alcoa lugnuts on
> the hub centered wheels but no info on the tapered wheels as they
> are basicly obsolete.
> Anybody know what the DOT requirements are??
>
> --
> C. Boyd
> 76 Crestmont
> East Tennessee
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



J.R. Wright
GMC GreatLaker
GMC Eastern States
GMCMI
78 30' Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion Under Reconstruction
Michigan
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184465 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 13:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Sharpe is currently offline  John Sharpe   United States
Messages: 489
Registered: February 2006
Location: Texas
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Quote:

is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads showing after installation.....


Anything past the nut is decoration. 3 threads should be fine. The weakest point of the stud is where the threads start at the shank. I'm not from MO but if more than three threads are required by the DOT I say, "Show Me"


John Sharpe
Humble,TX
'78 Eleganza TBI
'89 Spectrum 2000 MPI V-10
'40 Ford Panel Delivery TPI
johnasharpe@gmail.com
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184466 is a reply to message #184465] Fri, 14 September 2012 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
This whole discussion makes me think that somewhere Michael Scott is shouting "That's what she said!"


Larry Davick
Fremont, California
A Mystery Machine
'76 (ish) Palm Beach

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Sharpe" <johnasharpe@earthlink.net>
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 11:43:54 AM
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum

Quote:
> is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads showing after installation.....

Anything past the nut is decoration. 3 threads should be fine. The weakest point of the stud is where the threads start at the shank. I'm not from MO but if more than three threads are required by the DOT I say, "Show Me"
--
John Sharpe
Humble,TX
'78 Eleganza TBI
'89 Spectrum 2000 MPI V-10
'40 Ford Deluxe TBI
mailto:johnasharpe@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184467 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 14:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Chuck,

I don't know about DOT, but if you show a copy of this to anyone doubting
whether 2-3 threads is enough, they'll probably leave you alone in
bewilderment:

https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/viewdoc/.../3315811

Ken H.


On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Charles Boyd <covered-wagon@comcast.net>wrote:

>
>
> I am currently in a discussion about how many threads are allowed by DOT
> to show after tightening. It is centered on replacing front steel wheels
> on a big truck with Alcoas. This particular truck has the cone shaped lug
> nuts and tapered holes and are lug centered but the same discussion also
> covers changing the hub centered wheels also with the flat washers attached
> to the nut. The issue; is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads
> showing after installation. Trucks that come from the factory with Alcoas
> do have longer studs and probably have 1/2" stud showing. The tire store
> that this newbie uses says he needs longer ($500) studs to meet DOT
> requirements. I have ran Alcoas on the big trucks with short studs for 15
> years with no issues. I did have them covered with nut covers and have
> been thru MANY spot DOT checks and have passed without asking me to remove
> a nut cover to check? I believe that 2-3 threads showing is safe from
> experience. Google DOT did not help
> . Alcoa says to use the longer studs and special Alcoa lugnuts on the
> hub centered wheels but no info on the tapered wheels as they are basicly
> obsolete.
> Anybody know what the DOT requirements are??
> ..
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184476 is a reply to message #184467] Fri, 14 September 2012 15:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member

Hi, Ken.

This is apparently a bad (incomplete?) link.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*






> From: hend4800@bellsouth.net
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:10:51 -0400
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum
>
> Chuck,
>
> I don't know about DOT, but if you show a copy of this to anyone doubting
> whether 2-3 threads is enough, they'll probably leave you alone in
> bewilderment:
>
> https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/viewdoc/.../3315811
>
> Ken H.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Charles Boyd <covered-wagon@comcast.net>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I am currently in a discussion about how many threads are allowed by DOT
> > to show after tightening. It is centered on replacing front steel wheels
> > on a big truck with Alcoas. This particular truck has the cone shaped lug
> > nuts and tapered holes and are lug centered but the same discussion also
> > covers changing the hub centered wheels also with the flat washers attached
> > to the nut. The issue; is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads
> > showing after installation. Trucks that come from the factory with Alcoas
> > do have longer studs and probably have 1/2" stud showing. The tire store
> > that this newbie uses says he needs longer ($500) studs to meet DOT
> > requirements. I have ran Alcoas on the big trucks with short studs for 15
> > years with no issues. I did have them covered with nut covers and have
> > been thru MANY spot DOT checks and have passed without asking me to remove
> > a nut cover to check? I believe that 2-3 threads showing is safe from
> > experience. Google DOT did not help
> > . Alcoa says to use the longer studs and special Alcoa lugnuts on the
> > hub centered wheels but no info on the tapered wheels as they are basicly
> > obsolete.
> > Anybody know what the DOT requirements are??
> > ..

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184493 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 18:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
noi is currently offline  noi   United States
Messages: 293
Registered: October 2010
Location: South of Fremont
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Greetings:

The FAA Part AC 43.13....

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/99c827db9baac81b86256b4500596c4e/$FILE/Chapter%2007.pdf

Chapter 7 - Page 11 - f says....

"After the nut has been tightened, make sure the bolt or stud has at least one thread showing past the nut"

This should be enough to bewilder anyone as Ken H. was trying for Smile


Carl P.
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184494 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 18:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
winter is currently offline  winter   United States
Messages: 247
Registered: September 2007
Location: MPLS MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
silly people

trucks use their tires all the time. Planes only use their tires part of the time. It only makes sense that the number of threads showing should go up if you are always using your wheels Very Happy
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184500 is a reply to message #184494] Fri, 14 September 2012 19:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
winter wrote on Fri, 14 September 2012 19:58

silly people

trucks use their tires all the time. Planes only use their tires part of the time. It only makes sense that the number of threads showing should go up if you are always using your wheels Very Happy

But,

Trucks don't burn rubber EVERY time they stop and airplanes sure do..

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184501 is a reply to message #184424] Fri, 14 September 2012 19:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
winter is currently offline  winter   United States
Messages: 247
Registered: September 2007
Location: MPLS MN
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Depends on the truck. Some burn rubber every time they start.

Of course with $4 gas and $4.5 diesel, that kind of driving isn't very smart.
Re: changing steel wheels to alum [message #184502 is a reply to message #184465] Fri, 14 September 2012 19:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
John Sharpe wrote on Fri, 14 September 2012 14:43

Quote:

is the stud long enough if there are 2-3 threads showing after installation.....


Anything past the nut is decoration. 3 threads should be fine. The weakest point of the stud is where the threads start at the shank. I'm not from MO but if more than three threads are required by the DOT I say, "Show Me"

KenH is right even if the link does not work... (no surprise there)

As a past member of both IFI (International Fastener Institute) and the ASTM Fastener Advisory Board, I can tell you for a fact that one fastener diameter of threats engages is all that is required for 100% of the fastener tensile strength. The reason FAA, NRC, BuShips and NTSB want threads to protrude is for inspection of the the engagement of the thread locking system when locking fasteners (be they ESN or PTL) are involved. There is no protrusion required if a nut is safety wired to the mating screw.

I don't believe the requirement for thread to extend out of a lug nut even exists. If it does, I want to see the language and get all over someone's sCase.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184517 is a reply to message #184476] Fri, 14 September 2012 22:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
This will get it, but not as cleanly as that Google reply got it for me:

https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/detail/3315811

Ken H.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:38 PM, D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:

>
> Hi, Ken.
>
> This is apparently a bad (incomplete?) link.




> ...
> > I don't know about DOT, but if you show a copy of this to anyone doubting
> > whether 2-3 threads is enough, they'll probably leave you alone in
> > bewilderment:
> >
> > https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/viewdoc/.../3315811
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184518 is a reply to message #184494] Fri, 14 September 2012 22:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Hey Jerrod,

You reckon there might be a bit more stress on the bolts / nuts on a 747 that weighs about 975,000 pounds when taking off than a big
rig?

Rob "one of the silly people" M.


-----Original Message-----
From: jerrod winter

silly people

trucks use their tires all the time. Planes only use their tires part of the time. It only makes sense that the number of threads
showing should go up if you are always using your wheels :d

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184521 is a reply to message #184517] Fri, 14 September 2012 22:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Ken,

FLASHBACK!

As I read your first message regarding the number of exposed threads the number one and one half popped into my mind.

I read through the document and found Figure 2 and if you look at it carefully it sure looks like one and one half threads are
exposed.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Ken Henderson
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:14 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum

This will get it, but not as cleanly as that Google reply got it for me:

https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/detail/3315811

Ken H.

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 4:38 PM, D C *Mac* Macdonald wrote:

>
> Hi, Ken.
>
> This is apparently a bad (incomplete?) link.

...
> > I don't know about DOT, but if you show a copy of this to anyone doubting
> > whether 2-3 threads is enough, they'll probably leave you alone in
> > bewilderment:
> >
> > https://standards.nasa.gov/documents/viewdoc/.../3315811
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184538 is a reply to message #184521] Sat, 15 September 2012 00:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jaholland is currently offline  jaholland   United States
Messages: 565
Registered: June 2010
Location: Sweet Home Alebamy
Karma: 0
Senior Member

HOWDY ;

I have been following this thread with interest

BUT

I can't seem to grasp the concept of chancing
the steel wheels into aluminum wheels `

~ Joe ~


/_]*[__][] *[__|] ~ * '73 TZE063V101887 "
" O----------OO--]* ~ '78 TZE168V100234 "
" " Joe & Lavelle " "
" 'sweet home alebamy'
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184539 is a reply to message #184538] Sat, 15 September 2012 01:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powerjon is currently offline  powerjon   United States
Messages: 2446
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Joe,
Number 1 - Ride, the new wheels are round and don't flex, that was the
first thing that I noticed. The new 16" steel rims that some are
using have acceptable ride.
Number 2 - 16.5 tires in the right rating, size and quality are
getting harder to find

JR Wright
78 Buskirk Stretch
Michigan

On Sep 15, 2012, at 1:50 AM, J A Holland wrote:

>
>
>
> HOWDY ;
>
> I have been following this thread with interest
>
> BUT
>
> I can't seem to grasp the concept of chancing
> the steel wheels into aluminum wheels `
>
> ~ Joe ~
>
> --
> /_]*[__][] *[__|] ~ * '73 TZE063V101887 ""
> O----------OO--]* ~ '78 TZE168V100234 ""
> " Joe & Lavelle " ""
> 'sweet home alebamy'
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



J.R. Wright
GMC GreatLaker
GMC Eastern States
GMCMI
78 30' Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion Under Reconstruction
Michigan
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184549 is a reply to message #184538] Sat, 15 September 2012 07:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
jaholland wrote on Sat, 15 September 2012 01:50

HOWDY ;

I have been following this thread with interest

BUT

I can't seem to grasp the concept of chancing the steel wheels into aluminum wheels `

~ Joe ~

Joe,

Are you a lame stream media person?
You are reacting to just the title and only the title.

I strongly suggest that, in the future, you read whatever more completely before you expend the effort to misunderstand it.Wink

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] changing steel wheels to alum [message #184559 is a reply to message #184539] Sat, 15 September 2012 08:29 Go to previous message
jaholland is currently offline  jaholland   United States
Messages: 565
Registered: June 2010
Location: Sweet Home Alebamy
Karma: 0
Senior Member
~ BUT
How Can Steel Wheels
Be Changed Into
Aluminum Wheels ?

~ Still Confused ~

~ Joe ~








powerjon wrote on Sat, 15 September 2012 01:38

Joe,
Number 1 - Ride, the new wheels are round and don't flex, that was the
first thing that I noticed. The new 16" steel rims that some are
using have acceptable ride.
Number 2 - 16.5 tires in the right rating, size and quality are
getting harder to find

JR Wright
78 Buskirk Stretch
Michigan

On Sep 15, 2012, at 1:50 AM, J A Holland wrote:

>
>
>
> HOWDY ;
>
> I have been following this thread with interest
>
> BUT
>
> I can't seem to grasp the concept of chancing
> the steel wheels into aluminum wheels `
>
> ~ Joe ~
>
> --
> /_]*[__][] *[__|] ~ * '73 TZE063V101887 ""
> O----------OO--]* ~ '78 TZE168V100234 ""
> " Joe & Lavelle " ""
> 'sweet home alebamy'
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist





/_]*[__][] *[__|] ~ * '73 TZE063V101887 "
" O----------OO--]* ~ '78 TZE168V100234 "
" " Joe & Lavelle " "
" 'sweet home alebamy'
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] GMCMI 2012 Fall Vendor List!
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Folding bikes, custom rack & padded carry cases for sale
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 27 18:21:18 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01287 seconds