GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Is the check valve necessary
Is the check valve necessary [message #163469] Sun, 18 March 2012 23:17 Go to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
I have a check valve on the input side of the water heater. It decided to quit and is restricting the forward water flow. I took it out today and it has a plastic center plunger with a brass case. The plastic plunger is broken.

I understand it's purpose. The purpose is to keep expanding hot water from backing up into the cold water system. I do not mind that back up as I have an accumulator to take up that slack but I'm thinking I'll probably be irritated if I turn on the cold water and initially find warm water coming out.

I looked on McMaster-Carr for an appropriate replacement. If I order it tomorrow I know they will deliver it the next day if UPS can figure out how to get the 35 miles to my house from McMaster in Chicago. I'm trying to decide which one to get and also decide if I really need it in the first place.

I also see some plastic ball check valves. I'm wondering it that might be a better idea for this application.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Is the check valve necessary [message #163489 is a reply to message #163469] Mon, 19 March 2012 07:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Ken Burton wrote on Mon, 19 March 2012 00:17

I have a check valve on the input side of the water heater. It decided to quit and is restricting the forward water flow. I took it out today and it has a plastic center plunger with a brass case. The plastic plunger is broken.

I understand it's purpose. The purpose is to keep expanding hot water from backing up into the cold water system. I do not mind that back up as I have an accumulator to take up that slack but I'm thinking I'll probably be irritated if I turn on the cold water and initially find warm water coming out.

I looked on McMaster-Carr for an appropriate replacement. If I order it tomorrow I know they will deliver it the next day if UPS can figure out how to get the 35 miles to my house from McMaster in Chicago. I'm trying to decide which one to get and also decide if I really need it in the first place.

I also see some plastic ball check valves. I'm wondering it that might be a better idea for this application.


Ken,

My 73 is all sweat or flared copper, it doesn't have said check valve. I don't believe it ever did and it has not been any issue.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Is the check valve necessary [message #163499 is a reply to message #163469] Mon, 19 March 2012 08:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Ken Burton wrote on Sun, 18 March 2012 22:17

I have a check valve on the input side of the water heater. It decided to quit and is restricting the forward water flow. I took it out today and it has a plastic center plunger with a brass case. The plastic plunger is broken.

I understand it's purpose. The purpose is to keep expanding hot water from backing up into the cold water system. I do not mind that back up as I have an accumulator to take up that slack but I'm thinking I'll probably be irritated if I turn on the cold water and initially find warm water coming out.

I looked on McMaster-Carr for an appropriate replacement. If I order it tomorrow I know they will deliver it the next day if UPS can figure out how to get the 35 miles to my house from McMaster in Chicago. I'm trying to decide which one to get and also decide if I really need it in the first place.

I also see some plastic ball check valves. I'm wondering it that might be a better idea for this application.


Mine cracked about 10 or so years ago and I took it out. I have seen no adverse effects to date.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Is the check valve necessary [message #163509 is a reply to message #163469] Mon, 19 March 2012 10:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dan W is currently offline  Dan W   United States
Messages: 11
Registered: March 2012
Karma: 0
Junior Member
You will probably not experience any problem by leaving it out but there is a potential for serious burns.

RV Hot water tanks frequently trap a pocket of air in them especially after initial charge of system. When the water in tank gets hot this air wants to expand and presure in tank goes up. When a cold water tap is opened this expanding air can push hot water back down the cold water lines and out the cold water tap. If your water heater heats water to scolding temperatures this can cause severe burns when unexpected scolding water comes out cold water tap. If your heater has an engine heat option I would definately keep the check valve as these tanks frequently reach very high temperatures.
--
Dan Winchester
gmc.dwinchester.com
Sent from HTC phone

Ken Burton <n9cv@comcast.net> wrote:



I have a check valve on the input side of the water heater. It decided to quit and is restricting the forward water flow. I took it out today and it has a plastic center plunger with a brass case. The plastic plunger is broken.

I understand it's purpose. The purpose is to keep expanding hot water from backing up into the cold water system. I do not mind that back up as I have an accumulator to take up that slack but I'm thinking I'll probably be irritated if I turn on the cold water and initially find warm water coming out.

I looked on McMaster-Carr for an appropriate replacement. If I order it tomorrow I know they will deliver it the next day if UPS can figure out how to get the 35 miles to my house from McMaster in Chicago. I'm trying to decide which one to get and also decide if I really need it in the first place.

I also see some plastic ball check valves. I'm wondering it that might be a better idea for this application.

--
Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
_____________________________________________

GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: Is the check valve necessary [message #163511 is a reply to message #163469] Mon, 19 March 2012 10:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
roy1 is currently offline  roy1   United States
Messages: 2126
Registered: July 2004
Location: Minden nevada
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Mine didn't come with one so I added one. I didn't notice any difference.

Roy Keen Minden,NV 76 X Glenbrook
Re: Is the check valve necessary [message #163576 is a reply to message #163469] Mon, 19 March 2012 22:10 Go to previous message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Thanks for the opinions. I went to a local plumbing supply warehouse today. The had what I needed for $13.00. I installed it tonight. In the morning I'll reinstall the lower cabinet in the bath module if everything is dry and there is no evidence of leaks. Hopefully I'm done screwing around with this one. I now have more water flow that I have ever had in that coach. The old one must have been broken (internally) for a long time.

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Previous Topic: I went to a funeral today
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Fresh Water Pump Problems and More
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 09 09:15:39 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03243 seconds