|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless Air System [message #154011 is a reply to message #153961] |
Wed, 21 December 2011 22:20 |
bukzin
Messages: 840 Registered: April 2004 Location: North California
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Gary,
I terms of function and usage, how would this new system
be different/better than your first version?
All the way from Chico,
Bukzin
1977 Palm Beach
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Wireless Air System [message #154039 is a reply to message #154020] |
Thu, 22 December 2011 08:46 |
|
Well, gee, Gary. I need to update my illustration that goes in John
Shotwell's presentation so Gene can update his illustration in his
presentation that compares the two systems as far as total parts and mess
is concerned. Otherwise, some fool will wonder where the wire went when
they get their new wireless in.
Great job thinking through the test bench.
So, when are you going to put together a drop-in, pre-assembled, turn-key
solution? You could probably get rich in two lifetimes.
Byron
-----Original Message-----
From: Gary Bovee <gcbgold@digitalpath.net>
Reply-To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:08:55 -0800
To: <gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Wireless Air System
>Richard,
>
>I found it to be fairly expensive to have the aluminum frame built like
>my
>original one. After doing some looking around I remembered seeing
>pictures
>of what Ray Erspamer air setup when he redid his air system some time
>ago.
>I contacted him and he said he used UHMW plastic material and it has held
>up
>great. So I ordered some and built the frame using it instead of
>aluminum.
>Works great. Easy to work with. You can cut it with a table saw.
>Drills
>easily. That solves a problem for someone trying to figure out what to
>use
>to build a frame. It looks great when you are done.
>
>The wireless kit in the pic is different than the one I installed on my
>coach 15 months ago. Same part number, but new an improved. The digital
>remote has a number of icons that mine does not have such as low battery,
>leak detected, fail indicator for valve blockage or communication failure
>and more.
>
>The two(2) connections on the digital manifold are the easy slip in style
>instead of the old style connector that you had to use a wrench to
>tighten
>like mine.
>
>The new wireless air system comes with the digital remote mated with the
>digital manifold. No more having to tough the two together on setup to
>try
>and get them to recognize each other.
>
>There are now only two (2) wire to hook-up to the coach with this setup
>as
>compared to three (3) my old one. One wire goes to ground and the other
>to
>the ignition switch.
>
>Those are the main difference. Not a lot, but a few.
>
>Gary
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>GMCnet mailing list
>Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
--
Byron Songer
Full-timing to enjoy the USA
Former owner but still an admirer
GMC paint schemes at -
http://www.songerconsulting.net
|
|
|
|
|
|