| [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update [message #134622] |
Thu, 14 July 2011 16:08  |
Gary Worobec
Messages: 867
Registered: May 2005
Karma: -1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From the SEMA Legislative News Letter June 30, 2011
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will require an orange-and-black label be placed on fuel pumps dispensing gasoline with 15% ethanol (E15). The label will warn consumers not to use the fuel in vehicles older than model-year 2001 since it could cause damage. The EPA had previously approved the sale of E15 for vehicles made in MY 2001 or later, actions opposed by SEMA. While making it "illegal" to use E15 in older vehicles, the agency placed the burden on the motorist not to misfuel the vehicle. The EPA agreed with SEMA that the corrosive effects associated with E15 posed a risk to these vehicles. In comments previously submitted to the EPA, SEMA opposed the labeling rule as inadequate protection.
Several lawsuits have been filed to overturn the EPA's decision to allow the sale of E15. It may take months or even years to resolve the suits. SEMA-supported legislation has also been introduced in Congress to block implementation of the E15 rulings. SEMA will continue to oppose E15 until there are conclusive scientific findings that demonstrate that it will not harm automobiles of any age as a result of corrosion or other chemical incompatibilities. SEMA has consistently voiced concern that ethanol increases water formation, which can then create formic acid and corrode metals, plastics and rubber. SEMA represents thousands of companies that market products for these vehicles and, through its SEMA Action Network, millions of enthusiasts who buy and operate these automobiles.
Thanks
Gary and Joanne Worobec
1973 GMC Glacier
Anza, CA
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update [message #134624 is a reply to message #134622] |
Thu, 14 July 2011 16:45  |
GeorgeRud
Messages: 1380
Registered: February 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
It would seem that the current E-10 is already causing enough damage to older machines that perhaps they may have a point and can succeed in their lawsuit.
We all like clean air, but is the ethanol really helping? I'd love to see some actual scientific results that haven't been spun by the various factions!
George Rudawsky
Chicago, IL
75 Palm Beach
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update [message #134626 is a reply to message #134622] |
Thu, 14 July 2011 16:55 |
willietrucker
Messages: 83
Registered: April 2010
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 0
|
Member |
|
|
SEMA is one group that is at the nationwide forefront of this issue and many others in regards to antique vehicles.
It would be of great benefit to all GMC or classic car owners to join this organization and support it.
You can join the SEMA Action Network at: http://www.semasan.com/san/join.aspx
I've signed up several car collectors in my area so if you sign up, please use my name.
Here's how you do it: just write Tom Henderson in the “please specify” section of the online registration form under “How Did You Hear About SAN?”
Thanks.
Tom Henderson
Elgin, TX
'76 Birchaven 23'
GMC..."Gimme More Cash"
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update [message #135070 is a reply to message #134624] |
Mon, 18 July 2011 17:49 |
jhbridges
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I would too. Until a few years ago, I almost never saw a burining car beside the road. Now, it's a monthly occurrance. I got to wonder, is this due to alcohol in the fuel, or the higher line pressure used in injected engines, or (c) all of the above?
--johnny
--- On Thu, 7/14/11, George Rudawsky <GeorgeRud@aol.com> wrote:
From: George Rudawsky <GeorgeRud@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Date: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 9:45 PM
It would seem that the current E-10 is already causing enough damage to older machines that perhaps they may have a point and can succeed in their lawsuit.
We all like clean air, but is the ethanol really helping? I'd love to see some actual scientific results that haven't been spun by the various factions!
--
George Rudawsky
Chicago, IL
75 Palm Beach
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update [message #135094 is a reply to message #135070] |
Mon, 18 July 2011 20:02 |
James Hupy
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The cars that I remember burning most frequently started with the VW
squarebacks and 72 & later fuer injection VW busses. The hoses that VW first
used were not up to the task after a few years in the ozone atmosphere of So
Cal. I worked on a lot of those things. The higher temperatures in the
engine compartments coupled with heavy laden air cooled engines was a recipe
for a burn job. Later CIS cars like the Rabbit & Jetta & Fox autos had good
high pressure lines and banjo fittings. The GMC has some similarities to the
VW busses. Poorly cooled engine compartments, heavily laden, crappy fuel
line material given the current state of our fuel supply. We need to be ever
vigilant in our quest for the ultimate hoses. It is out there, but is not
cheap, and it doesen't last forever with oxygenated fuels. We can complain
about the stuff, but we are faced with the reality of having to deal with
it. Can't just curse the dark, we must seek the light. Enough philosophy
101.<Grin>
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Johnny Bridges <jhbridges@ymail.com> wrote:
> I would too. Until a few years ago, I almost never saw a burining car
> beside the road. Now, it's a monthly occurrance. I got to wonder, is this
> due to alcohol in the fuel, or the higher line pressure used in injected
> engines, or (c) all of the above?
>
> --johnny
>
> --- On Thu, 7/14/11, George Rudawsky <GeorgeRud@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: George Rudawsky <GeorgeRud@aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] SEMA E-15 update
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 9:45 PM
>
>
>
>
> It would seem that the current E-10 is already causing enough damage to
> older machines that perhaps they may have a point and can succeed in their
> lawsuit.
>
> We all like clean air, but is the ethanol really helping? I'd love to see
> some actual scientific results that haven't been spun by the various
> factions!
> --
> George Rudawsky
> Chicago, IL
> 75 Palm Beach
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
