|
|
|
Re: That "Other" Air Bag setup [message #115347 is a reply to message #115340] |
Thu, 17 February 2011 10:56 |
Luvn737s
Messages: 1106 Registered: June 2007
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I think the engineers that designed the dual bag and quadra bag setups had a center support plate in there for a reason! This one looks like any sideward load is trying to rip the bag apart.
Randy
1973 26' Painted Desert
Ahwatukee (Phoenix) AZ
|
|
|
Re: That "Other" Air Bag setup [message #115349 is a reply to message #115345] |
Thu, 17 February 2011 11:01 |
Don A
Messages: 895 Registered: October 2008 Location: Dallas, TX
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Don't think it is a grammer problem.
leak tested before installed.
$600.00 both sides, installed free.
clever but really doesn't look like much travel.
Don Adams Dallas, TX
'76 26' Glenbrook, '90 Sidekick
rebuilt by R Archer, powered by J Bounds, Koba [IMG]http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/data/6109/G2.jpg[/IMG]
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] That "Other" Air Bag setup [message #115353 is a reply to message #115342] |
Thu, 17 February 2011 11:21 |
|
mike miller
Messages: 3576 Registered: February 2004 Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
k2gkk wrote on Thu, 17 February 2011 08:30 |
Interesting, but wouldn't the suspension
travel be SEVERELY limited using this?
...
|
I was thinking the same.
It looks like it has enough travel for "travel," but wouldn't provide enough travel to do any leveling at the camp site.
They do make a "triple convoluted" air-bag that could be used on something like this design. (Using slightly shorter "spacers.") MAYBE the triple bag would provide enough travel to be usable.
I hope the bag they picked has internal bump stops.
Mike Miller -- Hillsboro, OR -- on the Black list
(#2)`78 23' Birchaven Rear Bath -- (#3)`77 23' Birchaven Side Bath
More Sidekicks than GMC's and a late model Malibu called 'Boo'
http://m000035.blogspot.com
|
|
|