GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM
[GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110152] Wed, 29 December 2010 18:46 Go to next message
Charles Aulgur is currently offline  Charles Aulgur   United States
Messages: 78
Registered: March 2006
Karma: 0
Member

Chuck
Is there any problem on this, ie: does it make the torque box bind??
Also, how/what did you do/use for the jacking system that I see
atached on the bogie frame?

Thankx
--
CBWood

Charles,

The massive bearing mount Rick designed that is bolted to the inboard
side of the suspension arm and the harden steel bearing is probably
10 times stronger then the bearing I used on my original concept
which I had no problems with several years of driving. I don't think
there is any concern with the torque box twisting. The true track
bearing is only putting a horizontal in and out load on the torque
box I don't know if you noticed the angle-iron bracket has three
different mounting holes for the bearing which is mounted in the
center hole. My intension is to some day mount two true track
bearings,one in the top hole and one in the bottom hole to see if it
helps reduce the suspension arm twisting and maybe reduce some of the
inherent mid axle steering. I get all of my GMC parts free from Jim
so if I break something he will replace it.

As for the 12v dc stabilizer jack you saw in the photo, they are
probably the most useful modification I have made to our GMC. I have
two in the rear and two in the front that have been on our current
GMC for over 20 years and I had the same units on a previous GMC for
5 years. They are RV trailer tong jacks that I got from Camping
World back in 1985 that I modified slightly for mounting on the GMC.
They are rated for 3,000 pounds and have a slip clutch that prevents
any chance of overloading. Manny is the only person I know of that
has copied the concept. There are 4 DPDT switches on my dash for
control. When I go to a campground I level my coach using the air
bags like most of you folks and then put down the jacks and vent the
air bags down and you can't see any rocking of our coach based on
internal activities (don't I wish). The front jacks will lift the
front off the ground but the slip clutch will will prevent lifting
the rear totally of the ground. I have been in only one camp ground
where I could not lift the rear high enough to get it level.
However, they will hold the total weight of the rear.

I use the one on the left rear to do double duty. When I am driving,
I use it to actuate the parking brake (shown on my "chuckieboy" photo
site) to lock the two left rear wheels together. The jack has enough
capability to hold the coach position with the air bag vented. You
don't want to know how I know that. When at a camp site I disengage
a locking lug and it them becomes a stabilizer jack. I store out GMC
in an inclosed area between the garage and a high block wall on the
left side. I have a garage side door that allows entry while parked
but I do not have enough room to access the left and right side of
the MH. When I park it I lower the two rear jacks and vent off the
air bags. When I get ready to move it, I hook my garage air system
to a QD under the front hood and air-up the coach air system.

If anyone has any questions about anything GMC please feel free to
contact me by email or phone.

Chuck who has to much crap on his GMC
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110155 is a reply to message #110152] Wed, 29 December 2010 19:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GeorgeRud is currently offline  GeorgeRud   United States
Messages: 1380
Registered: February 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire changing and other projects on the rear suspension easier. I do have a J hook and jacks to lift the rear, but having a preinstalled jack would be the best (if it could lift high enough to insert some jackstands under the frame).

As with most things, all it takes is money!


George Rudawsky
Chicago, IL
75 Palm Beach

[Updated on: Wed, 29 December 2010 19:09]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110168 is a reply to message #110155] Wed, 29 December 2010 20:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hardie Johnson is currently offline  Hardie Johnson   United States
Messages: 483
Registered: January 2004
Location: Raleigh NC
Karma: 0
Senior Member
GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07

I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire changing and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>

Nitrogen cylinders would work better.


Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
Raleigh NC
Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110174 is a reply to message #110168] Wed, 29 December 2010 21:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Formula 1 cars have auto jacking cylinders that are actuated by an air hose
QD fitting in the exterior of the car. Those cylinders raise the car in a
second or two. I don't know if the technology would trickle down to
something heavy duty enough to lift 8000# of GMC motorhome rearend. Most of
the levelers on Diesel pushers couldn't lift the entire coach but just
operate in the range of the suspension travel. More of a stabilizer concept.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC Royale 403

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Hardie Johnson <hardie.j@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07
> > I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be
> incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire changing
> and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>
>
> Nitrogen cylinders would work better.
> --
> Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
> 1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
> Raleigh NC
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110175 is a reply to message #110152] Wed, 29 December 2010 21:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cbwoodsr is currently offline  cbwoodsr   United States
Messages: 1063
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
so when do we build the kit and make it another option to put on the list???
1. hydraulic maybe instead of elect/screw
2. 2 in back so it will lift it for changing tire?


CBWood
77 Kingslay
MWC OK
ONLINE PARTS PROGRAM
www.GMCMHParts.com

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110177 is a reply to message #110174] Wed, 29 December 2010 21:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
larry erd is currently offline  larry erd   United States
Messages: 132
Registered: August 2010
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I had a 1936 ALVIS drop head coupe ( British car similar to a Bentley) and
it had 4 built in scissors
jacks also 4 wheel adjustable shocks from the dash,dual ignition, 9 valve
springs per valve etc., etc. Not much
new on cars except computers.
larry erd
77 kingsley

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 PM, James Hupy <jamesh1296@gmail.com> wrote:

> Formula 1 cars have auto jacking cylinders that are actuated by an air hose
> QD fitting in the exterior of the car. Those cylinders raise the car in a
> second or two. I don't know if the technology would trickle down to
> something heavy duty enough to lift 8000# of GMC motorhome rearend. Most of
> the levelers on Diesel pushers couldn't lift the entire coach but just
> operate in the range of the suspension travel. More of a stabilizer
> concept.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC Royale 403
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Hardie Johnson <hardie.j@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07
> > > I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be
> > incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire
> changing
> > and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>
> >
> > Nitrogen cylinders would work better.
> > --
> > Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
> > 1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
> > Raleigh NC
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> >
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110187 is a reply to message #110177] Wed, 29 December 2010 22:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
I'll bet it came with Lucas Electrics, and Girling brakes that used mineral
oil too. Probably had those wonderful baulk ring syncronizers that you had
to pause momentarily in the neutral gate or snick the gears. If they were
like most British cars of the time, they had about 3" of wheel travel. Big
ol' long stroke engines and a wonderful exhaust note. British cars have
wonderful flowing designs but the mechanicals aren't on a par with the
styling in my opinion. Worked on XK Jags & those valve lash adjustments
could take you up to a week to get right. Fortunately, after break in and
initial adjustment they seldom needed attention until they were quite worn
out. On the racing versions of those XK Jags, the aluminium fenders and
bonnets were made out of alloys so soft that you could dent them with your
elbows if you weren't careful when you worked on them. I tried to not be too
critical on these cars, I kinda do like them in spite of their quirks.
Nothing sounds like a Jag or a Healy inline six at full song. Kinda like the
exhaust note of a 455 Olds, with that siamese center exhaust port and huge
exhaust crossover, they have a very distinct sound. I love it, some people
hate it. Kinda like the sound of a Harley, you either love it or hate it.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC Royale 403

On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:21 PM, larry erd <1ljerd@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had a 1936 ALVIS drop head coupe ( British car similar to a Bentley) and
> it had 4 built in scissors
> jacks also 4 wheel adjustable shocks from the dash,dual ignition, 9 valve
> springs per valve etc., etc. Not much
> new on cars except computers.
> larry erd
> 77 kingsley
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 PM, James Hupy <jamesh1296@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Formula 1 cars have auto jacking cylinders that are actuated by an air
> hose
> > QD fitting in the exterior of the car. Those cylinders raise the car in a
> > second or two. I don't know if the technology would trickle down to
> > something heavy duty enough to lift 8000# of GMC motorhome rearend. Most
> of
> > the levelers on Diesel pushers couldn't lift the entire coach but just
> > operate in the range of the suspension travel. More of a stabilizer
> > concept.
> > Jim Hupy
> > Salem, Or
> > 78 GMC Royale 403
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Hardie Johnson <hardie.j@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07
> > > > I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be
> > > incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire
> > changing
> > > and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>
> > >
> > > Nitrogen cylinders would work better.
> > > --
> > > Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
> > > 1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
> > > Raleigh NC
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GMCnet mailing list
> > > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> >
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110189 is a reply to message #110187] Wed, 29 December 2010 22:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
larry erd is currently offline  larry erd   United States
Messages: 132
Registered: August 2010
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Your right about the lucas stuff, but the Alvis had 2 of everything,2
electric fuel pumps,
coil and magneto ign.,3 su carbs, etc, it even had something from GMC, a 4
speed all syncro trans
that was built under license from GMC (why didn't GMC build one till
what,1958 or so?)
larry erd
lake wales,fl.
77 kinsley



On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:11 PM, James Hupy <jamesh1296@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'll bet it came with Lucas Electrics, and Girling brakes that used mineral
> oil too. Probably had those wonderful baulk ring syncronizers that you had
> to pause momentarily in the neutral gate or snick the gears. If they were
> like most British cars of the time, they had about 3" of wheel travel. Big
> ol' long stroke engines and a wonderful exhaust note. British cars have
> wonderful flowing designs but the mechanicals aren't on a par with the
> styling in my opinion. Worked on XK Jags & those valve lash adjustments
> could take you up to a week to get right. Fortunately, after break in and
> initial adjustment they seldom needed attention until they were quite worn
> out. On the racing versions of those XK Jags, the aluminium fenders and
> bonnets were made out of alloys so soft that you could dent them with your
> elbows if you weren't careful when you worked on them. I tried to not be
> too
> critical on these cars, I kinda do like them in spite of their quirks.
> Nothing sounds like a Jag or a Healy inline six at full song. Kinda like
> the
> exhaust note of a 455 Olds, with that siamese center exhaust port and huge
> exhaust crossover, they have a very distinct sound. I love it, some people
> hate it. Kinda like the sound of a Harley, you either love it or hate it.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC Royale 403
>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:21 PM, larry erd <1ljerd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I had a 1936 ALVIS drop head coupe ( British car similar to a Bentley)
> and
> > it had 4 built in scissors
> > jacks also 4 wheel adjustable shocks from the dash,dual ignition, 9 valve
> > springs per valve etc., etc. Not much
> > new on cars except computers.
> > larry erd
> > 77 kingsley
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:00 PM, James Hupy <jamesh1296@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Formula 1 cars have auto jacking cylinders that are actuated by an air
> > hose
> > > QD fitting in the exterior of the car. Those cylinders raise the car in
> a
> > > second or two. I don't know if the technology would trickle down to
> > > something heavy duty enough to lift 8000# of GMC motorhome rearend.
> Most
> > of
> > > the levelers on Diesel pushers couldn't lift the entire coach but just
> > > operate in the range of the suspension travel. More of a stabilizer
> > > concept.
> > > Jim Hupy
> > > Salem, Or
> > > 78 GMC Royale 403
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Hardie Johnson <hardie.j@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07
> > > > > I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be
> > > > incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire
> > > changing
> > > > and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>
> > > >
> > > > Nitrogen cylinders would work better.
> > > > --
> > > > Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
> > > > 1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
> > > > Raleigh NC
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > GMCnet mailing list
> > > > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > > > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > GMCnet mailing list
> > > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GMCnet mailing list
> > List Information and Subscription Options:
> > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
> >
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110196 is a reply to message #110174] Thu, 30 December 2010 02:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jayrabe is currently offline  jayrabe   United States
Messages: 509
Registered: June 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Karma: 0
Senior Member

Camping World wants $160 ea for their 3000#, and $280 for the 3500#

But eBay has bunches of them, and lots cheaper, though who knows if they're equivalent quality.
Cheapest 3000# I saw in brief look had a starting bid of $69, offered by T-Motorsports
http://www.t-motorsports.com/
Their website lists the 3000# jack at $73. Looks like it has a manual switch on the jack, while some of the more expensive ones are wired to trailer plugs.

ebay had lots of 3500# versions, including one with a 6" drop leg for total of 24" extension for buyitnow $140 (item# 350422831610). Seems two of those on the rear ought to lift the wheels off the ground pretty easily. They also have 4000# versions for $200+.

OTOH I imagine the mounting might be a significant engineering challenge. One that I looked at (and they're all pretty similar) sticks up 18" above the mounting plate. Love to see some details of how Chuck modified and mounted his.

I'm afraid my wannado list just got longer...

J
76PB
Portland, OR


> > GeorgeRud wrote on Wed, 29 December 2010 20:07
> > > I love the idea of the tongue jack. I just wonder if one could be
> > incorporated to actualy lift the rear off the ground to make tire changing
> > and other projects on the rear suspension easier. <>
> >
> > Nitrogen cylinders would work better.
> > --
> > Hardie Johnson "Crashj"
> > 1973 26 foot Glacier, White Thing
> > Raleigh NC


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110216 is a reply to message #110152] Thu, 30 December 2010 08:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
cbwoodsr is currently offline  cbwoodsr   United States
Messages: 1063
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
..The front jacks will lift the front off the ground but the slip clutch will will prevent lifting the rear totally of the ground

Would a 3500lb one doit??


CBWood
77 Kingslay
MWC OK
ONLINE PARTS PROGRAM
www.GMCMHParts.com

Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110220 is a reply to message #110216] Thu, 30 December 2010 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mschultz is currently offline  mschultz   United States
Messages: 113
Registered: September 2010
Location: Maple City, MI
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I guess this topic is wondering a bit into the whole British thing, but I have to say a appreciate Jim Hupy's remarks about the XK Jags. Sort of got into a relationship with one about a dozen years ago and have never looked back. Drove it from Michigan to Georgia, about 200 miles, with the drophead down for most of the way in October and had a great time. Not your best candidate for a toad, but would be a hoot to bring it along sometime. Oh ya, XK 150 DHC, red/black.
Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110222 is a reply to message #110220] Thu, 30 December 2010 09:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mschultz is currently offline  mschultz   United States
Messages: 113
Registered: September 2010
Location: Maple City, MI
Karma: 0
Senior Member
OOPs, 2000 miles round trip
Re: [GMCnet] RUE TRACK ON REACTION ARM SYSTEM [message #110228 is a reply to message #110152] Thu, 30 December 2010 10:22 Go to previous message
cbwoodsr is currently offline  cbwoodsr   United States
Messages: 1063
Registered: February 2004
Karma: 0
Senior Member
How did you modify the jack for mounting??
Front - Back...Pics?
This may be one of the 'best' items for the GMC..
Its a PITA to jack even to just change wheels


CBWood
77 Kingslay
MWC OK
ONLINE PARTS PROGRAM
www.GMCMHParts.com

Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Nitrogen in tires
Next Topic: [GMCnet] furnace
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 20 11:22:42 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21332 seconds