GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Vacuum Advance
Re: [GMCnet] Vacuum Advance [message #65866 is a reply to message #65860] Sat, 28 November 2009 16:18 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Steven Ferguson is currently offline  Steven Ferguson   United States
Messages: 3447
Registered: May 2006
Karma:
Senior Member
Roger,
What Ken said is correct.

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Roger P. Gleason <rgleas@peoplepc.com> wrote:
>
>
> I would have to go measure it, but I would think that if you eliminate the TVS switch then the vacuum line would go to the manifold.
>
> According to the manual the carburator vacuum is lower to assist in cold engine conditions. Since most of the time we are driving these they are warm. I would think you would get poor gas mileage at the very least.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Steve Ferguson
'76 EII
Sierra Vista, AZ
Urethane bushing source
www.bdub.net/ferguson/
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] lower steering shaft complete new replacement
Next Topic: Another "Not News to Us" article
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 23 20:12:40 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02022 seconds