GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » new counter top (stone)
Re: [GMCnet] new counter top [message #60109 is a reply to message #60080] Wed, 14 October 2009 19:28 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
rwbmitiopt@comcast.net is currently offline  rwbmitiopt@comcast.net   United States
Messages: 189
Registered: April 2005
Karma:
Senior Member
Hey Gordon, long time no hear. Yeah I'm switching from this antiquated system to what the rest of the world uses. Anyway all granite that I've used in our remodels comes in cm thicknesses or thats what the suppliers spec.. I think my math is still correct for 1 sq/ft of 2cm (101/128")thick stone. BTW did you by chance take a pic of my counter at the Darrington rally?
Anyway good hearing from you,
] Randy
(
Tin Gerbil wrote on Wed, 14 October 2009 10:32

Randy;
My gosh, 2cm. Is your heritage showing or couldn't you find your REAL
tape measure? Square feet and cm's has my calculator flashing red.
Tre's complique'
Gordon "hiding from the rain"

rwbmitiopt wrote:
>
> I just went out and weighed a scrap of marble (maybe a bit lighter
> than granite but not by much). It works out to 12.5 lbs per square
> foot for 2cm thick material (common thickness for counter top)
> Estimate the square footage of the counter top is 10 sq ft so total
> weight is under 150 lbs. Randy
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist





Randall Burns
Sammamish WA
75 EX GB
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Windshields at the Eastern States Rally
Next Topic: Another sighting
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jul 01 02:12:31 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03296 seconds