| [GMCnet] Re: Fall GMCMI Rally in Chippewa falls [message #367037 is a reply to message #367036] |
Mon, 04 October 2021 09:34   |
k2gkk
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
From what I have read here over the past years,
it would seem to me that a good idea would be to
install a new fusible link OUTSIDE of the wiring
harness. This would avoid having a severely melted
link from destroying an entire harness as has been
reported.
D C "Mac" Macdonald
Amateur Radio K2GKK
Since 30 November '53
USAF and FAA, Retired
Member GMCMI & Classics
Oklahoma City, OK
"The Money Pit"
TZE166V101966
'76 ex-Palm Beach
k2gkk + hotmail dot com
________________________________
From: John R.Lebetski
Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 09:05
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Subject: [GMCnet] Re: Fall GMCMI Rally in Chippewa falls
I was just about to comment on the fusible link topic, but Ken B covered it very well.
I don’t have the schematic in front of me but from memory is that add on breaker were to open, charge Voltage would overshoot high, That could cause
secondary damage.
There was pretty much a “reason why” behind everything engineers did. Only understanding part of the picture and not the whole scope leads to
problems when people try to improve on designs.
--
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
|
|
|
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
