GMCforum: GMCnet » [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media [message #188228 is a reply to message #188226]

Thu, 25 October 2012 14:56

sgltrac

Messages: 2797
Registered: April 2011

Karma:

Senior Member

I see and can open (email user)

Sully
77 royale
Seattle

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 25, 2012, at 12:47 PM, A. <markbb1@netzero.com> wrote:

>
>
> Ken Henderson wrote on Thu, 25 October 2012 13:20
>> Kerry,
>>
>> Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but your photo-inclusion efforts are for naught for many GMCNeters. That is, those of us who use email only, never the Phorum. Our messages are pure text -- NO attachments nor higher order ASCII characters or graphics allowed. For example, I got only a couple of blank lines after your "Using the approach described below you can have your photos shown INSIDE your post like this:"
>>
>> Since we are such a large proportion, perhaps even a majority, of those monitoring and posting, links to GMCMHPhotos continues to be the best option. And it's not likely most of us will ever be converted to the Phorum, at least in its present form, despite considerable harassment by a few individuals... :)
>>
>> Ken H.
> Ken,
>
> I think Kerry is proposing a method that will work for BOTH email users and forum users. Forum users get a picture imbedded in the post, and email users don't get something they don't want.
>
> Here's a test of what I am talking about. If it works, forum users will see a picture of my proposed floor plan from the photo site accompanied by a URL, and email users will see the URL. Email users can do whatever they normally do on the URL to view the picture, forum users can ignore the URL and just view the photo.
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/data/6131/medium/Floor_Plan_Proposed.jpg
>
> If you can see the URL, and can open it, let us know and we can declare this a win-win.
> --
> '73 23' Sequoia
> UA (Upper Alabama)
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Sully 77 Royale basket case. Future motorhome land speed record holder(bucket list) Seattle, Wa.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		[GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Mr ERFisher on Thu, 25 October 2012 06:07
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Kingsley Coach on Thu, 25 October 2012 07:12
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Byron Songer on Thu, 25 October 2012 07:38
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: kerry pinkerton on Thu, 25 October 2012 08:01
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Thu, 25 October 2012 13:20
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: A Hamilto on Thu, 25 October 2012 14:47
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: sgltrac on Thu, 25 October 2012 14:56
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: A Hamilto on Thu, 25 October 2012 15:18
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ronald Pottol on Thu, 25 October 2012 16:13
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Thu, 25 October 2012 17:22
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Thu, 25 October 2012 17:37
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Sean on Thu, 25 October 2012 17:45
		[GMCnet] Onan oil spill By: werewilfs on Thu, 25 October 2012 17:48
		Re: [GMCnet] Onan oil spill By: Mr ERFisher on Fri, 26 October 2012 04:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Onan oil spill By: powerjon on Fri, 26 October 2012 07:27
		Re: [GMCnet] Onan oil spill By: USAussie on Fri, 26 October 2012 14:40
		[GMCnet] should I bag my plans to do bag work By: Douglas Norton on Fri, 26 October 2012 08:56
		Re: [GMCnet] should I bag my plans to do bag work By: powerjon on Fri, 26 October 2012 12:14
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: A Hamilto on Thu, 25 October 2012 18:25
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: kerry pinkerton on Thu, 25 October 2012 08:16
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: armandminnie on Thu, 25 October 2012 09:12
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: jayrabe on Thu, 25 October 2012 12:07
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Sean on Thu, 25 October 2012 12:34
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: jayrabe on Thu, 25 October 2012 15:08
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: kerry pinkerton on Thu, 25 October 2012 20:53
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Byron Songer on Thu, 25 October 2012 21:50
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: drstretchgsi on Thu, 25 October 2012 22:27
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: kerry pinkerton on Fri, 26 October 2012 10:41
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: midlf on Fri, 26 October 2012 12:08
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: werewilfs on Fri, 26 October 2012 20:02
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Mr ERFisher on Fri, 26 October 2012 20:04
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: werewilfs on Fri, 26 October 2012 20:15
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Don A on Fri, 26 October 2012 23:45
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Sat, 27 October 2012 05:55
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Matt Colie on Sat, 27 October 2012 09:48
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Sat, 27 October 2012 10:46
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Billy Massey on Sat, 27 October 2012 12:14
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Billy Massey on Sat, 27 October 2012 12:11
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Byron Songer on Sun, 28 October 2012 17:22
		[GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Mr ERFisher on Wed, 03 April 2013 06:01
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Ken Henderson on Wed, 03 April 2013 06:15
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Mr ERFisher on Wed, 03 April 2013 06:20
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Billy Massey on Wed, 03 April 2013 12:09
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: jhbridges on Wed, 03 April 2013 12:33
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: tphipps on Wed, 03 April 2013 06:25
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Don A on Wed, 03 April 2013 10:04
		Re: [GMCnet] Fwd: The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: jhbridges on Wed, 03 April 2013 12:14
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: rcjordan on Wed, 03 April 2013 10:06
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: rcjordan on Wed, 03 April 2013 10:10
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: Don A on Wed, 03 April 2013 10:34
		Re: [GMCnet] The risk of publishing GMC info on Social Media By: James Hupy on Wed, 03 April 2013 10:34

Previous Topic:	Comparison of Wood Dinette and Flexsteel Dinette?
Next Topic:	Re: [GMCnet] Resting In Peace

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed Jun 26 07:15:04 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.09596 seconds