GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance
[GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99910] Wed, 15 September 2010 12:48 Go to next message
kelvin is currently offline  kelvin   United States
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Need to know what the resistance does related to fuel level. This is
what I've found at one online site.
Accurate? Wrong?


Thanks in advance,
Kelvin


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/With General Motors analog resistance fuel gauges, the basic operating
principle is the same but electrically opposite. Resistance in the
sending unit decreases as the fuel level drops, and increases and the
level goes up. When the tank is empty, the sending unit reads about zero
ohms, and when the tank is full it reads about 90 ohms. Gauge operation
is also the same with maximum needle deflection corresponding to minimum
resistance in the sending unit. In this case, maximum deflection is
required to move the needle all the way over to the empty mark./

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99914 is a reply to message #99910] Wed, 15 September 2010 13:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
""Need to know what the resistance does related to fuel level. This is
what I've found at one online site.
Accurate? Wrong?


Thanks in advance,
Kelvin
"" Yes, that article is correct--90 ohms means full and 0 is empty


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99915 is a reply to message #99910] Wed, 15 September 2010 13:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Kelvin, you got me curious so I got my manual out and checked the schematic
which is on page 12-12 in the x-7525 GMC manual. It shows high resistance
with an empty tank, and low resistance with a full tank. There is NOT 12
volts in the sender circuit. Do not check it with full battery voltage or
you will probably burn out the resistance wire in the sender. About the only
fix for the senders is replacement. Again, sorry for the confusing
information.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 Royale 403

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Kelvin Dietz <kelvin@datsuns.com> wrote:

> Need to know what the resistance does related to fuel level. This is
> what I've found at one online site.
> Accurate? Wrong?
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Kelvin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /With General Motors analog resistance fuel gauges, the basic operating
> principle is the same but electrically opposite. Resistance in the
> sending unit decreases as the fuel level drops, and increases and the
> level goes up. When the tank is empty, the sending unit reads about zero
> ohms, and when the tank is full it reads about 90 ohms. Gauge operation
> is also the same with maximum needle deflection corresponding to minimum
> resistance in the sending unit. In this case, maximum deflection is
> required to move the needle all the way over to the empty mark./
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99919 is a reply to message #99915] Wed, 15 September 2010 13:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Geez Kelvin, I did it again. Forty lashes at least. What Bob said is
correct. The schematic is confusing but agrees with him. I forgot about the
float arm belcrank changing the range of motion. up is down and down is up
at least in this case.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 Royale 403

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, James Hupy <jamesh1296@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kelvin, you got me curious so I got my manual out and checked the schematic
> which is on page 12-12 in the x-7525 GMC manual. It shows high resistance
> with an empty tank, and low resistance with a full tank. There is NOT 12
> volts in the sender circuit. Do not check it with full battery voltage or
> you will probably burn out the resistance wire in the sender. About the only
> fix for the senders is replacement. Again, sorry for the confusing
> information.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 Royale 403
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Kelvin Dietz <kelvin@datsuns.com>wrote:
>
>> Need to know what the resistance does related to fuel level. This is
>> what I've found at one online site.
>> Accurate? Wrong?
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Kelvin
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> /With General Motors analog resistance fuel gauges, the basic operating
>> principle is the same but electrically opposite. Resistance in the
>> sending unit decreases as the fuel level drops, and increases and the
>> level goes up. When the tank is empty, the sending unit reads about zero
>> ohms, and when the tank is full it reads about 90 ohms. Gauge operation
>> is also the same with maximum needle deflection corresponding to minimum
>> resistance in the sending unit. In this case, maximum deflection is
>> required to move the needle all the way over to the empty mark./
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> List Information and Subscription Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99920 is a reply to message #99919] Wed, 15 September 2010 13:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
""Geez Kelvin, I did it again. Forty lashes at least. What Bob said is
correct. The schematic is confusing but agrees with him. I forgot about the
float arm belcrank changing the range of motion. up is down and down is up
at least in this case.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 Royale 403
""

I wonder what Rob Mueller would have said Smile


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99921 is a reply to message #99910] Wed, 15 September 2010 13:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
tmaki is currently offline  tmaki   United States
Messages: 200
Registered: September 2005
Karma: 0
Senior Member
On 9/15/2010 10:48 AM, Kelvin Dietz wrote:


> Need to know what the resistance does related to fuel level. This is
> what I've found at one online site.
> Accurate? Wrong?

Accurate.

Be careful, though, if you're depending on "0" = 0 and "90"
= 90. Those are general design specifications and in
practical terms, you'll be bouncing off padded walls trying
to figure out why you can't get 0 and 90 on your meter.
Although yours might be spot on.

When I had mine apart, I measured them and found they were
way off (I posted the readings months ago.). The senders are
nominally a 90-degree arc, but read nowhere near a
linear/angular relationship, although yours might be spot
on. I measured mine in terms of angle hoping to find by some
chance that there was a direct relationship between angle
and resistance. Not even close. Although yours might be spot on.

Also, the wiper contact travels along the inside of the arc
of resistance wire wound around a curved slice of insulating
cardboard-like material. That curved element gets warped
after time, and the wiper contact element may get skewed off
the resistance wire, making sporadic contact, and after a
bunch of cycles may just skitter off the edge, or the
insulator warps so much that it breaks the hair-fine wire.

Although yours might be spot on.



Toby Maki
'73 Glacier 230
Riverside, CA
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99924 is a reply to message #99920] Wed, 15 September 2010 14:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Bob, lets just hope that he doesn't see this. I have already confused Kelvin
enough for both of us. He probably thinks I'm a candidate for a straight
jacket by now. With all these trips to the OHSU hospital to see my wife, I
can't tell day from night. Might as well be up and down too.
Jim Hupy

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Bob de Kruyff <NEXT2POOL@aol.com> wrote:

>
>
> ""Geez Kelvin, I did it again. Forty lashes at least. What Bob said is
> correct. The schematic is confusing but agrees with him. I forgot about the
> float arm belcrank changing the range of motion. up is down and down is up
> at least in this case.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 Royale 403
> ""
>
> I wonder what Rob Mueller would have said :)
> --
> Bob de Kruyff
> 78 Eleganza
> Chandler, AZ
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] GMC Fuel Tank Sensor resistance [message #99931 is a reply to message #99924] Wed, 15 September 2010 14:23 Go to previous message
WD0AFQ is currently offline  WD0AFQ   United States
Messages: 7111
Registered: November 2004
Location: Dexter, Mo.
Karma: 207
Senior Member
Kelvin, when I rebuild one I check for 90, 45, and 0.
Dan


3 In Stainless Exhaust Headers One Ton All Discs/Reaction Arm 355 FD/Quad Bag/Alum Radiator Manny Tran/New eng. Holley EFI/10 Tire Air Monitoring System Solarized Coach/Upgraded Windows Satelite TV/On Demand Hot Water/3Way Refer
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] 403 engine rebuild
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Daily Reminder to Vote for "The Pickle"
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 29 16:33:28 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04206 seconds