Re: [GMCnet] Gmclist Digest, Vol 23, Issue 179 [message #90131] |
Sun, 27 June 2010 11:50 |
Gerald Work
Messages: 102 Registered: June 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Glad you found it helpful, Jim. We used the low profile Carrier unit and are very pleased. Still some around from dealer inventories.
Jerry
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 27, 2010, at 9:31 AM, gmclist-request@temp.gmcnet.org wrote:
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 09:43:37 -0700
> From: Jim Kanomata <jimkanomata@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Bad news from the corn belt
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Message-ID:
> <AANLkTimG14oEqK9NDi90-KGVK4V4jvYbVOlRS3MiNd4_@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Jerry,
> Thank you for your report.
> The heat from the exhaust pipe is strong, even when you get in town driving
> the pipe does not drop in temperature significantly.
> Re. the roof A/C, aerodynamic drag on a low profile units seem to help.
> The Dometic unit is the worst design I have seen, Carrier has the best, but
> they are no longer manufacturing them
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|