GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Converting OEM Rear Brakes to 3" Wide Shoes
[GMCnet] Converting OEM Rear Brakes to 3" Wide Shoes [message #60658] Mon, 19 October 2009 09:25 Go to next message
fbhtxak is currently offline  fbhtxak   United States
Messages: 191
Registered: April 2006
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Thanks to all who commented, both on this forum and privately, on this
subject. My objective in using the wider shoes was to reduce brake fade
under emergency stop conditions on steep mountain grades Theory
notwithstanding, actual experience by those who have installed wider shoes
is that there is no discernable improvement under those conditions(except
for this situation, the OEM brakes are adequate for the way I operate the
vehicle).

On to a disk brake retrofit, at least on the leading rear wheels... 'Knew
that would work but installing wider shoes was a more expedient solution.

As Packard enthusiast Dave Greenberg remembers, the old Packard Motor Car
Company promoted the sale of Packards with "Ask the man who owns one".
'Could be modified for GMCMh owners to "Ask the man who has done that".

Fred Hudspeth
'78 Royale - Tyler, TX
'82 Airstream Excella 28'Motorhome, Anchorage, AK

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Converting OEM Rear Brakes to 3" Wide Shoes [message #60750 is a reply to message #60658] Mon, 19 October 2009 22:14 Go to previous message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Fred,
By going with a drum in the rear back , your defeating the full
advantage of the disc. system.
I have been working with few people in perfecting the caliper parking
unit like the one on the Eldorado rear disc. system. I know that if we
wen with all 4 rear parking calipers, it would work, but will not have
the full advantage of the 80mm.
The limiting factor in the rear parking caliper is the lack of enough
force needed to lock the pads.
We have been using Albert Branscom's cable system, but that is another
$500 that we do not want to involve.
We are going to look at a foot operated system as we need more force.
I'm going to have Chuck Augur work on it to see .


On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Fred Hudspeth <fbhtxak@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Thanks to all who commented, both on this forum and privately, on this
> subject. My objective in using the wider shoes was to reduce brake fade
> under emergency stop conditions on steep mountain grades  Theory
> notwithstanding, actual experience by those who have installed wider shoes
> is that there is no discernable improvement under those conditions(except
> for this situation, the OEM brakes are adequate for the way I operate the
> vehicle).
>
> On to a disk brake retrofit, at least on the leading rear wheels... 'Knew
> that would work but installing wider shoes was a more expedient solution.
>
>  As Packard enthusiast Dave Greenberg remembers, the old Packard Motor Car
> Company promoted the sale of Packards with "Ask the man who owns one".
> 'Could be modified for GMCMh owners to "Ask the man who has done that".
>
>  Fred Hudspeth
> '78 Royale - Tyler, TX
> '82 Airstream Excella 28'Motorhome, Anchorage, AK
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> List Information and Subscription Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
List Information and Subscription Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] (no subject)
Next Topic: [GMCnet] The Nitty Gritty
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Nov 02 04:38:53 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00995 seconds