GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Am Fm radio reception
Am Fm radio reception [message #360213] Fri, 20 November 2020 09:40 Go to next message
Scott Nutter is currently offline  Scott Nutter   
Messages: 782
Registered: January 2015
Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Does anyone have ideas on how to improve radio reception? I have the stock antenna on top of the cab, and a aftermarket antenna that goes on top of the windshield. Both work the same(poorly). My FM picks up more than the AM does. My hand held radio will come in crystal clear while my dash radio will not pick up the station.
Also, the in dash radio has engine rev interference, probably because my plugs may not be resistor type. Should I use the house batteries to power the in dash radio? Would that stop the engine interference?
Thanks, Scott


Scott Nutter 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI Houston, Texas
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360214 is a reply to message #360213] Fri, 20 November 2020 10:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bullitthead is currently offline  Bullitthead   United States
Messages: 1411
Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most modern radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket. If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.

Terry Kelpien ASE Master Technician 73 Glacier 260 Smithfield, Va.
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360215 is a reply to message #360214] Fri, 20 November 2020 10:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
Also, try a known good radio.

Dolph Santorine

DE AD0LF

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
Howell EFI/EBL , Reaction Arms, Manny Transmission


> On Nov 20, 2020, at 11:10 AM, Terry via Gmclist wrote:
>
> Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most modern
> radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket. If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC
> circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360216 is a reply to message #360214] Fri, 20 November 2020 10:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Problem is on the transmit side (usually), rather than the receive side.
5000 watts don't quite cut it in an environment cluttered with transmitter
signals. Back in the days of little to no regulations, 100,000 watt
transmitter power was not uncommon.
And offshore, across the Mexican border "outlaw" radio stations had so
much power that you could hear Mother Maybell Carter picking "Wildwood
Flower" on the barbed wire fences in Texas. But, not today. The FCC has
just about killed off the AM stations. So, its not your radio receiver if
you have no antenna problems. I went to Sirius on my cars, same signal for
thousands of miles. But, on my GMC, I never drive with the radio on. Too
many mechanical sounds of impending doom can be masked by it to suit me.
JWID.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 8:10 AM Terry via Gmclist
wrote:

> Substitute a known good antenna right to the radio and check the
> performance. AM is going to require a decent antenna and wire while most
> modern
> radios will get FM with a pocket screwdriver stuck in the antenna socket.
> If your antenna wire is broken anywhere the signal loss will trigger the AGC
> circuit in the radio tuner to turn up the amplifier gain and then all the
> engine noise that is normally present will now be screaming at you.
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360218 is a reply to message #360213] Fri, 20 November 2020 12:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Scott Nutter is currently offline  Scott Nutter   United States
Messages: 782
Registered: January 2015
Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
Senior Member
I forgot to mention that it is a newer alpine stereo in the dash.

Scott Nutter 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI Houston, Texas
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360219 is a reply to message #360218] Fri, 20 November 2020 13:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
My reception was very poor only to find that the connection in the ceiling of the cockpit was loose and almost disconnected. Once plugged in the reception was perfect.

Of course I didn’t find it until I was working on the ceiling!

Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976 Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca.

> On Nov 20, 2020, at 10:27 AM, Scott Nutter via Gmclist wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention that it is a newer alpine stereo in the dash.
> --
> Scott Nutter
> 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera
> installed MSD Atomic EFI
> Houston, Texas
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360223 is a reply to message #360213] Fri, 20 November 2020 19:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.

Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a weak station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.



Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360225 is a reply to message #360223] Fri, 20 November 2020 20:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   Canada
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
RF_Burns wrote on Fri, 20 November 2020 20:47
Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.

Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a weak station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.
Wow Bruce,

You must be almost as old as I am. Did some also contain "fire bottles"?? Did you ever run into those weird types with 12V B+ so they did need a vibrator power supply? Those did last long. Those, nuvistors and compactrons are all gone now.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360226 is a reply to message #360225] Fri, 20 November 2020 22:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Hmpfff! "...almost as old as I am..." and then talk about 12 volts,
nuvistors, etc. Don't you remember the 6 VDC vibrators supplying ALL octal
vacuum tubes, like I do? :-(

Not to mention the scars I still bear from having a pot of molten tar
kicked over on me while watching the making radio batteries from dry cells
during WWII. Luckily, my great uncle, Dr. Marion Folsom, drove up in his
Model T about then. :-)

I still remember the tales told about my uncle who, when I was a little
boy, had one of the first 2-way radios in his Georgia (no "GA" foolishness
in those days) Highway Patrol cruiser. He was widely known for one of his
first broadcasts on it: The announcement that anyone coming to Newton (low
on the bank of the Flint river) that day "would have to do so by boat."

Let's see now, how can I tie this to the GMC???

Ken H.


On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:18 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> RF_Burns wrote on Fri, 20 November 2020 20:47
>> Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the
> AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM
>> band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio
> manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.
>>
>> Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a weak
> station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.
>
> Wow Bruce,
>
> You must be almost as old as I am. Did some also contain "fire
> bottles"?? Did you ever run into those weird types with 12V B+ so they
> did need a
> vibrator power supply? Those did last long. Those, nuvistors and
> compactrons are all gone now.
>
> Matt
>
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL,
> GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum
> Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360227 is a reply to message #360226] Fri, 20 November 2020 23:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
I have some less than fond memories of 6 volt batteries, charged with
generators instead of alternators, and vibratory power supplies that ran
those batteries down in short order when I was parked in some secluded spot
with an "interesting person of the opposite sex". Before cellular
telephones, and nearest houses miles away.
Makes me appreciate the luxury of GMC motorhomes and all the
convenient stuff like generators and isolated starting batteries.
Some of that stuff of the past was just adequate.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 8:43 PM Ken Henderson via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Hmpfff! "...almost as old as I am..." and then talk about 12 volts,
> nuvistors, etc. Don't you remember the 6 VDC vibrators supplying ALL octal
> vacuum tubes, like I do? :-(
>
> Not to mention the scars I still bear from having a pot of molten tar
> kicked over on me while watching the making radio batteries from dry cells
> during WWII. Luckily, my great uncle, Dr. Marion Folsom, drove up in his
> Model T about then. :-)
>
> I still remember the tales told about my uncle who, when I was a little
> boy, had one of the first 2-way radios in his Georgia (no "GA" foolishness
> in those days) Highway Patrol cruiser. He was widely known for one of his
> first broadcasts on it: The announcement that anyone coming to Newton (low
> on the bank of the Flint river) that day "would have to do so by boat."
>
> Let's see now, how can I tie this to the GMC???
>
> Ken H.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:18 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
>
>> RF_Burns wrote on Fri, 20 November 2020 20:47
>>> Many auto radios have a "trimmer" capacitor to match the antenna to the
>> AM tuner. The standard auto antenna is 1/4 wave at mid-band of the FM
>>> band, but it is far off of an optimum AM antenna. Check your radio
>> manual for the AM tuner adjustment if it exists.
>>>
>>> Back in the day when I worked on this stuff, you set the radio to a
> weak
>> station around 1400Khz, then tuned the trimmer for best reception.
>>
>> Wow Bruce,
>>
>> You must be almost as old as I am. Did some also contain "fire
>> bottles"?? Did you ever run into those weird types with 12V B+ so they
>> did need a
>> vibrator power supply? Those did last long. Those, nuvistors and
>> compactrons are all gone now.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> --
>> Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL,
>> GMCES
>> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum
>> Brakes with Applied Control Arms
>> SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360228 is a reply to message #360213] Sat, 21 November 2020 00:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Let's start with the basics on vehicle AM radio antennas. They require a good ground at the base of the antenna. The car / vehicle body is 1/2 of the antenna system and it's connection to the coax to feed RF to the radio is at the base of the antenna. NOT AT THE DASH OR RADIO

Almost every AM radio reception complaint I have ever worked on has been a poor ground connection where the antenna is mounted. On a car it is usually a rusty fender. You disassemble the antenna mounting and simply clean the fender or wherever it is mounted until shiny. Occasionally it was simply loose and only needed tightening. The GMC roof mount is the same thing except it is mounted in Aluminum which corrodes rather than rusts. Coat all of those loosened pieces with anti-seize when reassembling.

The other thing you can do to check this is to unplug the antenna from the radio and check the resistance between the center conductor of the cable and the antenna shaft on the roof. It should be around 1 or 2 ohms. Then check the shield of the cable too a good body ground. It too should be less than 3 ohms. DO NOT USE THE DASH or anything mounted to it as a ground connection for your meter when metering this. The dash is electrically connected to the engine ground and not the body ground.

I had mine corroded and had to clean it up about 15 years ago.

Ken B.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360231 is a reply to message #360213] Sat, 21 November 2020 09:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
You guys are funny!... Unfortunately I am old enough to have worked on some Motorola Twin V radios in Taxi service. A couple of those had motor-generator sets instead of vibrators for the high voltage tubes. Another customer had some nice Marconi units that to save power the transmitter tubes were cold until you hit the PTT then they instantly (about 2-3 seconds) heated up by drawing about 30 Amps of heater current.

GE Prog Line (Progress Line) low-banders were fun too.

I was still fixing Motorola Business Dispatchers and Pye radios into the '90s. They had transistor receivers and tube transmitters.

Yes Matt I worked with all those steam tubes in my day.

On the farm my father would rather crank start tractors than fix the generators. He was running them on 12V rather than 6 by just switching them out of the car (our battery charger) as we had no electricity on the farm. When the generator on the Ford 8N went south, swapping batteries just was a pain. So I replaced the generator with a nice Delco alternator. It started much better on 12V (Grin). Swapped the lights to 12V and it was the only tractor with a working electrical system.

Back to radios (which none of my dads vehicles had until into the '70s). (GMC content here)... I always loved the soft clunk sound of a GM radio turning ON. The heat off the class A audio amplifier was also nice in the winter.


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360232 is a reply to message #360213] Sat, 21 November 2020 12:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Scott Nutter is currently offline  Scott Nutter   United States
Messages: 782
Registered: January 2015
Location: Houston/San Diego
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Ken Burton,
Would it be a good idea to pull a ground wire from the radio chassis to a good body ground source? Would that improve my AM reception?
Scott.


Scott Nutter 1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final drive, Quad bags, Dave Lenzi super duty mid axle disc brakes, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi. Alex Ferrera installed MSD Atomic EFI Houston, Texas

[Updated on: Sat, 21 November 2020 14:14]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360252 is a reply to message #360213] Mon, 23 November 2020 11:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Ground it well, and be sure the antenna is working well. And realize, the AM section of current receivers is shiteye. Some of the Alpines are OK for AM, some aren't. As Bruce said there's likely an AM antenna trimmer on it someplace, look in the Alpine book and set it as advertised.

J.O. Weldon and Nestor Questor built most of the Mexican high power transmitters un der the Continental Electronics banner. I had the privilege of sitting at the table at a convention with several Gurus of the industry (Sellmeyer, Silliman pere and fils, Orban, Foti, Clark and several others) in the Continental hospitality suite drinking Mr J.O.'s whiskey and listening to his stories of the Mexican transmitters for several hours while Nestopr tended bar. (Nestor's idea opf bartending was, if he gave you a full glass of whiskey, he wouldn't have top serve you again quite as soon) Here's a short blurb: https://contelec.com/history/


--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360280 is a reply to message #360232] Wed, 25 November 2020 03:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Do NOT install a wire between the radio and body ground. The radio is already attached to engine ground and if you add the suggested wire you are making a ground loop. (A noise receiving antenna at some undetermined frequency located a few feet away for the two biggest noise generators in the the coach. {the ignition system and the heater fan.})

Also if that wire were installed and one of the braided frame to engine or frame to body jumpers were to open up, which happens frequently on these coaches, you now have an alternate ground path for all of the charging current going to the house batteries and to other things. That wire will not be able to carry the current. It will burn under those conditions.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360282 is a reply to message #360213] Wed, 25 November 2020 07:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Ken,
The 77-78 chassis wiring diagram I have shows the radio ground as being through the radio chassis, not a separate wire, so it gets ground from the dash frame it is mounted to. It also shows the dash is grounded by a separate wire direct the battery Neg (-), NOT to the engine block.

Since the antenna shield is grounded at the antenna (on the body) and also at the radio, the radio chassis is connected to the body ground. Therefore as-built there is already a ground loop in place.

If the engine to body ground straps fail, the antenna cable shield will carry the current. If the battery to engine block ground wire fails, again the antenna coax will complete the ground.

My Farm-boy mechanic and 45+ years in mobile radio communications tells me that separate dash ground wire from the battery should be disconnected from the battery and grounded at the engine.

When GE came out with their first microprocessor controlled, programmable radio we were having endless troubles with instability of the transmitter frequency. They finally sent an Engineer out to look at a new Police car with this issue. He promptly told me I had connected the radio power wrong, the ground wire had to go directly to the battery. I disagreed arguing the radio ground had to share the same ground as the radio case (mounting point) and the antenna ground, therefore be grounded to the vehicle body. But he insisted so we wired the radio ground wire to the battery. It did not fix the radio's instability, but as soon as the engine was started some starter current flowed though the new radio ground wire from the battery and out the case of the radio onto the body ground, through a grounding wire from the body to the engine block. This current was enough to burn a PCB trace from the radio ground wire connection to the radio chassis (case). This caused the 5 volt regulator to loose its proper ground reference and smoked the radio's microprocessor. The Police Chief was not amused and the Engineer was dumbfounded.

GE never did fix the issue as they claimed it worked fine on the bench (into a dummy antenna load) Trouble was when connected to an antenna the RF field when transmitting would upset the radio's voltage regulator powering the Voltage Controlled oscillator (VCO) causing stability in the VCO and therefore transmitter frequency. Once again... works as designed, but not designed to work!

Just my experience


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360284 is a reply to message #360213] Wed, 25 November 2020 07:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
You got to figure anyone who couldn't spell 'master' probably couldn't design a stable radio Smile

(Actually they spelled it 'Mastr' so they could copyright it)

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360286 is a reply to message #360213] Wed, 25 November 2020 07:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
GE claims Mastr stands for "Mobile and station transistor radio".

But I agree, my experience has been GE couldn't seem to make anything that worked with any reliability. Always gave me a warm and fuzzy feeling when getting on a plane to see the GE logo on the engines!


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception [message #360288 is a reply to message #360284] Wed, 25 November 2020 08:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
GE's Mastr 2-way radios were excellent performers.
I have used and maintained lots of them.

D C "Mac" Macdonald
Amateur Radio K2GKK
Since 30 November '53
USAF and FAA, Retired
Member GMCMI & Classics
Oklahoma City, OK
"The Money Pit"
TZE166V101966
'76 ex-Palm Beach
k2gkk + hotmail dot com

________________________________
From: Gmclist on behalf of Johnny Bridges via Gmclist
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2020 07:26
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Cc: Johnny Bridges
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Am Fm radio reception

You got to figure anyone who couldn't spell 'master' probably couldn't design a stable radio :)

(Actually they spelled it 'Mastr' so they could copyright it)

--johnny
--
Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons.
Braselton, Ga.
I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Am Fm radio reception [message #360297 is a reply to message #360282] Wed, 25 November 2020 17:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
RF_Burns wrote on Wed, 25 November 2020 07:13
Ken,
The 77-78 chassis wiring diagram I have shows the radio ground as being through the radio chassis, not a separate wire, so it gets ground from the dash frame it is mounted to. It also shows the dash is grounded by a separate wire direct the battery Neg (-), NOT to the engine block.

You failed to follow that wire any farther at the battery. That wire continues on through the battery connector and to a bolt on the engine Block (engine ground). We frequently call that continuation cable the negative battery cable.


Since the antenna shield is grounded at the antenna (on the body) and also at the radio, the radio chassis is connected to the body ground. Therefore as-built there is already a ground loop in place.

While the above is partially true, the antenna connector shield side is NOT DC connected to the radio frame itself. SO there is NO connection between body and engine ground there


If the engine to body ground straps fail, the antenna cable shield will carry the current. If the battery to engine block ground wire fails, again the antenna coax will complete the ground.

That connection inside the radio does not exist. If it did we would have many, many reports of smoked antenna coax cables and blown radios when the braided jumpers fail or were forgotten to be replaced on engine and transmission swaps. The engine to frame crossover is located on the back of the trans near the rear mount. I have replaced a few of them on other people's coaches.

My Farm-boy mechanic and 45+ years in mobile radio communications tells me that separate dash ground wire from the battery should be disconnected from the battery and grounded at the engine.

Agreed, but see previous comment. GM figured why not do it their way and it has worked just fine (other than corroded or loose connections) for a long time. The dash is still hooked to engine ground just by a slightly longer route on a 2 or 4 ga. cable.

When GE came out with their first microprocessor controlled, programmable radio we were having endless troubles with instability of the transmitter frequency. They finally sent an Engineer out to look at a new Police car with this issue. He promptly told me I had connected the radio power wrong, the ground wire had to go directly to the battery. I disagreed arguing the radio ground had to share the same ground as the radio case (mounting point) and the antenna ground, therefore be grounded to the vehicle body. But he insisted so we wired the radio ground wire to the battery. It did not fix the radio's instability, but as soon as the engine was started some starter current flowed though the new radio ground wire from the battery and out the case of the radio onto the body ground, through a grounding wire from the body to the engine block. This current was enough to burn a PCB trace from the radio ground wire connection to the radio chassis (case). This caused the 5 volt regulator to loose its proper ground reference and smoked the radio's microprocessor. The Police Chief was not amused and the Engineer was dumbfounded.

GE never did fix the issue as they claimed it worked fine on the bench (into a dummy antenna load) Trouble was when connected to an antenna the RF field when transmitting would upset the radio's voltage regulator powering the Voltage Controlled oscillator (VCO) causing stability in the VCO and therefore transmitter frequency. Once again... works as designed, but not designed to work!

Just my experience

Improper grounding will bite you frequently and people do not stop to consider it. What makes ours worse is we have 3 separate grounding systems in a GMC and most people do not stop to consider them.

I did a demonstration one time for Dan Gregg. He attached a ground wire to the base of his Paterson Distributor and ran it to battery negative. I told him not to do it but he disagreed.

The demonstration was to disconnect the starting battery negative cable from the engine block. Upon attempting to start the engine he promptly smoked the 12 ga. wire between the distributor base and the battery he had just installed. We replaced the wire and ran it to the engine instead of the battery.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Previous Topic: engine/trans removal instructions? Drop the front?
Next Topic: Which ATF Again ? Is DEXRON 3, 4,5 and 6 backward compatible?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 20 09:56:12 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01172 seconds