GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Better MPG with gear change - WHY ?
Better MPG with gear change - WHY ? [message #357965] Sun, 23 August 2020 09:14 Go to next message
hertfordnc is currently offline  hertfordnc   United States
Messages: 1164
Registered: September 2009
Location: East NC
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I've seen it said here many times that folks claimed better MPG after switching to a higher final drive ratio.

Also in my Ford Excursion groups, many people claim better MPG after going from 3.73 to 4.10

BUt i know a few car engineers and they are pretty smart guys so when something beats OEM design I am always suspicious.

In the case of the Excursion, it's often related to compensating for larger tires.

Are there other explanations?





Dave & Ellen Silva Hertford, NC 76 Birchaven, 1-ton and other stuff Currently planning the Great american Road Trip Summer 2021 It's gonna take a lot of Adderall to get this thing right.
Re: Better MPG with gear change - WHY ? [message #357966 is a reply to message #357965] Sun, 23 August 2020 09:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
6cuda6 is currently offline  6cuda6   Canada
Messages: 975
Registered: June 2019
Karma: -6
Senior Member
Basically, in a nutshell, puts the engine rpm verses power in a more useable spot in relation to speed.

Rich Mondor, Brockville, ON 77 Hughes 2600
Re: [GMCnet] Better MPG with gear change - WHY ? [message #357969 is a reply to message #357966] Sun, 23 August 2020 09:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powwerjon is currently offline  powwerjon   United States
Messages: 849
Registered: March 2013
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Dave,
The GMC motorhome final drive was a compromise at it was the best that MG had on hand.

The 403 and 455 are really not in a useful power band until the motors are up in rpm say in 2700 to 2800 rpm. As hot rodder say it gets up on the cam!

403 = Big bore and short stroke The motor likes rpm. Our first coach was a 77 with a 403 and it was a real dog in any type of hills and on the flats it never really ran well until over 70 MPH when the rpm was up towards 2700 RPM. Put a Jim K 3.55 final and the coach really woke up and would put the hills with any 455.
Because the engine is now “up on the cam” it is happy and more fuel efficient and not lugging. The 455 is similar but it is a small bore long stroke motor. Mine is a basic explanation and I am sure that Matt C can give you a technical explanation.

Presently run a 3.50 chain drive with a 3.21 final for a 3.66 final ratio and it pulls my 29 1/2’ Buskirk stretch all over the western US. 3.55 and 3.70 gears provide the best service and Jim K thinks that the 3.70 gear is best.

JR Wright
Michigan


> On Aug 23, 2020, at 10:43 AM, 6cuda6--- via Gmclist wrote:
>
> Basically, in a nutshell, puts the engine rpm verses power in a more useable spot in relation to speed.
> --
> Rich Mondor,
>
> Brockville, ON
>
> 77 Hughes 2600
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: Better MPG with gear change - WHY ? [message #357992 is a reply to message #357965] Sun, 23 August 2020 19:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
More vacuum with less load (higher numerical gears) means the primary rods stay pulled in more of the time, metering less fuel. That gives better MPG even with more combustion events per mile.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: Better MPG with gear change - WHY ? [message #358010 is a reply to message #357965] Mon, 24 August 2020 11:16 Go to previous message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
I'm sorry.
I did write a page long explanation, but the forum dumped it when I tried to post it. I don't have time to redo now.
Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Previous Topic: A/C hard start capacitors
Next Topic: Faint GEN light, voltage gauge reads 10, HELP!
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 20 04:31:25 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.08014 seconds