GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » EFI Question
EFI Question [message #349756] Tue, 29 October 2019 12:07 Go to next message
Tom Lins is currently offline  Tom Lins   United States
Messages: 372
Registered: February 2004
Location: St Augustine, FL
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Could someone explain to me why an exhaust leak could affect the reading of a O2 sensor?
I cannot picture how a leak out of a pressurized pipe could make a difference in the AFR reading inside the pipe.
Or am I not understanding something here.



Tom Lins
St Augustine, FL
77 GM Rear Twin, Dry Bath, 455, Aluminum Radiator Quad-Bag Suspension Solar Panel
Manuals on DVD
YOUTUBE Channel: GMC Dealer Training Tapes
http://www.bdub.net/tomlins/
Re: EFI Question [message #349757 is a reply to message #349756] Tue, 29 October 2019 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
I'm no expert but I expect that the pressurized pipe is really filled with pulses of exhaust gas pressure interspersed with pulses of vacuum. The vacuum (less than ambient pressure) draws in outside air.



Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: EFI Question [message #349759 is a reply to message #349757] Tue, 29 October 2019 15:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Tom Lins wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:07
Could someone explain to me why an exhaust leak could affect the reading of a O2 sensor?
I cannot picture how a leak out of a pressurized pipe could make a difference in the AFR reading inside the pipe.
Or am I not understanding something here.
ljdavick wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:34
I'm no expert but I expect that the pressurized pipe is really filled with pulses of exhaust gas pressure interspersed with pulses of vacuum. The vacuum (less than ambient pressure) draws in outside air.
This is exactly the correct answer and it is why when running a closed loop engine in a laboratory setting, we still needed an absolutely tight exhaust system.
Yes, even a little leak can matter.

Matt - the refugee from DynoLand


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] EFI Question [message #349761 is a reply to message #349759] Tue, 29 October 2019 15:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
I agree. Even reversion of gasses or reverberations in sonic pulses in the
gas stream can affect the O2 sensor. Placement of it upstream or downstream
is also critical, but nowhere near as critical as an exhaust leak.
2 stroke exhaust design is almost as critical, particularly on
expansion chamber type exhausts. Pipe shapes, twists and turns, even
welding slag, pipe diameter and length also have an effect.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 1:14 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Tom Lins wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:07
>> Could someone explain to me why an exhaust leak could affect the reading
> of a O2 sensor?
>> I cannot picture how a leak out of a pressurized pipe could make a
> difference in the AFR reading inside the pipe.
>> Or am I not understanding something here.
>
> ljdavick wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:34
>> I'm no expert but I expect that the pressurized pipe is really filled
> with pulses of exhaust gas pressure interspersed with pulses of vacuum. The
>> vacuum (less than ambient pressure) draws in outside air.
>
> This is exactly the correct answer and it is why when running a closed
> loop engine in a laboratory setting, we still needed an absolutely tight
> exhaust system.
> Yes, even a little leak can matter.
>
> Matt - the refugee from DynoLand
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: EFI Question [message #349762 is a reply to message #349756] Tue, 29 October 2019 18:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Because the flow in the tube is more like "- - -- " in the left bank and " -- - - " in the right bank. The low pressure gaps are pretty big where two consecutive cylinders fire on the opposite bank in the 18436572. This can ingest outside air into the leak. False high O2 tells computer to add fuel.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] EFI Question [message #349763 is a reply to message #349761] Tue, 29 October 2019 18:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Asperaton, when moving air has lower pressure than stagnant air.
I see it in our air filter side all the time.

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 1:36 PM James Hupy via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> I agree. Even reversion of gasses or reverberations in sonic pulses in the
> gas stream can affect the O2 sensor. Placement of it upstream or downstream
> is also critical, but nowhere near as critical as an exhaust leak.
> 2 stroke exhaust design is almost as critical, particularly on
> expansion chamber type exhausts. Pipe shapes, twists and turns, even
> welding slag, pipe diameter and length also have an effect.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Oregon
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 1:14 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:
>
>> Tom Lins wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:07
>>> Could someone explain to me why an exhaust leak could affect the
> reading
>> of a O2 sensor?
>>> I cannot picture how a leak out of a pressurized pipe could make a
>> difference in the AFR reading inside the pipe.
>>> Or am I not understanding something here.
>>
>> ljdavick wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:34
>>> I'm no expert but I expect that the pressurized pipe is really filled
>> with pulses of exhaust gas pressure interspersed with pulses of vacuum.
> The
>>> vacuum (less than ambient pressure) draws in outside air.
>>
>> This is exactly the correct answer and it is why when running a closed
>> loop engine in a laboratory setting, we still needed an absolutely tight
>> exhaust system.
>> Yes, even a little leak can matter.
>>
>> Matt - the refugee from DynoLand
>> --
>> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
>> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
>> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
>> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>


--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmcrvparts.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: [GMCnet] EFI Question [message #349764 is a reply to message #349762] Tue, 29 October 2019 18:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
This might get into reaction time for O2 sensor response to rapid
pulsations of different concentrations of air/fuel. I have not got a clue
how rapidly the sensor can read changes like we are discussing. But, I bet
Matt can shed some light on it.
I do know from 1st hand experience that when the system is in closed
loop, that very tiny changes, like a misfiring plug or an injector that
sprays odd patterns occasionally due to foreign stuff in the fuel stream,
will cause fluctuations in rpm. So, is the computer playing catch-up with
erratic information from sensors? I dunno.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 4:11 PM John R. Lebetski via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Because the flow in the tube is more like "- - -- " in the left bank and
> " -- - - " in the right bank. The low pressure gaps are pretty big where
> two consecutive cylinders fire on the opposite bank in the 18436572. This
> can ingest outside air into the leak. False high O2 tells computer to add
> fuel.
> --
> John Lebetski
> Woodstock, IL
> 77 Eleganza II
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] EFI Question [message #349766 is a reply to message #349764] Tue, 29 October 2019 19:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
James Hupy wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 19:25
This might get into reaction time for O2 sensor response to rapid pulsations of different concentrations of air/fuel. I have not got a clue how rapidly the sensor can read changes like we are discussing. But, I bet Matt can shed some light on it.

I do know from 1st hand experience that when the system is in closed loop, that very tiny changes, like a misfiring plug or an injector that sprays odd patterns occasionally due to foreign stuff in the fuel stream, will cause fluctuations in rpm. So, is the computer playing catch-up with erratic information from sensors? I dunno.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

Jim is very right (not any big surprise here), his experience is well founded.

Ready, Long story follows.....
The reaction time of O2 sensors is fast enough that back in the 80s, we were doing a development program for the 302. The OE was having a hard time getting the power that they though should be there without other problems. We did a two fold distribution study. This was a study of first mixture and then charge pressure (just after the intake closes). We could see the variations in mixture by cylinder, but even flow matched injectors could not fix it. This lead to the charge pressure study. Because the intake is a dynamic system, it is also crankshaft speed dependent. We looked at the maps we developed and then went back to watching the O2 signals. Things didn't make sense until we built "stereo EGO" exhaust. Then we used high speed analysis instruments to watch both banks individually. Whoa, we could isolate the individual cylinders! This was not a passcar production ECU, so we were able to adjust the cycle time of injectors by cylinder and then pull up to WOT and configure the individual timing to match. All this from the output of the "stock" (no special part number) O2 sensors. We were able to map and modify the controls to the individual cylinders and not just let the poor ones rule.

Customer was introducing a new and more capable ECU. When we passed the reports along, BOOM. We were in the middle of an unexpected (but very profitable) amazing development program. This was before internet, we tried to Modem the days data to their group. In a month, we had the first ISDN line I had seen installed to pass the days data to them in almost real time.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] EFI Question [message #349773 is a reply to message #349761] Wed, 30 October 2019 18:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Lins is currently offline  Tom Lins   United States
Messages: 372
Registered: February 2004
Location: St Augustine, FL
Karma: 1
Senior Member
James Hupy wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 16:38
I agree. Even reversion of gasses or reverberations in sonic pulses in the
gas stream can affect the O2 sensor. Placement of it upstream or downstream
is also critical, but nowhere near as critical as an exhaust leak.
2 stroke exhaust design is almost as critical, particularly on
expansion chamber type exhausts. Pipe shapes, twists and turns, even
welding slag, pipe diameter and length also have an effect.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Oregon

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 1:14 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Tom Lins wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:07
>> Could someone explain to me why an exhaust leak could affect the reading
> of a O2 sensor?
>> I cannot picture how a leak out of a pressurized pipe could make a
> difference in the AFR reading inside the pipe.
>> Or am I not understanding something here.
>
> ljdavick wrote on Tue, 29 October 2019 13:34
>> I'm no expert but I expect that the pressurized pipe is really filled
> with pulses of exhaust gas pressure interspersed with pulses of vacuum. The
>> vacuum (less than ambient pressure) draws in outside air.
>
> This is exactly the correct answer and it is why when running a closed
> loop engine in a laboratory setting, we still needed an absolutely tight
> exhaust system.
> Yes, even a little leak can matter.
>
> Matt - the refugee from DynoLand
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org






Thank you all that replied, I think I remember some of this from college

Makes sense Thank you all


Tom Lins
St Augustine, FL
77 GM Rear Twin, Dry Bath, 455, Aluminum Radiator Quad-Bag Suspension Solar Panel
Manuals on DVD
YOUTUBE Channel: GMC Dealer Training Tapes
http://www.bdub.net/tomlins/
Re: EFI Question [message #349779 is a reply to message #349756] Thu, 31 October 2019 18:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Tyler is currently offline  Chris Tyler   United States
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Slightly off topic but related:

Given the above discussion about pulses, are 02 sensors/gauges useful as a tuning aid on two stroke engines, or would EGT be more useful?


76 Glenbrook
Re: EFI Question [message #349780 is a reply to message #349779] Thu, 31 October 2019 18:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Chris Tyler wrote on Thu, 31 October 2019 19:16
Slightly off topic but related:

Given the above discussion about pulses, are 02 sensors/gauges useful as a tuning aid on two stroke engines, or would EGT be more useful?
Chris,

I hope you are ready...... EGO - Exhaust Gas O2 UEGO - Wide Band EGO HEGO - Heated EGO

There have been attempts to use EGOs and/or UEGO on some 2 stroke engines. They have been used in development, but in a real world application, there are some big issues. 2 Stroke exhaust temperatures are lower. They are hot enough to light an EGO at load, but they are not reliable to do so. There is (with some special exceptions) more lubricating oil residual in that exhaust. Lubricating oil must contain (even the modern ashless oils) some of the "metallic" antiwear additives. These will foul the chemical process that makes the EGO work. It is very difficult to tell when a sensor is failing, because they don't "go out". From a calibration stand point, they just get slow. So, if you were to use it for initial calibration, you might get by. But, you would have to do this with the understanding that the sensor life may not be very long.

If the electrical system can support it, I HEGO might get you by the slow heat up time.

Is that a help? I can try again if there is a not understood point.

Matt - the engine lab refugee


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
[GMCnet] Re: EFI [message #362838 is a reply to message #349756] Mon, 15 March 2021 18:57 Go to previous message
Billy Massey is currently offline  Billy Massey   United States
Messages: 916
Registered: January 2004
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 1
Senior Member

https://www.gmcrvparts.com/product-p/455-gm08-006-27.1.htm

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 6:41 PM Hanson Email wrote:

> Anyone know of a very low profile intake manifold for an EFI that will keep
> the doghouse from raising its ugly head? Right now the cover raise is about
> 6 inches. Thank you PO.
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:



bdub
bdub.net
Previous Topic: Rostra Cruise Control
Next Topic: Looking for Transmission Lift Tool - Ken Henderson
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Jul 05 05:23:24 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.21184 seconds