GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Fuel Sender Resistance
Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342033] Thu, 28 March 2019 11:23 Go to next message
Justin Brady is currently offline  Justin Brady   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: April 2015
Location: Bell Buckle, TN
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Has anyone measured fuel senders?
My tanks read Empty after using exactly 27 gallons of fuel. So roughly half a tank remaining and I'm on empty.

Normally I fill up anyway, but I'd really prefer them to read a little more accurately than this.

My thought is if I know what the resistance on the senders is maybe I can add some inline resistors to get them to read a little more accurately.
As with an airplane I don't really care if they read full accurately I just want them to read empty when I'm actually empty.



Justin Brady http://www.thegmcrv.com/ 1976 Palm Beach 455
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342035 is a reply to message #342033] Thu, 28 March 2019 12:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
The problem is not the senders, which are 0 - 90 ohm. The tanks transfer
fuel back and forth with terrain changes through the filler manifold. Only
way to be more accurate is to put in separate filler necks.
Jim Hupy

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 9:43 AM Justin Brady via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Has anyone measured fuel senders?
> My tanks read Empty after using exactly 27 gallons of fuel. So roughly
> half a tank remaining and I'm on empty.
>
> Normally I fill up anyway, but I'd really prefer them to read a little
> more accurately than this.
>
> My thought is if I know what the resistance on the senders is maybe I can
> add some inline resistors to get them to read a little more accurately.
> As with an airplane I don't really care if they read full accurately I
> just want them to read empty when I'm actually empty.
>
>
> --
> Justin Brady
> http://www.thegmcrv.com/
> 1976 Palm Beach 455
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342039 is a reply to message #342035] Thu, 28 March 2019 13:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Justin Brady is currently offline  Justin Brady   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: April 2015
Location: Bell Buckle, TN
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Hey Jim,
Yep I understand how the tanks work and are connected.

To clarify, on level ground not driving with the gas settled when 27 gallons down the fuel gauge reads Empty on both tanks. It should read 1/2 tank on each, or at least 1/2 tank when averaged between the two tank readings.


Justin Brady http://www.thegmcrv.com/ 1976 Palm Beach 455
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342040 is a reply to message #342039] Thu, 28 March 2019 13:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Justin Brady is currently offline  Justin Brady   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: April 2015
Location: Bell Buckle, TN
Karma: 11
Senior Member
So 0-90 Ohm, Empty is 0 correct?

Ao anything wrong (bad connection etc) should read MORE fuel, rather than less.
Odd as that's not what I'm seeing.

Is there any type of calibration on the gauge itself?


Justin Brady http://www.thegmcrv.com/ 1976 Palm Beach 455
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342041 is a reply to message #342040] Thu, 28 March 2019 14:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
0 resistance allows more current to flow through the electromagnetic coil
in the gage, and moves the pole piece attached to the needle and spring
assy. More resistance reduces current flow and moves the needle less.
Any loose connections in the circuit usually creates higher resistance
with the same result, except when it creates an open circuit. That results
in no current flow and no needle movement.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019, 11:22 AM Justin Brady via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> So 0-90 Ohm, Empty is 0 correct?
>
> Ao anything wrong (bad connection etc) should read MORE fuel, rather than
> less.
> Odd as that's not what I'm seeing.
>
> Is there any type of calibration on the gauge itself?
> --
> Justin Brady
> http://www.thegmcrv.com/
> 1976 Palm Beach 455
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342042 is a reply to message #342040] Thu, 28 March 2019 14:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Justin Brady wrote on Thu, 28 March 2019 14:07
So 0-90 Ohm, Empty is 0 correct?

Ao anything wrong (bad connection etc) should read MORE fuel, rather than less.
Odd as that's not what I'm seeing.

Is there any type of calibration on the gauge itself?
Justin,

Your assumptions are valid. (But they really only go down to about 3 ohms).
the dash instruments are "Air Core" gauges. There are two electromagnetic fields balanced against each other. So, if you have a bad ground on the instrument, it will report a higher level than is really there. Good luck at finding it.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342043 is a reply to message #342041] Thu, 28 March 2019 14:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
After quite a bit of effort I managed to install separate filler necks. The tradeoff is the generator only pulls from the rear tank. Got new fuel senders and I use an ohm-meter to measure fuel level. Neither of the new senders went from 0-90. More like 7-87 IIRC from my bench tests. That error can be calibrated with an ohm-meter. The problem that can't be corrected is that senders tend to stick. Recently the rear tank measured 11 ohms so I added 5 gallons. It still reads 11 ohms. The senders can move up or down depending on how gas sloshes around in the tank. They don't always return to the correct fuel level. Maybe older senders work better...

JP
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342046 is a reply to message #342042] Thu, 28 March 2019 15:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
If your using the old transfer switch , they are eaten by the ethanol and
draws fuel from both tank at times .
You should have replaced them when you rehoused the tank and vent .

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:22 PM Matt Colie via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Justin Brady wrote on Thu, 28 March 2019 14:07
>> So 0-90 Ohm, Empty is 0 correct?
>>
>> Ao anything wrong (bad connection etc) should read MORE fuel, rather
> than less.
>> Odd as that's not what I'm seeing.
>>
>> Is there any type of calibration on the gauge itself?
>
> Justin,
>
> Your assumptions are valid. (But they really only go down to about 3
> ohms).
> the dash instruments are "Air Core" gauges. There are two electromagnetic
> fields balanced against each other. So, if you have a bad ground on the
> instrument, it will report a higher level than is really there. Good luck
> at finding it.
>
> Matt
> --
> Matt & Mary Colie - '73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
> Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan
> OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
> SE Michigan - Twixt A2 and Detroit
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Newark,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342052 is a reply to message #342033] Fri, 29 March 2019 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Often there is oxidation on the back of the guage cluster connections and dissimilar metal stufff going on. Also broken solder connections. Added series resistance. Easy to pull cluster and freshen on the bench.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342053 is a reply to message #342052] Fri, 29 March 2019 10:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Van Vlack is currently offline  Bill Van Vlack   United States
Messages: 419
Registered: September 2015
Location: Guemes Island, Washington
Karma: 14
Senior Member
There must be damping in the system somewhere, or the gauges would be jumping around all the time. Is that in the sender (mechanical) or the gauge electronics?

Has anyone attached the senders to an aftermarket or custom readout?


Bill Van Vlack '76 Royale; Guemes Island, Washington; Twin bed, full (DS) side bath, Brazilian Redwood counter and settee tops,455, 6KW generator; new owner a/o mid November 2015.
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342056 is a reply to message #342053] Fri, 29 March 2019 11:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Bill Van Vlack wrote on Fri, 29 March 2019 10:13
There must be damping in the system somewhere, or the gauges would be jumping around all the time. Is that in the sender (mechanical) or the gauge electronics?

Has anyone attached the senders to an aftermarket or custom readout?
Here's a custom readout.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/dashboard/p66112-digital-dashboard-v40.html

Basically an ohm-meter. Fuel levels are the two red bars on the right side of the display. My tanks are separately filled and the fuel levels fluctuate quite a bit when going uphill/downhill or starting and stopping. It's more pronounced as the tank levels get lower. Friction in the mechanical senders impedes small fluctuations. I don't know if there is any lag in the factory gauge.

JP
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342057 is a reply to message #342056] Fri, 29 March 2019 11:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Justin Brady is currently offline  Justin Brady   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: April 2015
Location: Bell Buckle, TN
Karma: 11
Senior Member
From my research the factory gauge should have a parallel resistor to act as a buffer to eliminate the fast swings

Justin Brady http://www.thegmcrv.com/ 1976 Palm Beach 455
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342058 is a reply to message #342057] Fri, 29 March 2019 12:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stu Rasmussen is currently offline  Stu Rasmussen   United States
Messages: 130
Registered: January 2019
Location: Silverton, OR
Karma: 0
Senior Member

Also, some automotive gauges are of the 'hot wire' type that indicate by
showing the elongation and contraction of a piece of resistance wire
linked to the needle.

Very common for fuel, water temperature and oil pressure gauges.

I had a Chrysler product once that used an interrupter to modulate the
available current to the gauges (think 'turn signal flasher'). When the
interrupter stuck 'closed' ALL the gauges quickly moved to full scale
and my heart skipped a beat until I figured it out :)

Stu Rasmussen W7QJ
Silverton, OR
gutted '74 Eleganza

On 3/29/2019 9:50 AM, Justin Brady via Gmclist wrote:
>> From my research the factory gauge should have a parallel resistor to act as a buffer to eliminate the fast swings
>

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Stu Rasmussen W7QJ Silverton, OR '77 Birchaven
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342062 is a reply to message #342033] Sat, 30 March 2019 06:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Justin,
Here is a link on the operation of balance coil gauges and operation of fuel gauges. It might help you to understand it a bit better.

http://www.ppowers.com/mygauge.htm

I've always understood the advantage of a balance coil gauge is its much less sensitive to the vehicle supply voltage and so does not need a voltage regulator for the gauge. I'm not sure where the meter gets its damping from so the that the meter moves slowly and evenly. It may be due to the moving magnetic with possibly a separate shorted coil to dampen the meter movement.


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342064 is a reply to message #342062] Sat, 30 March 2019 10:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Van Vlack is currently offline  Bill Van Vlack   United States
Messages: 419
Registered: September 2015
Location: Guemes Island, Washington
Karma: 14
Senior Member
Bruce,
I was hoping to parallel the dash fuel gauge with inputs to two of the EBL analog ports, but I'm not sure that the voltage from the sender would be very accurate due to the changes in battery voltage on charging, etc. Perhaps one could use a virtual point on WinLog and use battery voltage and sensor voltage to compensate.


Bill Van Vlack '76 Royale; Guemes Island, Washington; Twin bed, full (DS) side bath, Brazilian Redwood counter and settee tops,455, 6KW generator; new owner a/o mid November 2015.
Re: Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342065 is a reply to message #342033] Sat, 30 March 2019 11:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
RF_Burns is currently offline  RF_Burns   Canada
Messages: 2277
Registered: June 2008
Location: S. Ontario, Canada
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Bill,
I've never measured the voltage on the fuel level sensors. If I recall, the Analog inputs on the EBL are 5 volt maximum, so a voltage divider might be needed and a way to limit the voltage to 5V in case of a wiring issue sending more than 5V to the EBL.

In any case, you should be able to scale the reading and compensate for the vehicle voltage. On the other hand, what is the accuracy of the fuel sensors... maybe +/- 10%.

I always start looking for fuel fillup when I hit the 1/2 tank mark. I need a stretch and pee myself by that point!!


Bruce Hislop
ON Canada
77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
1 ton front end
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342066 is a reply to message #342065] Sat, 30 March 2019 12:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Yep. Start out in the morning with full fuel tanks. Drive 5 hours at an
average speed of 50 miles per hour. That is 250 miles or so. Figure 8 - 10
miles per gallon. Easily within the range of the GMC's 50 gallon capacity.
Get out, walk about a bit, have lunch, look for a campsite for the night.
Enjoy your trip.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 9:39 AM Bruce Hislop via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> Bill,
> I've never measured the voltage on the fuel level sensors. If I recall,
> the Analog inputs on the EBL are 5 volt maximum, so a voltage divider might
> be
> needed and a way to limit the voltage to 5V in case of a wiring issue
> sending more than 5V to the EBL.
>
> In any case, you should be able to scale the reading and compensate for
> the vehicle voltage. On the other hand, what is the accuracy of the fuel
> sensors... maybe +/- 10%.
>
> I always start looking for fuel fillup when I hit the 1/2 tank mark. I
> need a stretch and pee myself by that point!!
>
> --
> Bruce Hislop
> ON Canada
> 77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.1 ton front end
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
> My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342070 is a reply to message #342035] Sat, 30 March 2019 12:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rallymaster is currently offline  rallymaster   United States
Messages: 662
Registered: February 2004
Location: North Plains, ORYGUN
Karma: -4
Senior Member
How do you know how much fuel is in the tank, mine doesn't move off the
full peg until I've driven about 100 miles after a fill-up.

Even after the fill-up, I don't know how much I have in the tanks. The
pump jockeys quit pumping gas as soon as the fill spout belches at them.
I can fill it closer to full than they can, of course, but not in Oregon.
Fixing that problem is on my fix-it list for our visit to Jim K. after
the Spring Rally.

Ron
-----------------
On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:18:06 -0700 James Hupy via Gmclist
writes:
> Yep. Start out in the morning with full fuel tanks. Drive 5 hours at
> an
> average speed of 50 miles per hour. That is 250 miles or so. Figure
> 8 - 10
> miles per gallon. Easily within the range of the GMC's 50 gallon
> capacity.
> Get out, walk about a bit, have lunch, look for a campsite for the
> night.
> Enjoy your trip.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>
> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 9:39 AM Bruce Hislop via Gmclist gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

Ron & Linda Clark
North Plains, ORYGUN
1978 Eleganza II


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Ron & Linda Clark
North Plains, ORYGUN
78 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342098 is a reply to message #342053] Sun, 31 March 2019 10:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard Denney is currently offline  Richard Denney   United States
Messages: 920
Registered: April 2010
Karma: 9
Senior Member
I’m using an Autometer 90-ohm gauge with new sending units, and yes they do
jump around quite a bit, and rather quixotically at that. When I installed
them two years ago I rang out the gauge lines to confirm the circuits.

They have less damping than the factory gauge, I suspect, but my factory
gauge has been out of use for my whole ownership and I don’t even know why
it was abandoned.

I have fuel level gauges and they work, but my bladder capacity is still
less than my fuel tanks, so my fill-ups tend to be in the 30-35-gallon
range.

Rick “who can’t make sense of the readings surprisingly often” Denney

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:35 PM Bill Van Vlack via Gmclist <
gmclist@list.gmcnet.org> wrote:

> There must be damping in the system somewhere, or the gauges would be
> jumping around all the time. Is that in the sender (mechanical) or the gauge
> electronics?
>
> Has anyone attached the senders to an aftermarket or custom readout?
> --
> Bill Van Vlack
> '76 Royale; Guemes Island, Washington; Twin bed, full (DS) side bath,
> Brazilian Redwood counter and settee tops,455, 6KW generator; new owner a/o
> mid
> November 2015.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
--
Rick Denney
73 x-Glacier 230 "Jaws"
Off-list email to rick at rickdenney dot com
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Fuel Sender Resistance [message #342103 is a reply to message #342098] Sun, 31 March 2019 14:45 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Justin Brady is currently offline  Justin Brady   United States
Messages: 769
Registered: April 2015
Location: Bell Buckle, TN
Karma: 11
Senior Member
One of my favorite parts of having the motorhome is that I can just pull off any exit, pull to the side of the on ramp get up and pee and be back on the road in under a minute.
I prefer to drive until I need to refuel. But at this point it's anyone's guess when that is because I read empty 25 gallons too early.

I'll pull the gauge soon and give it a look.


Justin Brady http://www.thegmcrv.com/ 1976 Palm Beach 455
Previous Topic: Who is selling the full length cockpit windows?
Next Topic: Who is selling the full length cockpit windows?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Sep 20 13:33:35 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02598 seconds