Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary? [message #335077 is a reply to message #335074] |
Fri, 13 July 2018 19:18 |
|
USAussie
Messages: 15912 Registered: July 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
G'day,
Here's JimB's solution to battery switches:
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/aa-miscellaneous-photos/p39553-battery-switches.html
Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
USA '77 Kingsley - TZE 267V100808
-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@list.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Gary Kosier
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:43 PM
To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
Brian,
My understanding has always been that the continuous duty solenoids have a
metal case and the intermittent ones are bakelite.
However, with the Chinese in the game, that could change. And the later
switches have a return spring in them because people
would forget and leave them on when dry camping and run both batteries dead,
leaving them helpless.
Gary Kosier
77PB w/500Cad
Newark, Ohio
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Brian Krikorian"
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 5:50 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
> Jim,
>
> My MH has the momentary boost switch...so would the starter solenoid ones
> still be okay? I did check at Applied, but didn't see anything when I
> did.
>
>
>
> James Hupy wrote on Fri, 13 July 2018 14:36
>> The boost solenoid is continuous duty. The starter solenoids, are not and
>> will overheat in continuous use. Jim K and Jim Bounds both have the
>> correct
>> ones.
>> Jim Hupy
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 2:29 PM Brian Krikorian wrote:
>>
>>> So is something like this correct, even though it's called a Starter
>>> Solenoid (looks similar). I found this on one of Bill Massey's posts.
>>>
>>> https://www.napaonline.com/en/p/ECHST80
>>> --
>>> Brian K
>>> 1977 Eleganza II, TZE167V100261
>>> Bellevue, WA
>>> Rebuilt 455, New brake system, a lot of Original Equipment ready to
>>> fall
>>> apart (discovering more as I go along....)
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
> --
> Brian K
> 1977 Eleganza II, TZE167V100261
> Bellevue, WA
> Rebuilt 455, New brake system, a lot of Original Equipment ready to fall
> apart (discovering more as I go along....)
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Regards,
Rob M. (USAussie)
The Pedantic Mechanic
Sydney, Australia
'75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
'75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Fri, 13 July 2018 15:59
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Rob on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:17
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:28
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:50
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Kosier on Fri, 13 July 2018 17:43
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Fri, 13 July 2018 17:14
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Anonymous on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:39
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: jimk on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:52
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Anonymous on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:34
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Kosier on Fri, 13 July 2018 16:45
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Fri, 13 July 2018 17:08
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: GMC2000 on Fri, 13 July 2018 22:48
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: JohnS on Sat, 14 July 2018 08:59
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Sat, 14 July 2018 12:07
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: rvanwin on Sat, 14 July 2018 19:42
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Sat, 14 July 2018 11:58
|
|
|
Re: Is the Boost Solenoid Necessary?
By: Brian K on Sun, 15 July 2018 00:45
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Sep 28 18:52:14 CDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00698 seconds
|