GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Posting photos on the net
Re: [GMCnet] Posting photos on the net [message #335027 is a reply to message #334980] Fri, 13 July 2018 01:53 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
GMC2000   United States
Messages: 193
Registered: March 2018
Location: Georgia
Karma:
Senior Member
long post with multiple quotes (email artifacts removed) alert:

Johnny Bridges wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 07:41
Well, if someone wants a formal forum with topic cops and strict adherence to rules, they're easy enough to start. P'raps you're the progenitor thereof? Go for it. As to multiple logins, I've not seen any here but I've not been looking... nor has anyone else. Anonymity is certain;y antone's right, but the accompanying pokes at anticipated paranoia come with it. You pays your money and you takes your choice as they say.

Again, without rancor, in a volunteer operation such as this the 'why don't you...' can only be met with 'go for it.'

--johnny


Im gonna look into it when things slow down, probably over the winter. I think I have some good ideas for something and could probably set up a test bed for everyone to play with. I dont think topic cops and stuff would be needed much if the layout is good.

I dont really want to do it but I see the need and want to have for GMCs what I and all of us have for most other clubs with good forums for the subjects of them and how it all fits in to make the GMCs better and even more valuable down the road. for many new people it would be the first impression of these GMCs and has tremendous potential to increase popularity and club memberships.

as far as multiple usernames, 'delbert_lecky_via_Gmc' seems to be several others who are using the same forum account for various reasons while sometimes tossing out credentials, other times not. kinda misleading but it may be just another email list combination glitch or something but since this topic here now was started using it and specifically for issues with 'different handles' I mention it.

BTW, I intended to comment on this post in my prior one but other stuff came up and I forgot to.

Ken Burton wrote on Wed, 04 July 2018 17:16
I have been wondering about that for a few days. It is also obvious that these people would not join the Black list to help others.


who are 'these people'? I can and do help complete strangers on the side of the road changing a tire when Im able, will even mis an important meeting or appointment for Old folks or someone who looks to be in a position that is over their head due to safety or what have you as would many other folks.

Ive also been on the receiving end a time or two. my question to you is: what if someone who is not blacklisted (on the black list lol) and prefers to use an internet pen name is driving along in a GMC and has some mechanical issues then reaches out on the forum for help. would You help them? things are not always so obvious as some would lead others to believe.

the Black list is great. I suppose it was from a time prior to the internet.


James Hupy wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 08:51
Tain't me either. I figure if I have balls enough to post comments here,
that the least I can do is sign my name to it.


as I wrote previous, I cant even discuss my reasoning for using a pen name here without bending the guidelines for political/religeous discussions.

James Hupy wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 08:51

I busted my knuckles making an income for myself, a wife, and 2
children. Many times working more than one job at a time. When my skills
were lacking, I went to community colleges, 4 year college specialty
courses, General Motors Training Centers, Apprenticeship centers,
VW/Porsche/Audi schools, Diesel School at Blue Mountain CC, etc.
I went into partnership with a very talented automotive machinist,
(who also happened to be an alcoholic, binge drinker, womanizer, liar, and
cheat) That mistake cost me all my personal savings making it right. Taught
me a whole lot about human behavior, though.
All this and I found time to build hot rods, and help raise my kids.
Finally, was recruited to become a Vocational Instructor in a Prison.
I worked there until my retirement at age 56. Then I went to work for my
wife at her flower shop. She said that I could work 1/2 time, I didn't know
that meant 12 hours a day. Sold that shop in 2010. Bought a GMC in 2007 as
a getaway vehicle. Been working on them for myself and others since then.
GM training came in very handy many times. Love these old coaches. Not the
smartest or the dumbest GMCer out there, but I value the collective wisdom
and helpful spirit of the GMC community.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or



I value the collective GMC wisdom too, no need to try an impress with anything other than but thanks for sharing yourself and your wisdom here. Ive learned some things from ya I hope to be able to put to use oneday.


USAussie wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 09:22
G'day,

Can anyone tell me:

1) how much it would cost to create a "modern GMC internet?"
2) if they have the ability do that?
3) would be willing to do it?
4) how long it would take?

Regards,
Rob M.




I havnt gotten deep enough into it to figure a monetary value, it would cost some time but not sure how much of that either. some folks are faster than others at the same tasks though. I think I and others have the ability, its really about the time and how much of it we are willing to give to the cause.

whos willing? I guess time will tell. I might take a shot at it, have no idea how long that might take. I'll definitely share any details as I get them if I do.


James Hupy wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 09:36
Let's see, a bunch of old fogies, driving 40+ year old coaches, want a
"modern" internet forum??? What's wrong with this picture?
(Grin) We shouldn't even be buying green bananas.
Jim Hupy



HAhaha! yeah, but if you could forsee what I do, you would be 100% in on the idea. its sorta like what happened when FM radio came along, this was before my time but Ive done some studies on that part of history so aside from the hippy/woodstock programming, the reception was way better Wink

USAussie wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 09:40
Jim,

Well in my opinion if we want the GMC to "live on" after us old fogies are gone GMC2000 is right.

Regards,
Rob M.



not always but I do think this is an important part of why we should be discussing all this. I dont know if it is supposed to be a secret or anything but I cant help but wonder what the disaster plan is for GMCnet & gmcmhphotos.

I hope we can continue discussing it and would really like to see Batman chime in here too. I also have some ideas that Im hesitant to propose but will if when I feel the timing is right and the senior officials are receptive. some along the lines of offsetting the costs and ways to make it happen but really just look at other successful forums and how they operate for some insights on that stuff.



James Hupy wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 10:01
I oftentimes wish for the ability to post photos on the gmcnet. I fully
understand why we can't. Bandwidth and cost. I do not participate on the
forum, because of the format. Can't find crap. Facebook is more of a
chatroom than anything else. Handy for some things, but doesn't lend itself
well to technical stuff.
A GMCer owns the photo site. And the net. That means a whole bunch
when it comes to longevity and finding stuff when it is needed.
Much non GMC information through the years has evaporated into
nothing, never to be found again. That shouldn't happen.
What makes this net great and unique is it's permanent nature, quirks
and all. Worth a few bucks once in a while to me. But Patrick and Billy
both should have someone standing in the wings, as understudies. Sounds
like a job for 2000.
Jim Hupy



I dont know.. I mean that would be great if I could do it and work with the GMC MVPs but I think this really needs to have some sort of everlasting organizational plan/foundation rather than another guy doing it. and I also see how it could all go wrong that way too. not by me, I wouldnt do it but the potential is there for someone to take advantage of the situation. thats another reason why its good to kick the ideas around but there should be a private sub-forum for some of the stuff that needs to be discussed for sure and believe it or not, email, while it can be considered private, is hardly and a secure forum with private messaging is much more difficult to hack into if its running on solid software and set up right.

but another thing is that age is not the only way we go and none of us have guarantees on tomorrow.


Carl S. wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 10:28
2-K,

I personally don't give a rip whether you use a real name or not. The reason it is important to some of our members is that it is nice to know who we are dealing with and when we eventually meet them in person we have a little better feel for who they are.

There HAVE been 'bad actors' show up here from time to time and they have either quietly gone away, or been banished by the moderator, or have gone off in a flurry of name calling and telling the rest of us where to go. One of them is big on Facebook now. The problem with them is that they have succeeded in running off some of the really good resources we have had over the years. My solution to dealing with them has always been to just ignore them and let them fend for themselves. Otherwise, I try to help to the extent that my limited ability and experience allows.

Personally, I am also satisfied with the forum the way it is, even though the split and/or hijacked threads can be annoying and sometimes makes it hard to find the post I am trying to respond to. At 62 years of age, I am probably way behind the curve on high tech, but this works for me. I have been using this forum and/or the email digest for about nine years now and I guess I'm just used to it. That makes it easy for me to use.



I think (hope) we are past the names part but even with a "real name" (?, that is no guarantee.. some people just act badly for the sake of it. that is who they are and a name has nothing to do with that.

does anyone have an example of these bad actors though? a link to a profile or post or something? Im not sure what to make of this really.

Ive gotten used to the way it is too but its far from optimal and if I wasnt a different breed when it comes to figuring things out I would have said eff it and moved on and this is one of the reasons why its not good for the GMCs IMO Ive actually seen this happen already in the relatively short time Ive been posting from another new poster but just think how many never even bother with becoming a new poster here the way it is.



Les Burt[1
wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 10:26]What I find a bit funny is how we praise the GMCNET and the photosite for being reliable and permanent places to store our TZE related info.

We then go on to complain about how it can be difficult at times to search those places for the info we are looking for.

To make things worse, we have GMCNET, the photo site, Genes list of valuable info, etc. These are all strewn across the web in multiple different locations, only tied together by links to each others websites.

GMC2000(Fred) is correct. We need a more modern and user friendly place to keep this info IN ONE LOCATION.

If that happens, then we will have genuine reason for praise!

Les Burt




yep, and its more than location that is needed though, its an everlasting foundation behind it but Im starting to see how tricky that is with the way the GMCs are under the FMCA umbrella as another poster put it.

but we evidently have some people acting as FMCA officials here so perhaps they have some ideas or input that could work?

Will Albers wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 10:57
Many of us are members of other automotive message forums that may provide
the modern functionality requested. Does anyone have an example that they
would like to share? Something that demonstrates the newer features this
medium lacks?

-Persistent image storage?
-Active administration?
-Topic archival and search capabilities?

FWIW, i'm a longstanding member of a Pinzgauer forum that uses *free *phpBB
as its foundation. phpBB started in 2000, but recent versions integrate
with Tapatalk... allows for wonderful functionality on a cell phone. The
interface should seem familiar. Are you looking for something more advanced
than phpBB?

-Will



I have shared several in the sandbox subforum somewhere but here is a favorite https://www.silveradosierra.com/ this software has more bells and whistles than most and support for them. the popular Vbullitin has some problems of late and most of the devs moved to Xenfro which seems to be the leader right now for security stability.

Im not expert but I know one or two and this is what they tell me.

if you notice the forum you mention is not an https one, that is fine for the basics but https is needed to have private-confidential sub forums for certain purposes and it gets complicated with photos and other interactive media used in the forum threads but hosted elsewhere from what I understand so far about it but as long as the forum is on the same host as the photos its not an issue.


delbert lecky via Gmc wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 11:16
Les

Having all those sites you mention on one site may sound good to you but it is never going to happen.

First there are several individuals putting time into collecting information and maintaining their site. Would you expect that they would all continue to do this if it's on someone else's site?

Also, what happens if the site goes down as often happens on the Internet? That would mean that all information is cut off. With it on more than one site much would still be available even if one source goes down for a while.

Also, this could get expensive and also require a lot of knowledge of one person to maintain it all. It could take several hours of time a week for someone to do it on a volunteer basis. Much more than the individuals managing separate sites do now.

The present set of systems is working well. It might have some quirks and imperfections but so would a new system that might take months or years to develop

As someone said before "are you volunteering to do it?" If so, you'd better start soon if you want it done in your remaining lifetime and don't plan on doing much else with your spare time.

Emery Stora


never say never.. LOL

yes, definitely set up a test area and work out the bugs and the plan from there but If I thought it was as difficult and time consuming as you seem to think, I wouldnt be writing any of this about it. it would take some work but once thats done I dont think it would be too big of a deal other than keeping upto date on security stuff. I could be totally incorrect about that.


most of the forums are going to cloud storage now too so the chances getting everything cut off is almost none.



Bill Van Vlack wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 12:27
I loved Jim's comment on green bananas...

I'll offer some attributes of any new system for GMC technical discussion and info retrieval.

- Accessible via email (mail list)
--- When bandwidth or company security issues issues prevent use of the full forum. Bandwidth is in short supply on the road or in campgrounds when help with problems is most needed.
--- When users aren't comfortable with a web-based forum (Especially those with the most experience)

- Incorporates all existing GMCNet posts.

- Supports sub-forums and images

- Incorporates all existing Photo Site photos.

- Converts Photo Site links in posts to Photo Site images

- Converts embedded photos in posts to links for email users.

- Converts GMCMH EFI Google group to a Sub-Forum

- Each sub-forum has a Sticky with links to additional GMC info.

- Curated and moderated by subject matter experts.

- Vendor independent.

- No targeted advertising, no harvesting of user data.

- Owned and managed by an institution supported by GMC owner dues (and that can finish up their green bananas).

As an aside, I helped convert and now manage the website and write PHP programs for a car enthusiast site. In the process, we converted (with a developer's help) a VBulletin forum to one compatible with our new site, including migrating all photos, sub-forums, etc.

The software (FUDforum) currently supporting the GMCNET site is free, open source, and feature rich. A developer familiar with FUDforum software, CSS, HTML, MySQL, and PHP could integrate most or all of the items above, I believe. Whatever organization takes this on would need to step up to the issues involved with the curatorial and website management functions of this approach.



so you might know then how much time is involved in something like this? would you agree with others that think it would be a full time job? and; what did you convert VBulletin to?

could you work in the email list messages so they were indistinguishable from forum posts and didnt make such a huge mess on the forum?


there is a GMC google group? oh my.. lol I guess it beats email lists anyway.

I am familiar with them and yahoo groups too but no longer use them. there needs to be a cash for clunker software platforms deal. HAhaha!

some ideas I think should be incorporated into a modern forum software is threaded threads like the old usnet groups so a thread could drift into other areas and users that had no interest in that drift could continue on the same thread. superuser.com has something close to this but it doesnt have many other features youd expect in a strong internet community.

with so many different personalities being moderators Ive seen problems on other forums where the mods ruined them just by power tripping. the way to prevent this is to have all moderation logged and displayed with reason for editing or whatever also displayed to there is some accountability there.

has anyone seen Batman? surely he has some thoughts either way? I still think this forum could work much better with just sub forums if only one of them was for combined email list. activate the photos and host them together with the text stuff.

Les Burt[1
wrote on Thu, 12 July 2018 22:10]For the record, I don't have any issues with continuing to use the GMCNET as it is now. I've gotten used to it's quirks and am confortable with how it works.

We do need to realize that to survive for the long term will require accommodating the newer TZE owners. We have previously commented here numerous times about the newer/younger crowd and how they expect/demand that online info be easily obtained. They are the future TZE owners and if we don't figure out how to attract them to the GMCNET, then we will just dwindle away and die due to lack of caring.

Les Burt


I dont know about any demands but expectations for sure. I was certainly expecting something as cool as the GMCs with many more aspects than other automobiles, the above average wherewithall of motorhome owners in general, etc. to have a more organized internet presence.

am I disappointed? no, there is good info, it drew me in but man did I have to work for it. Ive lost alot of time and continue to because of that. make it easier and more attractive and there will be more GMCs still on the road 10-20 years, even 5 or 2 years IMO

new potential owners could look at build threads and some who might never attempt something like these otherwise could think to themselves "I see!" "I can do that!"

I hope we can get something going where this can happen. one place where everybody can come to show off, teach, quench a minor curiosity, or figure out how to build a Big Block V8, you name it!

sorry for the long read y'all that did. just some thoughts put into words on the subject because I think its worth it obviously.

thanks
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] '77 Toronado Available
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Restoration: Getting the cap above the drivers seat to it's original color.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Jul 01 01:14:26 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.20681 seconds