Re: [GMCnet] Engine water temp sender location. [message #322335] |
Sat, 19 August 2017 09:57  |
James Hupy
 Messages: 6806 Registered: May 2010
Karma:
|
Senior Member |
|
|
If your intention is to tell the coolant temperature at the hottest place
in the engine, as near to the thermostat housing as possible should work.
If you want to tell coolant temperature in the cross flow radiator, then
your probe location will suffice.
Jim Hupy
On Aug 19, 2017 7:51 AM, "Scott Nutter" wrote:
I am in the process of hooking up a new engine water temperature gauge.
The manufacture, maxxtow, recommends to put the sending unit in the
radiator. I have the aluminum radiator and it has a port to accept the
sending
unit.
Our stock system has the sending unit in the intake manifold.
Is there a advantage in having the sending unit in the rad? Is the intake
manifold still the best location?
Or run the new gauge with the probe in the rad, and leave the stock gauge
as is?
Opinions? Recommendations?
Thanks, Scott
--
Scott Nutter
1978 Royale Center Kitchen, Patterson 455, switch pitch tranny, 3.21 final
drive, Quad bags, tankless water heater, everything Lenzi.
Houston, Texas
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|