GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading
Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311921] Mon, 09 January 2017 11:56 Go to next message
Atom Ant is currently offline  Atom Ant   United States
Messages: 170
Registered: October 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I came across an interesting idea on how to adjust your bad senders.

It's simply adding another potentiometer into the system, and setting it at a known fuel level.

they're cheap and easy to add into the wiring.

I thought I'd share as it might be something that a perpetual tinker that owns a GMC coach might be willing to check into. I may actually try it myeslf.

https://sites.google.com/site/shannonpowerlab2/home/calibrating-your-fuel-gauge

Thoughts?









1976 Palm Beach Austin, TX
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311924 is a reply to message #311921] Mon, 09 January 2017 13:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Atom Ant wrote on Mon, 09 January 2017 11:56
I came across an interesting idea on how to adjust your bad senders.
It's simply adding another potentiometer into the system, and setting it at a known fuel level.

they're cheap and easy to add into the wiring.

I thought I'd share as it might be something that a perpetual tinker that owns a GMC coach might be willing to check into. I may actually try it myeslf.

https://sites.google.com/site/shannonpowerlab2/home/calibrating-your-fuel-gauge

Thoughts?
You can get a little improvement, but it will never be right. Your last post on your measurements said 10 - 100 ohms. 900 ohms in parallel to the sender will get you 90 ohms at the gauge when the sender is at 100, but will only drop the 10 ohms at the low end to 9.9. Anything less than 900 will lower the top end to less than 90. 500 ohms in parallel would give you 83 when the sender is at 100 and 9.8 when the sender is at 10. The only way to lower the low end appreciably without messing up the top end is to get the sender low end down. There is no such thing as negative resistance. The 900 ohm resistor will make your gas gauge start to drop sooner than it would without the resistor. The 10 ohms will keep the gauge at 10% when the tank is dry. No matter what you do, that 10% reading when the tank is empty is unavoidable unless/until you get the sender resistance down. With 100 ohms and no parallel resistor, 10% of your gas will be gone before the gauge starts to drop. All that 900 ohm resistor buys you is a more accurate/responsive gauge at the full end, it gets you next to nothing as you get closer to empty.
Re: [GMCnet] Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311925 is a reply to message #311924] Mon, 09 January 2017 14:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
You guys need to bore a hole through the floor in your coaches, through the
top of the fuel tanks. Then, just use a stick of wood placed through the
hole to measure the contents. When you are through, put a cork in it. (Grin)
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Jan 9, 2017 11:58 AM, "A." wrote:

> Atom Ant wrote on Mon, 09 January 2017 11:56
>> I came across an interesting idea on how to adjust your bad senders.
>> It's simply adding another potentiometer into the system, and setting it
> at a known fuel level.
>>
>> they're cheap and easy to add into the wiring.
>>
>> I thought I'd share as it might be something that a perpetual tinker
> that owns a GMC coach might be willing to check into. I may actually try it
>> myeslf.
>>
>> https://sites.google.com/site/shannonpowerlab2/home/
> calibrating-your-fuel-gauge
>>
>> Thoughts?
> You can get a little improvement, but it will never be right. Your last
> post on your measurements said 10 - 100 ohms. 900 ohms in parallel to the
> sender will get you 90 ohms at the gauge when the sender is at 100, but
> will only drop the 10 ohms at the low end to 9.9. Anything less than 900
> will
> lower the top end to less than 90. 500 ohms in parallel would give you 83
> when the sender is at 100 and 9.8 when the sender is at 10. The only way to
> lower the low end appreciably without messing up the top end is to get the
> sender low end down. There is no such thing as negative resistance. The 900
> ohm resistor will make your gas gauge start to drop sooner than it would
> without the resistor. The 10 ohms will keep the gauge at 10% when the tank
> is
> dry. No matter what you do, that 10% reading when the tank is empty is
> unavoidable unless/until you get the sender resistance down. With 100 ohms
> and
> no parallel resistor, 10% of your gas will be gone before the gauge starts
> to drop. All that 900 ohm resistor buys you is a more accurate/responsive
> gauge at the full end, it gets you next to nothing as you get closer to
> empty.
> --
> 73 23' Sequoia 4 Sale
> 73 23' CanyonLands Parts Unit 4 Sale
> Upper Alabama
> "Highest price does not guarantee highest quality."
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311926 is a reply to message #311924] Mon, 09 January 2017 14:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Atom Ant is currently offline  Atom Ant   United States
Messages: 170
Registered: October 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Karma: 0
Senior Member
A Hamilto wrote on Mon, 09 January 2017 13:50
Atom Ant wrote on Mon, 09 January 2017 11:56
I came across an interesting idea on how to adjust your bad senders.
It's simply adding another potentiometer into the system, and setting it at a known fuel level.

they're cheap and easy to add into the wiring.

I thought I'd share as it might be something that a perpetual tinker that owns a GMC coach might be willing to check into. I may actually try it myeslf.

https://sites.google.com/site/shannonpowerlab2/home/calibrating-your-fuel-gauge

Thoughts?
You can get a little improvement, but it will never be right. Your last post on your measurements said 10 - 100 ohms. 900 ohms in parallel to the sender will get you 90 ohms at the gauge when the sender is at 100, but will only drop the 10 ohms at the low end to 9.9. Anything less than 900 will lower the top end to less than 90. 500 ohms in parallel would give you 83 when the sender is at 100 and 9.8 when the sender is at 10. The only way to lower the low end appreciably without messing up the top end is to get the sender low end down. There is no such thing as negative resistance. The 900 ohm resistor will make your gas gauge start to drop sooner than it would without the resistor. The 10 ohms will keep the gauge at 10% when the tank is dry. No matter what you do, that 10% reading when the tank is empty is unavoidable unless/until you get the sender resistance down. With 100 ohms and no parallel resistor, 10% of your gas will be gone before the gauge starts to drop. All that 900 ohm resistor buys you is a more accurate/responsive gauge at the full end, it gets you next to nothing as you get closer to empty.


fantastic! Thanks for the info. I think with the range it's showing now, plus gauging the odometer, I;ll be okay.



1976 Palm Beach Austin, TX
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311929 is a reply to message #311924] Mon, 09 January 2017 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
Fuel gauges are not a precision device and you are never going to get the gauge to read exactly what you have. As an example the rule on an aircraft fuel gauge is only one. The gauge must read empty when there is no fuel in the tank(s). After that there are no precise rules and a lot of variance in readings occurrs.

If you need a precise measure measurement then look at a fuel totalizer. They have a sender in the fuel line that senses the fuel flow through it on gas going to the engine. Then that amount is subtracted from the pre-programmed amount of fuel stored in the tank and displayed to the user.


Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311931 is a reply to message #311921] Mon, 09 January 2017 17:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Atom Ant is currently offline  Atom Ant   United States
Messages: 170
Registered: October 2016
Location: Austin, TX
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Nope, I've always driven used cars, with goofy this or not-working that on them. I'm not by any means needing a perfectly accurate gauge. The range I've got is fine, and until it completely stops working, will suffice. I shared simply because I thought it was an interesting and creative solution to an issue that seems to be a regular concern with these aging coaches.

1976 Palm Beach Austin, TX
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311949 is a reply to message #311931] Tue, 10 January 2017 09:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil   United States
Messages: 271
Registered: July 2007
Location: Los Angeles and Magalia, ...
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Any reason this wouldn't work with an electric oil pressure sender to "dial in" higher readings?

Neil
76 Eleganza now sold
Los Angeles
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311952 is a reply to message #311921] Tue, 10 January 2017 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Do you want higher readings than the sender is calibrated for? It isn't going to be accurate in that instance. The sender is built to provide a stated resistance at full scale, full scale being the high pressure it's made for. The wiper on the resistance wire is all the way at the end when the rated pressure is reached. Higher pressure won't move it any further since all the resistance is already in place. Adding external resistance will - depending on the gauge - make it read higher but it will do so at the sender's rated pressure, not a higher pressure. Worse, added resistance will keep the gauge from reading zero when there's no pressure, because there will still be the added resistance in the line.

Now, if you have a higher reading sender, but want to keep the gauge at full scale when the higher pressure is reached,padding the sender with a resistance will accomplish this, and the zero point will remain the same. How well it might track throughout its range is open to question.

Probably the best approach is to use a matched sender and gauge, and not have to worry about adding stuff.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311954 is a reply to message #311921] Tue, 10 January 2017 10:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Oh, Padding' in this case means adding resistance in parallel with the sender.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311957 is a reply to message #311924] Tue, 10 January 2017 10:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bullitthead is currently offline  Bullitthead   United States
Messages: 1411
Registered: November 2013
Karma: 5
Senior Member
"There is no such thing as negative resistance."

Negative resistance exists in plasma conduits (fluorescent light bulbs) and ionized gases (such as the junction between a brush and moving commutator in a motor or generator, or lightning or other electric arc).

The actual unit of measurement is "mhos".


Terry Kelpien ASE Master Technician 73 Glacier 260 Smithfield, Va.
[GMCnet] Negative Resistance [message #311960 is a reply to message #311957] Tue, 10 January 2017 11:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member
Here is what wikipedia says about it:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_resistance

Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Frederick, CO

> On Jan 10, 2017, at 9:47 AM, Terry wrote:
>
> "There is no such thing as negative resistance."
>
> Negative resistance exists in plasma conduits (fluorescent light bulbs) and ionized gases (such as the junction between a brush and moving commutator
> in a motor or generator, or lightning or other electric arc).
>
> The actual unit of measurement is "mhos".
> --
> Terry Kelpien
>
> ASE Master Technician
>
> 73 Glacier 260
>
> Smithfield, Va.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311961 is a reply to message #311957] Tue, 10 January 2017 11:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil is currently offline  Neil   United States
Messages: 271
Registered: July 2007
Location: Los Angeles and Magalia, ...
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Johnny

Right as always.

Truth is my question was for a non-gmc application with mismatched foreign senders and gauges where once the motor gets hot the sender reads really low. I was just trying to sneak some general knowledge out of the brain trust. Best would be to put in a mechanical gauge but not ascetically feasible.


Neil
76 Eleganza now sold
Los Angeles
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311962 is a reply to message #311957] Tue, 10 January 2017 11:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Bullitthead wrote on Tue, 10 January 2017 10:47
"There is no such thing as negative resistance."
Negative resistance exists in plasma conduits (fluorescent light bulbs) and ionized gases (such as the junction between a brush and moving commutator in a motor or generator, or lightning or other electric arc).

The actual unit of measurement is "mhos".
A mho is the reciprocal of an ohm (1/ohms), not the negative. What I was trying to convey is that a passive device is not going to subtract 10 ohms from the reading. Creating the effect of subtracting resistance from the subject sender would require active components, like an op amp.

If I was going to expend any effort on it, I would build a circuit that would convert the resistance reading to gallons remaining and feed a digital readout.

Digital readouts of the gas gauges would be fun to watch in mountains. Might be distracting enough to cause problems.

If all you want to know is a general idea of half a tank, plus or minus, then 10 - 100 is "good enough".
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311969 is a reply to message #311921] Tue, 10 January 2017 13:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Neil -

In that instance, try to get the proper sender for the installed gauge - assuming the gauge is in a stock instrument panel which doesn't lend itself to modification. Somewhere in the world, there's a sender intended for that gauge. Acquire it, and adapt it to the oil pressure port on the engine you want to measure. In that the adapter is under the hood out of sight, you can get really silly with it if you have to.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311995 is a reply to message #311969] Tue, 10 January 2017 17:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
If you want it real right, but have to stick with an automotive grade sender, there is a way. It can be made to work with either air-core (Delco) or thermal (Intro) gauges. It is a thing called a diode function generator. It took me two each quad op-amps (comparitors) and about another dozen components to make the silly wire would single ended pot produce an output that fit the real world curve withing a half a needle. I would bother to look it up and maybe even draw schematics if anybody actually cared. I do find it easier with the coach to run a log and learn what it does. The several times I have been able to take on more than 50 gallons, I was concerned, but far from panic.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #311999 is a reply to message #311995] Tue, 10 January 2017 17:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Matt Colie wrote on Tue, 10 January 2017 17:41
...The several times I have been able to take on more than 50 gallons, I was concerned, but far from panic.
Gas pumps vary by calibration. I drove my daily driver for a couple of years and could never jam more than 12 gallons in it at my usual station when the low fuel light came on. One time I was across the street from a station that was the same price as my regular place when the low fuel light came on. So I pulled in a filled up. The pump said it took 13 gallons by the time it clicked off. I never bought gas there again, and every time I needed gas after that I went to my usual place and never stuffed more than 12 gallons in it.
Re: [GMCnet] Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #312000 is a reply to message #311999] Tue, 10 January 2017 18:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
I put drivers who run their vehicles on very low fuel levels as the same
guys who play Russian roulette with all the chambers loaded. Breathe easier
guys, fill the tanks, and note your odometer reading. Drive 250 miles, then
refill the tanks. Forget those inaccurate electric fuel gages, and fuel
tanks joined at the hip with a large manifold between them. There are much
more important issues to concern you in your coach.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403

On Jan 10, 2017 3:54 PM, "A." wrote:

> Matt Colie wrote on Tue, 10 January 2017 17:41
>> ...The several times I have been able to take on more than 50 gallons, I
> was concerned, but far from panic.
> Gas pumps vary by calibration. I drove my daily driver for a couple of
> years and could never jam more than 12 gallons in it at my usual station
> when
> the low fuel light came on. One time I was across the street from a
> station that was the same price as my regular place when the low fuel light
> came
> on. So I pulled in a filled up. The pump said it took 13 gallons by the
> time it clicked off. I never bought gas there again, and every time I needed
> gas after that I went to my usual place and never stuffed more than 12
> gallons in it.
> --
> 73 23' Sequoia 4 Sale
> 73 23' CanyonLands Parts Unit 4 Sale
> Upper Alabama
> "Highest price does not guarantee highest quality."
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #312007 is a reply to message #311921] Tue, 10 January 2017 21:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Were I someplace I did not know, I might not play that game, but both times I did the 53+ the choice would have been to be late for a meeting with an owner and/or buy fuel at the marina. ($$ Not Happanan Jack)
As to calibration, I have two registered jeep cans (confirmed by MDA) and had recently filled both at both of the subject pumps. One was dead nuts on and the other 0.2 short (It said it pumped 4.Cool.
When one has had a lifetime that involved fuel inventory, managing a GMC is just no big thing.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #312020 is a reply to message #312007] Wed, 11 January 2017 08:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I bought two brand new senders from an unnamed GMC vendor. On hot days the plastic clamshell would open up and expose the innards. The fix was to bolt the clamshell to the plate.


http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-supply/p55013-fuel-sender-problem.html
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-supply/p55014-fuel-sender-repair.html

Neither of the senders went to zero ohms on empty or to 90 ohms on full. These results were confirmed with several different meters. I'm now using a switched face mounted ohm-meter to read the fill level. As seen above the headlight switch in this photo.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/interior/p61352-low-cost-glass-cockpit.html

Having replumbed my entire fuel supply I also added a meter at the fill necks to help avoid overfill. The two pics show one tank at empty and ~24.5 gallons.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-supply/p55259-forward-tank-empty.html
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/fuel-supply/p55982-fuel-level-ohm-meter.html

I agree with JimH and try to fill up when the tanks reach half full.

JP
Re: [GMCnet] Adding a potentiometer to system to adjust fuel reading [message #312106 is a reply to message #312000] Fri, 13 January 2017 18:07 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
kelvin is currently offline  kelvin   United States
Messages: 608
Registered: February 2004
Location: Eugene, OR
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I'm just getting into a groove at 350 miles!

Not all of us need to stop after 4 hours in the seat. Or we hit a rest
stop without filling up. I've gone 450miles without flipping over to
"AUX" a couple times. I think my record in the seat is about 8 hours.
Proper fluid intake (or lack thereof) is important. :-)

It is good to know your particular coach, though. My guage (VDO) is
reasonably accurate. My tank sensors were in great shape last time I
had them out.

Kelvin
'73 23' in Eugene, OR


On 1/10/2017 4:06 PM, James Hupy wrote:
> I put drivers who run their vehicles on very low fuel levels as the same
> guys who play Russian roulette with all the chambers loaded. Breathe easier
> guys, fill the tanks, and note your odometer reading. Drive 250 miles, then
> refill the tanks. Forget those inaccurate electric fuel gages, and fuel
> tanks joined at the hip with a large manifold between them. There are much
> more important issues to concern you in your coach.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>
> On Jan 10, 2017 3:54 PM, "A." wrote:
>
>> Matt Colie wrote on Tue, 10 January 2017 17:41
>>> ...The several times I have been able to take on more than 50 gallons, I
>> was concerned, but far from panic.
>> Gas pumps vary by calibration. I drove my daily driver for a couple of
>> years and could never jam more than 12 gallons in it at my usual station
>> when
>> the low fuel light came on. One time I was across the street from a
>> station that was the same price as my regular place when the low fuel light
>> came
>> on. So I pulled in a filled up. The pump said it took 13 gallons by the
>> time it clicked off. I never bought gas there again, and every time I needed
>> gas after that I went to my usual place and never stuffed more than 12
>> gallons in it.
>> --
>> 73 23' Sequoia 4 Sale
>> 73 23' CanyonLands Parts Unit 4 Sale
>> Upper Alabama
>> "Highest price does not guarantee highest quality."
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Onan electric gas shut off valve just before the fuel pump.
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Got the Olds aluminum intake for my 403. No modifications will be needed.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Sep 30 04:29:37 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01309 seconds