Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
| [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311715] |
Sat, 31 December 2016 00:41  |
BobDunahugh
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
|
Senior Member |
|
|
There is a stock Olds aluminum intake that will work for us. The casting number listed in a post before was wrong. The casting number for the large port 1982 to 1985 307 Olds is 22504068. Not ending in 4086. ( Thank you so much to Tom McManus for the correction, and help with my search.) One thing that has come to lite. This is a high demand part in the Olds committee. As it has larger ports then the manifold that came out the last half of the production year of 1985. Edelbrock make two intakes that will work with the heads that our 403's have as far as port alignment. But the carb mounting surface is 1/2 inch higher then our stock cast iron intake. Edelbrock # 3711 has an EGR port at $290. # 2711 doesn't at $320. So I just went out to check the clearance between my carb air cleaner, and the hatch. There is none. ( Body to frame pads are in place ). With the 403 being shorter then the 455. Why is my 403 carb air cleaner against the hatch? So were has the clearance gone that should be there? One thing that I could do. Is mount the manifold in the Bridgeport mill. And lower the carb mounting surface. Put in thicker body pads. Or find an original 307 intake manifold. I'm trying to make sure my EFI will fit after the intake is bolted down.
Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311723 is a reply to message #311715] |
Sat, 31 December 2016 09:13  |
JohnL455
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Shortening the runner length will sacrifice low torque by shortening runner length. Not sure if a measurable amount without a dyno test but I would look elsewhere to "cheat". Thinner carb composite gasket of some type or a slightly lower air horn maybe with dual entrant hoses to compensate for lost height. Thinking out loud.
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311731 is a reply to message #311715] |
Sat, 31 December 2016 11:45 |
Kosier
Messages: 834
Registered: February 2008
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bob,
Since I sent you the number on the manifold, I can only apologize for
crossing up the number. Dyslexia can be so annoying. I should
have sent the website www.442.com/oldsfaq/afinm.htp and you can even see a
picture of the manifold. The manifold does not have
the carb sunk down like the 455. That's why the motor is just as tall.
Both motors were designed to fit under the low hoods of a
Toronado and when GMC put them in the motorhomes, they had to cut a hole in
the engine lid and plate over it.
The floorboards in your GMC are 3/4" plywood and the engine lid is 1". You
can get a piece of 1" by 3" aluminum about 33" long and
double up on the rear of the frame around the rear of the hatch and make a
new lid from 3/4" fireproof plywood. This will save some
weight, but won't help on air cleaner clearance. Probably only practical if
you are switching to a carb bonnet and remote cleaner. JWID
Gary Kosier
77PB w/500Cad
Newark, Ohio
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bob Dunahugh"
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 1:41 AM
To:
Subject: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
> There is a stock Olds aluminum intake that will work for us. The casting
> number listed in a post before was wrong. The casting number for the large
> port 1982 to 1985 307 Olds is 22504068. Not ending in 4086. ( Thank you
> so much to Tom McManus for the correction, and help with my search.) One
> thing that has come to lite. This is a high demand part in the Olds
> committee. As it has larger ports then the manifold that came out the
> last half of the production year of 1985. Edelbrock make two intakes that
> will work with the heads that our 403's have as far as port alignment.
> But the carb mounting surface is 1/2 inch higher then our stock cast iron
> intake. Edelbrock # 3711 has an EGR port at $290. # 2711 doesn't at $320.
> So I just went out to check the clearance between my carb air cleaner, and
> the hatch. There is none. ( Body to frame pads are in place ). With the
> 403 being shorter then the 455. Why is my 403 carb air cleaner against the
> hatch? So were has the clearance gone that should be there? One thing that
> I could do. Is mount the manifold in the Bridgeport mill. And lower the
> carb mounting surface. Put in thicker body pads. Or find an original 307
> intake manifold. I'm trying to make sure my EFI will fit after the intake
> is bolted down.
>
> Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311736 is a reply to message #311733] |
Sat, 31 December 2016 13:39 |
sgltrac
Messages: 2797
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Aren't they the same block?
Sully
77 eleganza 2
Seattle
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:30 AM Bob Dunahugh wrote:
> With my 403 rubbing the hatch now. As did the other 2 - 78 Royales I've
> had. How would a 455 fit in my 78. Or the other 2 Royales. How much taller
> is the 455?
>
>
>
> Bob Dunahugh
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: Bob Dunahugh
>
> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 12:41 AM
>
> To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
>
> Subject: Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
>
>
>
>
>
> There is a stock Olds aluminum intake that will work for us. The casting
> number listed in a post before was wrong. The casting number for the large
> port 1982 to 1985 307 Olds is 22504068. Not ending in 4086. ( Thank you so
> much to Tom McManus for the correction, and help with my search.) One thing
> that has come to lite. This is a high demand part in the Olds committee. As
> it has larger ports then the manifold that came out the last half of the
> production year of 1985. Edelbrock make two intakes that will work with
> the heads that our 403's have as far as port alignment. But the carb
> mounting surface is 1/2 inch higher then our stock cast iron intake.
> Edelbrock # 3711 has an EGR port at $290. # 2711 doesn't at $320. So I just
> went out to check the clearance between my carb air cleaner, and the
> hatch. There is none. ( Body to frame pads are in place ). With the 403
> being shorter then the 455. Why is my 403 carb air cleaner against the
> hatch? So were has the clearance gone that should be there? One thing that
> I could do. Is mount the manifold in the Bridgeport mill. And lower the
> carb mounting surface. Put in thicker body pads. Or find an original 307
> intake manifold. I'm trying to make sure my EFI will fit after the intake
> is bolted down.
>
>
>
> Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> GMCnet mailing list
>
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Sully
77 Royale basket case.
Future motorhome land speed record holder(bucket list)
Seattle, Wa.
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311737 is a reply to message #311736] |
Sat, 31 December 2016 13:50 |
James Hupy
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The 403 and 307 and 350 are very similar. The 455 is nearly the same as the
400 big block and the 425 big block. Bore spacing on the 403 uses the
siamese casting method where there are no water jackets between pairs of
cylinders. Bore/stroke relationship is different also. 403 is oversquare,
455 is undersquare. Deck height is different too.
Jim Hupy
On Dec 31, 2016 11:40 AM, "Todd Sullivan" wrote:
> Aren't they the same block?
>
> Sully
> 77 eleganza 2
> Seattle
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:30 AM Bob Dunahugh
> wrote:
>
>> With my 403 rubbing the hatch now. As did the other 2 - 78 Royales I've
>> had. How would a 455 fit in my 78. Or the other 2 Royales. How much
> taller
>> is the 455?
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Dunahugh
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: Bob Dunahugh
>>
>> Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2016 12:41 AM
>>
>> To: gmclist@list.gmcnet.org
>>
>> Subject: Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> There is a stock Olds aluminum intake that will work for us. The casting
>> number listed in a post before was wrong. The casting number for the
> large
>> port 1982 to 1985 307 Olds is 22504068. Not ending in 4086. ( Thank you
> so
>> much to Tom McManus for the correction, and help with my search.) One
> thing
>> that has come to lite. This is a high demand part in the Olds committee.
> As
>> it has larger ports then the manifold that came out the last half of the
>> production year of 1985. Edelbrock make two intakes that will work with
>> the heads that our 403's have as far as port alignment. But the carb
>> mounting surface is 1/2 inch higher then our stock cast iron intake.
>> Edelbrock # 3711 has an EGR port at $290. # 2711 doesn't at $320. So I
> just
>> went out to check the clearance between my carb air cleaner, and the
>> hatch. There is none. ( Body to frame pads are in place ). With the 403
>> being shorter then the 455. Why is my 403 carb air cleaner against the
>> hatch? So were has the clearance gone that should be there? One thing
> that
>> I could do. Is mount the manifold in the Bridgeport mill. And lower the
>> carb mounting surface. Put in thicker body pads. Or find an original 307
>> intake manifold. I'm trying to make sure my EFI will fit after the intake
>> is bolted down.
>>
>>
>>
>> Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> GMCnet mailing list
>>
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311750 is a reply to message #311748] |
Sun, 01 January 2017 10:03 |
James Hupy
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
|
Senior Member |
|
|
To be precise, manifold height should have some parameters. If you are
referring to the carb mounting flange, you probably should measure from a
point that normally does not get machined as a result of engine overhaul.
Such a place might be the end walls of the lifter valley where the end
seals reside when the manifold is mounted to the engine. From that point,
the vertical distance to the carb base flange can be determined. I
personally have seen several intake manifolds on 403's that differed a good
bit in height, so, I don't know which one was "factory correct" for a GMC
MOTOR HOME, and which one was transplanted from another Olds model. I have
also seen Edelbrock "Performer" aluminum intakes with stock Quadra jet
carbs, as well as square bore AFB'S and Holley 4 barrels bolted down, using
a variety of air intakes. 40 years is a very long time for anything
automotive to remain stock, especially, pot metal carbs. I have done a
couple of Howell efi conversions on 403 engines, I use a Turbonetic right
angle snorkel combined with 3" stainless steel exhaust tubing combined with
an "air hog" air cleaner. Jim K has all the pieces in his catalog including
a really snazzy red convoluted silicone rubber hose and a machined aluminum
adapter that can be mounted to the floor of the coach. I took pictures,
but, god only knows where they are today.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
On Jan 1, 2017 7:04 AM, "Pete Smith" wrote:
> What's the standard intake manifold height on the motorhome 403?
> --
> Cary, NC
>
> No Coach yet but trending towards mid kitchen Rolaled, 77 or 78, 403,
> hopefully with good original Imron paint.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311751 is a reply to message #311723] |
Sun, 01 January 2017 10:31 |
Chris Tyler
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
|
Senior Member |
|
|
[quote title=JohnL455 wrote on Sat, 31 December 2016 09:13]Shortening the runner length will sacrifice low torque by shortening runner length. Not sure if a measurable amount without a dyno test but I would look elsewhere to "cheat".
Actually if you mill the manifold you decrease the plenum volume, the runner length remains the same.Conversly, Adding plenum volume [spacers] helps top end power rather than low end
I spoke with Edelbrock tech aboiut this when I was looking into putting a Performer manifold on my 455. They said it could be milled 1/2 with no problems, perhaps more but risked cracking
They mentioned the older edelbrock manifolds [C4B? I forget #] were lower
They also said they really had no data on torque under 2500, but felt there would be a small gain on the low end due to higher velocity.
I ended up not installing it as it would still require hatch mods. If I ever need to pull the manifold [stock iron] maybe I will
76 Glenbrook
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311753 is a reply to message #311752] |
Sun, 01 January 2017 13:50 |
sgltrac
Messages: 2797
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bob, I hand built a duct out of aluminum to feed the TB on my 77 royale 455
and routed it to a K&N conical filter. The biggest filter I could find
which was the same size as the one sold for my 7.3 liter powerstroke. The
biggest challenge was getting a duct of sufficient volume off the top of
the engine between the valve covers and the aluminum floor framing of the
cockpit. New body pads made a big difference in engine to hatch framing
clearance. The duct was a rectangular tube leading off the top of the TB
toward the front of the engine. I put a turn in the duct at a point where I
had the best shot out of the engine bay exiting the drivers side of the
engine and angled downward at about a 45 ^ to a transition to a 4" straight
aluminum pipe via a 90^ rubber elbow. The leading edge of the round pipe
held the k&n which terminates behind the left headlamp bucket. Fender
liners were not present when I bought the coach and I never added them
back. I never ran the TB with any other setup so I do not have any
performance data as far as how well /poorly my air intake impacted
performance. I do know that I could light the front tires with a stab of
the throttle on dry pavement( 355 lim slip diff). Mileage depended upon
pace. I seemed to get around 10mpg cruising at 65 mph or less. One real
negative of the k&n filter was that the unmuffled exposed air filter
generates a lot of intake noise when under load which made it hard to
converse while driving in that condition. If I were to do it all again I
would build an enclosure for the filter or a resonator box seen on most
modern engines to reduce engine decibels.
Sully
77 eleganza 2
Seattle
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 9:27 AM Bruce Hislop wrote:
> Bob,
>
> I posted some photos of how I did my air intake to the TBI. Like others I
> used the snorkel from a Jeep, but I found it did not run well. I surmised
>
> that the air was not making the 90 degree turn into the TB evenly between
> the two barrels. A local plumber let me rummage through his discard pile
>
> and I found a piece of plastic pipe that fit the TB and snorkel. Since I
> could not seem to cut it perfectly square, I sealed the pipe at the snorkel
>
> and onto the existing 1" riser on the TB using some Scotch 33 tape and a
> couple ty-wraps.
>
>
>
> The Intake Air Temperature sensor is mounted into the side of this riser
> pipe.
>
>
>
> The air filter is a K&N look alike mounted upfront.
>
>
>
> The PO had cut out the hatch cover where it was routed for the air
> cleaner. Then he added a piece of plywood and a piece of sheet aluminum.
> As you
>
> can see in the photo, its hardly noticeable.
>
>
>
> Someday I hope to make some improvements and make it all look pretty.
>
>
>
> Link to pics:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g7008-efi.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bruce Hislop
>
> ON Canada
>
> 77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
>
> Hubler 1 ton front end
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
>
> My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> GMCnet mailing list
>
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Sully
77 Royale basket case.
Future motorhome land speed record holder(bucket list)
Seattle, Wa.
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311754 is a reply to message #311752] |
Sun, 01 January 2017 15:04 |
Kosier
Messages: 834
Registered: February 2008
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bruce,
When I put the Cadillac in, I used a collection of by Spectre that I got
from Jegs. I made a new engine lid, eliminating the original cutout
for the air cleaner. I made a raised area over the snorkel only and our
waste basket goes right on top of that, making it inconspicuous.
Gary Kosier
77PB w/500Cad
Newark, Ohio
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bruce Hislop"
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2017 12:02 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
> Bob,
> I posted some photos of how I did my air intake to the TBI. Like others I
> used the snorkel from a Jeep, but I found it did not run well. I surmised
> that the air was not making the 90 degree turn into the TB evenly between
> the two barrels. A local plumber let me rummage through his discard pile
> and I found a piece of plastic pipe that fit the TB and snorkel. Since I
> could not seem to cut it perfectly square, I sealed the pipe at the
> snorkel
> and onto the existing 1" riser on the TB using some Scotch 33 tape and a
> couple ty-wraps.
>
> The Intake Air Temperature sensor is mounted into the side of this riser
> pipe.
>
> The air filter is a K&N look alike mounted upfront.
>
> The PO had cut out the hatch cover where it was routed for the air
> cleaner. Then he added a piece of plywood and a piece of sheet aluminum.
> As you
> can see in the photo, its hardly noticeable.
>
> Someday I hope to make some improvements and make it all look pretty.
>
> Link to pics:
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g7008-efi.html
>
>
>
> --
> Bruce Hislop
> ON Canada
> 77PB, 455 Dick P. rebuilt, DynamicEFI EBL EFI & ESC.
> Hubler 1 ton front end
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showphoto.php?photo=29001
> My Staff says I never listen to them, or something like that
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's [message #311759 is a reply to message #311757] |
Mon, 02 January 2017 10:19 |
Kosier
Messages: 834
Registered: February 2008
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bob,
The aftermarket has drop center air cleaners that will allow you to get
everything under the engine cover as long as the carb is not butted
solidly up against the lid. HOWEVER, what this does to air flow is another
story, as you well know.
Gary Kosier
77PB w/500Cad
Newark, Ohio
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Bob Dunahugh"
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2017 2:05 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Aluminum intake manifold for our 403's
> The stock iron 403 intake carb base surface is 2.75 inch's above the
> front block horizontal surface. My concern is that the Edelbrock 2711 alum
> intake is 3.2 inch's. But the Mondeo shop says that the 2711 manifold will
> work in a GMC.
>
>
> Bob Dunahugh 78 Royale
>
> --
>
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Sep 20 22:19:06 CDT 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01306 seconds
|
GMCforum
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
