GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings
[GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 10:03 Go to next message
Olly Schmidt is currently offline  Olly Schmidt   United States
Messages: 1265
Registered: February 2014
Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
Senior Member
After reading about people who are building a caravan using carbon
fibre, I was wondering, how much weight could be saved on a 26' GMC by
using carbon fibre for the body, replacing the frame with aluminum, and
the interior with today's low weight materials.

Anyone has a guess?
--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

'76a Eleganza II, VA

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Best regards

Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296516 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 12:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
An interesting exercise. The frame would likely save some, and doing away with spit board cabinets in favor of something lighter would be a plus. I don't know the differents per square foot of carbon fiber vs SMC, or vs aluminum. The airplane folks say it's lighter than the same panel in aluminum... but all their panels are stressed. How about a carbon fiber monocoque and skip the frame entirely?
An interesting way to spend a few hundred thousand bux is my perspective on it.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296517 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 12:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powwerjon is currently offline  powwerjon   United States
Messages: 849
Registered: March 2013
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Not cost effective to make it worth your time and money to go carbon fiber. Our coaches are already made out of aircraft aluminum and SMC. The real weight savings is to replace the heavier internal components such as the factory modules that are made out of particle board. The Coachman finished coaches (Avion and Royal) were lighter as they were finished using real wood. The overheads cabinets can be lightened up by replacing the particle board in them with 3/8” cabinet grade plywood.

J.R. Wright
GMC GreatLaker 18 Year Member
GMCGL Tech Editor
GMC Eastern States Charter Member
GMCMI 18 Year Member
78 Buskirk 30' Stretch
1975 Avion (Under Reconstruction)
Michigan

> On Mar 1, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Peer Oliver Schmidt GMC wrote:
>
> After reading about people who are building a caravan using carbon
> fibre, I was wondering, how much weight could be saved on a 26' GMC by
> using carbon fibre for the body, replacing the frame with aluminum, and
> the interior with today's low weight materials.
>
> Anyone has a guess?
> --
> Best regards
>
> Peer Oliver Schmidt
> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>
> '76a Eleganza II, VA
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296525 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 13:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Adrien G. is currently offline  Adrien G.   United States
Messages: 474
Registered: May 2008
Location: Burns Flat, OK 73624
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Peer Oliver Schmidt wrote on Tue, 01 March 2016 08:03
After reading about people who are building a caravan using carbon
fibre, I was wondering, how much weight could be saved on a 26' GMC by
using carbon fibre for the body, replacing the frame with aluminum, and
the interior with today's low weight materials.

Anyone has a guess?
--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

'76a Eleganza II, VA




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org





Peer, Having done some work with CF, the cost is very prohibitive and the light weight of the coach
could make it a road handling problem on cross wind conditions, and oncoming trucks on 2 lane roads.
As a motorcycle rider I have experienced what oncoming pressure wave can feel like and do.

SWAGing the weight of a bear (stripped, no glass) coach body could be picked up easily by 4 persons.

FWIW





Adrien & Jenny Genesoto 75 Glenbrook (26-3) Mods LS3.70 FD / Reaction Sys / 80mm Front&Intermidiate / Hydroboost / 16" Tires / Frame Rebuild / Interior Rebuild Yuba City,Ca. Text 530-nine-3-three-3-nine-nine-6
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296526 is a reply to message #296525] Tue, 01 March 2016 13:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Harry is currently offline  Harry   Canada
Messages: 1888
Registered: October 2007
Location: Victoria, BC CANADA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Have the rear suspension cast/forged in aluminum?
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296534 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 15:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Bah, do it right. Magnesium forgings, lighter and stronger and way more expensive.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296543 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 16:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dr.diesel is currently offline  dr.diesel   United States
Messages: 85
Registered: April 2015
Location: The Haute, Indiana
Karma: 0
Member
Having just removed the factory iron intake, I'm pretty sure you can save about 1000000000000000lbs buy investing in the aluminum replacement. Very Happy

77 Kingsley
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296544 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 16:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
In a muddy camground you will be wishing for cast iron over the front wheels.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296547 is a reply to message #296544] Tue, 01 March 2016 18:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ljdavick is currently offline  ljdavick   United States
Messages: 3548
Registered: March 2007
Location: Fremont, CA
Karma: -3
Senior Member
Well, so long as the driver’s seat is over the front wheels I’ll not be too concerned about lack of weight ;-)

I think it’s true that the low hanging fruit for weight savings is the cabinets. Replacing the overhead cabinets with aluminum will save some weight, but the lower cabinets could be substantially lighter if made from composites, or similar. Still I don’t think the weight savings would be significant.

Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, CA
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Distributor
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Larry Davick
A Mystery Machine
1976(ish) Palm Beach
Fremont, Ca
Howell EFI + EBL + Electronic Dizzy
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296549 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 18:53 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bwevers is currently offline  bwevers   United States
Messages: 597
Registered: October 2010
Location: San Jose
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Here's what you end up with.... Laughing
http://www.randygrubb.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Blastolene_by_Swanee31.jpg


Bill Wevers GMC49ers, GMC Western States 1975 Glenbrook - Manny Powerdrive, OneTon 455 F Block, G heads San Jose
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296552 is a reply to message #296549] Tue, 01 March 2016 19:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
I'd LOVE to have the sheet metal skills to build the Deco Liner!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUzqXJjpq94

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic

-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@list.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Bill Wevers

Here's what you end up with.... :lol:




_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296557 is a reply to message #296498] Tue, 01 March 2016 23:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hiwaystar is currently offline  Hiwaystar   United States
Messages: 12
Registered: January 2016
Location: Savannah Georgia
Karma: 0
Junior Member
These things are already pretty light. The greatest opportunity for savings as already stated is in the internal cabinets.
I work in the aerospace industry.
Luxury jets.
Our cabinetry is aluminum honeycomb covered with the real wood veneer of your choice. Very light.
That is where you could save several hundred pounds.


76 Eleganza mostly stock, Sully bags, needs one of everything.
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296566 is a reply to message #296498] Wed, 02 March 2016 06:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dr.diesel is currently offline  dr.diesel   United States
Messages: 85
Registered: April 2015
Location: The Haute, Indiana
Karma: 0
Member
I didn't actually weigh any of it, but:

- The two factory AC units where considerably heavier than the Coleman Mach Power savers I installed.
- One of my single AC units was holding temp in ~90F, perhaps remove one AC unit if you have the dual setup.
- Ditch the 6KW generator. I've run one AC unit off a Honda 2000 inverter style.
- Convert to Lithium batteries.
- Drink Tequila instead of Beer, save a ton of weight, HA HA HA.

Just guessing, but that might save 400lbs.


77 Kingsley
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296570 is a reply to message #296566] Wed, 02 March 2016 07:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Olly Schmidt is currently offline  Olly Schmidt   United States
Messages: 1265
Registered: February 2014
Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
Senior Member
Andy,
> Drink Tequila instead of Beer, save a ton of weight, HA HA HA.
I like your way of thinking :D

--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

'76a Eleganza II, VA


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Best regards

Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296689 is a reply to message #296557] Fri, 04 March 2016 09:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mghamms is currently offline  mghamms   United States
Messages: 466
Registered: March 2016
Location: Ware, Massachusetts
Karma: 2
Senior Member
AHiwaystar wrote on Tue, 01 March 2016 23:12
These things are already pretty light. The greatest opportunity for savings as already stated is in the internal cabinets.
I work in the aerospace industry.
Luxury jets.
Our cabinetry is aluminum honeycomb covered with the real wood veneer of your choice. Very light.
That is where you could save several hundred pounds.


Any idea where to buy the aluminum honeycomb?


1977 Kingsley 455 as stock as it gets except lots of Ragusa parts
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296695 is a reply to message #296689] Fri, 04 March 2016 09:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Richard RV   United States
Messages: 631
Registered: July 2012
Location: Full-timer for 12 years, ...
Karma: -17
Senior Member
It doesn't have to be aluminum. Cardboard or plastic honeycomb material would work just as well for our application.

http://www.hexcel.com/products/aerospace/ahoneycombs
(hint: if it says aerospace, aeronautical or marine the price is 3+ times higher than it should be!)

http://www.gulfstreamcomposites.com/category-s/137.htm

Richard


'77 Birchaven TZE...777; '76 Palm Beach under construction; ‘76 Edgemont waiting its turn
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296706 is a reply to message #296695] Fri, 04 March 2016 12:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
If you want to lighten your cabinets here's a way to do it.

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6868-interior.html

The original Royale face frames with 1/2" plywood base and dividers. Dadoed and glued with a few strategically located screws to hold it together while the glue sets.
I didn't weigh before and after but handling the original cabinets was a two handed task. The new ones are easily lifted with one hand. I haven't gotten around to posting pics of cabinet installation but hope to eventually.

Along with the aluminum manifold, waterpump & radiator, the A6 compressor and drum brakes one should add the Onan generator and transformer style buzz box to the list of very heavy replaceable parts.

I'm just estimating but I doubt that shedding 10% weight will improve gas mileage by 10%. The real benefit (to me at least) is that my weight budget has room for more useful things like more batteries and bigger water tanks.

JP

[Updated on: Fri, 04 March 2016 12:38]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296708 is a reply to message #296706] Fri, 04 March 2016 12:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dr.diesel is currently offline  dr.diesel   United States
Messages: 85
Registered: April 2015
Location: The Haute, Indiana
Karma: 0
Member
Jp Benson wrote on Fri, 04 March 2016 13:36
If you want to lighten your cabinets here's a way to do it.
JP


Very nice!

Any noticeable cooling/heating improvement with all that insulation?


77 Kingsley
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296710 is a reply to message #296706] Fri, 04 March 2016 13:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dr.diesel is currently offline  dr.diesel   United States
Messages: 85
Registered: April 2015
Location: The Haute, Indiana
Karma: 0
Member
Jp Benson wrote on Fri, 04 March 2016 13:36
transformer style buzz box


Dang thing weighs 35lbs, just finished pulling mine out for a modern switching replacement.

You can use it as a portable HD jump starter in your shop, just add wheels.


77 Kingsley
Re: [GMCnet] OT: Weight savings [message #296712 is a reply to message #296710] Fri, 04 March 2016 14:34 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
cadelec is currently offline  cadelec   Australia
Messages: 303
Registered: September 2011
Location: Brisbane Australia
Karma: 1
Senior Member
The PO replaced all my cabinets with ply and stick construction cabinets and used frp for sliding cupboard doors. when the coach was weighed to ship to Australia it came in at 4100 kilos about 9040 pounds this included some spares including a transmission

Trevor Brisbane Australia Siesta Koala 76 Edgemont (old Bobby Moores) 71 Cadillac Eldo Convert 58 Cadillac Eldorado Brougham Project
Previous Topic: Vacuum lines
Next Topic: [GMCnet] New RV's at Camping World
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 17 01:12:48 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01911 seconds