GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Another fuel question
Another fuel question [message #289227] Fri, 23 October 2015 09:53 Go to next message
78403 is currently offline  78403   United States
Messages: 21
Registered: October 2015
Location: Kingman AZ
Karma: 0
Junior Member
I have heard of some couch owners getting rid of the canister and just running a vent line down from the fuel separator. Can this be done or can the canister lines on the tanks be capped and just use a vented fuel cap? I don't have emission testing here and will never live where I need to. I would love to get rid of the canister and the line that runs all the way up there. Maybe there is another way of doing this?

Marvin Briggs 1978 23'birch redone interior modernized. Mostly stock olds 403 original 80,000 miles Kingman AZ
Re: Another fuel question [message #289232 is a reply to message #289227] Fri, 23 October 2015 10:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Marvin,

There is an easily missed issue here. That canister has two functions. One is to trap fuel vapors and the other is to filter the air going back into the tank to replace fuel as it is used. If your vent valve is good, you could disconnect the canister (just leave it there in case some FO wants it), cap the port on the carburetor and put a little cheap fuel filter on the line out of the vent valve to keep bugs and dirt out. If you take out the vent valve, you have to change to a vented fuel cap.

Matt

78403 wrote on Fri, 23 October 2015 10:53
I have heard of some couch owners getting rid of the canister and just running a vent line down from the fuel separator. Can this be done or can the canister lines on the tanks be capped and just use a vented fuel cap? I don't have emission testing here and will never live where I need to. I would love to get rid of the canister and the line that runs all the way up there. Maybe there is another way of doing this?



Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Another fuel question [message #289233 is a reply to message #289227] Fri, 23 October 2015 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Marvin, please give removal some careful consideration. The big reason NOT
TO REMOVE it is today's gasoline. It is much more volatile than fuel
without alcohol, and, it expands greatly when warmed. It severely taxes a
properly functioning cannister system to keep the expansion in check. Do
you really want to pay hard earned money for gasoline only to have it
evaporate into the air where you will receive no benefit from the
purchase? The canister absorbs those aromatic hydrocarbons that you paid
for and routes them into the engine, where they add to your fuel miles per
gallon. Your choice. Pay yourself or pay Standard Oil company some more
money for evaporated fuel.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403
On Oct 23, 2015 7:54 AM, "marvin" wrote:

> I have heard of some couch owners getting rid of the canister and just
> running a vent line down from the fuel separator. Can this be done or can
> the
> canister lines on the tanks be capped and just use a vented fuel cap? I
> don't have emission testing here and will never live where I need to. I
> would
> love to get rid of the canister and the line that runs all the way up
> there. Maybe there is another way of doing this?
> --
> Marvin Briggs
> 1978 23' Transmode redone interior modernized.
> Mostly stock
> olds 403 original 80,000 miles
> Kingman AZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: Another fuel question [message #289234 is a reply to message #289232] Fri, 23 October 2015 10:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
appie is currently offline  appie   Spain
Messages: 902
Registered: April 2013
Location: denmark
Karma: 2
Senior Member
And, ofcourse, then the tanks vent just outside of your sidewindow!

Appie eleganza 76 "Olga" now sadly sold 6 wheel discbrake Quadrabags Springfield stage 2 462 olds Manny tranny ( pictures at http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6489-olga.html Fulltiming in Europe july 2014 til july 2016 Denmark
Re: Another fuel question [message #289243 is a reply to message #289227] Fri, 23 October 2015 11:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
roy1 is currently offline  roy1   United States
Messages: 2126
Registered: July 2004
Location: Minden nevada
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Before you go to a vented cap loosen the cap for a time in warm weather. You will hate the stink of raw gas coming in the toll window as you go down the road

Roy Keen Minden,NV 76 X Glenbrook
Re: Another fuel question [message #289244 is a reply to message #289227] Fri, 23 October 2015 12:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
78403 is currently offline  78403   United States
Messages: 21
Registered: October 2015
Location: Kingman AZ
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Ok good answers. Where does the canister vacuum connection go? Straight to manifold vacuum or ported?

Marvin Briggs 1978 23'birch redone interior modernized. Mostly stock olds 403 original 80,000 miles Kingman AZ
Re: [GMCnet] Another fuel question [message #289252 is a reply to message #289244] Fri, 23 October 2015 18:54 Go to previous message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
For people thinking of way to get more power by bypassing emission system,
I can tell you of one thing that will give you more power.
Cap off the PVC connection to the carburetor. Lot of hot air from the
crankcase will be kept from entering the intake and thus it will run better
as cool air gives you more power.
NOW the fumes from the crankcase will somehow enter the passenger
compartment and fumigate you .
So what you gain is not always that great.
I have helped numerous GMC owners pass he CARB (California Air Resource
Board)
Emmision test.
I say; if your system is running half way dissent, you never need to worry
passing a test here.


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, marvin wrote:

> Ok good answers. Where does the canister vacuum connection go? Straight to
> manifold vacuum or ported?
> --
> Marvin Briggs
> 1978 23' Transmode redone interior modernized.
> Mostly stock
> olds 403 original 80,000 miles
> Kingman AZ
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Previous Topic: Collector Plates...
Next Topic: [GMCnet] The Renovation. Price for having it foam spray insulated.
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Oct 09 01:19:22 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00655 seconds