GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282160 is a reply to message #282157] Wed, 15 July 2015 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Just grab the metal push rod and pull it out -- that may require pliers.
If the plastic carrier comes out too, just push it back in after removing
the metal one.

Don't worry; it will all come clear eventually.

Ken H.


On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Neil Fonville
wrote:

> Now I really realize I'm in over my head. I only understand parts of
> this. So let me work on getting the pin extended. How do I remove the
> metal pin from the black sleeve that is about 1" in diameter that holds the
> metal pin?
>
> Ken: Thanks for taking the time to write this up. I know it's time
> consuming.
>
> Neil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@list.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Ken
> Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:28 AM
> To: GMCNet
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode
>
> "...can't be this hard." Sorry, but Yes, it can. When I, with the help
> of highly experienced GMCers Bobby Moore and JR Slaten, installed Eldorado
> rear discs in 2001, we probably pumped 3+ quarts of fluid through the
> system before eliminating all the air. Many have encountered worse. I've
> used "pump & hold", Vacuum at bleeder, Pressure bleeder, and System vacuum
> on various installations. They've all worked, eventually, but not one has
> been easy.
>
> First about that 0.100" pushrod clearance (actually, more like 0.120"):
> Because of the "pedal ratio" (the length of the pedal arm vs the length
> of the bell crank that actually pushes on the booster/master cylinder),
> which is somewhere around 6:1, Add the minimum 0.005" clearance the
> pushrod should have had before you moved the bracket to the 0.120" and you
> have 1/8" pushrod clearance MINIMUM. The result is that the pushrod
> clearance allows the pedal to go down about 3/4" before you even begin to
> try to apply the brakes. And there is some other play in the system, such
> as the input clevis on the bellcrank and in the cross-shaft bushings. 3/4"
> is probably the minimum pedal play you'll see.
>
> Then, before the brakes begin to apply, there's the "slop" in the brakes
> themselves:
>
> 1. The calipers are designed so that the rubber seals retract the pistons
> a tiny bit via hysteresis. That's intended to keep the brakes from
> dragging. I don't think any of us know what that distance is, but remember
> that it's present at 6 locations, and is amplified by the hydraulic
> advantage of the system. I don't know that number off hand but it's on the
> order of 10:1. So, if each caliper moves only 0.005", that's 0.050" at the
> MC, multiplied by that 6:1 pedal ratio, giving another 0.300" -- over 1/4"
> added to your 3/4", or 1" free play.
>
> 2. Then there's disc runout. We'd like the rotor to have NO axial runout
> -- but every one of them does. And on old equipment like our GMC's, it
> can be quite significant, even when one has installed new discs, as you did
> with the Manny Brakes. I've done several of those upgrades and have used a
> dial indicator to measure the runout. It has not proven unusual to see
> 0.010", especially if special care is not taken to clean ALL the rust off
> of the hub where the rotor mounts. If you see more than 0.005" runout on
> any rotor, it needs correction for optimal brake performance. Remember:
> runout causes kick-back of the caliper pistons exactly like in 1.,
> preceding.
>
> 3. Finally, there's the inevitable axial rotor movement due to wheel
> bearing clearance. There shouldn't be much of that at the front wheels,
> but the middle and rear wheels WILL have some. Manual X7525 specifies
> 0.001"-0.005" -- I, and many others prefer the 0.005" or more and it's
> likely that most have at least 0.005". That end play is likewise amplified
> by the system putting the pedal still lower.
>
> My own brake pedal, even with the newly installed Hydroboost, probably
> goes down ​ ​1" before achieving any significant braking. I've driven only
> one GMC that did better; it also had Hydroboost and had been worked on very
> intently by Bob Stone and probably had 1/2"+ play. If you can make a
> moderately fast stop with 1/2 pedal, you're probably in pretty good shape.
> But you're going to have to fix that push rod to have any chance of
> getting there.
>
> JMHO,
>
> Ken H.
> Americus, GA
> '76 X-Birchaven w/Cad500/Howell EFI & EBL, Manny Brakes & 1-Ton, etc., etc.
> www.gmcwipersetc.com
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Neil Fonville
> wrote:
>
>> I have not lengthen the push rod at this point. I feel the .010 gap
>> when beginning to push the pedal. I guess I’m clueless on the braking
>> system because I don’t understand how .010 gap can lead to 2/3 of the
>> pedal stroke before braking action occurs? Or the pedal being soft?
>>
>> I’m very frustrated at this point and must find some on hands help. I
>> spent about 20 hours installing the kit. 60 trying to bleed it and get
>> the MC replaced. Can’t be this hard.
>>
>> Neil
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282161 is a reply to message #282157] Wed, 15 July 2015 09:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wally is currently offline  wally   United States
Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Wed, 15 July 2015 09:04
Now I really realize I'm in over my head. I only understand parts of this. So let me work on getting the pin extended. How do I remove the metal pin from the black sleeve that is about 1" in diameter that holds the metal pin?

Ken: Thanks for taking the time to write this up. I know it's time consuming.

Neil

-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@list.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Ken Henderson
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 8:28 AM
To: GMCNet
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode

"...can't be this hard." Sorry, but Yes, it can. When I, with the help of highly experienced GMCers Bobby Moore and JR Slaten, installed Eldorado rear discs in 2001, we probably pumped 3+ quarts of fluid through the system before eliminating all the air. Many have encountered worse. I've used "pump & hold", Vacuum at bleeder, Pressure bleeder, and System vacuum on various installations. They've all worked, eventually, but not one has been easy.

First about that 0.100" pushrod clearance (actually, more like 0.120"):
Because of the "pedal ratio" (the length of the pedal arm vs the length of the bell crank that actually pushes on the booster/master cylinder), which is somewhere around 6:1, Add the minimum 0.005" clearance the pushrod should have had before you moved the bracket to the 0.120" and you have 1/8" pushrod clearance MINIMUM. The result is that the pushrod clearance allows the pedal to go down about 3/4" before you even begin to try to apply the brakes. And there is some other play in the system, such as the input clevis on the bellcrank and in the cross-shaft bushings. 3/4" is probably the minimum pedal play you'll see.

Then, before the brakes begin to apply, there's the "slop" in the brakes
themselves:

1. The calipers are designed so that the rubber seals retract the pistons a tiny bit via hysteresis. That's intended to keep the brakes from dragging. I don't think any of us know what that distance is, but remember that it's present at 6 locations, and is amplified by the hydraulic advantage of the system. I don't know that number off hand but it's on the order of 10:1. So, if each caliper moves only 0.005", that's 0.050" at the MC, multiplied by that 6:1 pedal ratio, giving another 0.300" -- over 1/4"
added to your 3/4", or 1" free play.

2. Then there's disc runout. We'd like the rotor to have NO axial runout
-- but every one of them does. And on old equipment like our GMC's, it can be quite significant, even when one has installed new discs, as you did with the Manny Brakes. I've done several of those upgrades and have used a dial indicator to measure the runout. It has not proven unusual to see 0.010", especially if special care is not taken to clean ALL the rust off of the hub where the rotor mounts. If you see more than 0.005" runout on any rotor, it needs correction for optimal brake performance. Remember:
runout causes kick-back of the caliper pistons exactly like in 1., preceding.

3. Finally, there's the inevitable axial rotor movement due to wheel bearing clearance. There shouldn't be much of that at the front wheels, but the middle and rear wheels WILL have some. Manual X7525 specifies 0.001"-0.005" -- I, and many others prefer the 0.005" or more and it's likely that most have at least 0.005". That end play is likewise amplified by the system putting the pedal still lower.

My own brake pedal, even with the newly installed Hydroboost, probably goes down ​ ​1" before achieving any significant braking. I've driven only one GMC that did better; it also had Hydroboost and had been worked on very intently by Bob Stone and probably had 1/2"+ play. If you can make a moderately fast stop with 1/2 pedal, you're probably in pretty good shape.
But you're going to have to fix that push rod to have any chance of getting there.

JMHO,

Ken H.
Americus, GA
'76 X-Birchaven w/Cad500/Howell EFI & EBL, Manny Brakes & 1-Ton, etc., etc.
www.gmcwipersetc.com

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Neil Fonville wrote:

> I have not lengthen the push rod at this point. I feel the .010 gap
> when beginning to push the pedal. I guess I'm clueless on the braking
> system because I don't understand how .010 gap can lead to 2/3 of the
> pedal stroke before braking action occurs? Or the pedal being soft?
>
> I'm very frustrated at this point and must find some on hands help. I
> spent about 20 hours installing the kit. 60 trying to bleed it and get
> the MC replaced. Can't be this hard.
>
> Neil
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Neil, On the vacuum booster just grab on to that rod with pliers and pull it out. You might get the seal coming out too but no biggie it goes right back where it was. Our rod was seeming stuck but it did come out with a little tug. The pedal play you feel may be just the booster from the pedal and not the gap in the rod to master.
HTH


Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282166 is a reply to message #281955] Wed, 15 July 2015 10:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Tom Whitton   United States
Messages: 235
Registered: February 2004
Location: Paducah, KY
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Hi Neal,

Don't give up on your brakes.

Question: What does this sentence from your post mean? "Attached rear and bleed with Hupy bleeder."

Are you pressure bleeding from the wheel cylinders?

I don't have the Jim Hupy's pressure bleeder but use a similar home-built one that works much the same way.

I have not pressure bled from the wheel cylinders but I understand it can be done. I'm not sure of the procedure to insure that all the air is out of the lines when pressure is applied at the wheel cylinders. Maybe someone else can comment. Probably the more traditional way is to pressure bleed from the master cylinder. The "Hupy bleeder" is attached to the master cylinder to bleed all six wheels, beginning with the wheel farthest away from the master cylinder and ending with the closest.

As for another necessary modification to the system when the original master cylinder is replaced with another.... To determine the correct length of the master cylinder push rod, I'm going send you a PM with a picture of the tool I made out of an old radio antenna. There are other ways to do it but this worked for me.

Hang in there. You'll have good brakes.

Tom Whitton
26 ft updated GMC
Paducah, KY


Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:24:23 +0000
From: Neil Fonville
To: "gmclist@list.gmcnet.org"
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Went back at it today without much success. Removed the MC and made
certain it was bench bleed. No air bubbles when pushing the plunger and
fluid flowed in solid streams. I plugged the rear at the MC and the front
brakes worked OK. Not great but not too bad. Pedal was solid. Attached
rear and bleed with Hupy bleeder. Brake pedal was soft and no braking
action occurred until the pedal was 2/3 the way down. Drivable but not
real safe. Checked to make sure pads were seated on rear rotors and they
were. It did not take much pedal movement to stop the wheel moving when
jacked up and turned by hand. Really at a loss here.

Is there anyone that can help find someone in the DFW area to come help
me? I?m pretty much over my head now and about done. About ready to list
it for sale and walk away. Lots of nice folks with these and have
provided some help but I just don?t have the time or energy to deal with a
storage queen. Already missed one trip due to this project and now
canceling another. I took a working coach with OK brakes and now have a
vehicle that is not safe enough to be on congested roads.

Thanks,
Neil Fonville
Allen TX
75 GMC II
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org

Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282199 is a reply to message #282148] Wed, 15 July 2015 18:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Beckman is currently offline  George Beckman   United States
Messages: 1085
Registered: October 2008
Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Wed, 15 July 2015 04:23
I have not lengthen the push rod at this point. I feel the .010 gap when
beginning to push the pedal. I guess I'm clueless on the braking system
because I don't understand how .010 gap can lead to 2/3 of the pedal
stroke before braking action occurs? Or the pedal being soft?

I'm very frustrated at this point and must find some on hands help. I
spent about 20 hours installing the kit. 60 trying to bleed it and get the
MC replaced. Can't be this hard.

Neil



I really am sorry this is so tough. (But then my coach has been on stands for three weeks, so I can understand being frustrated.)

I have no real skill in this area, but am going to try. If nothing else, when the smart guys correct me, perhaps an answer for you will appear.

When I did my disc brakes I had to differentiate between brakes that stop and brakes that feel soft. We fussed and fussed over what I thought was a "soft pedal". Most of this was in the shop and not on the road. My brakes still feel softer than when I had drums. But, and this is where you are having trouble that I did not have, when I finally test drove I found out that the coach stood on its nose before the brakes began to feel as firm as they did before." Once the disk brakes are working these things stop and I mean stop. I was going off an off ramp, down hill when a fellow in front did something silly and I had to make a more or less panic stop from about 50. I thought I was in the Accord. I was pushing 1/3 as hard as when I had the other setup and the coach just squatted. I don't have reaction arms, but I guess am just lucky. No skidding tires, just squatted.

Mine are not Manny brakes, but I mention this just in case. JimK mentioned getting the bleeder pointing up like they are in front. This was a big hassle for me at first. I mounted my rear calipers on the top, because they looked so good there... like the front. But that meant the bleeder was no near the top but at an angle. Perhaps the Manny system has the bleeder at the top but if not, air is hiding up in the part of the piston that is above the bleeder.

The Huby pressure bleeder should shove air out (if the bleeder is at 12 O'Clock) but I mention that the bleeders on the calipers (Caddy, I think) I have leak air. We tried to use a vacuum bleeder at the caliper and we kept sucking air. Only pressure at the MC was able to help us.

I didn't hook up my parking brake right away and did fine. As I understand mine, the adjuster is only necessary because you are trying to set the brakes with a lever. Disc brakes "auto adjust" in that the piston never returns all the way, but follows the rotor as the pads wear. Nice, but sometimes even in our modern cars we can get a light telling us to add brake fluid. That is a sign that the pads have let the pistons travel a ways. Time to look at more than adding fluid.

On the run-out issue, I would think that if that were the problem you could "pump" the brakes at stand still, which you have done ad-nausium, and make up the difference. But if you then drive and the pedal goes low again, that, to me, would me the run-out is opening the calipers to wide. As I said, I don't know beans about run-out.

I tried to read all the posts. Do you have the "sensitized" booster and bigger MC? I assume so, but I think both are needed because we are pushing more fluid.

Last, I know it seems odd that just a little play would make a difference but that rod is critical. Randy Van Winkle went to the moon and back in a goat's mouth trying to trouble shoot that thing and once he got the right combination he has brakes. Two things could be happening.

One, already mentioned by others, is that the rod is too short and the pedal goes too far before it hits pay dirt. In the measuring of that distance, is the spring on the pedal itself pulling it up as far as it should? If not the gap, if any, is perhaps misleading.

The second is that if the rod is too long, the MC doesn't go to rest and let the piston get more fluid. There must be that tiny bit of play. If the pedal spring is not letting the tiny gap happen the MC can just be pushing the same fluid back and never adding any to make up the difference and to raise the pedal. You can't see in the top of that sucker but ususally you can see a little disturbance as the piston hole opens to let more fluid in. With drum brakes the spring made the MC have a little "spout" of fluid make a bump on the fluid surface.

I really hope you don't give up. We all feel like it sometimes, especially when we want to go and can't. Hate missing opportunities because the coach is dead.


'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282201 is a reply to message #282199] Wed, 15 July 2015 18:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Don' forget you don't need the pressure delay of the combination valve with 6 disks. The system will work the way it is. But to disable the metering valve, read here:

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/deciphering-the-combination-valve/p5335.html
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282214 is a reply to message #282199] Wed, 15 July 2015 22:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
KB is currently offline  KB   United States
Messages: 1262
Registered: September 2009
Karma: 0
Senior Member
one thing I haven't seen mentioned: when you push on the brake pedal, you can not physically run the pedal into the firewall.
There is a curved arm above the pedal, and it's the curved part that will limit travel. In other words, if your pushrod has
too much gap, you may think there's still pedal travel available when there's not and you will not actually be engaging the brakes
because you're just running the pedal arm into the firewall.

You have to:
a) make sure ALL the air is out of the system. This can be time consuming and incredibly frustrating.
b) make sure the pushrod is the correct length to minimize pedal travel.
c) adjust the mechanical parking calipers by working the lever arm a bunch of times with a wrench. Since you've already pushed on the pedal
and extended the pistons hydraulically, you may need to push them back in with a clamp first to give clearance between the pad
and rotor so the mechanical actuator can advance.

Also, I've noticed than an all-disc system has a different "feel" than a drum/disc system and never seems to be quite as hard at the pedal for some reason.

Karen
1975 26'

[Updated on: Wed, 15 July 2015 22:30]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282224 is a reply to message #282201] Thu, 16 July 2015 07:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
I will be back at it today. First step is getting the pin the correct
length and evaluate. I did replace the combination valve to a disc/disc
version.

I spoke with several folks yesterday with tips and encouragement. Thanks
everyone. I¹ll report back.

Neil


On 7/15/15, 6:35 PM, "Gmclist on behalf of A."
wrote:

> Don' forget you don't need the pressure delay of the combination valve
> with 6 disks. The system will work the way it is. But to disable the
> metering
> valve, read here:
>
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/deciphering-the-combination-valve/p5335.
> html
> --
> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
> Upper Alabama
> On "marriage equality": Once you define the direction that society is
> headed as "forward", you can call it progress.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282251 is a reply to message #282224] Thu, 16 July 2015 16:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
So today I created a new pin that is the correct length. I did find it
helped some but not as much as I hoped. I ran out of time for more
troubleshooting but I did learn the rears are not working at all. After
driving a bit and applying the brakes numerous times, I took a temperature
reading on all six rotors. The fronts were hot and not touchable at 140+
degrees. All four rears were ambient at 100. That tells me I have the
front working and need to troubleshoot the rear. I will apply the
pressure gauge on the rear next.

Neil


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282252 is a reply to message #282251] Thu, 16 July 2015 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Thu, 16 July 2015 16:34
So today I created a new pin that is the correct length. I did find it helped some but not as much as I hoped. I ran out of time for more troubleshooting but I did learn the rears are not working at all. After driving a bit and applying the brakes numerous times, I took a temperature reading on all six rotors. The fronts were hot and not touchable at 140+ degrees. All four rears were ambient at 100. That tells me I have the front working and need to troubleshoot the rear. I will apply the pressure gauge on the rear next.

Neil
This may have been mentioned, but I don't think you ever addressed it:

Do you have the system that has the brake calipers mounted such that they have to be unbolted from the backplate and rotated so that the bleeder is at the top, then bled, then returned to position, and bolted back on?
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282253 is a reply to message #282251] Thu, 16 July 2015 17:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Neil, you still have air in the rear system, or, you have another non
functioning master cylinder. I would start with the rear brakes. Due to
the common supply line between the rear and intermediate brakes, you can
chase air back and forth between them, and I have noticed that some of the
bleeder screws are loose fitting and will draw air around them. If you
suspect that this is happening, release the pressure in the tank and
unscrew the bleeders and coat their threads with a liberal amount of
silicone compound, then re-bleed all the rear brakes until you no longer
see ANY BUBBLES in the bleeder hose. Hang in there. You should see at least
100° F over ambient with light to moderate braking on the rear disc rotors.
More on the fronts. They do 60 to 70% of the stopping. Hang in there, you
will be successful.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403
On Jul 16, 2015 2:35 PM, "Neil Fonville" wrote:

> So today I created a new pin that is the correct length. I did find it
> helped some but not as much as I hoped. I ran out of time for more
> troubleshooting but I did learn the rears are not working at all. After
> driving a bit and applying the brakes numerous times, I took a temperature
> reading on all six rotors. The fronts were hot and not touchable at 140+
> degrees. All four rears were ambient at 100. That tells me I have the
> front working and need to troubleshoot the rear. I will apply the
> pressure gauge on the rear next.
>
> Neil
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282254 is a reply to message #282252] Thu, 16 July 2015 17:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
I have Manny¹s system and the bleeders are on the top of calipers but I
will look at this more closely too. The pressure gauge will tell me a bit
more. I will have a helping tomorrow night to work on this again.

Thanks everyone...

On 7/16/15, 5:12 PM, "Gmclist on behalf of A."
wrote:

> Neil Fonville wrote on Thu, 16 July 2015 16:34
>> So today I created a new pin that is the correct length. I did find it
>> helped some but not as much as I hoped. I ran out of time for more
>> troubleshooting but I did learn the rears are not working at all.
>> After driving a bit and applying the brakes numerous times, I took a
>> temperature
>> reading on all six rotors. The fronts were hot and not touchable at
>> 140+ degrees. All four rears were ambient at 100. That tells me I have
>> the
>> front working and need to troubleshoot the rear. I will apply the
>> pressure gauge on the rear next.
>>
>> Neil
> This may have been mentioned, but I don't think you ever addressed it:
>
> Do you have the system that has the brake calipers mounted such that they
> have to be unbolted from the backplate and rotated so that the bleeder is
> at
> the top, then bled, then returned to position, and bolted back on?
> --
> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
> Upper Alabama
> On "marriage equality": Once you define the direction that society is
> headed as "forward", you can call it progress.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282255 is a reply to message #282254] Thu, 16 July 2015 17:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jimk is currently offline  jimk   United States
Messages: 6734
Registered: July 2006
Location: Belmont, CA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Neil,
You need to make sure when you bleed the rear, that the bleeder is at exact
12 O'clock.
We normally remove one of the pins and pivot it to be in that position.

On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Neil Fonville wrote:

> I have Manny¹s system and the bleeders are on the top of calipers but I
> will look at this more closely too. The pressure gauge will tell me a bit
> more. I will have a helping tomorrow night to work on this again.
>
> Thanks everyone...
>
> On 7/16/15, 5:12 PM, "Gmclist on behalf of A."
> wrote:
>
>> Neil Fonville wrote on Thu, 16 July 2015 16:34
>>> So today I created a new pin that is the correct length. I did find it
>>> helped some but not as much as I hoped. I ran out of time for more
>>> troubleshooting but I did learn the rears are not working at all.
>>> After driving a bit and applying the brakes numerous times, I took a
>>> temperature
>>> reading on all six rotors. The fronts were hot and not touchable at
>>> 140+ degrees. All four rears were ambient at 100. That tells me I have
>>> the
>>> front working and need to troubleshoot the rear. I will apply the
>>> pressure gauge on the rear next.
>>>
>>> Neil
>> This may have been mentioned, but I don't think you ever addressed it:
>>
>> Do you have the system that has the brake calipers mounted such that they
>> have to be unbolted from the backplate and rotated so that the bleeder is
>> at
>> the top, then bled, then returned to position, and bolted back on?
>> --
>> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
>> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
>> Upper Alabama
>> On "marriage equality": Once you define the direction that society is
>> headed as "forward", you can call it progress.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>



--
Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC, Fremont,CA
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
http://www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Jim Kanomata
Applied/GMC
jimk@appliedairfilters.com
www.appliedgmc.com
1-800-752-7502
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282264 is a reply to message #282255] Thu, 16 July 2015 20:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Carl S. is currently offline  Carl S.   United States
Messages: 4186
Registered: January 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
Senior Member

Neil,

I don't know anything about Manny's system, but on the original Chuck Aulgur reaction arm system I got from Jim K, the calipers are 90 degrees to the frame, (http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/disc-brakes-2fchuck-aulgur-reaction-arm-install/p40119-right-mid.html) putting the bleeder a little down from the top. Like the others have stated, you will need to tip the calipers at an angle so that the bleeder is at the very top. Take a look at your front calipers and use them as an example of the angle, (http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/disc-brakes-2fchuck-aulgur-reaction-arm-install/p40121-right-front.html)

I had no problems with the installation of Jim K's system, although getting them bled was a bit of a chore. I have FANTASTIC brakes. Better than most sports cars.


Carl Stouffer '75 ex Palm Beach Tucson, AZ. Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282391 is a reply to message #282264] Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right
Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi. So I
installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled in
the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi. Is
it the combination valve causing me a problem?

I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc
conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or
paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4. Did
I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?

Thanks,
Neil


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282395 is a reply to message #282391] Sat, 18 July 2015 11:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
wally is currently offline  wally   United States
Messages: 643
Registered: August 2004
Location: Omaha Nebraska
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28
Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right
Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi. So I
installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled in
the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi. Is
it the combination valve causing me a problem?

I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc
conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or
paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4. Did
I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?

Thanks,
Neil


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


PV4 is the one you want. It should not have the button on the front end of it like your PV2 did. Thats a way to tell them apart.


Wally Anderson
Omaha NE
75 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282397 is a reply to message #282391] Sat, 18 July 2015 11:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28
Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi. So I installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled in the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi. Is it the combination valve causing me a problem?

I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4. Did I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?

Thanks,
Neil
Don't be offended, but are you sure you didn't measure the pressure to the fronts when you had the gauge at the master cylinder?

You need to read the pressure at EACH output at the master cylinder. That'll tell more of the story.
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282398 is a reply to message #282397] Sat, 18 July 2015 12:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
I did not read the front pressure because the fronts are solid and seem to
be working. Since I had the front working, no leaks, etc I did not want
to open that part of the system up. Not really sure why that would tell
me more? 800-900PSI at the MC and 300-400PSI at the caliper. Huge loss
somewhere in the rear system and the combination value seems likely. From
what I have read, the PV2 value will cut the pressure by 1/2 within a
certain range. I¹m thinking I got sold the PV2 instead of the PV4 when I
replaced it.

On 7/18/15, 11:57 AM, "Gmclist on behalf of A."
wrote:

> Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28
>> Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right
>> Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi. So
>> I
>> installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled
>> in the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi.
>> Is
>> it the combination valve causing me a problem?
>>
>> I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc
>> conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or
>> paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4.
>> Did I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Neil
> Don't be offended, but are you sure you didn't measure the pressure to
> the fronts when you had the gauge at the master cylinder?
>
> You need to read the pressure at EACH output at the master cylinder.
> That'll tell more of the story.
> --
> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
> Upper Alabama
> On "marriage equality": Once you define the direction that society is
> headed as "forward", you can call it progress.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282399 is a reply to message #282395] Sat, 18 July 2015 12:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Neil Fonville is currently offline  Neil Fonville   
Messages: 68
Registered: May 2014
Karma: 0
Member
That is a simple check and will do that later today.
Thanks

On 7/18/15, 11:42 AM, "Gmclist on behalf of Wally Anderson"
wrote:

> Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28
>> Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right
>> Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi.
>> So I
>> installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled
>> in
>> the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi.
>> Is
>> it the combination valve causing me a problem?
>>
>> I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc
>> conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or
>> paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4.
>> Did
>> I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Neil
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
> PV4 is the one you want. It should not have the button on the front end
> of it like your PV2 did. Thats a way to tell them apart.
> --
> Wally Anderson
> 1975 Glenbrook
> Megasquirt 455 port injection science project
> Omaha Nebraska
> Greater Midwest Classics
> GMCES
> http://wallyandsue.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org



1975 GMC II Allen, TX
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282400 is a reply to message #282398] Sat, 18 July 2015 12:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
Neil,

Even if you have the PV2 combination valve installed, it should not cause
the rear pressure to be lower than the front. The metering valve works
just the opposite of that: The FRONT pressure is held off until the rear
reaches about 130 psi and continues to increase with the rear pressure
reaches about 400-600 psi. The rear pressure should track the MC pressure
all the way. I'm at a loss to explain what may be causing yours to not do
so. You may have to start at the MC and check the pressure at each
connection, in turn, from there to the caliper.

One thought: Don't just take measure the caliper pressure and immediately
take that as gospel. Rather, HOLD THE PEDAL DOWN for an extended period to
see if the pressure rises. It should come up immediately, but if it
doesn't and comes up slowly, you'll know you have a flow restriction
somewhere. If it NEVER comes up, I don't know what to tell you.

Ken H.


On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Neil Fonville wrote:

> I did not read the front pressure because the fronts are solid and seem to
> be working. Since I had the front working, no leaks, etc I did not want
> to open that part of the system up. Not really sure why that would tell
> me more? 800-900PSI at the MC and 300-400PSI at the caliper. Huge loss
> somewhere in the rear system and the combination value seems likely. From
> what I have read, the PV2 value will cut the pressure by 1/2 within a
> certain range. I¹m thinking I got sold the PV2 instead of the PV4 when I
> replaced it.
>
> On 7/18/15, 11:57 AM, "Gmclist on behalf of A."
> wrote:
>
>> Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 11:28
>>> Update: Went out today and installed the pressure gauge on the Right
>>> Front Rear Caliper. Best pressure reading we saw was about 300 psi. So
>>> I
>>> installed the gauge at the MC and was getting 800-900psi. Reinstalled
>>> in the Right front rear caliper and bleed good. Best we got was 400psi.
>>> Is
>>> it the combination valve causing me a problem?
>>>
>>> I have replaced the valve with what I thought was a PV4 for Disc/Disc
>>> conversions. I did pick this up from a local shop with no markings or
>>> paperwork. I had the PV2 which I removed and replaced with this PV4.
>>> Did I get the wrong part or defective? Is the PV4 the best option?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Neil
>> Don't be offended, but are you sure you didn't measure the pressure to
>> the fronts when you had the gauge at the master cylinder?
>>
>> You need to read the pressure at EACH output at the master cylinder.
>> That'll tell more of the story.
>> --
>> '73 23' Sequoia For Sale
>> '73 23' CanyonLands For Sale
>> Upper Alabama
>> On "marriage equality": Once you define the direction that society is
>> headed as "forward", you can call it progress.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://list.gmcnet.org/mailman/listinfo/gmclist_list.gmcnet.org


Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Disc brake project still in failure mode [message #282401 is a reply to message #282398] Sat, 18 July 2015 13:10 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Neil Fonville wrote on Sat, 18 July 2015 12:09
I did not read the front pressure because the fronts are solid and seem to be working. Since I had the front working, no leaks, etc I did not want to open that part of the system up. Not really sure why that would tell me more? 800-900PSI at the MC and 300-400PSI at the caliper. Huge loss somewhere in the rear system and the combination value seems likely. From what I have read, the PV2 value will cut the pressure by 1/2 within a certain range. I¹m thinking I got sold the PV2 instead of the PV4 when I replaced it.
It is understandable that you don't want to open up the front since it is working. But I have made the mistake of thinking the line farthest from the booster is the rear and the other is the front, which was backwards (or vice versa, I have to trace the lines to tell, since I can never remember).

That's why I asked if you are sure the line you checked at the master cylinder is actually the line to the rear brakes. I don't know what can happen to cause 800 psi at one end, and half that at the other end. Doesn't seem plausible if they were the same line.

If you have the OEM type combination valve, at light pedal pressure you can have less pressure to the FRONT than the rear. And in that case, you could have less pressure to one set than is coming out of the master cylinder.

To summarize the thought process here: Something LIKE what you are describing COULD occur with an OEM type combination valve, and the lines from that valve that are supposed to go to the front going to the rear, and vice versa. But not the numbers you are reporting

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/deciphering-the-combination-valve/p5331.html

There are also cases where folks had to reverse the lines at the master cylinder to get the fittings to work (because one is larger than the other).
Previous Topic: Brake Switch Repair
Next Topic: [GMCnet] New GMC
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Jul 02 21:41:29 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02083 seconds