GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » [GMCnet] 455 Olds
[GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280021] Tue, 16 June 2015 11:56 Go to next message
BobDunahugh is currently offline  BobDunahugh   United States
Messages: 2465
Registered: October 2010
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280022 is a reply to message #280021] Tue, 16 June 2015 12:14 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Carl S. is currently offline  Carl S.   United States
Messages: 4186
Registered: January 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ.
Karma: 13
Senior Member

BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 09:56
I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist




Pretty sure Buick had their own 455. So did Pontiac. Seems like a weird way to do business, but that's how the different GM divisions did it back then.


Carl Stouffer '75 ex Palm Beach Tucson, AZ. Chuck Aulgur Reaction Arm Disc Brakes, Quadrabags, 3.70 LSD final drive, Lenzi knuckles/hubs, Dodge Truck 16" X 8" front wheels, Rear American Eagles, Solar battery charging. GMCSJ and GMCMI member
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280024 is a reply to message #280021] Tue, 16 June 2015 12:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
habbyguy is currently offline  habbyguy   United States
Messages: 896
Registered: May 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Karma: 3
Senior Member
What Carl said...

OTOH, the 403 (in the late '77 and all '78 GMCs) was known as a "corporate motor" and showed up across a lot of GM product lines. That's a good thing, because it means we have a lot more options when we go to the men's mall (aka junkyard) for parts.

Here's a quickie list of vehicles that might have a 403...
1977 Cutlass, Vista Cruiser, Delta 88, Custom Cruiser, 98, Toronado, Electra 225, Bonneville
1978 Delta 88, Custom Cruiser, 98, Toronado
1979 Custom Cruiser, 98

(didn't mean to hijack the thread, but this might come in handy for someone some day).


Mark Hickey Mesa, AZ 1978 Royale Center Kitchen

[Updated on: Tue, 16 June 2015 12:24]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280026 is a reply to message #280022] Tue, 16 June 2015 12:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
They didn't always. GMC pickups used Pontiac v8 engines with Hydramatic
transmissions in 55 -56. Engines weren't 455's, but smaller displacement.
Later GMC and Chevrolet pickups used Chevrolet V8 coupled with TH 350 and
TH 400 turbohydramatic transmissions. GMC made their own inline 6's. 248
and 302 cubic inch versions. Chevrolet used their own inline 6. Buick
always used their own engines in their cars. Old nailheads up through the
401 cubic in. engines, then a 400 and 455. Also a 350 was available Buick
built. There was a 2 or 3 year period where General Motors tried out a
CORPORATE Chevrolet V8 in all brands, including Cadillac. That didn't last
long. Consumers went Batsh#* when they found out their Caddy's had a
Chevrolet engine. I cannot ever remember a Buick engine being used by any
other division.
Jim Hupy
Salem, Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403
On Jun 16, 2015 10:15 AM, "Carl Stouffer" wrote:

> BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 09:56
>> I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any
> Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
>
>
> Pretty sure Buick had their own 455. So did Pontiac. Seems like a weird
> way to do business, but that's how the different GM divisions did it back
> then.
> --
> Carl Stouffer
> '75 ex Palm Beach
> Tucson, AZ.
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280037 is a reply to message #280021] Tue, 16 June 2015 16:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Im pretty sure some of late 70s Pontiac Firebird Trans Ams could be had with a "Corporate Olds 403"


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280040 is a reply to message #280037] Tue, 16 June 2015 17:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Guy Lopes is currently offline  Guy Lopes   United States
Messages: 499
Registered: April 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
You are correct! I owned a 1977 Trans Am and a 1978 Formula Firebird. Both
had the Olds 403.

Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA
W6TOL

www.GMC-Guy.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of John
Heslinga
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 2:38 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds

Im pretty sure some of late 70s Pontiac Firebird Trans Ams could be had with
a "Corporate Olds 403"

--
John and Cathie Heslinga
1974 Canyonlands 260
455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS,
Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd.
Edmonton, Alberta
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Guy Lopes 76 Birchaven "Orion" Sacramento, CA W6TOL www.GMC-Guy.com
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280043 is a reply to message #280021] Tue, 16 June 2015 17:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Tyler is currently offline  Chris Tyler   United States
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Are you sure with the 77 T/A? As far as I knew, 77s were all still poncho motors. Same with 78 T/A. Not sure with other models. In 79, the manual T/As had pontiac 400s, autos got 403s. 80 and 81 were all Olds engines

But getting back to the original thread, no, never seen a buick in anything else.

Buick 455s are great engines for a street car. Probably not for a 12000# GMC though.


76 Glenbrook
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280045 is a reply to message #280043] Tue, 16 June 2015 17:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Guy Lopes is currently offline  Guy Lopes   United States
Messages: 499
Registered: April 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Though this was around 1985, I am positive. Apparently California and high
altitude T/As received the Olds 403. I just looked up the Wikipedia which
confirms this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiac_Firebird#Engines_2

Wishing I still had either of those Firebirds...

Guy Lopes
76 Birchaven "Orion"
Sacramento, CA
W6TOL

www.GMC-Guy.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Tyler
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:25 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds

Are you sure with the 77 T/A? As far as I knew, 77s were all still poncho
motors. Same with 78 T/A. Not sure with other models. In 79, the manual T/As
had pontiac 400s, autos got 403s. 80 and 81 were all Olds engines

But getting back to the original thread, no, never seen a buick in anything
else.

Buick 455s are great engines for a street car. Probably not for a 12000# GMC
though.
--
76 Glenbrook
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Guy Lopes 76 Birchaven "Orion" Sacramento, CA W6TOL www.GMC-Guy.com
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280096 is a reply to message #280026] Wed, 17 June 2015 08:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ronald Pottol is currently offline  Ronald Pottol   United States
Messages: 505
Registered: September 2012
Location: Redwood City, California
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)

Also used in the Pontiac and Oldsmobile's of the early 1960s.
On Jun 16, 2015 10:38, "James Hupy" wrote:

> They didn't always. GMC pickups used Pontiac v8 engines with Hydramatic
> transmissions in 55 -56. Engines weren't 455's, but smaller displacement.
> Later GMC and Chevrolet pickups used Chevrolet V8 coupled with TH 350 and
> TH 400 turbohydramatic transmissions. GMC made their own inline 6's. 248
> and 302 cubic inch versions. Chevrolet used their own inline 6. Buick
> always used their own engines in their cars. Old nailheads up through the
> 401 cubic in. engines, then a 400 and 455. Also a 350 was available Buick
> built. There was a 2 or 3 year period where General Motors tried out a
> CORPORATE Chevrolet V8 in all brands, including Cadillac. That didn't last
> long. Consumers went Batsh#* when they found out their Caddy's had a
> Chevrolet engine. I cannot ever remember a Buick engine being used by any
> other division.
> Jim Hupy
> Salem, Or
> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
> On Jun 16, 2015 10:15 AM, "Carl Stouffer" wrote:
>
>> BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 09:56
>>> I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any
>> Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>>
>>
>>
>> Pretty sure Buick had their own 455. So did Pontiac. Seems like a weird
>> way to do business, but that's how the different GM divisions did it back
>> then.
>> --
>> Carl Stouffer
>> '75 ex Palm Beach
>> Tucson, AZ.
>> _______________________________________________
>> GMCnet mailing list
>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



1973 26' GM outfitted
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280104 is a reply to message #280096] Wed, 17 June 2015 10:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
When did Pontiac abandon the 389 engine? I once had a '62 Pontiac Tempest with the 1/2 389 4 cyl engine. Had a 10:1 or 10.25:1 compression ratio and a big honking 4 bbl carb and went like stink while getting great gas mileage on hi-test!

I thought the small Buick/Olds V-8 engine was a 215 but that may be a FADED memory.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"



> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:38:50 -0700
> From: ronaldpottol@gmail.com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds
>
> Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)
>
> Also used in the Pontiac and Oldsmobile's of the early 1960s.
> On Jun 16, 2015 10:38, "James Hupy" wrote:
>
>> They didn't always. GMC pickups used Pontiac v8 engines with Hydramatic
>> transmissions in 55 -56. Engines weren't 455's, but smaller displacement.
>> Later GMC and Chevrolet pickups used Chevrolet V8 coupled with TH 350 and
>> TH 400 turbohydramatic transmissions. GMC made their own inline 6's. 248
>> and 302 cubic inch versions. Chevrolet used their own inline 6. Buick
>> always used their own engines in their cars. Old nailheads up through the
>> 401 cubic in. engines, then a 400 and 455. Also a 350 was available Buick
>> built. There was a 2 or 3 year period where General Motors tried out a
>> CORPORATE Chevrolet V8 in all brands, including Cadillac. That didn't last
>> long. Consumers went Batsh#* when they found out their Caddy's had a
>> Chevrolet engine. I cannot ever remember a Buick engine being used by any
>> other division.
>> Jim Hupy
>> Salem, Or
>> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>> On Jun 16, 2015 10:15 AM, "Carl Stouffer" wrote:
>>
>>> BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 09:56
>>>> I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any
>>> Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> GMCnet mailing list
>>>> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>>> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pretty sure Buick had their own 455. So did Pontiac. Seems like a weird
>>> way to do business, but that's how the different GM divisions did it back
>>> then.
>>> --
>>> Carl Stouffer
>>> '75 ex Palm Beach
>>> Tucson, AZ.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280106 is a reply to message #280104] Wed, 17 June 2015 10:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
215 cubic inch it was.
Jim Hupy
Salem, OR
78 GMC Royale 403

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:00 AM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald
wrote:

> When did Pontiac abandon the 389 engine? I once had a '62 Pontiac Tempest
> with the 1/2 389 4 cyl engine. Had a 10:1 or 10.25:1 compression ratio and
> a big honking 4 bbl carb and went like stink while getting great gas
> mileage on hi-test!
>
> I thought the small Buick/Olds V-8 engine was a 215 but that may be a
> FADED memory.
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
> ~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
> ~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
> ~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
> ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
> ~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
> ~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ______________
> |[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
> "--OO--[]---O-"
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 06:38:50 -0700
>> From: ronaldpottol@gmail.com
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds
>>
>> Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)
>>
>> Also used in the Pontiac and Oldsmobile's of the early 1960s.
>> On Jun 16, 2015 10:38, "James Hupy" wrote:
>>
>>> They didn't always. GMC pickups used Pontiac v8 engines with Hydramatic
>>> transmissions in 55 -56. Engines weren't 455's, but smaller
> displacement.
>>> Later GMC and Chevrolet pickups used Chevrolet V8 coupled with TH 350
> and
>>> TH 400 turbohydramatic transmissions. GMC made their own inline 6's.
> 248
>>> and 302 cubic inch versions. Chevrolet used their own inline 6. Buick
>>> always used their own engines in their cars. Old nailheads up through
> the
>>> 401 cubic in. engines, then a 400 and 455. Also a 350 was available
> Buick
>>> built. There was a 2 or 3 year period where General Motors tried out a
>>> CORPORATE Chevrolet V8 in all brands, including Cadillac. That didn't
> last
>>> long. Consumers went Batsh#* when they found out their Caddy's had a
>>> Chevrolet engine. I cannot ever remember a Buick engine being used by
> any
>>> other division.
>>> Jim Hupy
>>> Salem, Or
>>> 78 GMC ROYALE 403
>>> On Jun 16, 2015 10:15 AM, "Carl Stouffer" wrote:
>>>
>>>> BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 09:56
>>>> > I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any
>>>> Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > GMCnet mailing list
>>>> > Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
>>>> > http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pretty sure Buick had their own 455. So did Pontiac. Seems like a
> weird
>>>> way to do business, but that's how the different GM divisions did it
> back
>>>> then.
>>>> --
>>>> Carl Stouffer
>>>> '75 ex Palm Beach
>>>> Tucson, AZ.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280141 is a reply to message #280096] Wed, 17 June 2015 19:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
AKA "Nail Head" IIRC.

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Pottol

Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280145 is a reply to message #280021] Wed, 17 June 2015 20:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
BobDunahugh wrote on Tue, 16 June 2015 10:56
I'm not up on Buick's from the 70's. Was the Olds 455 used in any Buick's?Bob Dunahugh
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


With a few exceptions on the truck side, the divisional engines were all specific until the late 70's. One of the first deviations was the Olds 350 with fuel injected heads applied to the Cadillac Seville which was built off the X-car platform (Nova). That started the public outcry and related lawsuits. Also the 60's Cutlass and Skylarks shared the 215 all aluminum engines but the heads were different. After that. many Olds 403 and 350's were spread across the divisions.
The Buick V8 engine was considered a dog and was not shared, but most of the allocations were based on engine capacity, no necessarily which one was best.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280148 is a reply to message #280141] Wed, 17 June 2015 20:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kosier is currently offline  Kosier   United States
Messages: 834
Registered: February 2008
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Not so, Rob. The Nail-Head was the big Buick
that started in '53 and went up to, I believe, the 401.
The little 215 became the 225 V6 in iron which was sold
to Jeep for a while and then bought back.
The 215 was sold to Rover, who fixed the problems and
subsequently stretched it from 3.5L to 4.9L.
I know, I know! So who cares?

Gary Kosier
77PB w/500 Cad
Newark, Oh


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Mueller
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 8:52 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds

AKA "Nail Head" IIRC.

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Pottol

Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280169 is a reply to message #280148] Thu, 18 June 2015 03:10 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Gary,

Hmmm, my memory seems to have failed me (so what else is new) I was going to build a mid engine copy of a McLaren M-6 and use the
aluminum Buick engine for light weight, I thought that was called a Nail Head.

Regards,
Rob M.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Kosier

Not so, Rob. The Nail-Head was the big Buick
that started in '53 and went up to, I believe, the 401.
The little 215 became the 225 V6 in iron which was sold
to Jeep for a while and then bought back.
The 215 was sold to Rover, who fixed the problems and
subsequently stretched it from 3.5L to 4.9L.
I know, I know! So who cares?

Gary Kosier
77PB w/500 Cad
Newark, Oh


-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Mueller

AKA "Nail Head" IIRC.

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic


-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Pottol

Rover had the 218 alloy v8 ;-)


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280188 is a reply to message #280021] Thu, 18 June 2015 09:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
I believe Kosier has it right. The little 215CID V8 was called the BOP engine. It appeared in the 'compacts' designed by Buick, Olds, and Pontiac. It was actually a pretty good design, which may be whgy GM sold it to the Brits. It soldiers on today in much upgraded and increased size in Land Rovers. At the time, its competition was the 221CID Ford offering in Fairlanes, and I believe it overlapped the early LA engines which came in at 273CID.
Just to make it more complex, GM designed and built a V6 which was an iron 60degree engine for trucks under the GMC marque. Far as I know, it was never fitted to anything else in the GM line. It was supposed to be extendable to a V12, but I have never seen one of them.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280191 is a reply to message #280188] Thu, 18 June 2015 09:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
IIRC, Ford enlarged the 221 CID V8 to a 270 that was put in later Fairlanes and then Falcons around 1963 or 1964 and then into the Mustang in 1964. I believe the basic design was then expanded to be the 289 and then the 302. I chose the 289 4bbl for the Mustang that I ordered in April 1964 and kept until 1993.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"


> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:23:32 -0600
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> From: jhbridges@ymail.com
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds
>
> I believe Kosier has it right. The little 215CID V8 was called the BOP engine. It appeared in the 'compacts' designed by Buick, Olds, and Pontiac.
> It was actually a pretty good design, which may be whgy GM sold it to the Brits. It soldiers on today in much upgraded and increased size in Land
> Rovers. At the time, its competition was the 221CID Ford offering in Fairlanes, and I believe it overlapped the early LA engines which came in at
> 273CID.
> Just to make it more complex, GM designed and built a V6 which was an iron 60degree engine for trucks under the GMC marque. Far as I know, it was
> never fitted to anything else in the GM line. It was supposed to be extendable to a V12, but I have never seen one of them.
>
> --johnny
> --
> '76 23' transmode Norris upfit
> Braselton, Ga.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280192 is a reply to message #280021] Thu, 18 June 2015 09:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
It kinda stretched to the 260 and original 289, although later the 289 showed some internal changes, didn't it? It grew to the 302. I had a '66 Mustang with the 289 fitted, wish I still had it. My Ranger pickup has a 302 fitted, much modified. It and the current versions are roller lifters and other upgraded stuff. Now, if I can just find time to fit the new distributor and get some sparks into it, maybe I can sell it. I don't think it will pass CA smog, none is needed where I am.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280196 is a reply to message #280191] Thu, 18 June 2015 10:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member



Something didn't look quite right when I typed in 270 for the engine that was an expansion of the 221. Johnny Bridges' note stating the 260 corrected my error. Was the 273 a Mopar engine?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"


> From: k2gkk@hotmail.com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:39:23 -0500
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds
>
> IIRC, Ford enlarged the 221 CID V8 to a 270 that was put in later Fairlanes and then Falcons around 1963 or 1964 and then into the Mustang in 1964. I believe the basic design was then expanded to be the 289 and then the 302. I chose the 289 4bbl for the Mustang that I ordered in April 1964 and kept until 1993.
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
>
>> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:23:32 -0600
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> From: jhbridges@ymail.com
>> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds
>>
>> I believe Kosier has it right. The little 215CID V8 was called the BOP engine. It appeared in the 'compacts' designed by Buick, Olds, and Pontiac.
>> It was actually a pretty good design, which may be whgy GM sold it to the Brits. It soldiers on today in much upgraded and increased size in Land
>> Rovers. At the time, its competition was the 221CID Ford offering in Fairlanes, and I believe it overlapped the early LA engines which came in at
>> 273CID.
>> Just to make it more complex, GM designed and built a V6 which was an iron 60degree engine for trucks under the GMC marque. Far as I know, it was
>> never fitted to anything else in the GM line. It was supposed to be extendable to a V12, but I have never seen one of them.
>>
>> --johnny
>> --
>> '76 23' transmode Norris upfit
>> Braselton, Ga.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] 455 Olds [message #280207 is a reply to message #280021] Thu, 18 June 2015 12:39 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
The 273CID was an early 'LA" or "Light A' engine from Mopar. It was built in 273, 318, 340~, and 360CID versions. The current Mopar V8s are basically from the LA family, albeit much modified over the years. The B (and later RB or 'raised B') engines were for larger cars, this family was produced in 350*, 361, 383#, 400, 413, 426, and 440CID versions. It has been discontinued. The 426 appeared both as the Max Wedge engine and as the Hemi, although the latter was somewhat modified. A fair number of these engines landed in cars other than Mopar originally intended, thanks to Mr. Norm's Grand Spaulding Dodge. Grand Spaulding was kind of the 'COPO' for Mopar hotrods.

--johnny
~ Unlike the other LA engines, the 340CID was only ever built as a performance engine. Fitted to A body cars, it was a screamer.
* yes, Mopar >did< build a 350CID B engine for a bit. You can often win bar bets on this fact.
# the 383 CID engine was built both as a B and as an RB engine. Displacement is about the only commonality between the two.


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell

[Updated on: Thu, 18 June 2015 12:40]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Alternator failures
Next Topic: Still fighting leaks
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Sep 29 10:35:36 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01887 seconds