GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Three burner stove, why?
Three burner stove, why? [message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 07:48 Go to next message
Dominik is currently offline  Dominik   Switzerland
Messages: 78
Registered: July 2014
Location: Zurich reg., Switzerland
Karma: 0
Member

Hello all,

I thought this might be worth a new post.
You all gave me lots to read regarding the jack I would like to buy. So I thought at least somebody of you would know an answer to my next question:

"Why do some earlier GMC Motorhomes have four burner stoves, and later ones only have three?"

Dave who generously helped me out last fall when I was in Toronto couldn't tell back then.
He said something like "I only know that even the new ones do not come with more than three burners..."
He proved his point by taking me to a Motor Coach sales place outside of Toronto. I would have believed him anyways.
But the Motor Coach dealership was surprising. It was not the biggest place I've ever seen - LARAG AG in my home town is bigger - but having these huge, expensive Motor Coaches for you to see and step in was new to me. We only have tiny Campers that I can't really get warm with, as we say.
So since I am again browsing the internet and am looking for GMC Motorhomes, I'd love to have an answer to this question.
Since I hate incomplete kitchens, and to me, a three burner stove is just that. But please, no offense to all you three-burner-cooks out there...

All the best,
Dominik


- The good the bad and the ugly and its all me -
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278504 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 08:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
Dominik, my three burner Magic Chef and my four burner Magic Chef from the SOB look to be the same size. You could replace one with the other. A couple of folks have shown interest in my four burner, but unfortunately, I haven't had time to have a close look at it to ensure it works properly and clean it up. I suspect it will replace a three burner as a drop - in though. Since I've never needed all three burners of the installed one yet, I haven't swapped them.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Three burner stove, why? [message #278506 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 08:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
I have two Avion's and they came with four burner stove tops.

I'll answer your question with a question; how often do you think you will have four different items on a stove in a motorhome?

I can tell you that since 2008 we have NEVER had four things on the stove top at once.

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
Sydney, Australia

-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Hertle
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:49 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: [GMCnet] Three burner stove, why?

Hello all,

I thought this might be worth a new post.
You all gave me lots to read regarding the jack I would like to buy. So I thought at least somebody of you would know an answer to
my next question:

"Why do some earlier GMC Motorhomes have four burner stoves, and later ones only have three?"

Dave who generously helped me out last fall when I was in Toronto couldn't tell back then.
He said something like "I only know that even the new ones do not come with more than three burners..."
He proved his point by taking me to a Motor Coach sales place outside of Toronto. I would have believed him anyways.
But the Motor Coach dealership was surprising. It was not the biggest place I've ever seen - LARAG AG in my home town is bigger -
but having these huge, expensive Motor Coaches for you to see and step in was new to me. We only have tiny Campers that I can't
really get warm with, as we say.
So since I am again browsing the internet and am looking for GMC Motorhomes, I'd love to have an answer to this question.
Since I hate incomplete kitchens, and to me, a three burner stove is just that. But please, no offense to all you three-burner-cooks
out there...

All the best,
Dominik
-

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278509 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 09:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dominik is currently offline  Dominik   Switzerland
Messages: 78
Registered: July 2014
Location: Zurich reg., Switzerland
Karma: 0
Member

I did live in an apartment that only had a kitchenette with a two-burner stove - That was not enough to cook properly.
Before that, I did live in an apartment that had a separate room for the kitchen, with a four burner stove.
Every saturday, I used three of the four burners for cooking, and did like to have a fourth burner in case I needed hot water.
Hot water, for example to make coffee or tea.
And after my grand parents divorced, they both had a three burner stove in their kitchen, and in both cases I deemed it un-practical.

Thank you all so far for your offers - But I have no GMC yet.
But the front seats (the ones with the armrest folding into the seat base) and the oven-and-stove-combination will be something I may
replace if they are not to my liking. And yes, an automobile (or motor coach in this case) is a very personal thing that really needs to suit the owner.
In my opinion.

I was hoping for an explanation to WHY there only are three burner stoves in the newer motor coaches. Maybe a regulatory law ? LPG lines too small ?

All the best
Dominik


- The good the bad and the ugly and its all me -
Re: [GMCnet] Three burner stove, why? [message #278512 is a reply to message #278506] Wed, 27 May 2015 09:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
powerjon is currently offline  powerjon   United States
Messages: 2446
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 5
Senior Member
I am with Rob on this, we have a 2 burner cooktop which is more than you will probably ever use. The big plus is that you have more counter top space and storage under the cooktop. The Microwave is a Convection/Microwave unit and yes you can bake in it. This is what we did in the 77 Eleganza II when we did the interior over. I also have an Avion coach in the shop and it will also have a 2 burner cooktop.

The 2 burner cooktop opened up the counter top space.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/interior-restoration/p382.html

In the stretch we changed out the original cooktop to a glass top to provide more space when not in use. There are a number of these that are available today out there.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/1978-buskirk-stretch/p48935-g2-gmcmi-2013-402.html
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/1978-buskirk-stretch/p48936-g2-gmcmi-2013-403.html

With the eye level overhead microwave installation the wife will thank you. Tough getting down to check the microwave.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/interior-restoration/p378.html

Storage is King inside the GMC.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/interior-restoration/p381.html

JR Wright
78 Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion
Michigan

> On May 27, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Robert Mueller wrote:
>
> I have two Avion's and they came with four burner stove tops.
>
> I'll answer your question with a question; how often do you think you will have four different items on a stove in a motorhome?
>
> I can tell you that since 2008 we have NEVER had four things on the stove top at once.
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> The Pedantic Mechanic
> Sydney, Australia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Dominik Hertle
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 10:49 PM
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Subject: [GMCnet] Three burner stove, why?
>
> Hello all,
>
> I thought this might be worth a new post.
> You all gave me lots to read regarding the jack I would like to buy. So I thought at least somebody of you would know an answer to
> my next question:
>
> "Why do some earlier GMC Motorhomes have four burner stoves, and later ones only have three?"
>
> Dave who generously helped me out last fall when I was in Toronto couldn't tell back then.
> He said something like "I only know that even the new ones do not come with more than three burners..."
> He proved his point by taking me to a Motor Coach sales place outside of Toronto. I would have believed him anyways.
> But the Motor Coach dealership was surprising. It was not the biggest place I've ever seen - LARAG AG in my home town is bigger -
> but having these huge, expensive Motor Coaches for you to see and step in was new to me. We only have tiny Campers that I can't
> really get warm with, as we say.
> So since I am again browsing the internet and am looking for GMC Motorhomes, I'd love to have an answer to this question.
> Since I hate incomplete kitchens, and to me, a three burner stove is just that. But please, no offense to all you three-burner-cooks
> out there...
>
> All the best,
> Dominik
> -
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



J.R. Wright
GMC GreatLaker
GMC Eastern States
GMCMI
78 30' Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion Under Reconstruction
Michigan
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278513 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 09:32 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgrue is currently offline  mgrue   United States
Messages: 192
Registered: October 2010
Location: Valmeyer IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
I would guess that because the burners are staggered you can use a large pot with the middle burner on a 3 burner stove. With a 4 burner I would guess a large pot would hang over the edge of the stove. Just a guess.

Mark


Mark Grueninger 76 Palm Beach Valmeyer IL
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278518 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 09:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chr$ is currently offline  Chr$   United States
Messages: 2690
Registered: January 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I'm thinking they started only putting 3 burners on them to save mfg costs so the price didn't have to go up. After all, most manufacturers usually put downward pressure on suppliers after a while. Eliminating the parts for the fourth burner is one way to deal with that. Who uses four anyway?

We have a 3 burner Attwood in our current Rig. I don't think we ever use more than two. There simply is no room to use them all. When we cook big, like with groups, we cook outdoors on our Camp Chef Explorer 30,000BTU/burner outdoor camping stove. In those cases, we usually use both indoor an outdoor stoves but we're cooking a lot. Now that's cooking with gas.
http://www.atwoodmobile.com/images/wedgewood-blk.jpghttp://lghttp.16485.nexcesscdn.net/808325/mage/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/521x311/602f0fa2c1f0d1ba5e241f914e856ff9/e/x/ex60lw700x767.jpg

The more important thing is BTU's per burner. Some older stoves just don't put out enough heat. More burners usually mean smaller output per burner. I'd be fine with a two burner so long as one was 9,000-11,000 BTU, and the smaller at least 6,500.

I had a 2 burner Gaggenau Vario in my GMC and it was just right. One burner was 9,500 BTU.
http://st.houzz.com/simgs/e661094003cdfdae_4-8753/cooktops.jpg

Many older ones are only 4,500-5000. Not good for boiling a big pot of water. I tried using one from an old Pop up camper in my outdoor kitchen and it just totally sucked. That's what you really want to look at.

I'd buy one of these and replace whatever you have in the coach you buy: http://www.atwoodmobile.com/ranges-and-cooktops/atwood-ranges/high-output-ranges.asp
http://www.atwoodmobile.com/images/blk-range.jpg


-Chr$: Perpetual SmartAss
Scottsdale, AZ

77 Ex-Kingsley 455 SOLD!
2010 Nomad 24 Ft TT 390W PV W/MPPT, EV4010 and custom cargo door.
Photosite: Chrisc GMC:"It has Begun" TT: "The Other Woman"
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278521 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 10:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Dominik,

When these coaches were built, some people still cooked. The four burner (ours is a Coleman) was an extra cost option.
My wife still does cook and I have seen her with all four burners hot.
In the US, some have even shortened or removed the galley. Many have no oven and just a microwave. From those you get the answer that the wife thinks that the coach is for "vacations" and if she is on vacation, she isn't cooking.

I like our way.

Matt
Dominik wrote on Wed, 27 May 2015 08:48
Hello all,

I thought this might be worth a new post.
You all gave me lots to read regarding the jack I would like to buy. So I thought at least somebody of you would know an answer to my next question:

"Why do some earlier GMC Motorhomes have four burner stoves, and later ones only have three?"

Dave who generously helped me out last fall when I was in Toronto couldn't tell back then.
He said something like "I only know that even the new ones do not come with more than three burners..."
He proved his point by taking me to a Motor Coach sales place outside of Toronto. I would have believed him anyways.
But the Motor Coach dealership was surprising. It was not the biggest place I've ever seen - LARAG AG in my home town is bigger - but having these huge, expensive Motor Coaches for you to see and step in was new to me. We only have tiny Campers that I can't really get warm with, as we say.
So since I am again browsing the internet and am looking for GMC Motorhomes, I'd love to have an answer to this question.
Since I hate incomplete kitchens, and to me, a three burner stove is just that. But please, no offense to all you three-burner-cooks out there...

All the best,
Dominik



Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278525 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 10:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
habbyguy is currently offline  habbyguy   United States
Messages: 896
Registered: May 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Karma: 3
Senior Member
Our (updated) 1978 Royale Center Kitchen came with a four-burner stove. I agree with the others that you'll probably never, ever have four burners going at the same time (I'm not sure I've ever had two going...). But it's a total non-issue to me whether it's got three or four burners (or even two).

But as an aside, every time I look at newer coaches, I'm more impressed by ours. The layout and utility of is just better than anything else out there... you just can't do a better job squeezing useful space and features into such a small area than GMC did four decades ago. And then there's the ability to keep them running, using readily available parts (mainly, anyway). We've never had a moment of buyer's remorse about investing in a 35 year old (at the time) GMC. We always have a stream of visitors wanting to look at our coach when we stop in an RV park - many of them wish they had something like our coach instead of the (usually MUCH more expensive) coach they drove there. Wink


Mark Hickey Mesa, AZ 1978 Royale Center Kitchen
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278527 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 11:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
thesmith is currently offline  thesmith   United States
Messages: 589
Registered: February 2015
Location: Cary, NC
Karma: 6
Senior Member
We like cooking but apart from Christmas and Thanksgiving we usually only use two and sometime 3 burners at home.
In an RV even two might be planty as the microwave does much of the veggie cooking nowadays. I would keep a real oven
though.....best way to make sausage rolls

Pete


Cary, NC 1978 Center Kitchen Royale.
Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278531 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 11:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
To muddy the water -
Mine isn't a GM upfit, Norris Coach put the stove (three burner) in. They got bought by one of the then big RV makers.

--johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: [GMCnet] Pep up your burners on your stove! [message #278533 is a reply to message #278525] Wed, 27 May 2015 11:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
emerystora is currently offline  emerystora   United States
Messages: 4442
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 13
Senior Member
The problem with both the 3 burner and 4 burner older stoves in our GMCs is that none of the burners get really hot. Most newer stoves have one super burner which puts out a lot more heat.
Here is something that I posted 12 years ago to solve the problem. I carry the small drill bit in my motorhome and have modified several burners at rallies. People really love it as they can now boil water much, much faster (for pasta) and even stir fry on the burner which was impossible on the original burners.


>> 11/16/2003
>
>> We often cook in the Magic Chef oven while traveling down the road. Put in a meatloaf with some potatoes and onions around it and when we are ready to pull over for dinner we have a quick, hot meal ready for us.
>>
>> Unfortunately, the three burners on the top have never been too efficient when we want to boil a pot of water for pasta or whatever. You can also forget about doing any stir frying as the burner isn't hot enough. The burners are rated at approx. 5200 btu. I have recently read about new stoves with three burners that have the front one rated as a "superburner" with about 7500 btu output.
>>
>> I checked the orifice on the burners and they have a hole for a #71 drill bit (.026" diameter). I calculated that to raise the BTU to approx. 7500 from the current 5200 rating I would need an orifice opening of approximately .031" diameter which corresponds to a #68 drill bit.
>>
>> Today I removed the orifice from the front burner and drilled it with a #68 bit and reinstalled it. What a fantastic difference! The flame appears almost twice as big and it certainly puts off a lot more heat. I haven't timed it yet but I suspect that a pot of water will boil about 1.5 times faster. (it should with 7500 btu versus 5200). The flame front still is blue with no jumping so it was not necessary to make any adjustments on the air openings in the burner tube going over the orifice. I would not go with any larger bit as it would probably give too hot a flame with too much propane and you'd also have to adjust the air flow by enlarging the air openings in the tube.
>>
>> I have thought about doing all three burners but the original stove installation instructions say to keep the burners 7" from any combustible surface. I don't want to increase the heat as the two rear burners are about that distance from the walls right now and I certainly don't want any fire hazard. I may, however, drill those two out with a #70 bit just to give a little more increase.
>>
>> If anyone wants to do this modification but doesn't have the tiny drill bits I would be willing to do it for you (at no charge) if you mail me your orifice. To get it off you just remove the screw holding the front burner down to the pan below the burner top, pull the tube off the orifice and then unscrew the orifice. Include about $1.00 in the shipment to me to pay for return postage. However, you can probably buy the little drill for that amount at a hardware or hobby store.

> On May 27, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mark wrote:
>
> Our (updated) 1978 Royale Center Kitchen came with a four-burner stove. I agree with the others that you'll probably never, ever have four burners
> going at the same time (I'm not sure I've ever had two going...). But it's a total non-issue to me whether it's got three or four burners (or even
> two).
>
> But as an aside, every time I look at newer coaches, I'm more impressed by ours. The layout and utility of is just better than anything else out
> there... you just can't do a better job squeezing useful space and features into such a small area than GMC did four decades ago. And then there's
> the ability to keep them running, using readily available parts (mainly, anyway). We've never had a moment of buyer's remorse about investing in a 35
> year old (at the time) GMC. We always have a stream of visitors wanting to look at our coach when we stop in an RV park - many of them wish they had
> something like our coach instead of the (usually MUCH more expensive) coach they drove there. ;)
> --
> Mark Hickey
> Mesa, AZ
> 1978 Royale Center Kitchen
>

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: Three burner stove, why? [message #278534 is a reply to message #278501] Wed, 27 May 2015 12:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dominik is currently offline  Dominik   Switzerland
Messages: 78
Registered: July 2014
Location: Zurich reg., Switzerland
Karma: 0
Member

While reading all the answers I noticed how pointless my post really is.
I thought there was a good reason to why there often only are three burners on an RV.
Maybe some law or something prohibiting the fourth burner.
But I guess it is just cheapness of some manufacturers or people buying RVs.
Maybe save $ 800 on a 1/4 M dollar Motor Coach seems to be a good thing.
Yes, there are people like that. They usually drive Volkswagens around here.
Accountants. I don't have much left for them. They break the whole auto industry.
And yes, I think I could live with only three burners.
Especially if it is as clean as the one in the picture of that GMC on Craigslist, for sale in Mobile, Alabama.
What a nice rig. This really is in good condition for $ 5000.
Thank you all for your contribution.
Dominik
PS: The GMC Motorhome was available in Germany for 145'000 Deutsch-Mark when new.


- The good the bad and the ugly and its all me -
[GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why) [message #278538 is a reply to message #278534] Wed, 27 May 2015 12:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Olly Schmidt is currently offline  Olly Schmidt   United States
Messages: 1265
Registered: February 2014
Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
Senior Member
Dominik,
> PS: The GMC Motorhome was available in Germany for 145'000 Deutsch-Mark when new.

where did you find that piece of information

--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

'76a Eleganza II, VA

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Best regards

Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
Re: [GMCnet] Pep up your burners on your stove! [message #278542 is a reply to message #278533] Wed, 27 May 2015 13:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ronald Pottol is currently offline  Ronald Pottol   United States
Messages: 505
Registered: September 2012
Location: Redwood City, California
Karma: -2
Senior Member
Yeah, a modern stove is more like 10k, and might have one that can hit
12-15. One low one would be good too. Frankly, I think one super hot, and
one small would be enough, I don't see cooking Thanksgiving dinner in it.
On May 27, 2015 9:50 AM, "Emery Stora" wrote:

> The problem with both the 3 burner and 4 burner older stoves in our GMCs
> is that none of the burners get really hot. Most newer stoves have one
> super burner which puts out a lot more heat.
> Here is something that I posted 12 years ago to solve the problem. I
> carry the small drill bit in my motorhome and have modified several burners
> at rallies. People really love it as they can now boil water much, much
> faster (for pasta) and even stir fry on the burner which was impossible on
> the original burners.
>
>
>>> 11/16/2003
>>
>>> We often cook in the Magic Chef oven while traveling down the road. Put
> in a meatloaf with some potatoes and onions around it and when we are ready
> to pull over for dinner we have a quick, hot meal ready for us.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, the three burners on the top have never been too
> efficient when we want to boil a pot of water for pasta or whatever. You
> can also forget about doing any stir frying as the burner isn't hot
> enough. The burners are rated at approx. 5200 btu. I have recently read
> about new stoves with three burners that have the front one rated as a
> "superburner" with about 7500 btu output.
>>>
>>> I checked the orifice on the burners and they have a hole for a #71
> drill bit (.026" diameter). I calculated that to raise the BTU to approx.
> 7500 from the current 5200 rating I would need an orifice opening of
> approximately .031" diameter which corresponds to a #68 drill bit.
>>>
>>> Today I removed the orifice from the front burner and drilled it with a
> #68 bit and reinstalled it. What a fantastic difference! The flame
> appears almost twice as big and it certainly puts off a lot more heat. I
> haven't timed it yet but I suspect that a pot of water will boil about 1.5
> times faster. (it should with 7500 btu versus 5200). The flame front
> still is blue with no jumping so it was not necessary to make any
> adjustments on the air openings in the burner tube going over the orifice.
> I would not go with any larger bit as it would probably give too hot a
> flame with too much propane and you'd also have to adjust the air flow by
> enlarging the air openings in the tube.
>>>
>>> I have thought about doing all three burners but the original stove
> installation instructions say to keep the burners 7" from any combustible
> surface. I don't want to increase the heat as the two rear burners are
> about that distance from the walls right now and I certainly don't want any
> fire hazard. I may, however, drill those two out with a #70 bit just to
> give a little more increase.
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to do this modification but doesn't have the tiny drill
> bits I would be willing to do it for you (at no charge) if you mail me your
> orifice. To get it off you just remove the screw holding the front burner
> down to the pan below the burner top, pull the tube off the orifice and
> then unscrew the orifice. Include about $1.00 in the shipment to me to pay
> for return postage. However, you can probably buy the little drill for that
> amount at a hardware or hobby store.
>
>> On May 27, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Mark wrote:
>>
>> Our (updated) 1978 Royale Center Kitchen came with a four-burner stove.
> I agree with the others that you'll probably never, ever have four burners
>> going at the same time (I'm not sure I've ever had two going...). But
> it's a total non-issue to me whether it's got three or four burners (or even
>> two).
>>
>> But as an aside, every time I look at newer coaches, I'm more impressed
> by ours. The layout and utility of is just better than anything else out
>> there... you just can't do a better job squeezing useful space and
> features into such a small area than GMC did four decades ago. And then
> there's
>> the ability to keep them running, using readily available parts (mainly,
> anyway). We've never had a moment of buyer's remorse about investing in a
> 35
>> year old (at the time) GMC. We always have a stream of visitors wanting
> to look at our coach when we stop in an RV park - many of them wish they had
>> something like our coach instead of the (usually MUCH more expensive)
> coach they drove there. ;)
>> --
>> Mark Hickey
>> Mesa, AZ
>> 1978 Royale Center Kitchen
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



1973 26' GM outfitted
Re: [GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why) [message #278543 is a reply to message #278538] Wed, 27 May 2015 14:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
appie is currently offline  appie   Denmark
Messages: 902
Registered: April 2013
Location: denmark
Karma: 2
Senior Member
I have been looking for documentation for prices in europe for a while Så any receipt etc would be welcome


Appie eleganza 76 "Olga" now sadly sold 6 wheel discbrake Quadrabags Springfield stage 2 462 olds Manny tranny ( pictures at http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6489-olga.html Fulltiming in Europe july 2014 til july 2016 Denmark
Re: [GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why) [message #278546 is a reply to message #278538] Wed, 27 May 2015 14:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
When I was transferred from the FRG back to the USA in 1971, I believe the exchange rate was around 3.6 to 3.8 DM per US dollar. At those exchange rates, the German cost would be roughly equivalent to a range between around 38,200 to 40,300 US Dollars.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
|[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
"--OO--[]---O-"



> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:55:06 +0200
> From: posde@theinternet.de
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Subject: [GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why)
>
> Dominik,
>> PS: The GMC Motorhome was available in Germany for 145'000 Deutsch-Mark when new.
>
> where did you find that piece of information
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> Peer Oliver Schmidt
> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>
> '76a Eleganza II, VA

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Price in Germany [message #278547 is a reply to message #278546] Wed, 27 May 2015 14:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Olly Schmidt is currently offline  Olly Schmidt   United States
Messages: 1265
Registered: February 2014
Location: Germany and Scottsville, ...
Karma: 8
Senior Member
D C _Mac_ Macdonald:
> When I was transferred from the FRG back to the USA in 1971, I believe the exchange rate was around 3.6 to 3.8 DM per US dollar. At those exchange rates, the German cost would be roughly equivalent to a range between around 38,200 to 40,300 US Dollars.
>

According to
http://fxtop.com/en/historical-exchange-rates.php?A=1&C1=USD&C2=DEM&DD1=&MM1=&YYYY1=&B=1&P=&I=1&DD2=27&MM2=05& amp;YYYY2=1976&btnOK=Go%21
the exchange rate in 1976 was around 1USD = 2,58DEM - But that doesn't
really help in this instance, as prices vary greatly between the US and
Europe. So it would be nice to know, the real price at that point in time.

--
Best regards

Peer Oliver Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA

'76a Eleganza II, VA

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Best regards

Olly Schmidt
PGP Key ID: 0x18a9 3a1f 4196 bf22
'76a Eleganza II, VA
'73 Sequoia, SH, Germany
Re: [GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why) [message #278551 is a reply to message #278546] Wed, 27 May 2015 15:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Dolph Santorine is currently offline  Dolph Santorine   United States
Messages: 1236
Registered: April 2011
Location: Wheeling, WV
Karma: -41
Senior Member
There was also not a direct correlation between the U.S. Price and what was being charged because of transfer pricing. At one point in the mid 70's, certain GM vehicles were half price (after currency conversion) because of it.

Dolph Santorine

DE N8JPC

Wheeling, West Virginia

1977 ex-Palm Beach TZE167V100820
1-ton, Sullybuilt Bags, Reaction Arms, 3.70 LSD, Manny Transmission, EV-6010,


> On May 27, 2015, at 3:45 PM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:
>
> When I was transferred from the FRG back to the USA in 1971, I believe the exchange rate was around 3.6 to 3.8 DM per US dollar. At those exchange rates, the German cost would be roughly equivalent to a range between around 38,200 to 40,300 US Dollars.
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
> ~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
> ~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
> ~ Member GMCMI and Classics ~
> ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
> ~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
> ~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ______________
> |[ ]~~~[][ ][]\
> "--OO--[]---O-"
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 19:55:06 +0200
>> From: posde@theinternet.de
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> Subject: [GMCnet] Price in Germany (was: Three burner stove, why)
>>
>> Dominik,
>>> PS: The GMC Motorhome was available in Germany for 145'000 Deutsch-Mark when new.
>>
>> where did you find that piece of information
>>
>> --
>> Best regards
>>
>> Peer Oliver Schmidt
>> PGP Key ID: 0x83E1C2EA
>>
>> '76a Eleganza II, VA
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Pep up your burners on your stove! [message #278568 is a reply to message #278533] Wed, 27 May 2015 19:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Emery,

I followed your instructions and drilled out the jet for the left rear burner on my four burner stove and that burner works a treat!


Unfortunately choosing the right rear wasn't too bright as it was too close to the window in Double Trouble as the plastic surround
got pretty hot. I felt over time that it could cause a problem so I moved the drilled jet to the left front burner.

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426


-----Original Message-----
From: Emery Stora

The problem with both the 3 burner and 4 burner older stoves in our GMCs is that none of the burners get really hot. Most newer
stoves have one super burner which puts out a lot more heat.
Here is something that I posted 12 years ago to solve the problem. I carry the small drill bit in my motorhome and have modified
several burners at rallies. People really love it as they can now boil water much, much faster (for pasta) and even stir fry on the
burner which was impossible on the original burners.


_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] SALE! Harbor Freight 3 Ton Jack!
Next Topic: Hello everybody from England
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 18 19:34:20 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03803 seconds