GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » again, belts
again, belts [message #277563] Sat, 09 May 2015 14:30 Go to next message
jhbridges is currently offline  jhbridges   United States
Messages: 8412
Registered: May 2011
Location: Braselton ga
Karma: -74
Senior Member
I got a set from the place recommended earlier this year. They're 29/64ths. Are we splitting hairs here? A 10mm wrench just barely won't go on them.

==johnny


Foolish Carriage, 76 26' Eleganza(?) with beaucoup mods and add - ons. Braselton, Ga. I forgive them all, save those who hurt the dogs. They must answer to me in hell
Re: again, belts [message #277566 is a reply to message #277563] Sat, 09 May 2015 17:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Johnny:

After you've measured this with your wrench and you think it will work. Check the belt in the pulleys. The belt should not come to the bottom of the pulley. It works by wedging between the legs of the V on the pully. If it can bottom once it is to recommended tension and some wear. Then it's too narrow. If its clear that the belt will not bottom out then you will be fine. Dont forget that pulleys wear too making the legs of the V wider and grooved rather than flat, complicating the situation.

If the belt rides too high in the groove then the fiction surface on the belt is too small and power transfer ability of the belt decreases and it slips. Sholders are worn into the belt and it will refuse to slide down into the V.


Regards


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: again, belts [message #277567 is a reply to message #277563] Sat, 09 May 2015 17:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John Heslinga   Canada
Messages: 632
Registered: February 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 4
Senior Member
This is what the Belt and Pulley Relationship should look like.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussion-photos/p57976-v-belt-pulley-relationship.html


John and Cathie Heslinga 1974 Canyonlands 260 455, Manny tranny and 1 ton, 3:70 LS, Red Seal Journeyman, DTE, BEd. MEd. Edmonton, Alberta
Re: again, belts [message #277573 is a reply to message #277563] Sat, 09 May 2015 22:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
29/64ths belt width is fine.

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: again, belts [message #277702 is a reply to message #277567] Mon, 11 May 2015 21:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
midlf is currently offline  midlf   United States
Messages: 2212
Registered: July 2007
Location: SE Wisc. (Palmyra)
Karma: 1
Senior Member
John Heslinga wrote on Sat, 09 May 2015 17:59
This is what the Belt and Pulley Relationship should look like.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussion-photos/p57976-v-belt-pulley-relationship.html


See here for a photo(s) showing this in "real life":

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/belts/p46721-double-belt-installation-using-dayco-belts.html



Steve Southworth
1974 Glacier TZE064V100150 (for workin on)
1975 Transmode TZE365V100394 (parts & spares)
Palmyra WI
Re: again, belts [message #277709 is a reply to message #277702] Mon, 11 May 2015 23:22 Go to previous message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
midlf wrote on Mon, 11 May 2015 20:06
John Heslinga wrote on Sat, 09 May 2015 17:59
This is what the Belt and Pulley Relationship should look like.
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/discussion-photos/p57976-v-belt-pulley-relationship.html


See here for a photo(s) showing this in "real life":

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/belts/p46721-double-belt-installation-using-dayco-belts.html


Steve--this gets right to the issue of worn pulleys and belts. However when I become the nay sayer on dual belt alternator belts/ pulleys no one seems to take this into account. The work arounds almost always neglect the basic problem in the first place.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Previous Topic: Chassis fuse panel
Next Topic: Front shocks
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 19 20:33:37 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02413 seconds