GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » Tire load range (Why E vs D)
Tire load range [message #269148] Wed, 07 January 2015 17:43 Go to next message
dblcola is currently offline  dblcola   United States
Messages: 9
Registered: August 2010
Location: Cairo,Ga.
Karma: 0
Junior Member
Getting ready to purchase tires for our new (to us) 76 Palm Beach. I read in the maintenance manual that the MH came from the factory with 8.75-16.5 load range D tires and that's what they suggested staying with. Our tires/rims were changed to 16" and load range E. I've noticed in most tire posts you all are using Load range E not D. Why the upgrade? Our MH has had a number of changes made and we have more questions than answers. Thanks


1976 Palm Beach
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269156 is a reply to message #269148] Wed, 07 January 2015 18:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
James Hupy is currently offline  James Hupy   United States
Messages: 6806
Registered: May 2010
Karma: -62
Senior Member
Today, most owners carry more weight in their coaches. E range tires help
with that. Try to stay with tires that have the same circumference as the
originals. That way your speedometer will be as accurate as it was when the
coach left the factory.
Jim Hupy
Salem,Or
78 GMC ROYALE 403
On Jan 7, 2015 3:44 PM, "Richard Lucey" wrote:

> Getting ready to purchase tires for our new (to us) 76 Palm Beach. I read
> in the maintenance manual that the MH came from the factory with 8.75-16.5
> load range D tires and that's what they suggested staying with. Our
> tires/rims were changed to 16" and load range E. I've noticed in most tire
> posts
> you all are using Load range E not D. Why the upgrade? Our MH has had a
> number of changes made and we have more questions than answers. Thanks
>
> --
> 1976 Palm Beach
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269160 is a reply to message #269156] Wed, 07 January 2015 18:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Otterwan   United States
Messages: 946
Registered: July 2013
Location: Lynnwood (north of Seattl...
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Your average 1-ton dually pickup is rated at 10,000 lbs total loaded weight and comes with load range E tires. Your coach weighs on the high side of 11,000 lbs. As they say, do the math.

1977 Birchaven, Lynnwood WA - "We may not be able to stop all evil in the world, but I know that how we treat one another is entirely up to us."
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269166 is a reply to message #269160] Wed, 07 January 2015 20:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Burton is currently offline  Ken Burton   United States
Messages: 10030
Registered: January 2004
Location: Hebron, Indiana
Karma: 10
Senior Member
The difference in price between the two is usually around $5.00 each. Your coach is probably right near the limit of Load Range D tires. LRE tires will give you some additional capacity.

Ken Burton - N9KB
76 Palm Beach
Hebron, Indiana
Re: Tire load range [message #269170 is a reply to message #269148] Wed, 07 January 2015 20:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Steve is currently offline  Steve   United States
Messages: 506
Registered: September 2013
Location: East Greenville, Pa
Karma: 1
Senior Member
That's great news that you have already been upgraded to 16 inch wheels. That wile save you some bucks. 225/75/16 load range E is the way to go. It gives you a little safety margin for the weight of your coach. You still should ultimately weigh your coach and adjust tire pressures according to actual weight. Many people start with 65 psi up front and 60 psi in the rear and then dial it in based on actual weight.

1978 GMC Royal
Eastern Pennslyvania
1968 Chevrolet C20 396 Camper Special
1969 Chevrolet C20 Camper Special
1985 Buick Electra Park Avenue
1992 Camaro 25th Anniversary Heretage Edition Black
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269184 is a reply to message #269170] Wed, 07 January 2015 23:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
G'day,

I believe there is a mis-conception that Load Range E tires provide a margin of safety over load range D tires, however, if one
clicks on the link below:

http://gmcmotorhome.info/tires.html

and scrolls down to:

LOAD / INFLATION
LOAD / INFLATION TABLE - ALL TIRES

One will note that if the weight on your tires is 2335 or less load range D tires are fine and load range E tires don't support any
more weight than load range D at 65 psi or less. Load range E can be inflated to a higher pressure and support more weight.

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426



_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269185 is a reply to message #269184] Thu, 08 January 2015 00:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rob is currently offline  Rob   United States
Messages: 651
Registered: November 2013
Location: Victoria, BC
Karma: 3
Senior Member
In my experience - load range E's quite often have a much firmer sidewall and I use them when situations may benefit from that.

Rob
Victoria, BC
76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath

On 2015-01-07, at 9:57 PM, Robert Mueller wrote:

> G'day,
>
> I believe there is a mis-conception that Load Range E tires provide a margin of safety over load range D tires, however, if one
> clicks on the link below:
>
> http://gmcmotorhome.info/tires.html
>
> and scrolls down to:
>
> LOAD / INFLATION
> LOAD / INFLATION TABLE - ALL TIRES
>
> One will note that if the weight on your tires is 2335 or less load range D tires are fine and load range E tires don't support any
> more weight than load range D at 65 psi or less. Load range E can be inflated to a higher pressure and support more weight.
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Rob - Victoria, BC - 76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269190 is a reply to message #269184] Thu, 08 January 2015 06:04 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Great post. We been there done that
Erf

On Wednesday, January 7, 2015, Robert Mueller
wrote:

> G'day,
>
> I believe there is a mis-conception that Load Range E tires provide a
> margin of safety over load range D tires, however, if one
> clicks on the link below:
>
> http://gmcmotorhome.info/tires.html
>
> and scrolls down to:
>
> LOAD / INFLATION
> LOAD / INFLATION TABLE - ALL TIRES
>
> One will note that if the weight on your tires is 2335 or less load range
> D tires are fine and load range E tires don't support any
> more weight than load range D at 65 psi or less. Load range E can be
> inflated to a higher pressure and support more weight.
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>


--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269208 is a reply to message #269166] Thu, 08 January 2015 09:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
When I went to buy my first pair of 225-16s, the best local shop did not even have LRDs. Plus, if your house bank is up front, then your right front is probably at the limit of a Load Range D (aka 8 ply) tire. I suspect that many if not all 26s are over LRD in the rear. LRD (all brands) good up to 2150@65psi, but LREs are good to 2470@80psi.

Matt


Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269211 is a reply to message #269184] Thu, 08 January 2015 09:35 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Emery Stora is currently offline  Emery Stora   United States
Messages: 959
Registered: January 2011
Karma: 4
Senior Member
Rob, there is another difference between load range D and load range E tires besides LOAD/INFLATION.

Load range E tires have a stiffer (and usually shorter) sidewalk. This would allow less sway. Less flexing would also mean less heat buildup in the sidewalks. Excessive heat can lead to blowouts.

The arrangement of the GMC rear suspension leads to sway so anything that could reduce it would seem to be beneficial.


Emery Stora
77 Kingsley
Frederick, CO

> On Jan 7, 2015, at 10:57 PM, Robert Mueller wrote:
>
> G'day,
>
> I believe there is a mis-conception that Load Range E tires provide a margin of safety over load range D tires, however, if one
> clicks on the link below:
>
> http://gmcmotorhome.info/tires.html
>
> and scrolls down to:
>
> LOAD / INFLATION
> LOAD / INFLATION TABLE - ALL TIRES
>
> One will note that if the weight on your tires is 2335 or less load range D tires are fine and load range E tires don't support any
> more weight than load range D at 65 psi or less. Load range E can be inflated to a higher pressure and support more weight.
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269223 is a reply to message #269208] Thu, 08 January 2015 11:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
A Hamilto is currently offline  A Hamilto   United States
Messages: 4508
Registered: April 2011
Karma: 39
Senior Member
Matt Colie wrote on Thu, 08 January 2015 09:35
...if your house bank is up front, then your right front is probably at the limit of a Load Range D (aka 8 ply) tire. I suspect that many if not all 26s are over LRD in the rear. LRD (all brands) good up to 2150@65psi, but LREs are good to 2470@80psi.

Matt
Unless the rear is overloaded or left-to-right imbalance is outside of Operating Manual spec, there is no situation where the rears will ever exceed LRD specs for any year model. '78 models are the only ones that can overload LRD tires and still be within operating GVWR, and even then only on the front. LRDs go to 2335 pounds and you CAN have as much as 2375 pounds on one of the front wheels on a 78 and still be within weight and left-to-right imbalance specs. If the front is within max weight spec and the left-to-right imbalance is less than 170 pounds, even a '78 will not overload LRD tires.

'77s and earlier can only exceed LRD specs on any axle if they are overloaded according to the Operating Manual.

Since so many people chronically overload their GMCs, it is just simpler to tell everyone to buy LRE tires.
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269237 is a reply to message #269223] Thu, 08 January 2015 15:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dblcola is currently offline  dblcola   United States
Messages: 9
Registered: August 2010
Location: Cairo,Ga.
Karma: 0
Junior Member
I'm sure we will put load range E on as not enough difference in price. Thanks for all the good information. This is a great place to learn.

1976 Palm Beach
Re: Tire load range [message #269242 is a reply to message #269148] Thu, 08 January 2015 17:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
When you are at 65 PSI and accidentally slam a pothole ( not if but when you do) you want the E as the internal pressure momentarily spikes. Secondly when you are far from home and need a tire you will have an easier time matching what you have in an E range. Thirdly, you do not mention all steel consruction (as XPS RIB) or steel belted polyester fabric carcass tire called ragwalls. Most here far prefer the ragwalls in LRE. All this is afftionatly called Tire Wars and can be searched in depth on this forum.

John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269244 is a reply to message #269211] Thu, 08 January 2015 17:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Emery,

I agree that the LRE tire sidewall would have to be stiffer (read stronger) than the LRD to take the additional 15 psi max pressure
and support the additional weight. Logic dictates that they would flex less; however, I'm confused regarding the height.

Are you saying that the side wall on a 225/75-16R Load Range E is shorter than a 225/75-16R Load Range D?

I just posted this to the Photo Site: http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6716-tires.html

As you can see the Tread depth and Overall diameter of both tires is the same.

There is a weight difference which could mean the side wall in the LRE is thicker (read stronger) than the LRD, however, the tread
width of the LRD is 0.10 inches narrower and that could be where the weight difference is.

Note that the KL-78's LRD and LRE tires are the same price so I agree that it makes more sense to buy LRE. Even if the LRE's are
more expensive you're better off with them than the LRD.

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426

-----Original Message-----
From: Emery Stora

Rob, there is another difference between load range D and load range E tires besides LOAD/INFLATION.

Load range E tires have a stiffer (and usually shorter) sidewalk. This would allow less sway. Less flexing would also mean less
heat buildup in the sidewalks. Excessive heat can lead to blowouts.

The arrangement of the GMC rear suspension leads to sway so anything that could reduce it would seem to be beneficial.


Emery

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269249 is a reply to message #269244] Thu, 08 January 2015 18:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
USAussie wrote on Thu, 08 January 2015 16:57
Emery,

I agree that the LRE tire sidewall would have to be stiffer (read stronger) than the LRD to take the additional 15 psi max pressure
and support the additional weight. Logic dictates that they would flex less; however, I'm confused regarding the height.

Are you saying that the side wall on a 225/75-16R Load Range E is shorter than a 225/75-16R Load Range D?

I just posted this to the Photo Site: http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g6716-tires.html

As you can see the Tread depth and Overall diameter of both tires is the same.

There is a weight difference which could mean the side wall in the LRE is thicker (read stronger) than the LRD, however, the tread
width of the LRD is 0.10 inches narrower and that could be where the weight difference is.

Note that the KL-78's LRD and LRE tires are the same price so I agree that it makes more sense to buy LRE. Even if the LRE's are
more expensive you're better off with them than the LRD.

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426

-----Original Message-----
From: Emery Stora

Rob, there is another difference between load range D and load range E tires besides LOAD/INFLATION.

Load range E tires have a stiffer (and usually shorter) sidewalk. This would allow less sway. Less flexing would also mean less
heat buildup in the sidewalks. Excessive heat can lead to blowouts.

The arrangement of the GMC rear suspension leads to sway so anything that could reduce it would seem to be beneficial.


Emery

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


I thought that the GMC community has agreed that rut running has been significantly reduced by ragwalls due to a more flexible sidewall. Are we now saying we want a stiffer sidewall? The internal friction of a D rated tire is less than an E rated and I bet most people who have E rated tires are only running D rated pressure so you really are gaining nothing.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: Tire load range [message #269277 is a reply to message #269148] Thu, 08 January 2015 22:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mild bill is currently offline  mild bill   Canada
Messages: 98
Registered: November 2014
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
Member
Ok, might be a stupid question so here I go.
Load carrying ability..
Stiffer sidewalls better, softer sidewalls better?
Bogies pretty much remind me of a trailer.
Other than max recommended speed of 65 MPH what would be wrong with trailer tires on the bogies?

http://www.kijiji.ca/v-trailer-parts-accessories/edmonton/new-trailer-tires-for-sale-mounted-on-rims/1043350433?enableSearchNavigationFlag=true

[Updated on: Thu, 08 January 2015 22:31]

Report message to a moderator

Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269315 is a reply to message #269244] Fri, 09 January 2015 13:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Emery Stora is currently offline  Emery Stora   United States
Messages: 959
Registered: January 2011
Karma: 4
Senior Member

> On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:57 PM, Robert Mueller wrote:
>
> Emery,
>
> I agree that the LRE tire sidewall would have to be stiffer (read stronger) than the LRD to take the additional 15 psi max pressure
> and support the additional weight. Logic dictates that they would flex less; however, I'm confused regarding the height.
>
> Are you saying that the side wall on a 225/75-16R Load Range E is shorter than a 225/75-16R Load Range D?
>

Yes, that is what I am saying. I said “usually”. So it might not apply to all brands.
It is hard to see in pictures but if you look at the same make tires side by side and do a measurement it is evident in the tires that I have looked at.
The tread above the side wall is usually larger on the load range E so to meet the dimensional restraints the sidewalls have to be shorter.

Emery Stora

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269326 is a reply to message #269315] Fri, 09 January 2015 17:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Emery,

Come to think of it I did note on Tire Rack that some of the same brand tires had the same OD but different tread depth which would
mean the side walls had to be shorter.

I did not publish that because unlike the Kumho KL-78's D and E load range they were different models.

Regards,
Rob M.


-----Original Message-----
From: Gmclist [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Emery Stora

Yes, that is what I am saying. I said "usually". So it might not apply to all brands.
It is hard to see in pictures but if you look at the same make tires side by side and do a measurement it is evident in the tires
that I have looked at.
The tread above the side wall is usually larger on the load range E so to meet the dimensional restraints the sidewalls have to be
shorter.

Emery

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: Tire load range [message #269349 is a reply to message #269148] Fri, 09 January 2015 21:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mild bill is currently offline  mild bill   Canada
Messages: 98
Registered: November 2014
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Karma: 0
Member
So I must be crazy? So is it ride you are concerned with? Big truck rears have the stiffest sidewalls, just relating it to long wheel base trucks and trailer experience with both stiff sidewalls and soft. Soft you could see in the rear view mirror back end or trailer doing a lateral 4" hunt in certain situations. Tail wagging the dog so to speak. Rears on a big truck cheap compared to the steers.
IMO while sidewall flex can improve ride I think that's the suspensions job, my big non engineered bag system should soften things out compared to a 4 bag. Regardless of ride I would rather the back end not bob about on the sidewallls. Don't know how that affects highway groove hunting.
Valid discussion I think? Sorry for not searching all relevant discussions in the past.
Re: [GMCnet] Tire load range [message #269355 is a reply to message #269349] Fri, 09 January 2015 23:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
powerjon is currently offline  powerjon   United States
Messages: 2446
Registered: January 2004
Karma: 5
Senior Member
Bill,
We go thru the tire discussion about every 6 to 8 months, mostly for newbies.

I am not going to tell you what brand, size or type of tire to run as that is your personal choice, but in the last 15 years I have run all the tire combinations that are for our coaches. Listed in order in which I ran them and they were all a 225 size tire.
1. All steel tires (Goodyear G159) on the factory radial steel rims. Worst ride in the GMC, steered all over the place and rut ran bad.
2. New Alcoa wheels with Firestone RTS tires with poly side walls. 2 different coaches, very good ride, 2 fingers on the wheel going down the road. Ran this combo for 7 years before changing out tires.
3. Combo 3 is all steel on the rear with poly sidewall tires on the front. I had a set of low milage Goodyear G159 all steels which on put on the rear and used Michelin LTX on the front and it drove and handle well with this combo.
The first three setups were run on our 77 26’ Eleganza II. The combo is what I run on the Buskirk Stretch coach.
4. I had a set of the Goodyear G149 all steel tires that I bought for the Avion, but needed new tires for the stretch. I put the 4 of those on rear and put the Michelin LTX poly steel sidewall tires on the front. Have not had any issues and it goes down the road straight. Ride height also plays a very important part of how you go down the road too!

My personal choice of tires is Michelin or Goodyear. Others have run BF Goodrich, Bridgestone, Firestone, General, Kumho, Yokohama tires on their coaches with equal success. They vary in cost and most run the 225 tire and some run 235 and 245 tire. The tire size can effect your final drive ratio a lot. I run a 225 size tire with a 3.21 final drive and 3.50 chain drive to give me a 3.66 final drive ratio.

So in the end you have to live with what you run!

JR Wright
78 Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion
Michigan

> On Jan 9, 2015, at 10:43 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> So I must be crazy? So is it ride you are concerned with? Big truck rears have the stiffest sidewalls, just relating it to long wheel base trucks and
> trailer experience with both stiff sidewalls and soft. Soft you could see in the rear view mirror back end or trailer doing a lateral 4" hunt in
> certain situations. Tail wagging the dog so to speak. Rears on a big truck cheap compared to the steers.
> IMO while sidewall flex can improve ride I think that's the suspensions job, my big non engineered bag system should soften things out compared to a 4
> bag. Regardless of ride I would rather the back end not bob about on the sidewallls. Don't know how that affects highway groove hunting.
> Valid discussion I think? Sorry for not searching all relevant discussions in the past.

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist


J.R. Wright
GMC GreatLaker
GMC Eastern States
GMCMI
78 30' Buskirk Stretch
75 Avion Under Reconstruction
Michigan
Previous Topic: Found the title location of my family's 1975 GMC.... need assistance
Next Topic: GMC Test drive video
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Oct 01 09:31:16 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06205 seconds