GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan
John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 10:19 Go to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
Here is a synopsis of the presentation John gave at Chippewa Falls.

John Biwersi has helped develop a balanced 8 blade reinforced composite fan that is quieter and pulls more air. He utilized data that Steve Ferguson did regarding fan clutches and their engaged and disengaged speed in order to make a recommendation for the proper fan clutch for this new fan. The new fan is some type of plastic like you see on new diesels. I think it has 8 blades. The hub is drilled for our clutches and is balanced. Moves more air and is quieter according to the manufacturer. Also according to the manufacturer (if I recall correctly) the new fan takes less power to turn even while moving more air. The price is slightly AROUND $120 if I recall correctly but don't hold me to it. I got one from him at the Chippewa Falls GMCMI rally.

John is a member here. I don't want to post his info but if anyone wants it, PM or email me.

John uses the severe duty clutch on his coach with a stock radiator but just after I ordered my new severe duty clutch, Bob Dunahugh posted this:

Quote:
I was having problems with 2 new Hayden severe duty clutch's not disengaging my engine fan. That's the one that is suggested in our parts book. I've never had problems with their products. And why was there a standard duty, heavy duty, and a severe duty listed in our parts book. The stock GMC fan has 7 blades, and a 2.25 inch pitch. It rotates at a fixed ratio to the crankshaft. So the clutch load is constant to the crank speed. The clutch has 2 operating conditions. Engaged. Or disengaged. Nothing else. And the engaged operation is based on the temperature of the air coming from the radiator to the coil spring on the front side of the unit. This spring tells the clutch what needs to be done for proper engine cooling. So back to my question.

What can the severe duty do the the heavy duty can't. As the unit just turns the fan blade on, or off. Duty cycle shouldn't be the issue. It's a fluid type clutch. And, these units just don't turn on, or off that off ton in our type of service. In my mind. I was missing something. So I called Hayden.

What I found out was that for our size, and number of blades. It goes like this. A 2.00 inch pitch blade would require their standard duty unit. A 2.25 inch pitch blade requires their heavy duty unit. And the 2.50 inch pitch would require their sever duty unit. He stated that if you put a sever duty unit on the 2.25 pitch blade that we have. ( Remember. That sever duty unit was designed for the load of the 2.5 inch pitch blade. ) The sever duty clutch unit can encounter problems having enough load to properly disengage. So to have the fan pull more air. Go to a 2.5 inch pitch blade . And then use the sever duty clutch unit. In short. The heavy duty unit should be use for our fan blades that have the 2.25 inch pitch fan. No others.


Given this info and the fact that my aluminum radiator is more efficient than stock AND my oil cooler is not in the radiator (thereby decreasing the heat load) I ordered and installed a standard duty clutch and installed it with the new fan blade. I'll keep the severe duty clutch for a while just in case.

My clutch was a severe duty unit that would be engaged most the time and when it did release it was still loud. The new standard unit engages when the coach first starts and disengages shortly after the temperature gauge starts to come up. So far, it has not needed to come on again. Perhaps it will on the trip. My temperature stays rock solid at 180 degrees. It is MUCH, MUCH quieter. I can actually hear the fan on my aftermarket oil cooler cycle on and off as needed. I never could before.

I was planning on waiting until I had the upcoming trip to LazyDays on the coach before I posted but the above is what I know now. I'll post more info when we get back from the rally.


Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L

[Updated on: Sat, 03 January 2015 16:52]

Report message to a moderator

Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268777 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 10:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rcjordan   United States
Messages: 1913
Registered: October 2012
Location: Elizabeth City, North Car...
Karma: 1
Senior Member
GMCMI session picture here
http://www.gmcmi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/IMG_2757-e1413037859620.jpg

8 or 10 blades, Kerry?


SOLD 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
76 Eleganza
Elizabeth City, NC
Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268778 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 10:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
Obviously it's 10 blades not 8. Embarassed

Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268779 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 10:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bdub is currently offline  bdub   United States
Messages: 1578
Registered: February 2004
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 5
Senior Member

How is it possible to be quieter and pull more air? Isn't the roar
actually the sound of the wind created by the fan?

bdub
www.bdub.net/GMCLinks.html
On Jan 3, 2015 10:19 AM, "Kerry Pinkerton" wrote:

> Here is a synopsis of the presentation John gave at Chippewa Falls.
>
> John Biwersi has helped develop a balanced 8 blade reinforced composite
> fan that is quieter and pulls more air. He utilized data that Steve
> Southworth
> did regarding fan clutches and their engaged and disengaged speed in order
> to make a recommendation for the proper fan clutch for this new fan. The
> new fan is some type of plastic like you see on new diesels. I think it
> has 8 blades. The hub is drilled for our clutches and is balanced. Moves
> more
> air and is quieter according to the manufacturer. Also according to the
> manufacturer (if I recall correctly) the new fan takes less power to turn
> even
> while moving more air. The price is slightly AROUND $120 if I recall
> correctly but don't hold me to it. I got one from him at the Chippewa Falls
> GMCMI rally.
>
> John is a member here. I don't want to post his info but if anyone wants
> it, PM or email me.
>
> John uses the severe duty clutch on his coach with a stock radiator but
> just after I ordered my new severe duty clutch, Bob Dunahugh posted this:
>
> Quote:
>> I was having problems with 2 new Hayden severe duty clutch's not
> disengaging my engine fan. That's the one that is suggested in our parts
> book.
>> I've never had problems with their products. And why was there a
> standard duty, heavy duty, and a severe duty listed in our parts book. The
> stock
>> GMC fan has 7 blades, and a 2.25 inch pitch. It rotates at a fixed ratio
> to the crankshaft. So the clutch load is constant to the crank speed. The
>> clutch has 2 operating conditions. Engaged. Or disengaged. Nothing else.
> And the engaged operation is based on the temperature of the air coming
>> from the radiator to the coil spring on the front side of the unit. This
> spring tells the clutch what needs to be done for proper engine cooling. So
>> back to my question.
>>
>> What can the severe duty do the the heavy duty can't. As the unit just
> turns the fan blade on, or off. Duty cycle shouldn't be the issue. It's a
>> fluid type clutch. And, these units just don't turn on, or off that off
> ton in our type of service. In my mind. I was missing something. So I
>> called Hayden.
>>
>> What I found out was that for our size, and number of blades. It goes
> like this. A 2.00 inch pitch blade would require their standard duty unit. A
>> 2.25 inch pitch blade requires their heavy duty unit. And the 2.50 inch
> pitch would require their sever duty unit. He stated that if you put a sever
>> duty unit on the 2.25 pitch blade that we have. ( Remember. That sever
> duty unit was designed for the load of the 2.5 inch pitch blade. ) The sever
>> duty clutch unit can encounter problems having enough load to properly
> disengage. So to have the fan pull more air. Go to a 2.5 inch pitch blade .
>> And then use the sever duty clutch unit. In short. The heavy duty unit
> should be use for our fan blades that have the 2.25 inch pitch fan. No
>> others.
>
>
> Given this info and the fact that my aluminum radiator is more efficient
> than stock AND my oil cooler is not in the radiator (thereby decreasing the
> heat load) I ordered and installed a standard duty clutch and installed it
> with the new fan blade. I'll keep the severe duty clutch for a while just
> in case.
>
> My clutch was a severe duty unit that would be engaged most the time and
> when it did release it was still loud. The new standard unit engages when
> the coach first starts and disengages shortly after the temperature gauge
> starts to come up. So far, it has not needed to come on again. Perhaps it
> will on the trip. My temperature stays rock solid at 180 degrees. It is
> MUCH, MUCH quieter. I can actually hear the fan on my aftermarket oil
> cooler cycle on and off as needed. I never could before.
>
> I was planning on waiting until I had the upcoming trip to LazyDays on the
> coach before I posted but the above is what I know now. I'll post more
> info when we get back from the rally.
>
> --
> Kerry Pinkerton
>
> North Alabama, near Huntsville,
>
> 77 Eleganza II, "The Lady", 403CI, Manny Brakes, 1 ton, tranny also a 76
> Eleganza to be re-bodied as an Art Deco car hauler
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



bdub
'76 Palm Beach/Central Texas
www.bdub.net
www.gmcmhphotos.com
www.gmcmotorhomemarketplace.com
www.gmcmhregistry.com
www.facebook.com/groups/classicgmcmotorhomes
www.facebook.com/groups/gmcmm
Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268781 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 11:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Steve is currently offline  Steve   United States
Messages: 506
Registered: September 2013
Location: East Greenville, Pa
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Kerry,
Great information. Cooling is so important. Nearly every engine I have lost over the years has been due to a cooling failure, never a lubrication or wear issue. Thanks for posting.


1978 GMC Royal
Eastern Pennslyvania
1968 Chevrolet C20 396 Camper Special
1969 Chevrolet C20 Camper Special
1985 Buick Electra Park Avenue
1992 Camaro 25th Anniversary Heretage Edition Black
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268782 is a reply to message #268781] Sat, 03 January 2015 11:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Got it



On Saturday, January 3, 2015, Steve Adams wrote:

> Kerry,
> Great information. Cooling is so important. Nearly every engine I have
> lost over the years has been due to a cooling failure, never a lubrication
> or
> wear issue. Thanks for posting.
> --
> 1978 GMC Royal
> Eastern Pennslyvania
> 1968 Chevrolet C20 396 Camper Special
> 1969 Chevrolet C20 Camper Special
> 1985 Buick Electra Park Avenue
> 1992 Camaro 25th Anniversary Heretage Edition Black
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>


--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268783 is a reply to message #268777] Sat, 03 January 2015 11:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Will not load

On Saturday, January 3, 2015, RC Jordan wrote:

> GMCMI session picture here
> http://www.gmcmi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/IMG_2757-e1413037859620.jpg
>
> 8 or 10 blades, Kerry?
> --
> 77 Royale Coachmen Side Dry Bath
> 76 Birchaven Coachmen Side Wet Bath
> Elizabeth City, NC
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>


--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268784 is a reply to message #268779] Sat, 03 January 2015 11:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
bdub wrote on Sat, 03 January 2015 10:54
How is it possible to be quieter and pull more air? Isn't the roar
actually the sound of the wind created by the fan?

bdub


Billy, I can't answer that from a physics perspective. However, I will say there is air flow and there is air flow. You can breath out hard and barely make a sound or create a piercing whistle with less air. The Navy spends billions researching and designing quieter, more efficient, propeller blades.

However, I can tell you it is quieter. I don't have any data as to how efficient it may or may not be. From the blast of air when my hatch is up and the clutch is engaged that it moves a good bit of air...quieter Smile


Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268787 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 11:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
armandminnie is currently offline  armandminnie   United States
Messages: 864
Registered: May 2009
Location: Marana, AZ
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Where can I see the data that Steve Southworth developed on fan clutches and their speeds?

Armand Minnie
Marana, AZ
'76 Eleganza II TZE166V103202
visit my gmc blog
click here to visit gmcws.org
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268788 is a reply to message #268787] Sat, 03 January 2015 12:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Ken Henderson is currently offline  Ken Henderson   United States
Messages: 8726
Registered: March 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Karma: 9
Senior Member
I think the Steves got confused -- Ferguson did the fan tests. That should
help (search GMCMH Photos for user=botiemad, IIRC).

Ken H.


On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Armand Minnie wrote:

> Where can I see the data that Steve Southworth developed on fan clutches
> and their speeds?
> --
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Ken Henderson
Americus, GA
www.gmcwipersetc.com
Large Wiring Diagrams
76 X-Birchaven
76 X-Palm Beach
Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268792 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 13:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George B. is currently offline  George B.   United States
Messages: 213
Registered: February 2012
Karma: 1
Senior Member
My understanding of a "Severe Duty" fan clutch, in addition to the information cited about blade pitch matching, also has to do with severe duty being intended for low-speed, stop & go urban delivery type vehicles. The design intention being to keep the fan engaged most of the time or longer as these vehicles are typically idling or in slow-moving traffic and infrequently have the advantage of high-speed forward movement to circulate air through the radiator.

George Butts Las Vegas Nevada 73 "Custom 26' Q" & 76 23' Birchaven 71 Honda 600 Coupe & 01 Tracker Toads
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268796 is a reply to message #268788] Sat, 03 January 2015 14:03 Go to previous messageGo to next message
midlf is currently offline  midlf   United States
Messages: 2212
Registered: July 2007
Location: SE Wisc. (Palmyra)
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Ken Henderson wrote on Sat, 03 January 2015 12:38
I think the Steves got confused -- Ferguson did the fan tests. That should
help (search GMCMH Photos for user=botiemad, IIRC).

Ken H.



Correct - it was Ferguson, not I

His photos are here:

http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/g5181-tech-stuff.html


I don't know where the data is, if any was posted. The data may have only been in the forum/net posting.


Steve Southworth
1974 Glacier TZE064V100150 (for workin on)
1975 Transmode TZE365V100394 (parts & spares)
Palmyra WI
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268799 is a reply to message #268779] Sat, 03 January 2015 15:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
Billy,

Fan (and propeller) noise is greatly affected by the number of blades and the way they are shaped.

Regards,
Rob M.
Sydney, Australia
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426

-----Original Message-----
From: Billy Massey

How is it possible to be quieter and pull more air? Isn't the roar actually the sound of the wind created by the fan?

bdub

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268801 is a reply to message #268799] Sat, 03 January 2015 15:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
I suspect that most of the "noise" comes from the blades beating the air inefficiently due to poor design!
There are non-automotive fans out there that move lots of air VERY quietly.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*

> From: robmueller@iinet.net.au
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 08:29:45 +1100
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan
>
> Billy,
>
> Fan (and propeller) noise is greatly affected by the number of blades and the way they are shaped.
>
> Regards,
> Rob M.
> Sydney, Australia
> AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
> USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Billy Massey
>
> How is it possible to be quieter and pull more air? Isn't the roar actually the sound of the wind created by the fan?
>
> bdub

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268806 is a reply to message #268799] Sat, 03 January 2015 17:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
bdub is currently offline  bdub   United States
Messages: 1578
Registered: February 2004
Location: Central Texas
Karma: 5
Senior Member

It's a little weird, in this group particularly, that there has not been a
request to substantiate the statement, "the new fan takes less power to
turn even while moving more air".

Maybe I missed the link. There's bound to be a data sheet available
somewhere.

bdub
www.bdub.net/GMCLinks.html

On Jan 3, 2015 3:29 PM, "Robert Mueller" wrote:
>
> Fan (and propeller) noise is greatly affected by the number of blades and
the way they are shaped.
>
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



bdub
'76 Palm Beach/Central Texas
www.bdub.net
www.gmcmhphotos.com
www.gmcmotorhomemarketplace.com
www.gmcmhregistry.com
www.facebook.com/groups/classicgmcmotorhomes
www.facebook.com/groups/gmcmm
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268807 is a reply to message #268801] Sat, 03 January 2015 17:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kingsley Coach is currently offline  Kingsley Coach   United States
Messages: 2691
Registered: March 2009
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Karma: -34
Senior Member
Kerry

Thank you !

Mike

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:54 PM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald
wrote:

> I suspect that most of the "noise" comes from the blades beating the air
> inefficiently due to poor design!
> There are non-automotive fans out there that move lots of air VERY quietly.
>
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
> ~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
> ~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
> ~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
> ~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
> ~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
> ~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
> ~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
> ______________
> *[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
> *--OO--[]---O-*
>
>> From: robmueller@iinet.net.au
>> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
>> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 08:29:45 +1100
>> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan
>>
>> Billy,
>>
>> Fan (and propeller) noise is greatly affected by the number of blades
> and the way they are shaped.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rob M.
>> Sydney, Australia
>> AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
>> USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Billy Massey
>>
>> How is it possible to be quieter and pull more air? Isn't the roar
> actually the sound of the wind created by the fan?
>>
>> bdub
>
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>



--
Michael Beaton
1977 Kingsley 26-11
1977 Eleganza II 26-3
Antigonish, NS

I am not an alcoholic; alcoholics go to meetings.
I am a drunk; I go to parties !
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268811 is a reply to message #268806] Sat, 03 January 2015 18:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
bdub wrote on Sat, 03 January 2015 17:22
It's a little weird, in this group particularly, that there has not been a
request to substantiate the statement, "the new fan takes less power to
turn even while moving more air".

Maybe I missed the link. There's bound to be a data sheet available
somewhere.

bdub


Billy, you'll need to talk to John Biwersi about that. I think he told us the name of the manufacturer that he worked with.

I could have been mistaken about the more air less power but that is what I recall hearing during his presentation and I have no problem accepting that statement as fact.



Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268812 is a reply to message #268772] Sat, 03 January 2015 18:26 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kerry pinkerton is currently offline  kerry pinkerton   United States
Messages: 2565
Registered: July 2012
Location: Harvest, Al
Karma: 15
Senior Member
I just spoke with John. He'll check in tonight or tomorrow.

Kerry Pinkerton - North Alabama Had 5 over the years. Currently have a '06 Fleetwood Discovery 39L
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268817 is a reply to message #268796] Sat, 03 January 2015 18:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
armandminnie is currently offline  armandminnie   United States
Messages: 864
Registered: May 2009
Location: Marana, AZ
Karma: 2
Senior Member
Steve Ferguson's data is on the gmcws web site and I have seen his presentation a couple of times. Steve's experiments were good but they were limited to a low-power electric motor driving the fan clutches with a big GMC fan on them. This setup did not allow Steve to see what happened at higher RPMs which is where the differences between the clutch ratings would show. I was hoping that someone was able to measure the differences on a running engine and was willing to share the data.

Armand Minnie
Marana, AZ
'76 Eleganza II TZE166V103202
visit my gmc blog
click here to visit gmcws.org
Re: [GMCnet] John Biwersi's new direct replacement fan [message #268818 is a reply to message #268806] Sat, 03 January 2015 19:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jp Benson is currently offline  Jp Benson   United States
Messages: 649
Registered: October 2011
Location: Fla
Karma: 2
Senior Member
bdub wrote on Sat, 03 January 2015 17:22
It's a little weird, in this group particularly, that there has not been a
request to substantiate the statement, "the new fan takes less power to
turn even while moving more air".




It does seem too good to be true...but is possible. In general more noise means more turbulence. More turbulence means less efficiency. A more efficient fan would cool the engine and disengage sooner. So you could have higher efficiency operating on a lower duty cycle.

The new fan blade actually weighs 1 oz more than the original but is reputed to have a lower moment of inertia.

JP
Previous Topic: [GMCnet] Electric heat..??
Next Topic: Interior Remodeling
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Oct 03 23:25:03 CDT 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01751 seconds