GMCforum
For enthusiast of the Classic GMC Motorhome built from 1973 to 1978. A web-based mirror of the GMCnet mailing list.

Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » "Water Injection" (Anybody try it?)
"Water Injection" [message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 21:31 Go to next message
rickmike is currently offline  rickmike   United States
Messages: 252
Registered: September 2011
Location: United States
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.

Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?

Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?

Rick M.


1974 26' Canyonlands aka "The General" Clinton, TN
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260173 is a reply to message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 21:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Gatsbys' Cruiser is currently offline  Gatsbys' Cruiser   United States
Messages: 91
Registered: August 2014
Location: Illinois
Karma: 0
Member
Hydrogen fuel is supposed to be an answer to fuel economy. The problem is how to make it if you want to produce your own. It takes a lot of power to create hydrogen.

In my experiments, I felt that pure hydrogen, not oxy hydrogen was best. And it worked best while going down the road on cruise. The hydrogen would replace the fuel and maintain speed as the cruise would drop the gasoline feed, sort of regulation as needed.

The home brew hydrogen guys use the electrodes in water but again, high power needs to make it and it still has oxygen in the gas which makes it highly explosive. Take that oxygen out of the mix and the hydrogen is easier to control and regulate.

Commercial hydrogen units are large and have other needs. The car industry wants to put hydrogen filling stations along the highways, like gasoline stations where you would fill up and pay the big bill. Of course, none of this infrastructure is available yet.

L
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260174 is a reply to message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 22:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bob de Kruyff   United States
Messages: 4260
Registered: January 2004
Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
rickmike wrote on Tue, 26 August 2014 20:31
Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.

Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?

Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?

Rick M.

Oldsmobile had water injection in the mid 60's on the F85. IIRC the dealers sold the special jet away water for a lot of money although probably less than what people buy water bottles for today. It must have helped a little bit or an OEM wouldn't have offered it. I think it was part of the turbo option.


Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260175 is a reply to message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 22:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Rob is currently offline  Rob   United States
Messages: 651
Registered: November 2013
Location: Victoria, BC
Karma: 3
Senior Member
I experimented quite a bit with water injection in the mid to late 80's (on muscle cars and 4x4's - not on GMC MH's). It mainly works by cooling the intake air - since the energy required to vaporize the water comes from the intake air/fuel. Basically - kind of like an intercooler.

It worked a bit - but I recall that ultimately the net power was down - probably due to the water displacing some of the fuel. I even experimented with adding alcohol and other additives to the water, but eventually gave up trying to find the "holy grail".

Most of the hydrogen kits I've seen (on the net) appear to be nothing more than snake oil. I'm not going to hook up a Skippy's PB jar to my air cleaner and claim 20 mpg...

YMMV.

Rob
Victoria, BC
76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath

On 2014-08-26, at 7:31 PM, Richard Michelhaugh wrote:

> Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water
> into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
>
> Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?
>
> Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?
>
> Rick M.
> --
> 1974 26' Canyonlands
> aka "The General"
> Clinton, TN
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Rob - Victoria, BC - 76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260186 is a reply to message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 23:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Chris Tyler is currently offline  Chris Tyler   United States
Messages: 458
Registered: September 2013
Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Water injection was used sucessfully in aircraft as an anti detonate. It can be useful in cars. I have run it, also water/alcohol, and more recently pure methanol in my turbo corvette.

By itself, water offers no benifit. However, IF you get the mix just right, you can get away with more comression than the fuel would otherwise allow, an/or more timing.For an ~8:1 conservatively timed motor, it may not be worth it. Youd have to play with the timing
Snow performance, AEM, and Alky control are very good units, none cheap.

Hydrogen generators are snake oil.


76 Glenbrook
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260187 is a reply to message #260170] Tue, 26 August 2014 23:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mrgmc3 is currently offline  mrgmc3   United States
Messages: 210
Registered: September 2013
Location: W Washington
Karma: 2
Senior Member
The primary function of water injection is to reduce peak combustion chamber temperatures. The heat capacity of water and the phase change to steam absorbs a lot of heat. Water injection has the exact same effect as EGR - reduces chamber temp and in so doing it reduces the production of NOx. Both EGR and water injection allow more ignition advance due to the lower temps. The extra advance does not directly help economy because you've reduced the thermal efficiency with lower temps. There is a slight gain as you are forced to open the throttle slightly more to make up for the torque loss. This additional throttle opening gives a slight reduction in pumping losses.
Olds used water injection on the turbo 215 V8 in 62-63 cutlass to lower knock.
Bottom line - don't bother with water injection. Set optimum spark and fuel values and you should not have to worry about knock.


Chris Geils - Twin Cities / W Wa 1978 26' Kingsley w/ very few mods; PD9040, aux trans cooler, one repaint in stock colors, R134a, Al rad, Alcoas, 54k mi
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260190 is a reply to message #260187] Wed, 27 August 2014 00:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Len Novak is currently offline  Len Novak   United States
Messages: 676
Registered: February 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Karma: -3
Senior Member
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G

10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.

No water, no fly

Great system!

Len and Pat
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375

www.bdub.net/novak/





-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris Geils
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:51 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"

The primary function of water injection is to reduce peak combustion chamber
temperatures. The heat capacity of water and the phase change to steam
absorbs a lot of heat. Water injection has the exact same effect as EGR -
reduces chamber temp and in so doing it reduces the production of NOx.
Both EGR and water injection allow more ignition advance due to the lower
temps. The extra advance does not directly help economy because you've
reduced the thermal efficiency with lower temps. There is a slight gain as
you are forced to open the throttle slightly more to make up for the torque
loss. This additional throttle opening gives a slight reduction in pumping
losses.
Olds used water injection on the turbo 215 V8 in 62-63 cutlass to lower
knock.
Bottom line - don't bother with water injection. Set optimum spark and fuel
values and you should not have to worry about knock.
--
Chris Geils - Twin Cities
1978 26' Kingsley w/ very few mods; Headers, Progressive Dynamics 9040
battery charger, aux trans cooler, one repaint in stock colors, R134a, Al
radiator, 45k mi _______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Len and Pat Novak 1978 GMC Kingsley The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see! Las Vegas, NV new email: B52sRule@Gmail.com http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375 www.bdub.net/novak/
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260192 is a reply to message #260170] Wed, 27 August 2014 01:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
George Beckman is currently offline  George Beckman   United States
Messages: 1085
Registered: October 2008
Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
Senior Member
rickmike wrote on Tue, 26 August 2014 19:31
Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.

Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?


Rick M.

I tried it on my coach. I went old school with an Edelbrock variJect system. Not sure i ever got equal water in each barrel. I have EFI and so fuel and spark is pretty much controlled. I could see no difference in the exhaust temperatures. I am sure it does work though as early tractors introduced water for carbon and heat, not to mention planes.

I suppose I was thinking about delaying power enrichment (power valve) as gasoline is an expensive coolant. The truth is it made me nervous. Run out of water and burn a valve or piston. Heat in the combustion chamber is one that I would like to control with some assured technique.

As a side bar, when Randy Van Winkle and I experimented with spark during Lean Cruise( 16.4+ to 1 air fuel) we could not advance the spark far enough to get a knock on th eknock sensor before power was compromised. The pistons were being driven backwards before it pinged. This was crusing easily at 62 mph; given a hill with too much spark and EFI will ping with the best of them.



'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260194 is a reply to message #260170] Wed, 27 August 2014 04:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Mr ERFisher is currently offline  Mr ERFisher   United States
Messages: 7117
Registered: August 2005
Karma: 2
Senior Member
This one is still in use after 20 years
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/propane-convesion/p10071.html

Erf

On Tuesday, August 26, 2014, Richard Michelhaugh <
rick.michelhaugh@frontiernet.net> wrote:

> Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that
> connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water
> into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion
> chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
>
> Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the
> results?
>
> Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to
> increase mileage?
>
> Rick M.
> --
> 1974 26' Canyonlands
> aka "The General"
> Clinton, TN
> _______________________________________________
> GMCnet mailing list
> Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
> http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
>


--
Gene Fisher -- 74-23,77PB/ore/ca
“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today --- give him a URL and
-------
http://gmcmotorhome.info/
Alternator Protection Cable
http://gmcmotorhome.info/APC.html
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260209 is a reply to message #260194] Wed, 27 August 2014 08:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Matt Colie is currently offline  Matt Colie   United States
Messages: 8547
Registered: March 2007
Location: S.E. Michigan
Karma: 7
Senior Member
Water injection was/is real. I am almost surprised that none of the new processor controlled engines are taking advantage of it.
How common was it? Every DC-6 with R2800 still has it and many are still in use in cargo service. It is used on take-off and it is called ADI - Anti Detonation Injection and it is a water alcohol mix with the alcohol only there to prevent the system from freezing.
Many of the famous WWII interceptor and fighter aircraft were so equipped. It was one of the reasons that a P-51 could bushwack an ME-262.

The way it really works is that it does cool the combustion process, but in doing so it changes state. This kind of makes it work like an internal combustion steam engine - gobs of torque.

Two big problems:
The additional pressure delivered can easily damage engine parts like rod bearing and head gaskets.
The extra water that can condense out of the combustion gasses can cause unanticipated corrosion problems.

But, we had fun with the program.....

Matt



Matt & Mary Colie - Chaumière -'73 Glacier 23 - Members GMCMI, GMCGL, GMCES
Electronically Controlled Quiet Engine Cooling Fan with OE Rear Drum Brakes with Applied Control Arms
SE Michigan - Near DTW - Twixt A2 and Detroit
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260211 is a reply to message #260190] Wed, 27 August 2014 09:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
k2gkk is currently offline  k2gkk   United States
Messages: 4452
Registered: November 2009
Karma: -8
Senior Member
Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or require water injection to provide the cooling at Max Emergency Takeoff power?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*

(Former B-52F EWO)


> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260213 is a reply to message #260211] Wed, 27 August 2014 09:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Len Novak is currently offline  Len Novak   United States
Messages: 676
Registered: February 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Karma: -3
Senior Member
The G has the same turbojets it came with, J-57s. The H is the only one
with turbo fans, TF-33s if I remember correctly.

Water is used to increase the volumetric density of the air, aka more
thrust, so it can actually get off the ground on a hot day.

B-52F/G/H radar navigator

Never was a nav.

Len and Pat
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375

www.bdub.net/novak/





-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:32 AM
To: GMC Mail List
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"

Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or
require water injection to provide the cooling at Max Emergency Takeoff
power?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*

(Former B-52F EWO)


> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Len and Pat Novak 1978 GMC Kingsley The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see! Las Vegas, NV new email: B52sRule@Gmail.com http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375 www.bdub.net/novak/
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260220 is a reply to message #260211] Wed, 27 August 2014 10:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
USAussie is currently offline  USAussie   United States
Messages: 15912
Registered: July 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
Senior Member
G'day,

I was a Mechanical Accessories Repairman (ABR 42251) in the USAF. The B-52 H2O injection system was a mechanical accessory. It was
used on all the B-52's that had the J-57's. IIRC (it has been 50 years!) the H model with the TF-33 did not have the system as they
produced enough thrust enough thrust to get the 52's wings flapping! ;-)

Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
USAussie - Downunder
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428


-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:32 AM
To: GMC Mail List
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"

Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or require water injection to provide the cooling at Max
Emergency Takeoff power?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*

(Former B-52F EWO)


> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist



Regards, Rob M. (USAussie) The Pedantic Mechanic Sydney, Australia '75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428 '75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260252 is a reply to message #260220] Wed, 27 August 2014 16:44 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bill Freeman is currently offline  Bill Freeman   United States
Messages: 122
Registered: March 2004
Location: Colerain, NC
Karma: 1
Senior Member
I put a turbocharged/water injected 215 Olds in a Corvair van. It had the original factory water-alcohol injection system installed because the engine had a 10.25:1 compression ratio. I ran the van that way for about a year before replacing the turbo system with a 4 barrel. It was a PITA to keep the turbo system/water injection working right. Back then you could go to most any Olds dealer and find an F-85 turbo system in their trash barrel. Apparently the dealership mechanics had trouble keeping them running right too. I think I still have a couple of the F-85 turbo systems that I wanted to put on a 455, but I'm too old now to care about such things.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/70698473@N07/


Bill Freeman
78 Royale 73 Sequoia
Colerain, North Carolina
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260290 is a reply to message #260252] Wed, 27 August 2014 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pzerkel is currently offline  pzerkel   United States
Messages: 212
Registered: September 2007
Location: Salisbury, IL
Karma: 0
Senior Member
DW's cousin runs an IH 1066 Pro Farm pulling tractor. Of course that is diesel motor, but the rules allow water injecting, and they are doing it.

Paul Zerkel
'78 Eleganza II
Salisbury IL (near Springfield)
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260291 is a reply to message #260170] Wed, 27 August 2014 21:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
JohnL455 is currently offline  JohnL455   United States
Messages: 4447
Registered: October 2006
Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
Senior Member
Buick ALMOST btought it back on the turbo Riviera and turbo Regals. In the dash idiot light backlit strip there is one cell with no bulb behind it. If the sun hits it you can read POWER INJECTION. They went with the air to air intercooler instead in 86/87 and scraped the alky/ wàter injection.


John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260962 is a reply to message #260211] Fri, 05 September 2014 08:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
GMC.LES is currently offline  GMC.LES   United States
Messages: 505
Registered: April 2014
Karma: -2
Senior Member
The Rolls Royce Dart turboprop engines used water-methanol injection as a means of increasing take-off power. The purpose of the water-meth was to drop the TIT (turbine inlet temp) so that extra fuel could be added without burning up the turbine blades. Many an operator learned the expensive way that they needed to keep the water-meth tank full and respect the max power time limits on take-off. We saw many an engine come into the shop with only the stubs of the blades remaining.

The recommended water-meth mixture was a 60/40 methanol to water ratio, and our test jocks claimed the high methanol content added power without any significant additional heat. If a mix using more water was used, power dropped slightly for a given fuel flow & TIT.

Of course a turbine reacts somewhat differently to water injection than a piston engine, so very little of this info directly applies to our GMCs.

Les Burt
Montreal
1975 Eleganza 26ft
A work in Progress



On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:31 AM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:

Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or require water injection to provide the cooling at Max Emergency Takeoff power?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*

(Former B-52F EWO)


> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/

_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist

Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #261162 is a reply to message #260962] Sun, 07 September 2014 08:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chasingsummer is currently offline  chasingsummer   United States
Messages: 434
Registered: May 2011
Location: asheboro, nc
Karma: 0
Senior Member
Many years ago I played around with water injection on a 914. Which was a simple flat 4 cy. early fuel injection . I had 2 switches in the car, one fed the injector and one added resistance to the the head temp sensor.I felt it helped a bit with temps, and maybe a little to the ump. I got the idea when converting back to fuel injection from carbs. Initially I had it running rich. Then one foggy misty mornign I went to play around and noticed it liked the damp air when running rich.

brian asheboro, nc 75 eleganza, 74 build 119k miles and counting, DOG HOUSE
Re: "Water Injection" [message #261197 is a reply to message #260170] Sun, 07 September 2014 13:56 Go to previous message
Chr$ is currently offline  Chr$   United States
Messages: 2690
Registered: January 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Karma: 1
Senior Member
Turning the GMC into a "Water Wagon"
Laughing


-Chr$: Perpetual SmartAss
Scottsdale, AZ

77 Ex-Kingsley 455 SOLD!
2010 Nomad 24 Ft TT 390W PV W/MPPT, EV4010 and custom cargo door.
Photosite: Chrisc GMC:"It has Begun" TT: "The Other Woman"
Previous Topic: Does radio wiring harness have pugs on both ends?
Next Topic: [GMCnet] Fwd: Vapor Lock?
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 18 03:24:29 CST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06336 seconds