Home » Public Forums » GMCnet » "Water Injection" (Anybody try it?)
"Water Injection" [message #260170] |
Tue, 26 August 2014 21:31 |
rickmike
Messages: 252 Registered: September 2011 Location: United States
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?
Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?
Rick M.
1974 26' Canyonlands
aka "The General"
Clinton, TN
|
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260174 is a reply to message #260170] |
Tue, 26 August 2014 22:05 |
Bob de Kruyff
Messages: 4260 Registered: January 2004 Location: Chandler, AZ
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rickmike wrote on Tue, 26 August 2014 20:31Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?
Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?
Rick M.
Oldsmobile had water injection in the mid 60's on the F85. IIRC the dealers sold the special jet away water for a lot of money although probably less than what people buy water bottles for today. It must have helped a little bit or an OEM wouldn't have offered it. I think it was part of the turbo option.
Bob de Kruyff
78 Eleganza
Chandler, AZ
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260175 is a reply to message #260170] |
Tue, 26 August 2014 22:06 |
Rob
Messages: 651 Registered: November 2013 Location: Victoria, BC
Karma: 3
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I experimented quite a bit with water injection in the mid to late 80's (on muscle cars and 4x4's - not on GMC MH's). It mainly works by cooling the intake air - since the energy required to vaporize the water comes from the intake air/fuel. Basically - kind of like an intercooler.
It worked a bit - but I recall that ultimately the net power was down - probably due to the water displacing some of the fuel. I even experimented with adding alcohol and other additives to the water, but eventually gave up trying to find the "holy grail".
Most of the hydrogen kits I've seen (on the net) appear to be nothing more than snake oil. I'm not going to hook up a Skippy's PB jar to my air cleaner and claim 20 mpg...
YMMV.
Rob
Victoria, BC
76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath
On 2014-08-26, at 7:31 PM, Richard Michelhaugh wrote:
> Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water
> into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
>
> Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?
>
> Also what is the scoop on the "Hydrogen Generator" that is supposed to increase mileage?
>
> Rick M.
> --
> 1974 26' Canyonlands
> aka "The General"
> Clinton, TN
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Rob -
Victoria, BC -
76 Royale - Rear Twins/Dry Bath
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260186 is a reply to message #260170] |
Tue, 26 August 2014 23:45 |
Chris Tyler
Messages: 458 Registered: September 2013 Location: Odessa FL
Karma: 7
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Water injection was used sucessfully in aircraft as an anti detonate. It can be useful in cars. I have run it, also water/alcohol, and more recently pure methanol in my turbo corvette.
By itself, water offers no benifit. However, IF you get the mix just right, you can get away with more comression than the fuel would otherwise allow, an/or more timing.For an ~8:1 conservatively timed motor, it may not be worth it. Youd have to play with the timing
Snow performance, AEM, and Alky control are very good units, none cheap.
Hydrogen generators are snake oil.
76 Glenbrook
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260187 is a reply to message #260170] |
Tue, 26 August 2014 23:50 |
mrgmc3
Messages: 210 Registered: September 2013 Location: W Washington
Karma: 2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The primary function of water injection is to reduce peak combustion chamber temperatures. The heat capacity of water and the phase change to steam absorbs a lot of heat. Water injection has the exact same effect as EGR - reduces chamber temp and in so doing it reduces the production of NOx. Both EGR and water injection allow more ignition advance due to the lower temps. The extra advance does not directly help economy because you've reduced the thermal efficiency with lower temps. There is a slight gain as you are forced to open the throttle slightly more to make up for the torque loss. This additional throttle opening gives a slight reduction in pumping losses.
Olds used water injection on the turbo 215 V8 in 62-63 cutlass to lower knock.
Bottom line - don't bother with water injection. Set optimum spark and fuel values and you should not have to worry about knock.
Chris Geils - Twin Cities / W Wa
1978 26' Kingsley w/ very few mods; PD9040, aux trans cooler, one repaint in stock colors, R134a, Al rad, Alcoas, 54k mi
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260190 is a reply to message #260187] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 00:40 |
Len Novak
Messages: 676 Registered: February 2004 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Karma: -3
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
No water, no fly
Great system!
Len and Pat
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
www.bdub.net/novak/
-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris Geils
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:51 PM
To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
The primary function of water injection is to reduce peak combustion chamber
temperatures. The heat capacity of water and the phase change to steam
absorbs a lot of heat. Water injection has the exact same effect as EGR -
reduces chamber temp and in so doing it reduces the production of NOx.
Both EGR and water injection allow more ignition advance due to the lower
temps. The extra advance does not directly help economy because you've
reduced the thermal efficiency with lower temps. There is a slight gain as
you are forced to open the throttle slightly more to make up for the torque
loss. This additional throttle opening gives a slight reduction in pumping
losses.
Olds used water injection on the turbo 215 V8 in 62-63 cutlass to lower
knock.
Bottom line - don't bother with water injection. Set optimum spark and fuel
values and you should not have to worry about knock.
--
Chris Geils - Twin Cities
1978 26' Kingsley w/ very few mods; Headers, Progressive Dynamics 9040
battery charger, aux trans cooler, one repaint in stock colors, R134a, Al
radiator, 45k mi _______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Len and Pat Novak
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Las Vegas, NV new email: B52sRule@Gmail.com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
www.bdub.net/novak/
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260192 is a reply to message #260170] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 01:47 |
George Beckman
Messages: 1085 Registered: October 2008 Location: Colfax, CA
Karma: 11
|
Senior Member |
|
|
rickmike wrote on Tue, 26 August 2014 19:31Remember back in the '70s they advertised a "Water Injection" system that connected to a vacuum port on the manifold and let a small amount of water into the intake. It was supposed to stop knock and clean the combustion chambers and increase efficiency by allowing timing advancement.
Has anybody ever tried one of these on a car or a coach? What were the results?
Rick M.
I tried it on my coach. I went old school with an Edelbrock variJect system. Not sure i ever got equal water in each barrel. I have EFI and so fuel and spark is pretty much controlled. I could see no difference in the exhaust temperatures. I am sure it does work though as early tractors introduced water for carbon and heat, not to mention planes.
I suppose I was thinking about delaying power enrichment (power valve) as gasoline is an expensive coolant. The truth is it made me nervous. Run out of water and burn a valve or piston. Heat in the combustion chamber is one that I would like to control with some assured technique.
As a side bar, when Randy Van Winkle and I experimented with spark during Lean Cruise( 16.4+ to 1 air fuel) we could not advance the spark far enough to get a knock on th eknock sensor before power was compromised. The pistons were being driven backwards before it pinged. This was crusing easily at 62 mph; given a hill with too much spark and EFI will ping with the best of them.
'74 Eleganza, SE, Howell + EBL
Best Wishes,
George
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260213 is a reply to message #260211] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 09:45 |
Len Novak
Messages: 676 Registered: February 2004 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Karma: -3
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The G has the same turbojets it came with, J-57s. The H is the only one
with turbo fans, TF-33s if I remember correctly.
Water is used to increase the volumetric density of the air, aka more
thrust, so it can actually get off the ground on a hot day.
B-52F/G/H radar navigator
Never was a nav.
Len and Pat
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
www.bdub.net/novak/
-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org
[mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 7:32 AM
To: GMC Mail List
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or
require water injection to provide the cooling at Max Emergency Takeoff
power?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*
(Former B-52F EWO)
> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Len and Pat Novak
1978 GMC Kingsley
The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
Las Vegas, NV new email: B52sRule@Gmail.com
http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
www.bdub.net/novak/
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260220 is a reply to message #260211] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 10:01 |
|
USAussie
Messages: 15912 Registered: July 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia
Karma: 6
|
Senior Member |
|
|
G'day,
I was a Mechanical Accessories Repairman (ABR 42251) in the USAF. The B-52 H2O injection system was a mechanical accessory. It was
used on all the B-52's that had the J-57's. IIRC (it has been 50 years!) the H model with the TF-33 did not have the system as they
produced enough thrust enough thrust to get the 52's wings flapping! ;-)
Regards,
Rob M.
The Pedantic Mechanic
USAussie - Downunder
USA '75 Avion - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
AUS '75 Avion - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
-----Original Message-----
From: gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org [mailto:gmclist-bounces@temp.gmcnet.org] On Behalf Of D C _Mac_ Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 9:32 AM
To: GMC Mail List
Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or require water injection to provide the cooling at Max
Emergency Takeoff power?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*
(Former B-52F EWO)
> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
Regards,
Rob M. (USAussie)
The Pedantic Mechanic
Sydney, Australia
'75 Avion - AUS - The Blue Streak TZE365V100428
'75 Avion - USA - Double Trouble TZE365V100426
|
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260290 is a reply to message #260252] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 21:19 |
pzerkel
Messages: 212 Registered: September 2007 Location: Salisbury, IL
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
DW's cousin runs an IH 1066 Pro Farm pulling tractor. Of course that is diesel motor, but the rules allow water injecting, and they are doing it.
Paul Zerkel
'78 Eleganza II
Salisbury IL (near Springfield)
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #260291 is a reply to message #260170] |
Wed, 27 August 2014 21:22 |
JohnL455
Messages: 4447 Registered: October 2006 Location: Woodstock, IL
Karma: 12
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Buick ALMOST btought it back on the turbo Riviera and turbo Regals. In the dash idiot light backlit strip there is one cell with no bulb behind it. If the sun hits it you can read POWER INJECTION. They went with the air to air intercooler instead in 86/87 and scraped the alky/ wàter injection.
John Lebetski
Woodstock, IL
77 Eleganza II
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #260962 is a reply to message #260211] |
Fri, 05 September 2014 08:38 |
GMC.LES
Messages: 505 Registered: April 2014
Karma: -2
|
Senior Member |
|
|
The Rolls Royce Dart turboprop engines used water-methanol injection as a means of increasing take-off power. The purpose of the water-meth was to drop the TIT (turbine inlet temp) so that extra fuel could be added without burning up the turbine blades. Many an operator learned the expensive way that they needed to keep the water-meth tank full and respect the max power time limits on take-off. We saw many an engine come into the shop with only the stubs of the blades remaining.
The recommended water-meth mixture was a 60/40 methanol to water ratio, and our test jocks claimed the high methanol content added power without any significant additional heat. If a mix using more water was used, power dropped slightly for a given fuel flow & TIT.
Of course a turbine reacts somewhat differently to water injection than a piston engine, so very little of this info directly applies to our GMCs.
Les Burt
Montreal
1975 Eleganza 26ft
A work in Progress
On Aug 27, 2014, at 10:31 AM, D C _Mac_ Macdonald wrote:
Did the G model get turbo-fan engines as a mod? Do the fanjet engines use or require water injection to provide the cooling at Max Emergency Takeoff power?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ D C "Mac" Macdonald ~ ~~
~ ~ Amateur Radio - K2GKK ~ ~
~ ~ USAF and FAA, Retired ~ ~
~ ~ ~ Oklahoma City, OK ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ "The Money Pit" ~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ TZE166V101966 ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ '76 ex-Palm Beach ~ ~ ~
~~ k2gkk + hotmail dot com ~~
~ www.gmcmhphotos.com/okclb ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
______________
*[ ]~~~[][ ][|\
*--OO--[]---O-*
(Former B-52F EWO)
> From: B52Rule@RoadRunner.Com
> To: gmclist@temp.gmcnet.org
> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:40:04 -0700
> Subject: Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection"
>
> Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh, water injection on the B-52G
>
> 10,000 pounds of water gone in 110 seconds.
>
> No water, no fly
>
> Great system!
>
> Len and Pat
> 1978 GMC Kingsley
> The Beast II with dash lights that work and labels you can see!
> Fallbrook, CA new email: B52Rule@Roadrunner.Com
> http://www.gmcmhphotos.com/photos/showgallery.php?cat=4375
>
> www.bdub.net/novak/
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
_______________________________________________
GMCnet mailing list
Unsubscribe or Change List Options:
http://temp.gmcnet.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gmclist
|
|
|
Re: [GMCnet] "Water Injection" [message #261162 is a reply to message #260962] |
Sun, 07 September 2014 08:43 |
chasingsummer
Messages: 434 Registered: May 2011 Location: asheboro, nc
Karma: 0
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Many years ago I played around with water injection on a 914. Which was a simple flat 4 cy. early fuel injection . I had 2 switches in the car, one fed the injector and one added resistance to the the head temp sensor.I felt it helped a bit with temps, and maybe a little to the ump. I got the idea when converting back to fuel injection from carbs. Initially I had it running rich. Then one foggy misty mornign I went to play around and noticed it liked the damp air when running rich.
brian
asheboro, nc
75 eleganza, 74 build
119k miles and counting,
DOG HOUSE
|
|
|
Re: "Water Injection" [message #261197 is a reply to message #260170] |
Sun, 07 September 2014 13:56 |
Chr$
Messages: 2690 Registered: January 2004 Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Karma: 1
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Turning the GMC into a "Water Wagon"
-Chr$: Perpetual SmartAss
Scottsdale, AZ
77 Ex-Kingsley 455 SOLD!
2010 Nomad 24 Ft TT 390W PV W/MPPT, EV4010 and custom cargo door.
Photosite: Chrisc GMC:"It has Begun" TT: "The Other Woman"
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 18 03:24:29 CST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06336 seconds
|